Investigating infectious outcomes in adult patients undergoing solid organ transplantation: A retrospective single-center experience, Paris, France.

OBJECTIVES: This study described the demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes of solid organ transplant recipients who were admitted to our center for infection. It also determined factors associated with a poor outcome, and compares early and late period infections. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, conducted at a tertiary care center in France between October 2017 and March 2019, infectious outcomes of patients with solid organ transplant where studied. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included with 158 hospitalizations for infection. Among these 104 patients, 71 (68%) were men. The median age was 59 years old. The most common symptoms on admission were fever (66%) and chills (31%). Lower respiratory tract infections were the most common diagnosis (71/158 hospitalizations). Urinary tract infections were frequently seen in kidney transplant recipients (25/60 hospitalizations). One or more infectious agents were isolated for 113 hospitalizations (72%): 70 bacteria, 36 viruses and 10 fungi, with predominance of gram-negative bacilli (53 cases) of which 13 were multidrug-resistant. The most frequently used antibiotics were third generation cephalosporins (40 cases), followed by piperacillin-tazobactam (26 cases). We note that 25 infections (16%) occurred during the first 6 months (early post-transplant period). Patients admitted during the early post-transplant period were more often on immunosuppressive treatment with prednisone (25/25 VS 106/133) (p = 0.01), mycophenolic acid (22/25 VS 86/133) (p = 0.03), presented for an urinary tract infection (10/25 VS 25/133) (p = 0.04) or a bacterial infection (17/25 VS 53/133) (p = 0.01). Patients with later infection had more comorbidities (57/83 VS 9/21) (p = 0.03), cancer (19/83 VS 0/21) (p = 0.04) or were on treatment with everolimus (46/133 VS 0/25) (p = 0.001). During 31 hospitalizations (20%), patients presented with a serious infection requiring intensive care (n = 26; 16%) or leading to death (n = 7; 4%). Bacteremia, pulmonary and cardiac complications were the main risk factors associated with poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Infections pose a significant challenge in the care of solid organ transplant patients, particularly those with comorbidities and intensive immunosuppression. This underscores the crucial importance of continuous surveillance and epidemiologic monitoring within this patient population.

Nonskeletal and skeletal effects of high doses versus low doses of vitamin D3 in renal transplant recipients: Results of the VITALE (VITamin D supplementation in renAL transplant recipients) study, a randomized clinical trial.

Vitamin D sufficiency is associated with a reduced risk of fractures, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular events, and cancers, which are frequent complications after renal transplantation. The VITALE (VITamin D supplementation in renAL transplant recipients) study is a multicenter double-blind randomized trial, including nondiabetic adult renal transplant recipients with serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH) vitamin D) levels of <30 ng/mL, which is randomized 12 to 48 months after transplantation to receive high (100 000 IU) or low doses (12 000 IU) of cholecalciferol every 2 weeks for 2 months and then monthly for 22 months. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint, including diabetes mellitus, major cardiovascular events, cancer, and death. Of 536 inclusions (50.8 [13.7] years, 335 men), 269 and 267 inclusions were in the high-dose and low-dose groups, respectively. The serum 25(OH) vitamin D levels increased by 23 versus 6 ng/mL in the high-dose and low-dose groups, respectively (P < .0001). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 15% versus 16% of the patients in the high-dose and low-dose groups, respectively, experienced a first event of the composite endpoint (hazard ratio, 0.94 [0.60-1.48]; P = .78), whereas 1% and 4% of patients in the high-dose and low-dose groups, respectively, experienced an incident symptomatic fracture (odds ratio, 0.24 [0.07-0.86], P = .03). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups. After renal transplantation, high doses of cholecalciferol are safe but do not reduce extraskeletal complications (trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: NCT01431430).

COVID-19 Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Disease Incidence and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has been associated with high morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients. However, risk factors for COVID-19 disease in patients with kidney transplants remain poorly defined. METHODS: We enrolled patients who underwent kidney transplantation and were actively followed up in two hospitals in Paris on March 1st, 2020. Patients were screened for baseline and transplant characteristics, functional parameters, comorbidities, and immunosuppressive therapies. COVID-19 disease was assessed. Patients were followed up during the pandemic until April 30th, 2020 by the COVID-19 SLS KT survey program, including teleconsulting, at-home monitoring for patients with COVID-19, and a dedicated phone hotline platform. RESULTS: Among 1216 patients with kidney transplants enrolled, 66 (5%) patients were identified with COVID-19 disease, which is higher than the incidence observed in the general population in France (0.3%). Their mean age was 56.4±12.5 years, and 37 (56%) patients were men. The following factors were independently associated with COVID-19 disease: non-White ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.17; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.23 to 3.78; P=0.007), obesity (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.19 to 4.05; P=0.01), asthma and chronic pulmonary disease (OR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.49 to 6.41; P=0.002), and diabetes (OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.92 to 5.77; P<0.001). The mortality rate related to COVID-19 disease was 1% in the overall study population and 24% in COVID-19-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with kidney transplants display a high risk of mortality. Non-White ethnicity and comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes, asthma, and chronic pulmonary disease were associated with higher risk of developing COVID-19 disease. It is imperative that policy makers urgently ensure the integration of such risk factors on response operations against COVID-19.

Preliminary results of transplantation with kidneys donated after cardiocirculatory determination of death: a French single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD), formerly non-heart-beating donation and donation after cardiac death, has been re-introduced into clinical practice in France since June 2006 as a potential solution to organ shortage, but this kidney transplantation programme is not popular yet, mainly because of logistical concerns and uncertainty about the long-term warm ischaemia impact on transplanted kidneys. METHODS: Our institution started the DCDD programme in January 2007, following the national 'BioMedicine Agency' protocol. We only considered uncontrolled donors with an initial no-flow period (i.e. delay between collapse and external cardiac massage start) <30 min. A 5-min stand-off period was observed before declaring the death and performing in situ cold perfusion, and since January 2010, normothermic subdiaphragmatic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. All kidneys were machine-perfused using the hypothermic pulsatile preservation system before transplantation. Morphologic assessment and perfusion indexes were used to assess the suitability for transplantation. RESULTS: From January 2007 to December 2010, our team performed 58 kidney transplantations from uncontrolled Maastricht Category I and II donors. Mean recipient age was 47 ± 9 years. Male/female ratio was 45/13. Mean waiting time on transplantation registry was 30 months (4-180). Mean cold ischaemia time was 13 h 40 min (7-18) and pulsatile perfusion time 8 h (1-16). We had three cases (5%) of primary non-function (PNF) and 95% of delayed graft function. There was no increase in biopsy-proven acute rejection incidence (12.7%). Patient and graft survivals were 98 and 91.4%, respectively, at 1 year and 98 and 88%, respectively, at last follow-up. Estimated glomerular filtration rate ( Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) was 48 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 year and 48 ± 15 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: DCDD kidneys are a valuable additional source of organs for transplantation. Our results show encouraging outcomes, which give rise to further interest in this donor pool. Respecting the national protocol is crucial to prevent PNF and deleterious warm ischaemia effect on transplanted kidney.

Renal transplantation in patients with sarcoidosis: a French multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder of unknown etiology. The outcome of renal transplantation on patients with sarcoidosis is not well known. A few case reports have described recurrence of sarcoidosis after transplant. Here, we report for the first time results and outcome of renal transplantation in a series of patients with sarcoidosis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Eighteen patients with sarcoidosis who underwent renal transplantation were identified retrospectively in eight French renal transplantation departments. Patient medical charts, demographics, and the outcome of renal transplantation were reviewed. RESULTS: Initial renal disease was related to sarcoidosis in 10 patients. At the end of the follow-up (median, 42 months), patient and death-censored graft survival were 94.4% and the mean GFR was 60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Five patients (27%) experienced recurrence of sarcoidosis including extra-renal involvement in two patients and renal involvement in three patients. Median GFR was lower in the group of patients with renal recurrence compared with that of the entire cohort: 31 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Recurrence occurred shortly after transplantation (median period, 13 months). Risk factors for recurrence included primary renal disease related to sarcoidosis and a shorter delay between the last episode of sarcoidosis and renal transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that renal transplantation may be carried out safely in transplant candidates with sarcoidosis. Recurrence is not rare and is likely to affect graft outcome. These results fully justify a specific clinical and histologic monitoring mainly during the early posttransplant period.

Oxidative stress mediates a reduced expression of the activating receptor NKG2D in NK cells from end-stage renal disease patients.

To characterize the immune defect of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), we performed NK cell subset analysis in 66 patients with ESRD treated by hemodialysis (n = 59) or peritoneal dialysis (n = 7). Compared with healthy blood donors, patients undergoing chronic dialysis showed a profound decrease in NKG2D(+) cells within both the CD8(+) T cell (58% vs 67%, p = 0.03) and NK cell (39% vs 56%, p = 0.002) populations. CD56(dim) cells, which comprise the majority of NK cells in the periphery, were more affected in this regard than were CD56(bright) cells. Uremic serum could decrease NKG2D expression on NK cells from healthy donors. Among factors that could contribute to the decrease in NKG2D expression in ESRD patients, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a major role. We found that catalase could reverse the effects of uremic serum on NKG2D expression (p < 0.001) and that ROS down-regulated NKG2D at the mRNA level and at the NK cell surface. Additionally, ESRD patients had both increased membrane-bound MHC class I-related chain A (MICA) on monocytes (p = 0.04) and increased soluble MICA (203 pg/ml vs 110 pg/ml; p < 0.001). Both ROS and uremic serum could significantly increase in vitro the expression of the NKG2D ligand MICA on the renal epithelial cell line HK-2. Taken together, these studies suggest for the first time that both low NKG2D expression and up-regulation of its ligand MICA are related to ROS production and may be involved in the immune deficiency of ESRD patients.

Assessment of the heparin-binding AN69 ST hemodialysis membrane: II. Clinical studies without heparin administration.

Binding polyanionic unfractionated heparin over the modified AN69 polyacrylonitrile membrane, the surface electronegativity of which has been neutralized by polyethyleneimine (AN69-ST), renders the membrane more hemocompatible. This property was tested in two groups of long-term hemodialysis patients. Results were rated as massive or partial clotting of a dialyzer at the end of the session. Group I patients were included in a prospective, cross-over study comparing standard dialysis with hemodialysis without systemic administration of unfractionated heparin (n = 12, 123 sessions). In all instances, priming was made with 2 I saline containing 5,000 IU/l heparin. Only patchy or partial clotting was observed in 11% and 39% of the sessions with standard and heparin-free administration, respectively. Group II patients were included in an open, observational pilot study testing the effects of the heparin-coated membrane, without systemic administration of heparin, in patients at high risk of bleeding (n = 68, 331 sessions). Massive clotting was observed in six sessions only (less than 2%) and normal or slightly patchy dialyzers were found in 88% of the sessions. It is concluded that the dialysis AN69 ST membrane, after adequate priming at bedside, can be used without systemic administration of heparin for hemodialysis in patients at high risk of bleeding.

Optimal anticoagulation strategy in haemodialysis with heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane.

BACKGROUND: Binding of polycationic unfractionated heparin onto the modified AN69 polyacrylonitrile membrane, whose surface electronegativity has been neutralized by layering polyethyleneimine (AN69ST), produces stable coating. We investigated whether the heparin-coated membrane was suitable for regular haemodialysis with low heparin doses. METHODS: Sheep were instrumented for extracorporeal circulation perfusing a dialyser equipped with either the AN69ST or the original AN69 membrane. Dialysis sessions were performed after priming the dialyser with heparinized saline. The session was conducted without systemic administration of heparin. In chronic haemodialysis patients, the AN69ST membrane was tested for safety, clotting and thrombin generation according to protocols of 4-h haemodialysis sessions with tapered heparin doses. The goal was to define optimal heparin requirements with the heparin-coated membrane in the setting of continuous or intermittent administration of heparin. Both unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (enoxaparin) were tested. RESULTS: In sheep, systemic heparin-free haemodialysis was conducted for 6 h without clotting using the heparin-coated dialyser. In the same conditions, massive clotting was observed within 90 min of dialysis with the native AN69 membrane. In man, through kinetic measurements of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), heparin anti-Xa concentration and thrombin-anti-thrombin complexes levels (TAT), significant dialyser clotting was avoided when APTT and anti-Xa concentration at 180 min of dialysis, were maintained at >40 s and >0.2 IU/ml, respectively. With the AN69ST heparin-coated membrane, thrombin generation was reduced then suppressed, as compared with the original AN69, primed in the same conditions. Safety of haemodialysis conducted with the AN69ST heparin-coated membrane and low doses of unfractionated heparin (50% reduction of the reference dose) was validated by a survey of 2590 sessions in 32 patients. Doses of LMWH were also safely reduced by 50%. In addition, haemodialysis without systemic administration of heparin was possible with minor risk of clotting. CONCLUSION: During the rinsing phase, the ionic interactions between the new AN69ST polyacrylonitrile membrane and unfractionated heparin induce stable heparin coating. This allows a significant reduction of systemic anticoagulant requirements without increasing the risk of clotting, both in the experimental setting and in the chronic haemodialysis patients. Further studies are required to assess this advantage in patients with acute renal failure and at risk of bleeding and to reduce the metabolic consequences of long-term treatment with heparin.