RESUMEN
Background: Health literacy (HL) encompasses knowledge and skills for dealing critically and confidently with health information in individual and social contexts. Current studies show that a high proportion of children and adolescents have limited health literacy, depending on aspects of their social background. Health literacy is considered an important factor influencing health. Little is known about the development of health literacy over time and its connection with psychosomatic complaints in young people. Methods: Based on the results of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study, this article focusses on the level of HL in 11-, 13-, and 15-year-old students (N = 6,475) over time and taking social differences into account. Finally, the relationship between HL and psychosomatic complaints is analysed. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were carried out for this purpose. Results: At 24.4 %, slightly more students have low HL in 2022 than in 2017/18 (21.4 %). There are differences in HL according to gender, age, type of school, and family affluence. Low HL is associated with a high psychosomatic burden. Conclusions: The results highlight the need for target group-specific measures to promote young people's HL, which address individual and organisational aspects of HL.
RESUMEN
Background: Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) is one of the largest international studies on child and adolescent health and cooperates with the World Health Organization (WHO). In Germany, adolescents aged 11, 13 and 15 are surveyed every four years about their health, health behaviour and social conditions. This article describes the HBSC study and in particular the methodology of the current 2022 survey and prior surveys conducted between 2009/10 and 2017/18. Method: 174 schools with a total of 6,475 students participated in the 2022 survey. The survey was conducted using questionnaires and covered a wide range of topics (including mental health, physical activity, bullying experiences, social determinants of health and experiences related to COVID-19). The 2022 survey was complemented by a school principal survey (N = 160). In addition to the current sample, the samples of the three previous surveys with representative data for Germany are presented: 2009/10 (N = 5,005), 2013/14 (N = 5,961) and 2017/18 (N = 4,347). Discussion: The health of children and adolescents is of great public health importance. The HBSC study makes a substantial contribution by providing internationally comparable results, analysing trends, and providing stakeholders with comprehensive and representative health monitoring data.
RESUMEN
We aimed to evaluate the associations between information searching about public health and social measures (PHSM) and university students' digital health literacy (DHL) related to the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and COVID-19. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 3,084 Portuguese university students (75.7% females), with an average age of 24.2 (SD = 7.5). Sociodemographic data, DHL questionnaire and online information concerning PHSM were gathered. Cox proportional hazards models were performed. RESULTS: Students who searched for personal protective measures achieved in shorter time sufficient "evaluating reliability" (HR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.1; 1.7) and "determining relevance" (HR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.2; 1.8). Searching for surveillance and response measures was associated with sufficient "determining relevance" (HR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.1; 1.9). Finally, those students who searched for environmental, economic and psychosocial measures achieved in shorter time "determining relevance" (HR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0; 1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Searching for PHSM was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of achieving sufficient DHL subscales in a shorter time. Further studies are needed, including developing strategies to increase the availability of high-quality information concerning public health and social measures and to improve (digital) health literacy.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Alfabetización en Salud , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Infodemia , Masculino , Salud Pública , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudiantes , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Universidades , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While there are increasing empirical findings on general health literacy (HL), there is a lack of evidence on digital HL in adolescence and its association with health behavior. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 490 students from grade eight and nine from the federal state of Hesse was conducted from October 2019 to February 2020. Digital HL was assessed using five subscales of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI), while consumption of fruits, vegetables, and soft drinks as well as weekly physical activity were used as indicators of health behavior. In addition to gender and grade level, subjective social status (SSS) was used as a social characteristic. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed, with binary-logistic regression adjusted for gender and SSS. RESULTS: Across all items, 15.3 to 37.5% of adolescents reported difficulties in acquiring and dealing with digital health information. Stratified by social characteristics, gender and socioeconomic differences were found with girls and respondents reporting a lower SSS more often showed a limited digital HL. Adolescents with moderate and low digital HL reported higher levels of low physical activity and non-daily fruit and daily soft drink consumption. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest a need for interventions to promote digital HL among adolescents, particularly for those of low SSS. In this context, the differential relationship patterns with health behaviors provide an avenue for the development of specific interventions. The school as a place of teaching and learning is a suitable setting because, among other things, of its fit with the mandatory strategy of media literacy education in schools.
Asunto(s)
Alfabetización en Salud , Adolescente , Estudios Transversales , Dieta , Ejercicio Físico , Femenino , Alemania , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy calls for user-friendly and health-competent development of health care at all levels. After the first years of focusing on individual health literacy, the focus is increasingly on organizational health literacy. Organizational health literacy addresses different standards (e. g., management, communication, staff, users or patients) and levels in the organization (i.e., organizational, staff and user level). Numerous tools already exist to strengthen health literacy in hospitals. However, previous studies have rarely focused on a differentiated overview of tools to strengthen organizational health literacy by health literacy standards and differentiated by level of organization, staff and users. The article has two goals, one of which is to search for and review existing tools to strengthen organizational health literacy in health care institutions. In addition, selected tools for strengthening organizational health literacy for health care institutions, differentiated according to the eight fields of action and the three organizational levels (i.e., institution, staff, users), will be presented. METHOD: A search was carried out to identify tools on strengthening health literacy in facilities of health care. All the tools identified were reviewed, selected according to previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria and assigned to the level (institution, employees or patients/clients and their relatives) as well as the eight fields of action of organizational health literacy. RESULTS: We found a total of N=191 tools for health care facilities. After taking into account the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of n=60 tools were selected and differentiated according to the level and standard of organizational health literacy. Some of these tools could be assigned to more than one field of action. Most tools (n=37) were found for Standard 5 "Health-competent communication users", while the lowest number of tools were identified for Standard 7 "Promoting the health literacy of employees" (n=4). Differentiation by level (i. e., organizational, staff, patients or clients) shows that there is a smaller number of tools for employees (n=43) compared to the level of the organization (n=76) or users (n=65). DISCUSSION: Overall, the study shows that numerous tools already exist to strengthen organizational health literacy for hospitals, in particular, and for health care settings, in general. In the future, however, it will be necessary to develop and test tools for individual standards of health literate organizations in health care facilities. Further, internationally provided and tested tools have to be adapted and piloted for the German-speaking countries and health care settings in order to address the health literacy of staff, users and their relatives in a sustainable manner. CONCLUSION: The development of health literate settings requires effort from health care organizations. Thus, tools for strengthening organizational health literacy should be provided and implemented by also focusing on the level of organization, staff and users so that the individual health literacy of users can be addressed and improved in the long-run.
Asunto(s)
Alfabetización en Salud , Comunicación , Atención a la Salud , Alemania , Sector de Atención de Salud , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: People with disabilities and chronic diseases represent a population group in vulnerable circumstances, and often have difficulty finding, understanding, assessing, and applying health information. The aim of this study was to examine the health literacy of people doubly burdened with both disabilities and chronic diseases in comparison to two other groups, namely people with either disabilities or chronic diseases and people without impairment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our data is based on the representative survey "German Health Update" 2014/2015-EHIS. The sample consists of n=21,647 people, including 2,875 (13.3%) people with disabilities and chronic diseases, 7,598 people (35.1%) with disability or chronic diseases and 11,174 (51.6%) people without impairment. Health literacy was measured using the short form of the questionnaire of the European Health Literacy Survey (HLS-EU-Q16). Uni, bi- and multivariate analyses were conducted. RESULTS: 43.7% of respondents with both disabilities and chronic diseases had quite a lot difficulties in dealing with health information in comparison to people with disabilities or chronic diseases (37.7%) or those with no impairment (33.0%). People with double burdens had a 1.22-fold (CI: 1.10-1.35; p<0.001) and people with a single burden had a 1.08-fold (CI: 1.01-1.16; p=0.031) increased likelihood to find it difficult or very difficult to find, understand, evaluate and apply health-related information compared to people without impairment. CONCLUSION: The results show a gradient to the disadvantage of people with disabilities and/or chronic diseases. Health literacy among people with disabilities and/or chronic diseases should be adequately promoted in order to support their health, their participation as well as the quality and efficiency of and the reduction of barriers to access health care.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Alfabetización en Salud , Humanos , Alemania/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Enfermedad CrónicaRESUMEN
