Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 50(3): 257-263, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37885121

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine the visual outcomes and risk factors of uveitis cataract eyes after phacoemulsification and manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS). SETTING: Tertiary-care eye hospital in southern India. DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series. METHODS: Of the uveitis eyes operated for cataract surgery between 2017 and 2020, eyes with a minimum of 6 months postoperative follow-up were included. Eyes with ocular trauma, lens subluxation, lens-induced uveitis, or retinal detachment-induced uveitis were excluded. Demography, visual acuity, intraoperative and postoperative records, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: 191 eyes of 191 patients with a mean age of 51.7 ± 14.4 years were included. Phacoemulsification was performed in 134 eyes, and 57 eyes underwent MSICS. Synechiolysis and pupil-expanding maneuvers were required in 74 eyes (38.7%). No differences were noted in the rates of complications between phacoemulsification and MSICS eyes, except at 1 year, where higher rates of posterior capsular opacification and vitritis were noted in MSICS eyes ( P = .018). The visual outcomes of eyes that underwent MSICS and phacoemulsification were comparable ( P = .463). In 12 eyes (13.5%), improvement in vision was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows phacoemulsification may be a preferred technique in uveitis cataracts, given the lesser incidence of postoperative complications. Patients should be counseled for realistic expectations.


Asunto(s)
Opacificación Capsular , Extracción de Catarata , Catarata , Facoemulsificación , Uveítis , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Facoemulsificación/efectos adversos , Facoemulsificación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Extracción de Catarata/efectos adversos , Extracción de Catarata/métodos , Catarata/complicaciones , Opacificación Capsular/etiología , Uveítis/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 68(9): 1737-1748, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32823389

RESUMEN

Uveitis is a complex disorder including both infectious and non-infectious etiologies. Clinical diagnosis is a challenge because many diseases share common clinical signs. Laboratory support is crucial for confirming the clinical diagnosis. Laboratory diagnosis includes direct tests and indirect tests. For example smear, culture, and molecular diagnostics demonstrate the pathogens, hence they are direct tests. Immunologic tests employ an antigen to detect presence of antibodies to a pathogen, or an antibody to detect the presence of an antigen, of the pathogen in the specimens. The immunological tests used in laboratories are made by producing artificial antibodies that exactly "match" the pathogen in question. When these antibodies come into contact with a sample they bind to the matching pathogen if found in the sample. Hence they are grouped under indirect evidence. There are several investigations in uveitis to reach the confirmed diagnosis including microbiological, immunological, imaging and molecular diagnostic testing. In this section we will discuss immunological investigations of infectious and non-infectious uveitis.


Asunto(s)
Uveítis , Anticuerpos , Humanos , Pruebas Inmunológicas , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Uveítis/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA