Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for clinical diagnostics.

Mass spectrometry is a powerful analytical tool used for the analysis of a wide range of substances and matrices; it is increasingly utilized for clinical applications in laboratory medicine. This Primer includes an overview of basic mass spectrometry concepts, focusing primarily on tandem mass spectrometry. We discuss experimental considerations and quality management, and provide an overview of some key applications in the clinic. Lastly, the Primer discusses significant challenges for implementation of mass spectrometry in clinical laboratories and provides an outlook of where there are emerging clinical applications for this technology.

Review of the Use of Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Laboratories: Part II-Operations.

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is increasingly utilized in clinical laboratories because it has advantages in terms of specificity and sensitivity over other analytical technologies. These advantages come with additional responsibilities and challenges given that many assays and platforms are not provided to laboratories as a single kit or device. The skills, staff, and assays used in LC-MS/MS are internally developed by the laboratory, with relatively few exceptions. Hence, a laboratory that deploys LC-MS/MS assays must be conscientious of the practices and procedures adopted to overcome the challenges associated with the technology. This review discusses the post-development landscape of LC-MS/MS assays, including validation, quality assurance, operations, and troubleshooting. The content knowledge of LC-MS/MS users is quite broad and deep and spans multiple scientific fields, including biology, clinical chemistry, chromatography, engineering, and MS. However, there are no formal academic programs or specific literature to train laboratory staff on the fundamentals of LC-MS/MS beyond the reports on method development. Therefore, depending on their experience level, some readers may be familiar with aspects of the laboratory practices described herein, while others may be not. This review endeavors to assemble aspects of LC-MS/MS operations in the clinical laboratory to provide a framework for the thoughtful development and execution of LC-MS/MS applications.

Review of the Use of Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Laboratories: Part I-Development.

The process of method development for a diagnostic assay based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) involves several disparate technologies and specialties. Additionally, method development details are typically not disclosed in journal publications. Method developers may need to search widely for pertinent information on their assay(s). This review summarizes the current practices and procedures in method development. Additionally, it probes aspects of method development that are generally not discussed, such as how exactly to calibrate an assay or where to place quality controls, using examples from the literature. This review intends to provide a comprehensive resource and induce critical thinking around the experiments for and execution of developing a clinically meaningful LC-MS/MS assay.

Special Considerations for Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method Development.

Method development for diagnostic liquid-chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays are not broadly discussed in publications. Certain aspects of the development process are thus learned via experience. This article touches on a number of aspects that should be contemplated during method development for LC-MS/MS tests beyond sample preparation, chromatographic separation, and mass spectrometric detection. Utilization of factors intrinsic to LC-MS/MS, such as isotopically labeled internal standards and appraisal of transition ratios, engenders confidence in assay development and accelerates movement toward validation and testing.

Urinary Concentrations of Topically Administered Pain Medications.

A common treatment for chronic pain is prescription of analgesics, but their long-term use entails risk of morbidity, addiction and misuse. One way to reduce the risk of abuse is prescribing of analgesics in a topical form. Physicians are urged to perform urine drug testing to ensure that patients are compliant with their medication regimens. However, there is little data on the efficiency of transdermal delivery for many analgesic drugs, and no data on expected urine drug levels. This study includes data from over 29,000 specimens tested for gabapentin, ketamine, cyclobenzaprine or amitriptyline used orally or topically. Gabapentin and amitriptyline concentrations were more likely to be below the limits of detection (25-40 ng/mL) in the urine of patients using them topically as compared with patients using them orally. Levels in gabapentin-positive topical specimens were much lower than in gabapentin-positive oral specimens (261 ng/mL vs >10,000 ng/mL). In contrast, ketamine and cyclobenzaprine were more readily detectable in the urine of topical users. Ketamine topical specimens were positive 12% more often than oral specimens, and mean topical specimen levels were 68-100% those of oral specimens. Cyclobenzaprine specimens were equally likely to be positive whether the dose was oral or topical, although mean levels after topical dosing were approximately 13-21% those after oral dosing. These findings are consistent with the reported percutaneous absorption efficiencies of gabapentin and ketamine, and are likely to be related to the absorption efficiencies of cyclobenzaprine and amitriptyline.

HILIC-MS/MS method development for targeted quantitation of metabolites: practical considerations from a clinical diagnostic perspective.

The development of targeted assays for polar molecules is a persistent challenge in quantitative metabolite measurement. In addressing these challenges, hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) has proved to be a valuable, though under-used and poorly understood chromatographic technique. This work has addressed a number of components that are intrinsic in development of a high-throughput, specific and sensitive assay for metabolites using HILIC-MS/MS. Generally accepted HILIC doctrine, such as addition of water to all mobile phases and re-equilibration time, was shown to be flawed under gradient HILIC mode. The effect of non-classical mobile phase additives on HILIC-MS/MS specificity, sensitivity and assay throughput was shown for endogenous metabolites. A broad evaluation of columns and mobile phases for the retention of varied molecular classes was performed, elucidating the empirical nature of HILIC method development. Application of the empirical evaluations performed in the paper was demonstrated by detailing a method development cycle for methylmalonic acid to achieve a highly selective and sensitive HILIC-MS/MS quantitation capable of high-throughput analysis for clinical utility.