Early-on in the COVID-19 pandemic when universities were closed as part of the nation-wide public health response to the COVID-19 outbreak, studying and student life significantly changed. Based on limited evidence the aim of this study was to explore the relationship between sense of coherence (SoC), future worries and mental health outcomes among German university students during the early phase of the pandemic. A cross-sectional online survey with n = 14 916 participants was carried out by inviting all private and public universities in Germany. All data were analysed using univariate, bivariate and multivariate statistics. Findings indicate a low and very low wellbeing for 38% of university students. Moreover, 29% reported being affected by at least two health complaints more than once week. Both health outcomes follow a social gradient and could be more frequently observed for respondents with lower subjective social status and female students. Regression analysis revealed significant association between the SoC dimensions and wellbeing (OR: 1.2-2.03) as well as health complaints (OR: 1.58-1.71). A high level of future worries was associated with low/very low wellbeing (OR: 2.83) and multiple health complaints (OR: 2.84). Based on the results, the public health response to the pandemic and university health promotion should therefore consider student mental health as an important target within their policy and action frameworks.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Sentido de Coherencia , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Salud Mental , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudiantes/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , UniversidadesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Children and adolescents with disabilities and health-related impairment belong to a vulnerable population group. There are only few German findings on mental health that distinguish between children and adolescents with and without disabilities and health-related impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were used from the German KiGGS Wave 2 of the Robert Koch-Institute from 2014-2017. A total of 11,830 children and adolescents aged 3-17 years were included using the parent perspective and 5,222 children and adolescents between 11-17 years using their self-assessments. Mental health outcomes were mental health problems (SDQ, parental assessment) and health-related quality of life (kidscreen, self-assessment). Univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted using cross-tables with Chi square tests and multivariate analyses using binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: In 16.5% of children aged 3-17 years, parents reported mental health problems; 48.4% of the interviewed children and adolescents aged 11-17 years reported a low health-related quality of life. Children with disabilities and health-related impairment had a significantly higher probability of mental health problems (OR: 5.11) and a low health-related quality of life (OR: 1.50). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest a need for action to strengthen mental health in children and adolescents with disabilities and/or health-related impairment. In this context, the educational settings of kindergarten and school are of great importance.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Salud Mental , Adolescente , Salud del Adolescente , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Alemania/epidemiología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Digital communication technologies are playing an important role in the health communication strategies of governments and public health authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The internet and social media have become important sources of health-related information on COVID-19 and on protective behaviors. In addition, the COVID-19 infodemic is spreading faster than the coronavirus itself, which interferes with governmental health-related communication efforts. This jeopardizes national public health containment strategies. Therefore, digital health literacy is a key competence to navigate web-based COVID-19-related information and service environments. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate university students' digital health literacy and web-based information-seeking behaviors during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. METHODS: A cross-sectional study among 14,916 university students aged ≥18 years from 130 universities across all 16 federal states of Germany was conducted using a web-based survey. Along with sociodemographic characteristics (sex, age, subjective social status), the measures included five subscales from the Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI), which was adapted to the specific context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Web-based information-seeking behavior was investigated by examining the web-based sources used by university students and the topics that the students searched for in connection with COVID-19. Data were analyzed using univariate and bivariate analyses. RESULTS: Across digital health literacy dimensions, the greatest difficulties could be found for assessing the reliability of health-related information (5964/14,103, 42.3%) and the ability to determine whether the information was written with a commercial interest (5489/14,097, 38.9%). Moreover, the respondents indicated that they most frequently have problems finding the information they are looking for (4282/14,098, 30.4%). When stratified according to sociodemographic characteristics, significant differences were found, with female university students reporting a lower DHLI for the dimensions of "information searching" and "evaluating reliability." Search engines, news portals, and websites of public bodies were most often used by the respondents as sources to search for information on COVID-19 and related issues. Female students were found to use social media and health portals more frequently, while male students used Wikipedia and other web-based encyclopedias as well as YouTube more often. The use of social media was associated with a low ability to critically evaluate information, while the opposite was observed for the use of public websites. CONCLUSIONS: Although digital health literacy is well developed in university students, a significant proportion of students still face difficulties with certain abilities to evaluate information. There is a need to strengthen the digital health literacy capacities of university students using tailored interventions. Improving the quality of health-related information on the internet is also key.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Alfabetización en Salud/métodos , Conducta en la Búsqueda de Información/fisiología , Internet/normas , Adulto , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudiantes , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM OF THE STUDY: Self-rated health is an important indicator of current and future health. However, panel data-based findings are lacking that take into consideration the background features of differentiated development of self-reported adolescent health. This paper examines the development of self- rated health through secondary education from grade 5-12 in Germany, analyzing differences according to indicators of socio-economic position and other background characteristics such as gender and family structure. METHODOLOGY: 5th to 10th grade data from the "Class 5" cohort and 9th to 12th grade data from the "9th grade" cohort of the National Education Panel were combined. Growth curve models based on multi-level analysis were used to examine the level and course of self-rated health and to examine differences according to type of school, parenting, household income, gender and family structure. The final model contains 28,987 observations from 11,290 individuals over 8 time points. RESULTS: Self-reported health declines slightly from 5th to 12th grade. Adolescents attending high school, living in higher-income households or parents with higher education status reported better health. Boys and adolescents growing up in nuclear families showed a more favorable course of self-rated health through secondary education. CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the development of self-rated health of adolescents in secondary education. In addition to the static differences according to background characteristics, girls and adolescents who do not live in nuclear families also had a worse prognosis for the development of self-rated health over the school career.
Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Autoinforme , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Renta , Masculino , Instituciones Académicas , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of personality traits in self-rated health and well-being of adolescents has barely been studied in Germany so far. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between the Big Five personality traits and self-reported health as well as life satisfaction of adolescents in Germany. METHODS: The study data are based on the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS), starting cohort 3 (wave 3, 2012). This sample includes (n=5,440) 7th grade adolescents in regular schools. Personality traits were measured by the Big Five-Inventory (BFI-10): Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, Openness. Statistical analyses were carried out using bivariate methods and binary-logistic multilevel models, taking into account individuals nested in school classes and schools. RESULTS: Adolescents with pronounced neuroticism had a higher risk of both poor self-rated health (OR: 1.33) and low life satisfaction (OR: 1.46). In contrast, adolescents with high levels of conscientiousness had a reduced risk of poor health (OR: 0.72) and low life satisfaction (OR: 0.59). High levels of extraversion (OR: 0.78) and agreeableness (OR: 0.72) also correlated with higher life satisfaction, but not with better self-reported health. The characteristic of openness was not associated with either self-reported health or the life satisfaction of adolescents. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that certain personality traits, namely the Big Five can be important indicators of health and life satisfaction of adolescents in early adolescence. However, further studies are needed to assess the link between the Big Five and its generalizability to other age groups.
