Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 109(2): 128-134, 2024 Feb 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37751992

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Staphylococcus capitis, a coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) species, has been increasingly detected from UK sterile site samples and has caused neonatal unit outbreaks worldwide. We compared survival to discharge and 30-day mortality for the detection of S. capitis versus other CoNS species. METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, we included hospitalised infants with any CoNS species detected from a normally sterile body site up to 90 days of age. We linked English laboratory reports from the Second Generation Surveillance System database, mortality data from the Personal Demographics Service, and neonatal unit admissions from the National Neonatal Research Database. In primary analysis, multivariable logistic regression was used, with two co-primary outcomes: survival to discharge and death within 30 days of positive specimen date. Sensitivity analyses using multiply imputed datasets followed. RESULTS: We identified 16 636 CoNS episodes relating to 13 745 infants. CoNS episodes were highest among infants born extremely preterm (22-27 weeks) and with extremely low birth weight (400-999 g). In primary analysis, there were no differences in survival to discharge (p=0.71) or 30-day mortality (p=0.77) between CoNS species. In sensitivity analyses, there were no differences in outcomes between infection with four of the most common CoNS species (Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. capitis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus warneri) but the remaining CoNS species were at higher risk of adverse outcomes when treated in aggregate. CONCLUSION: Infants with S. capitis detected from sterile site samples did not experience significant differences in either survival to discharge or 30-day mortality compared with infants with detection of other common CoNS species.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus capitis , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Recien Nacido Extremadamente Prematuro , Nacimiento Prematuro
2.
Access Microbiol ; 5(6)2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37424540

RESUMEN

Objective: To review the epidemiology of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) in England over the recent 12 year period. Methods: Laboratory-confirmed CoNS reported from sterile sites in patients in England to the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) between 2010 and 2021 were extracted from the national laboratory database and analysed. Results: Overall, 668 857 episodes of CoNS were reported. Unspeciated CoNS accounted for 56 % (374 228) of episodes, followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (26 %; 174 050), S. hominis (6.5 %; 43 501) and S. capitis (3.9 %; 25 773). Unspeciated CoNS increased by 8.2 % (95 % CI, 7.1-9.3) annually between 2010 and 2016, then decreased annually by 6.4 % (95 % CI: -4.8 to -7.9) until 2021. Speciated CoNS increased by 47.6 % (95 % CI, 44.5-50.9) annually between 2010 and 2016 and increased annually by 8.9 % (95 % CI: 5.1 to 12.8) until 2021. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles differed by species. Conclusions: Reports of CoNS from normally sterile body sites in patients in England increased between 2010 and 2016 and remained stable between 2017 and 2021. There has been a striking improvement in species-level identification of CoNS in recent years. Monitoring trends in CoNS epidemiology is crucial for development of observational and clinical intervention studies on individual species.

3.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 22(6): 586-589, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36427879

RESUMEN

In its first 2 decades, the NHS witnessed the near eradication of life-threatening community-acquired infections. However, medical advances have created different challenges (such as antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infections) against a background of an increasingly ageing population. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted a lack of parity with regards to provision of NHS 'infection services' (infectious diseases, microbiology and virology) across the UK, which urgently needs to be addressed. We recommend a fundamental review of NHS infection service provision: divided into four key areas. Firstly, there should be a consideration of a single multidisciplinary specialty of infection medicine removing barriers to training and service delivery. Secondly, streamline infection training via a single pathway through to certificate of completion of training, encompassing all aspects of infection service provision, for example, infection diagnostics, clinical care (including inpatient, outpatient and community based care), and infection prevention and control. There should be flexibility within the training curriculum to facilitate combined training with general internal medicine (GIM) as well as out of programme activities. Innovative ways of providing clinical experience should be considered, acknowledging the roles that medical microbiologists working closely with GIM colleagues in district general hospitals can play in managing patients with infections. Thirdly, formally commission a national network of specialised infectious diseases units with the creation of service standards. This can facilitate future pandemic resilience using a hub-and-spoke model utilising local infection expertise. Lastly, standardise the NHS framework to lead and coordinate development of integrated infection services at the local level.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Humanos , Pandemias , Medicina Estatal , Curriculum
5.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 76(9): 2428-2436, 2021 08 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34142130

