Factors influencing inpatient bowel preparation: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Inpatients undergoing colonoscopy experience a higher-than-average rate of inadequate bowel preparation (compared to outpatients) leading to canceled procedures, increased stress on the patient, increased time in hospital, and increased cost to the healthcare system. The aim of this scoping review was to identify research surrounding inpatient bowel preparation and to identify modifiable and non-modifiable factors that influence the adequacy of bowel preparation in hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy and establish areas where nursing interventions may help improve overall bowel preparation rates. METHODS: An initial search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Embase was undertaken to identify seed articles, followed by a structured search using keywords and subject headings. Studies conducted between 2000 and 2022 and published in English were included. A total of 37 full-text studies were screened for inclusion, with 22 meeting inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Advanced age, decreased mobility, constipation, extended length of stay, and multiple comorbidities were identified as non-modifiable factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation. Narcotic use, failure to follow preparation instruction, and delayed time to colonoscopy were identified as modifiable factors associated with poor bowel preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Educational interventions and interprofessional programs, using a multifaceted approach, increase the odds of adequate bowel preparation, including nursing tip sheets, troubleshooting flowsheets, and bowel movement assessment scoring.

Animal sheltering: A scoping literature review grounded in institutional ethnography.

A diverse research literature now exists on the animals, staff and organisations involved in animal sheltering. We reviewed this research through the lens of institutional ethnography, a method of inquiry that focuses on the actual work that people do within institutions. The main topics, identified through a larger ethnographic study of animal sheltering, were: (i) research about shelter staff and officers; (ii) the relinquishment of animals to shelters; and (iii) animals' length of stay in shelters. After reviewing the literature, we held focus groups with shelter personnel to explore how their work experiences are or are not represented in the research. The review showed that stress caused by performing euthanasia has attracted much research, but the decision-making that leads to euthanasia, which may involve multiple staff and potential conflict, has received little attention. Research on 'compassion fatigue' has also tended to focus on euthanasia but a granular description about the practical and emotional work that personnel undertake that generates such fatigue is missing. Published research on both relinquishment and length of stay is dominated by metrics (questionnaires) and often relies upon shelter records, despite their limitations. Less research has examined the actual work processes involved in managing relinquishment as well as monitoring and reducing animals' length of stay. Institutional ethnography's focus on people's work activities can provide a different and more nuanced understanding of what is happening in animal sheltering and how it might better serve the needs of the animals and staff.

Using institutional ethnography to analyse animal sheltering and protection I: Animal protection work.

Animal protection laws exist at federal, provincial and municipal levels in Canada, with enforcement agencies relying largely upon citizens to report concerns. Existing research about animal protection law focuses on general approaches to enforcement and how legal terms function in the courts, but the actual work processes of animal law enforcement have received little study. We used institutional ethnography to explore the everyday work of Call Centre operators and Animal Protection Officers, and we map how this work is organised by laws and institutional polices. When receiving and responding to calls staff try to identify evidence of animal 'distress' as legally defined, because various interventions (writing orders, seizing animals) then become possible. However, many cases, such as animals living in deprived or isolated situations, fall short of constituting 'distress' and the legally mandated interventions cannot be used. Officers are also constrained by privacy and property law and by the need to record attempts to secure compliance in order to justify further action including obtaining search warrants. As a result, beneficial intervention can be delayed or prevented. Officers sometimes work strategically to advocate for animals when the available legal tools cannot resolve problems. Recommendations arising from this research include expanding the legal definition of 'distress' to better fit animals' needs, developing ways for officers to intervene in a broader range of situations, and more ethnographic research on enforcement work in jurisdictions with different legal systems to better understand how animal protection work is organised and constrained by laws and policies.

Using institutional ethnography to analyse animal sheltering and protection II: Animal shelter work.

Efficient adoption is an important aim of animal shelters, but it is not possible for all animals including those with serious behavioural problems. We used institutional ethnography to explore the everyday work of frontline shelter staff in a large animal sheltering and protection organisation and to examine how their work is organised by standardised institutional procedures. Shelter staff routinely conduct behavioural evaluations of dogs and review intake documents, in part to plan care for animals and inform potential adopters about animal characteristics as well as protect volunteers and community members from human-directed aggression. Staff were challenged and felt pressure, however, to find time to work with animals identified as having behavioural problems because much of their work is directed toward other goals such as facilitating efficient adoption for the majority and anticipating future demands for kennel space. This work is organised by management approaches that broadly aim to maintain a manageable shelter animal population based on available resources, decrease the length of time animals spend in shelters and house animals based on individual needs. However, this organisation limits the ability of staff to work closely with long-stay animals whose behavioural problems require modification and management. This also creates stress for staff who care for these animals and are emotionally invested in them. Further inquiry and improvements might involve supporting the work of behavioural modification and management where it is needed and expanding fostering programmes for animals with special needs.