Social media as a clinical, educational and networking tool for neurosurgeons: A systematic review of literature.

BACKGROUND: The use of social media has been drastic in the field of neurosurgery over the last two decades. Almost 70 % of neurosurgeons use social media platforms such as Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, and Instagram for purposes of professional growth. This literature review aims to quantify the use of social media in the field of neurosurgery, its benefits, and implications. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar for articles pertaining tosocial media and neurosurgery.Mesh terms employed in the search strategy encompassed "Social Media", "neurosurgery", "education""benefits", "consequences"and related variations.Inclusion criteria involved studiesvaryingin methodology, includingobservational studies, case reports and comprehensive reviewsand investigatingvarious aspects of benefits and limitations of social media for neurosurgeons, encompassing its importance in community building, professional development, contribution to research and publications, mentorship, cultural diversity and other pertinent benefits. RESULTS: The search yielded635articles, with437unique articles screened based on relevance. Following a meticulous screening process,86articles underwent full-text assessment, resulting in the inclusion of22articles meeting the eligibility criteria.Insights were derived onthebenefits of social media,its current limitationsas well astrends and demographics surrounding social media use in neurosurgery. CONCLUSION: In todays modernized world, social media acts as a double-edged sword when it comes to neurosurgery; it offers unparalleled opportunities for collaboration, education, patient engagement, and support while demanding careful use and navigation to mitigate the risks associated with it.

Liliequist membrane: A systematic review of history, anatomy, clinical importance, and surgical challenges.

BACKGROUND: The Liliequist membrane (LM) represents a crucial yet challenging anatomical structure in neuroanatomy. First observed in 1875 and later elucidated by Bengt Liliequist in 1956, the LM's precise anatomical description and boundaries remain complex. Its significance extends to neurosurgery, impacting various procedures like endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomies, aneurysm and tumor surgeries, treatment of suprasellar arachnoid cysts, and managing perimesencephalic hemorrhages. However, a comprehensive understanding of the LM is hindered by inconsistent anatomical descriptions and limitations in available literature, warranting a systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar for articles pertaining to Liliequist's membrane. The search employed Mesh terms like "Liliequist membrane," "Liliequist's diaphragm," and related variations. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies exploring the historical evolution, anatomical structure, radiological characteristics, and clinical implications of the LM in neurosurgery. RESULTS: The search yielded 358 articles, with 276 unique articles screened based on relevance. Following a meticulous screening process, 72 articles underwent full-text assessment, resulting in the inclusion of 5 articles meeting the eligibility criteria. The selected studies varied in methodology, including anatomical dissections, radiological evaluations, and clinical significance in neurosurgical procedures. Insights were derived on LM's anatomical variations, radiological visualization, and its critical role in guiding neurosurgical interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advancements in understanding its clinical significance and radiological visualization, challenges persist in precisely delineating its boundaries. Further research, especially on embryological development and histological characterization, is essential. Enhancing comprehension of LM-related pathologies is crucial for accurate preoperative planning and optimizing patient outcomes in neurosurgery.

Neurosurgery and Social Media: A Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Production from 2004 to 2023.

BACKGROUND: Neurosurgery is a rapidly advancing surgical specialty. Social media has significantly impacted the landscape of advancements in the field of neurosurgery. Research on the subject of neurosurgery and social media plays a vital role in combating disability and mortality due to neurological diseases, especially in trauma-affected individuals by increasing cooperation and sharing of clinical experiences between neurosurgeons via social media. This study aimed to evaluate the global neurosurgery and social media research performance from 2004 to 2023. METHODS: All the data for neurosurgery and social media-related research publications from 2004 to 2023 were extracted from the Web of Science database and a comprehensive analysis was performed on the R-bibliometrix package. RESULTS: An increasing number of publications with an annual growth rate of 22.04% was observed, with >91% of total articles published in the last decade. The United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, France, Canada, and India made up of more than 67% of the global contribution. Out of 1449 authors, Chaurasia B was the most productive with 14 publications and the most globally cited document was JEAN WC, 2020 with 117 citations. The University of Cambridge was the leading institutional affiliation. World Neurosurgery was the most productive with >60 articles. CONCLUSIONS: Exploring neurosurgery on social media enhances global collaboration, utilizing dynamic platforms for real-time knowledge exchange and holds immense potential for the field's global advancement.