Asunto(s)
Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Satisfacción Personal , Autoinforme , Adolescente , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Instituciones AcadémicasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: People with disabilities belong to a vulnerable population group, especially with regard to their economic and health situation. In the social-epidemiological research, hardly any studies on mental health and health awareness among people with disabilities are available using representative data, in particular not differentiated according to their degree of disability (DoD). Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate 1) differences in mental health and health awareness between people with disabilities compared to people without disabilities. In addition, the study 2) shows differences mental health outcomes and health awareness, differentiated according to the DoD. METHODS: Data is used from the representative study "Gesundheit in Deutschland Aktuell (GEDA) 2012" (N=19,294). Outcomes were self-reported health, health awareness, depression or depressive mood, mental discomfort, vitality and psychological well-being. The exposure variable used was the recognized disability (DoD≥50 vs. DoD<50 vs. no disability). Univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted using cross-tables and multivariate analyses using binary logistic regression models, controlled for socio-demographic, economic and health-related features. RESULTS: People with disabilities often rate their mental health worse than people without disabilities. The bi- and multivariate analyses revealed a disability-specific gradient for all outcome measures according to the DoD (p<0,001). People with disabilities had a significantly higher likelihood of poor mental health compared to people without disabilities. People with severe disabilities (DoD≥50) had a more than 4,6-fold increased likelihood risk of poor self-reported health and 2,5-fold likelihood of depression or depressed mood compared to people without disabilities. A high level of health awareness was more prevalent in PWD than in those without disabilities. CONCLUSION: The study highlights that People with disabilities more frequently reported mental health problems than people without disabilities. Targeted measures are necessary, which address in particular the target group of the people with disabilities. There is further need to strengthen access to health services and programs, assistive technologies and support services, and to make health of people with disabilities to the subject of research and health promotion in line with the WHO Action Plan on "Better health for all people with disabilities" (2014-2021).
Asunto(s)
Estado de Conciencia , Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Salud Mental , Alemania , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
More than 20% of all school-aged children in Germany experience a grade retention and repetition during the educational career which is likely to affect their well-being as a central element of school success. This study aims at revealing the temporal dynamics of general and school well-being around the event of grade retention (i.e., the year when the decision to repeat a grade is taken) and the subsequent grade repetition (i.e., the repeated school year) during secondary school in Germany. Longitudinal data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) is used on native students attending grades 5 through to 12 (N = 4581 from originally 273 schools). Distributed fixed-effects regressions by gender and school type have been conducted, using satisfaction with school and life as outcomes. Although retention decisions often trigger an immediate decrease in students' well-being, there arise still benefits from this event in the short-term, middle-term and long-term, though trajectories differ by gender and school type. Overall, it is necessary to promote students´ well-being throughout their educational career, particularly in those critical periods when they face grade retention. Results highlight that tailored programs for both genders and students in different school types should be provided to foster well-being during this phase.
Asunto(s)
Éxito Académico , Autoimagen , Estudiantes , Logro , Niño , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Satisfacción Personal , Instituciones Académicas , Estudiantes/psicologíaRESUMEN
To date, studies on individual and organizational health literacy (OHL) in facilities for people with disabilities are scarce. Thus, the aims of this study are (1) to adapt an existing instrument for measuring organizational health literacy (OHL), namely, the "Health literate health care organization scale" (HLHO-10), to the context of facilities for people with disabilities, (2) to quantitatively examine characteristics of OHL, and (3) to qualitatively assess the definition and role of OHL by interviewing managers and skilled staff. An online study in Germany with N = 130 managers and skilled staff in facilities for people with disabilities was conducted, using the adapted HLHO-10 questionnaire. Univariate analyses were applied. Qualitative content analysis was used to investigate interview data from N = 8 managers and skilled staff from N = 8 facilities for people with disabilities in Hesse, Germany. Quantitative results revealed that respondents reported a below-average level in HLHO-10, with the lowest level found in the attribute of participative development of health information. The qualitative findings showed a clear need for improved navigation to and in facilities. The quantitative and qualitative findings are mainly consistent. Future research and measures should focus on facilities for people with disabilities in order to strengthen the development of and access to target-group-specific health information, as well as to establish a health-literate working and living environment.