RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews comparing untargeted antifungal treatment with placebo or no treatment in critically ill patients have provided conflicting results. We aimed to assess patient-important benefits and harms of untargeted antifungal therapy vs. placebo or no treatment in adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials assessing untargeted antifungal therapy compared to placebo or no treatment in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection. We used the Cochrane and GRADE methodologies and exclusively assessed patient-important outcomes. Two independent authors screened trials for eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We performed conventional meta-analyses, including sensitivity and subgroup analyses, and trial sequential analysis to assess the risk of random errors and to estimate trial sequential analysis adjusted confidence intervals. RESULTS: We included six trials (1,067 patients) in the review, and four trials reported data on the predefined outcome measures and were included in the meta-analysis. Three of the four trials had high risk of bias. We observed no statistically significant difference in mortality (relative risk 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.24-1.39) or in any of the other patient-important outcomes between untargeted antifungal treatment and placebo or no treatment (low/very low quality of evidence). Trial sequential analysis demonstrated lack of data and high risk of random errors. CONCLUSIONS: The quantity and quality of evidence supporting untargeted antifungal treatment in adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection are low to very low with no firm evidence for benefit or harm.
Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antifúngicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Ferritin was analysed with an immunoradiometric assay using anti-spleen ferritin antibodies, in pleural effusions (Pl) from 28 patients with malignant effusions (18 carcinoma, 10 mesothelioma), 15 patients with non-malignant exudative effusions of unknown aetiology, and from 12 patients with transudative effusions due to congestive cardiac failure. Geometric mean Pl-ferritin was 617 micrograms/l in carcinoma, 1301 micrograms/l in mesothelioma (p less than 0.01 against carcinoma), 931 micrograms/l in non-malignant exudates, and 178 micrograms/l in transudates (p less than 0.0001 against malignant and non-malignant exudates). There was no correlation between Pl-ferritin and Pl-protein, Pl-albumin or Pl-cell count. P1-ferritin displayed a wide overlap between the various groups, and was of no value in the discrimination between malignant and non-malignant exudates. In the differentiation between exudates and transudates, the diagnostic accuracy of Pl-ferritin was only slightly lower compared to Pl-protein and Pl-albumin. With the present method, analysis of Pl-ferritin appears to be of limited value in the routine diagnostic evaluation of pleural effusions.