RESUMEN
Purpose: The risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) by risk stratification remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of CVD death in patients with localized PCa by risk stratification. Patients and methods: Population-based study of 340,806 cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database diagnosed with localized PCa between 2004 and 2016. The proportion of deaths identifies the primary cause of death, the competing risk model identifies the interaction between CVD and PCa, and the standardized mortality rate (SMR) quantifies the risk of CVD death in patients with PCa. Results: CVD-related death was the leading cause of death in patients with localized PCa, and cumulative CVD-related death also surpassed PCa almost as soon as PCa was diagnosed in the low- and intermediate-risk groups. However, in the high-risk group, CVD surpassed PCa approximately 90 months later. Patients with localized PCa have a higher risk of CVD-related death compared to the general population and the risk increases steadily with survival (SMR = 4.8, 95% CI 4.6-5.1 to SMR = 13.6, 95% CI 12.8-14.5). Conclusions: CVD-related death is a major competing risk in patients with localized PCa, and cumulative CVD mortality increases steadily with survival time and exceeds PCa in all three stratifications (low, intermediate, and high risk). Patients with localized PCa have a higher CVD-related death than the general population. Management of patients with localized PCa requires attention to both the primary cancer and CVD.
RESUMEN
Background: Previous studies focused on the impact of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) risk factors in breast cancer patients with chemotherapy (CT) or radiotherapy (RT). This study aimed to identify the impact of tumor characteristics on CVD death in these patients. Methods: Data of female breast cancer patients with CT or RT between 2004 and 2016 were included. The risk factors of CVD death were identified using Cox regression analyses. A nomogram was constructed to evaluate the predicted value of tumor characteristics, and then validated by the concordance indexes (C-index) and calibration curves. Result: A total of 28,539 patients were included with an average follow-up of 6.1 years. Tumor size > 45â mm (adjusted HR = 1.431, 95% CI = 1.116-1.836, P = 0.005), regional (adjusted HR = 1.278, 95% CI = 1.048-1.560, P = 0.015) and distant stage (adjusted HR = 2.240, 95% CI = 1.444-3.474, P < 0.001) were risk factors of CVD death for breast cancer patients with CT or RT. The prediction nomogram of tumor characteristics (tumor size and stage) on CVD survival was established. The C-index of internal and external validation were 0.780 (95% Cl = 0.751-0.809), and 0.809 (95% Cl = 0.768-0.850), respectively. The calibration curves showed consistency between the actual observation and nomogram. The risk stratification was also significant distinction (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Tumor size and stage were related to the risk of CVD death for breast cancer patients with CT or RT. The management of CVD death risk in breast cancer patients with CT or RT should focus not only on CVD risk factors but also on tumor size and stage.
RESUMEN
Hypotestosterone and erectile dysfunction (ED) occur frequently in males with type 2 diabetes. It is still clinically challenging to manage diabetes-induced ED. Here, we conducted a 2-arm randomized clinical study and in vitro cell line experiments to investigate the effects of nerve growth factor (NGF) on serum testosterone and ED in diabetic males with sensorimotor polyneuropathy and to identify its underlying mechanisms. The analyses of serum total testosterone (TT) and free testosterone (FT), and 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score at baseline and after treatment show increases in TT (3.90 nmol/L, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.13-4.66 nmol/L vs 1.21 nmol/L [95% CI: 0.57-1.85 nmol/L]), FT (3.79 pg/mL [95% CI: 3.05-4.54 pg/mL] vs 1.27 pg/mL [95% CI: 0.85-1.70 pg/mL]), and IIEF-5 score (1.84 [95% CI: 1.21-2.47] vs 0.24 [95% CI: -0.24 to 0.73]) in the NGF treatment compared controls ( P < .005). In mouse Leydig cells, NGF significantly ameliorated the hyperglycemia-induced downregulation of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein and cytochrome P450 11A1 ( P < .05). Thus, NGF treatment effectively improves type 2 diabetes-induced hypotestosterone and ED outcome through a mechanism that includes upregulation of key enzymes in testosterone biosynthesis.