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Alfabetización en Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The promotion of health literacy is seen as an urgent goal in public health and education and, hence, should be integrated in the school context as a component of the holistic health promoting school (HPS) approach. However, only limited empirical studies have addressed health literacy of school staff so far. Hence, this study aimed to examine the level of health literacy among school leaders and its association with the extent of HPS implementation. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with n = 680 school principals and members of the school management board from Germany was carried out at the end of 2018. Individual health literacy, attitudes, and competencies towards HPS and occupational self-efficacy served as independent variables and the level of HPS implementation was the dependent variable. Data were analyzed using univariate and bivariate analysis as well as multiple binary logistic regression. RESULTS: 29.3% of school leaders show a limited health literacy with significantly higher values found for male respondents. Regression analyses revealed that male gender (OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.22-2.99), HPS attitudes (OR: 3.17, 95% CI: 2.13-4.72), and HPS competencies (OR: 3.66, 95% CI: 2.43-5.50) were associated with a lower level of HPS implementation. Furthermore, regression analyses differentiated by gender showed that limited health literacy is associated with a low level of HPS implementation for male school leaders only (OR: 2.81, 95% CI: 1.22-6.45). CONCLUSIONS: The promotion of health literacy especially for male leaders would not only result in positive effects on an individual level but also could contribute to a stronger implementation of activities on school health promotion. We suggest integrating health literacy, HPS attitudes, and competencies more strongly into the qualification and in further training of school leaders.
Asunto(s)
Alfabetización en Salud , Promoción de la Salud , Personal Docente/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Alfabetización en Salud/normas , Alfabetización en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Promoción de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Servicios de Salud Escolar/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Enfermería Escolar , Instituciones Académicas/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Psychosocial working conditions and symptoms of burnout in somatic and psychiatric nursing Abstract. Background: While mental workload and stress among nurses are generally well-documented, differences within the nursing profession have hardly been investigated so far. Aim: This study aims to examine the differences and associations between psychosocial working conditions and symptoms of burnout of nurses working in somatic and psychiatric settings. Methods: A cross-sectional study has been conducted with employees in one somatic and one psychiatric hospital (n = 576). The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory were used to assess psychosocial workloads and burnout symptoms. The data analysis was carried out by univariate, bivariate and multivariate (regression) analyses. Results: About 50 % of respondents report at least a moderate level of symptoms of burnout with somatic nurses more frequently affected. While quantitative and physical demands are higher in somatic nursing, psychiatric nurses have a higher degree of emotional demands, socialß = 0.33) in somatic nursing and emotional demands (ß = 0.29) in psychiatric nursing serve as strongest predictors of burnout symptoms. Conclusions: Findings suggest specific profiles of psychosocial workload in somatic and psychiatric nursing as well as a high need for differentiated approaches for occupational health promotion.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Enfermería Psiquiátrica , Especialidades de Enfermería , Carga de Trabajo/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Tobacco, alcohol and cannabis are psychoactive substances that is often tried for the first time during adolescence and further continued in later life. Regular tobacco and cannabis use as well as alcohol abuse are associated with serious health consequences. According to the importance of health reporting, this article describes current prevalence of adolescent substance use and the associations between psychoactive substance use and specific social determinants. Representative data for Germany from the 2017/18 Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) study among schoolchildren aged 11, 13 and 15 years are used. The article analyses both, the lifetime and 30-day prevalence of tobacco, alcohol and cannabis use (in the latter case, data were only available for 15-year-olds) among adolescents as well as their experiences of alcohol-related misuse (binge drinking). Tobacco and alcohol are used comparatively rarely by 11- and 13-year-olds. However, the prevalence increases significantly among 15-year-olds. In addition, cannabis use is also quite common among this age group. Schoolchildren who do not attend grammar schools are at greater risk of smoking and those with high family affluence are at a greater risk of alcohol use, this applies particularly to girls. Finally, adolescents with a migration background are less at risk of regular alcohol use or binge drinking, but face an increased risk of cannabis use (girls with one-sided migration background). The results indicate that prevention measures should start early, as the prevalence of substance use is significantly higher among older schoolchildren. Depending on the substance, different risk groups can be identified that require particular consideration when drawing up preventive measures.