Passive transfer of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with platelet transfusions.

BACKGROUND: Although over 5000 platelet transfusions occur daily in the United States, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in platelet units is not commonly evaluated for. The effects of platelet transfusions with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies remain largely unknown. We evaluated single-donor (apheresis) platelet units for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and determined if platelet transfusions passively transferred antibodies to seronegative recipients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis as part of a quality assurance initiative during February to March 2021 at a tertiary referral academic center in suburban New York. Platelet units and platelet recipients were evaluated for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using the DiaSorin LIASON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG assay. There were 47 platelet recipients eligible for study inclusion. The primary outcome was the presence of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG antibodies in the recipient's blood after platelet transfusion. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received platelets with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG antibodies; 13 recipients had detection of SARS-COV-2 antibodies (56.5%), and 10 recipients did not. The median antibody titer in the platelet units given to the group with passive antibodies detected was significantly higher compared to the median antibody titer in the platelet units given to the group without antibodies detected (median [interquartile range]: 306 AU/ml [132, 400] vs. 96.1 AU/ml [30.6, 186], p = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a significant rate of passive transfer of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG antibodies through platelet transfusions. Considering the volume of daily platelet transfusions, this is something all clinicians should be aware of.

Belatacept and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In previous analyses of BENEFIT, a phase 3 study, belatacept-based immunosuppression, as compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, was associated with similar patient and graft survival and significantly improved renal function in kidney-transplant recipients. Here we present the final results from this study. METHODS: We randomly assigned kidney-transplant recipients to a more-intensive belatacept regimen, a less-intensive belatacept regimen, or a cyclosporine regimen. Efficacy and safety outcomes for all patients who underwent randomization and transplantation were analyzed at year 7 (month 84). RESULTS: A total of 666 participants were randomly assigned to a study group and underwent transplantation. Of the 660 patients who were treated, 153 of the 219 patients treated with the more-intensive belatacept regimen, 163 of the 226 treated with the less-intensive belatacept regimen, and 131 of the 215 treated with the cyclosporine regimen were followed for the full 84-month period; all available data were used in the analysis. A 43% reduction in the risk of death or graft loss was observed for both the more-intensive and the less-intensive belatacept regimens as compared with the cyclosporine regimen (hazard ratio with the more-intensive regimen, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.95; P=0.02; hazard ratio with the less-intensive regimen, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.94; P=0.02), with equal contributions from the lower rates of death and graft loss. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased over the 7-year period with both belatacept regimens but declined with the cyclosporine regimen. The cumulative frequencies of serious adverse events at month 84 were similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Seven years after transplantation, patient and graft survival and the mean eGFR were significantly higher with belatacept (both the more-intensive regimen and the less-intensive regimen) than with cyclosporine. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00256750.).

[Kidney transplant program: Mexican Institute of Transplants. Model of synergy between private hospital and private assistance foundations]. / Programa de trasplante renal: Instituto Mexicano de Trasplantes. Modelo de sinergia entre hospital privado y fundaciones de asistencia privada.

INTRODUCTION: The Mexican Institute of Transplantation (IMT) was created in 1999 in response to the need to meet the demand for transplants in the south of the country for patients with limited resources. Thanks to the synergy with private assistance foundations this task has been accomplished. OBJECTIVE: To describe the IMT experience in kidney transplants. RESULTS: From November 1999 to May 23,2011, 754 kidney transplants were performed in the IMT, of which 733 were from living donors and only 21 from deceased donors. In our experience, the 10-year patient and graft survival were 84.4 and 72.4%, respectively. The average follow-up of patients was 44 months, it was during the first year after transplantation when most of patients were lost. More than 50% of patients have been supported by private assistance foundations. The IMT has participated in research protocols for phase II and phase III, for the development of new immunosuppressants. CONCLUSION: The synergy between our private medical institution and private assistance foundations has permitted to transplant low income patients, a similar association can be carried out in governmental health institutions that have overcharge in their transplant services.