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of 16S rRNA methyltransferase- (16S RMTase-) producing Gram-negative bacteria in patients in the UK and to identify potential risk factors for their acquisition. METHODS: A 6 month prospective surveillance study was conducted from 1 May to 31 October 2016, wherein 14 hospital laboratories submitted Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates that displayed high-level amikacin resistance according to their testing methods, e.g. no zone of inhibition with amikacin discs. Isolates were linked to patient travel history, medical care abroad, and previous antibiotic exposure using a surveillance questionnaire. In the reference laboratory, isolates confirmed to grow on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 256 mg/L amikacin were screened by PCR for 16S RMTase genes armA, rmtA-rmtH and npmA, and carbapenemase genes (blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA-48-like and blaVIM). STs and total antibiotic resistance gene complement were determined via WGS. Prevalence was determined using denominators for each bacterial species provided by participating hospital laboratories. RESULTS: Eighty-four isolates (44.7%), among 188 submitted isolates, exhibited high-level amikacin resistance (MIC >256 mg/L), and 79 (94.0%) of these harboured 16S RMTase genes. armA (54.4%, 43/79) was the most common, followed by rmtB (17.7%, 14/79), rmtF (13.9%, 11/79), rmtC (12.7%, 10/79) and armA + rmtF (1.3%, 1/79). The overall period prevalence of 16S RMTase-producing Gram-negative bacteria was 0.1% (79/71 063). Potential risk factors identified through multivariate statistical analysis included being male and polymyxin use. CONCLUSIONS: The UK prevalence of 16S RMTase-producing Gram-negative bacteria is low, but continued surveillance is needed to monitor their spread and inform intervention strategies.


Asunto(s)
Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Bacterias Gramnegativas/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Metiltransferasas/genética , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Reino Unido/epidemiología , beta-Lactamasas/genética
6.
Clin Infect Pract ; 12: 100095, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36338177

RESUMEN

Infection expertise in the NHS has historically been provided predominantly by hospital-based medical microbiologists responsible for provision of diagnostic services and advice to front-line clinicians. While most hospitals had consultant-led microbiology departments, infectious iiseases departments were based in a small number of specialist centres. The demand for infection expertise is growing in the NHS, driven by advances in medical care, increasing awareness of the impact of antibiotic resistant and healthcare associated infections and threats from emerging infectious diseases. At the same time diagnostic services are being reorganised into pathology networks. The Combined Infection Training (CIT) is delivering a consultant workforce with expertise both in laboratory diagnostic practice and delivery of direct patient care. These changes create challenges for delivery of high quality infection expertise equitably across the NHS. They also offer an opportunity to shape infection services to meet clinical and laboratory demands. To date there has not been an attempt to bring together a single set of best practice guidelines for the requirements of an infection service. This document sets out seven standards. These are written to be practical and flexible according to the diverse ways in which infection expertise may be required across the NHS. It has been prepared by the Clinical Services Committee of the British Infection Association drawing on published evidence and guidance where they exist and on the group's extensive experience of delivering infection services in hospitals across the NHS. It was then refined with input from the RCP Joint Specialist committee (JSC) and the RCPath Specialist Advisory Committee (SAC) and through consultation with the RCPath membership. It has been endorsed by the Royal College of Pathologists and the Royal College of Physicians. It will be reviewed annually by the CSC and updated as additional evidence becomes available.

7.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20112011 Oct 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22679146

RESUMEN

Culture-negative endocarditis (CNE) presents physicians with diagnostic and treatment challenges. Postpartum endocarditis is rare and usually culture negative. Empirical antimicrobial regimes lead to the risk of aggressive treatment with potentially toxic drugs. This paper presents a case of postpartum CNE, discussing the issues of diagnosis and treatment. European and American guidelines for CNE are then reviewed and compared.


Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Penicilina G/uso terapéutico , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo
9.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 6(5): 601-18, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18847401

RESUMEN

This review looks at the challenges facing the worldwide community with the increasing problem of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. The epidemiology and natural history of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and the challenge of control is discussed. Options for treatment and review of key antimicrobial agents acting against methicillin-resistant S. aureus, both currently in use and in development, are addressed. There are a number of new agents, the place of which in therapeutic regimens is yet to emerge. The review attempts to inform the reader of the probable position of these agents.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/clasificación , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/patogenicidad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
J Clin Microbiol ; 43(1): 514-5, 2005 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15635032

RESUMEN

We describe a case of peritonitis due to Vibrio fluvialis in a patient receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; we believe the case to be associated with the consumption of poorly prepared seafood. This was shown to be an important but rare cause of recurrent infection in our patient.


Asunto(s)
Diálisis Peritoneal Ambulatoria Continua/efectos adversos , Peritonitis/microbiología , Vibriosis/microbiología , Vibrio/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vibrio/clasificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...