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although there is evidence for socioeconomic inequalities in health and health behaviour in adolescents, different indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) have rarely been compared within one data sample. We examined associations of five SES indicators with self-rated health (SRH) and smoking (ie, a leading cause of health inequalities) in Europe. METHODS: Data of adolescents aged 14-17 years old were obtained from the 2013 SILNE survey (smoking inequalities: learning from natural experiments), carried out in 50 schools in 6 European cities (N=10 900). Capturing subjective perceptions of relative SES and objective measures of education and wealth, we measured adolescents' own SES (academic performance, pocket money), parental SES (parental educational level) and family SES (Family Affluence Scale, subjective social status (SSS)). Logistic regression models with SRH and smoking as dependent variables included all SES indicators, age and gender. RESULTS: Correlations between SES indicators were weak to moderate. Low academic performance (OR=1.96, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.51) and low SSS (OR=2.75, 95% CI 2.12 to 3.55) were the strongest indicators of poor SRH after adjusting for other SES-indicators. Results for SSS were consistent across countries, while associations with academic performance varied. Low academic performance (OR=5.71, 95% CI 4.63 to 7.06) and more pocket money (OR=0.21, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.26) were most strongly associated with smoking in all countries. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent health were largest according to SES indicators more closely related to the adolescent's education as well as the adolescent's perception of relative family SES, rather than objective indicators of parental education and material family affluence. For future studies on adolescent health inequalities, consideration of adolescent-related SES indicators was recommended.
Asunto(s)
Salud del Adolescente/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Fumar/epidemiología , Clase Social , Adolescente , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , AutoinformeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Subjective well-being (SWB) is an important indicator of quality of life, but prior research mostly analyzed adolescents' subjective well-being in cross-sectional studies. There is a lack of studies examining changes in subjective well-being throughout adolescence using longitudinal panel data. This study examined trajectories of subjective well-being of adolescents in Germany throughout secondary education and differences by socioeconomic position, gender and family structure. METHODS: We use the German National Educational Panel Study and combine data from annual survey waves of two of its cohorts. These were first surveyed in 2010 and cover 5th to 10th and 9th to 12th grade level. Using growth curve modelling based on multilevel models, differences in levels and trajectories of subjective well-being overall and differentiated by school type, parental education, household income, gender and family structure were identified. The analyses include 34 504 observations of 12 564 students. RESULTS: Subjective well-being decreased from 5th to 12th grade. Students attending lower track schools showed lower subjective well-being, but also a lesser decrease over time. Students living in low-income households or in single-parent or step-families showed lower subjective well-being. Female students showed higher subjective well-being than males in 5th grade, but also a higher decrease over time, leading to lower subjective well-being than males by 12th grade. CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive picture of subjective well-being throughout secondary education. Adolescents' subjective well-being is linked to social factors regarding family and living conditions as well as school features. Overall, disadvantaged adolescents experience longer periods of lower subjective well-being, thus accumulating the effects of worse psychosocial health opportunities over time.
Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Clase Social , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Familia , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Factores Sexuales , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
This study investigates whether class-level school performance affects students' life satisfaction and if there are differential effects for high- and low-performing students. Data were derived from the National Educational Panel Study, including n = 5196 students (49.6% girls), nested in 478 classes and 250 secondary schools. School performance in class was measured by aggregating individual grade point average in Mathematics and German. The study could not reveal the "big-fish-little-pond"-effect regarding students' life satisfaction but found differential effects for high- vs. low performing students. There was no significant association for low-performing students attending classes with higher class-level performance However, low-performing students revealed the lowest life satisfaction. High-performing students placed in classes with higher average performance reported lower life satisfaction compared to high-performing students in classes with lower average performance. This study provides evidence for the impact of the learning environment in class on school-aged children's life satisfaction, by highlighting the differential sensitivity of high-performing students when placed in classes with higher or lower average performance.