Differences in somatostatin receptor subtype expression in patients with acromegaly: new directions for targeted therapy?

PURPOSE: To analyze the expression of somatostatin receptor (SSTR)2a and 5 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in surgically resected somatotrophic pituitary adenomas and to associate expression rates with tumor size and clinical, biochemical, and histological parameters and response to somatostatin analog (SA) therapy. METHODS: Forty-three microsurgically treated patients with histopathologically proven growth hormone (GH)-producing pituitary adenoma were included (WHO 2017). SSTR subtype expression was analyzed in adenoma tissues using monoclonal antibodies (Abcam, SSTR2a-UMB1, SSTR5-UMB4). Expression rates were classified as low (≤ 20% staining positivity), moderate (21-50%), and high (> 50%). Furthermore, biochemical parameters such as human growth hormone (hGH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels were measured and clinical, biochemical, radiological, and histological data were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 43 patients included in this study, 28 were female and 15 were male. The median age was 52 years (range 17-72 years). The median tumor size was 1.2 cm (range: 0.13-3.93 cm). All resected tumors showed positivity for somatotrophic hormone (STH). In all tissue samples, SSTR2a signal expression was detectable in immunohistochemistry, while only 39 samples were positive for SSTR5. Thirty-six samples had a high expression of SSTR2a, while three had a moderate and four a low SSTR2a signal. In comparison, SSTR5 signal was high in 26 out of 43 samples, while seven adenomas showed a moderate and six cases a low expression rate of SSTR5. The median IGF-1 was 714.2 µg/l and the median GH 19.6 mU/l (= 6.53 µg/l). The present study indicates that there is no significant relationship between the expression rates of receptor subtypes and the parameters we analyzed. However, our study revealed that smaller adenomas have a lower baseline GH level (p = 0.015), CONCLUSION: IHC with monoclonal antibodies appears to be a suitable method to determine the expression rates of SSTR2a and 5 at protein levels, as it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding receptor subtypes solely on the basis of the parameters analyzed.