Effectiveness of Bichat's Buccal Fat Pad (BFP) Technique for Vertical Ridge Augmentation in the Maxilla.

This study evaluated the efficacy of buccal fat pad (BFP) as a natural barrier to cover nonresorbable devices for vertical ridge augmentation (VRA). Twelve consecutive patients with 14 vertical bone defects in need of bone augmentation for implantprosthetic rehabilitation were treated according to the described protocol. VRA was performed by means of customized titanium meshes, titanium-reinforced d-PTFE membranes, or resorbable membranes and titanium plates. After buccal flap release, the BFP was identified and isolated, then mesially and coronally advanced to cover the whole augmented area. BFP was used as a pedicle flap in 11 cases and as a free graft in 3 cases. The mean BFP surface area was 13.5 ± 5.5 cm2. Healing was uneventful in all 14 augmented sites. No patients reported healing complications or facial volumetric changes. The mean vertical bone gain (VBG) was 4.2 ± 1.8 mm. In this limited number of cases, using the BFP as a natural barrier has proven to be efficient in bone augmentation, as it improved the healing process while reducing the risk of complications. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2023;43:e99-e109. doi: 10.11607/prd.5473.

Effectiveness Of Bichat's Buccal Fat Pad (BFP) Technique For Vertical Ridge Augmentation In The Maxilla.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of buccal fat pads (BFP) as a natural barrier to cover nonresorbable devices for vertical ridge augmentation (VRA). A total of 12 consecutive patients with 14 vertical bone defects in need of bone augmentation for implant-prosthetic rehabilitation were treated according to the described protocol. VRA was performed by means of (1) customized titanium meshes, (2) titanium-reinforced PTFE membranes, or (3) resorbable membranes plus titanium plates. After buccal flap release, the BFP was identified, isolated, then mesially and coronally advanced to cover the whole augmented area. BFP was used as a pedicle flap in 11 cases and as free graft in 3 cases. The mean surface of the BFP obtained was 13.5 ± 5.5 cm2. In all 14 augmented sites, uneventful healing was assessed. No patients reported healing complications or facial volumetric changes. The mean VBG was 4.2 ± 1.8 mm. In this limited number of cases, the technique using the BFP as a natural barrier has proven to be efficient in bone augmentation, as it has shown to improve the healing process while reducing the risk of complications.

Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh with versus without resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the role of resorbable membranes applied over customized titanium meshes related to soft tissue healing and bone regeneration after vertical/horizontal bone augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with partial edentulism of the maxilla/mandible, with vertical/horizontal reabsorption of the alveolar bone, and needing implant-supported restorations, were randomly divided into two groups: Group A was treated using only custom-made meshes (Mesh-) and Group B using custom-made meshes with cross-linked collagen membranes (Mesh+). Data collection included surgical/technical and healing complications, "pseudo-periosteum" thickness, bone density, planned bone volume (PBV), regenerated bone volume (RBV), regeneration rate (RR), vertical bone gain (VBG), and implant survival in regenerated areas. Statistical analysis was performed between the two study groups using a significance level of α = .05. RESULTS: Regarding the healing complications, the noninferiority analysis proved to be inconclusive, despite the better results of group Mesh+ (13%) compared to group Mesh- (33%): estimated value -1.13 CI-95% from -0.44 to 0.17. Superiority approach confirmed the absence of significant differences (p = .39). RBV was 803.27 mm3 and 843.13 mm3 , respectively, and higher RR was observed in group Mesh+ (82.3%) compared to Mesh- (74.3%), although this value did not reach a statistical significance (p = .44). All 30 patients completed the study, receiving 71 implants; 68 out of them were clinically stable and in function. CONCLUSION: The results showed that customized meshes alone do not appear to be inferior to customized meshes covered by cross-linked collagen membranes in terms of healing complication rates and regeneration rates, although superior results were observed in group Mesh+compared to group Mesh- for all variables.

Patient-reported outcomes and complication rates after lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Oral surgery morbidity is highly variable based on patients' characteristics and kind of surgical intervention. However, poor data are available in the literature regarding patient outcomes after oral surgery. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate patient-reported outcome and complication rates after maxillary sinus floor elevation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the records of patients undergoing maxillary sinus elevation have been collected from a private dental office. Patient-reported outcome has been assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale to evaluate the post-operative pain (VASpain) experienced in the first week following surgery and visual rating scales to evaluate discomfort level (VRSdiscomfort: 0 to 4) and willingness to repeat the same surgical procedure (VRSwillingness: 0 to 3). Analgesics intake, swelling onset and duration, and ecchymosis have been also recorded. RESULTS: VASpain showed moderate values in the first 2 days (< 50) post-surgery, with a tendency to progressively decrease over the next 2 days. Average assumption of painkillers was 3.93 ± 3.03. Discomfort level (VRSdiscomfort) after surgery was low (median: 1; IR: 1-0), while willingness to undergo the same surgical procedure was very high (77.63% of patients). Swelling and ecchymosis were experienced by 97.36% and 51.32% of patients, respectively, with a mean duration of 4.09 ± 1.43 and 2.21 ± 2.31 days, respectively. Membrane perforation occurred in 4 cases. Other post-operative complications were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary sinus grafting is a safe procedure, with a low complication rate and moderate morbidity that is well tolerated by patients. Particular attention is needed in case selection, surgical planning and operator expertise. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The analysis of patient-reported outcomes can be of great help in surgical planning and in providing correct and adequate treatment.