Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am Surg ; 90(6): 1731-1733, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38215041

RESUMEN

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) utility in management of choledocholithiasis may decrease length of stay and patient cost, but postoperative management remains widely debated. We examined periprocedural LFTs for patients undergoing LCBDE and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) speculating for trend existence after successful LCBDE. We hypothesized that postoperative LCBDE LFTs would not downtrend even after successful ductal clearance. We identified 99 patients under 18 who underwent ERCP or LCBDE with at least one pre- and post-procedural LFT. Periprocedural LFTs between groups were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The 22 ERCP patients demonstrated a significant downtrend across Tbili (P < .001), AST (P = .001), ALT (P = .002), and ALP (P < .001). The 27 LCBDE patients demonstrated a significant downtrend in Tbili (P = .002) only, while AST (P > .05), ALT (P > .05), and ALP (P > .05) were nonsignificant. Lack of consistent downtrend in the LCBDE group raises doubt regarding the utility of postoperative LFTs for post-procedural management.


Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Coledocolitiasis , Conducto Colédoco , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Coledocolitiasis/cirugía , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Conducto Colédoco/cirugía , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Preescolar , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA