Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Nat Genet ; 56(4): 627-636, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38514783

RESUMEN

We present a gene-level regulatory model, single-cell ATAC + RNA linking (SCARlink), which predicts single-cell gene expression and links enhancers to target genes using multi-ome (scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq co-assay) sequencing data. The approach uses regularized Poisson regression on tile-level accessibility data to jointly model all regulatory effects at a gene locus, avoiding the limitations of pairwise gene-peak correlations and dependence on peak calling. SCARlink outperformed existing gene scoring methods for imputing gene expression from chromatin accessibility across high-coverage multi-ome datasets while giving comparable to improved performance on low-coverage datasets. Shapley value analysis on trained models identified cell-type-specific gene enhancers that are validated by promoter capture Hi-C and are 11× to 15× and 5× to 12× enriched in fine-mapped eQTLs and fine-mapped genome-wide association study (GWAS) variants, respectively. We further show that SCARlink-predicted and observed gene expression vectors provide a robust way to compute a chromatin potential vector field to enable developmental trajectory analysis.


Asunto(s)
Cromatina , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Cromatina/genética , Secuencias Reguladoras de Ácidos Nucleicos , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas/genética , ARN , Análisis de la Célula Individual/métodos
5.
Fam Community Health ; 44(4): 292-298, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34292226

RESUMEN

Research around probable solutions to immigrants accessing health care in Canada is not extensive, and the perspective of immigrant communities on priorities and potential solutions has not been captured effectively. The purpose of this article is to describe a research initiative that involved grassroots community members as producers of research priorities on primary care access issues. This study aimed to seek input from an immigrant community in Calgary, Canada. Members of the Bangladeshi community of Calgary were asked through a survey to rank 10 predefined primary care access topics as to what they felt constituted priorities for solution-oriented research (1, highest; 10, lowest). We used frequencies and percentages to describe the participant demographics. Ratings of preferred research themes were analyzed on the basis of relative weighted priority rank. We received 432 responses: 51.2% female; 58.9% aged 36 to 55 years; 90.5% had university-level education; 46.2% immigrated to Canada between 10 and 19 years ago; 82.5% employed full/part-time or self-employed. Lack of resources, lack of knowledge, health care cost, and workplace-related barriers were among the top-ranked topics identified as solution-oriented research priorities. Through partnerships and reciprocal learning, public input can increase insider perspectives to help develop interventions that align with the needs of community members.


Asunto(s)
Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud , Canadá , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 12: 21501327211010165, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33882748

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Immigrants continue to face significant challenges in accessing primary healthcare (PHC) that often negatively impact their health. The present research aims to capture the perspectives of immigrants to identify potential approaches to enhance PHC access for this group. METHODS: Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted among a sample of first-generation Bangladeshi immigrants who had experience with PHC in Canada. A total of 13 FGDs (7 among women, 6 among men) were conducted with 80 participants (women = 42, men = 38) in their preferred language, Bangla. We collected demographic information prior to each focus group and used descriptive statistics to identify the socio-demographic characteristics of participants. We applied thematic analysis to examine qualitative data to generate a list of themes of possible approaches to improve PHC access. RESULTS: The focus group findings identified different levels of approaches to improve PHC access: individual-, community-, service provider-, and policy-level. Individual-level approaches included increased self-awareness of health and wellness and personal knowledge of cultural differences in healthcare services and improved communication skills. At the community level, supports for community members to access care included health education workshops, information sessions, and different support programs (eg, carpool services for senior members). Suggested service-level approaches included providers taking necessary steps to ensure an effective doctor-patient relationship with immigrants (eg, strategies to promote cultural competencies, hiring multicultural staff). FGD participants also raised the importance of government- or policy-level solutions to ensure high quality of care (eg, increased after-hour clinics and lab/diagnostic services). CONCLUSIONS: Although barriers to immigrants accessing healthcare are well documented in the literature, solutions to address them are under-researched. To improve healthcare access, physicians, community health centers, local health agencies, and public health units should collaborate with members of immigrant communities to identify appropriate interventions.


Asunto(s)
Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Canadá , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Atención Primaria de Salud , Investigación Cualitativa
7.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 11: 2150132720952618, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32865103

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Understanding barriers in primary health care access faced by Canadian immigrants, especially among women, is important for developing mitigation strategies. The aim of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of perceived challenges and unmet primary health care access needs of Bangladeshi immigrant women in Canada. METHODS: In this qualitative study, we conducted 7 focus groups among a sample of 42 first-generation immigrant women on their experiences in primary health care access in their preferred language, Bangla. Descriptive analysis was used for their socio-demographic characteristics and inductive thematic analysis was applied to the qualitative data. RESULTS: The hurdles reported included long wait time at emergency service points, frustration from slow treatment process, economic losses resulting from absence at work, communication gap between physicians and immigrant patients, and transportation problem to go to the health care centers. No access to medical records for walk-in doctors, lack of urgent care, and lack of knowledge about Canadian health care systems are a few of other barriers emerged from the focus group discussions. CONCLUSIONS: The community perception about lack of primary health care resources is quite prevalent and is considered as one of the most important barriers by the grassroots community members.


Asunto(s)
Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Canadá , Etnicidad , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Investigación Cualitativa
8.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32994217

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to explore the experience of male members of a rapidly grown community of Bangladeshi immigrants while accessing primary healthcare (PHC) services in Canada. DESIGN: A qualitative research was conducted among a sample of Bangladeshi immigrant men through a community-based participatory research approach. Focus group discussions were conducted to collect the qualitative data where thematic analysis was applied. SETTING: The focus group discussions were held in various community centres such as individual meeting rooms at public libraries, community halls and so on arranged in collaboration with community organisations while ensuring complete privacy. PARTICIPANT: Thirty-eight adults, Bangladeshi immigrant men, living in Calgary were selected for this study and participated in six different focus groups. The sample represents mostly married, educated, Muslim, Bangla speaking, aged over 25 years, full-time or self-employed and living in an urban centre in Canada >5 years. RESULT: The focus groups have highlighted long wait time as an important barrier. Long wait at the emergency room, difficulties to get access to general physicians when feeling sick, slow referral process and long wait at the clinic even after making an appointment impact their daily chores, work and access to care. Language is another important barrier that impedes effective communication between physicians and immigrant patients, thus the quality of care. Unfamiliarity with the healthcare system and lack of resources were also voiced that hinder access to healthcare for immigrant Bangladeshi men in Canada. However, no gender-specific barriers unique to men have been identified in this study. CONCLUSION: The barriers to accessing PHC services for Bangladeshi immigrant men are similar to that of other visible minority immigrants. It is important to recognise the extent of barriers across various immigrant groups to effectively shape public policy and improve access to PHC.


Asunto(s)
Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/psicología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hombres/psicología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Bangladesh/etnología , Canadá , Barreras de Comunicación , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa
9.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 7(4): 296-302, 2018 Dec 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28992068

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With >1.4 million cases in the United States reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2012, Chlamydia trachomatis infection is a major public health concern. We examined the impact of a C trachomatis vaccination program using a decision-analysis model to estimate the effects of vaccination on C trachomatis-associated costs and morbidity. METHODS: We developed a Markov model considering a cohort of 2158117 US females aged 9 to 26 years. Morbidity, death, and healthcare-associated costs associated with chlamydial infection of mothers and fetuses/neonates were calculated over a 17-year time frame. We developed 2 major comparison arms, namely, a C trachomatis vaccination program and no C trachomatis vaccination program. Base-case efficacy and coverage were set to those of human papillomavirus in the United States with all variables, including efficacy and coverage, ranged in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: On the basis of a base-case analysis, a vaccination program would cost an estimated $710 million for a cohort of 2158117 women over a 17-year period, an increase of $41 million over having no vaccination program. A vaccination program would prevent 34000 cases of C trachomatis infection and 5976 cases of pelvic inflammatory disease. CONCLUSIONS: A C trachomatis vaccination program results in increased cost to the healthcare system but averts significant morbidity and death.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas Bacterianas/economía , Vacunas Bacterianas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/prevención & control , Chlamydia trachomatis , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Vacunación Masiva/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Chlamydia/transmisión , Árboles de Decisión , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Cadenas de Markov , Método de Montecarlo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...