Inhaled silica nanoparticles cause chronic kidney disease in rats.

Silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) released during the burning of sugarcane have been postulated to have a role in chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology. We tested the hypothesis that pristine SiNPs of the size present in sugarcane might cause chronic kidney injury when administered through the lung in rats. We administered 200- or 300-nm amorphous SiNPs twice weekly (4 mg/dose), or vehicle by oropharyngeal aspiration for 13 wk to rats followed by euthanasia after an additional 13 wk (26 wk total). Tissues were evaluated for the presence of SiNPs and evidence of histological injury. Both sizes of SiNPs caused kidney damage, with early tubular injury and inflammation (at week 13) that continued to inflammation and chronic fibrosis at week 26 despite discontinuation of the SiNP administration. Both sizes of SiNPs caused local inflammation in the lung and kidney and were detected in the serum and urine at week 13, and the 200-nm particles were also localized to the kidney with no evidence of retention of the 300-nm particles. At week 26, there was some clearance of the 200-nm silica from the kidneys, and urinary levels of SiNPs were reduced but still significant in both 200- and 300 nm-exposed rats. In conclusion, inhaled SiNPs cause chronic kidney injury that progresses despite stopping the SiNP administration. These findings support the hypothesis that human exposure to amorphous silica nanoparticles found in burned sugarcane fields could have a participatory role in chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Inhalation of silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) released during the burning of sugarcane has been postulated to have a role in chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology (CKDu). We administered 200- and 300-nm amorphous SiNPs to rats by aspiration and observed kidney damage with tubular injury and inflammation that persisted even after stopping the SiNP exposure. These findings support the hypothesis that human exposure to SiNPs found in sugarcane ash could have a participatory role CKDu.

Multisegment Foot Kinematic and Kinetic Compensations in Level and Uphill Walking Following Tibiotalar Arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: Foot and ankle movement alterations following ankle arthrodesis are still not well understood, particularly those that might contribute to the documented increase in adjacent joint arthritis. Generalized tarsal hypermobility has long been postulated, but not confirmed in gait or functional movements. The purpose of this study was to more thoroughly evaluate compensation mechanisms used by arthrodesis patients during level and uphill gait through a variety of measurement modalities and a detailed breakdown of gait phases. METHODS: Level ground and uphill gait of 14 unilateral tibiotalar arthrodesis patients and 14 matched controls was analyzed using motion capture, force, and pressure measurements in conjunction with a kinetic multisegment foot model. RESULTS: The affected limb exhibited several marked differences compared to the controls and to the unaffected limb. In loading response, ankle eversion was reduced but without a reduction in tibial rotation. During the second rocker, ankle dorsiflexion was reduced, yet was still considerable, suggesting compensatory talar articulation (subtalar and talonavicular) motion since no differences were seen at the midtarsal joint. Also during the second rocker, subjects abnormally internally rotated the tibia while moving their center of pressure laterally. Third rocker plantarflexion motion, moments, and powers were substantially reduced on the affected side and to a lesser extent on the unaffected side. CONCLUSION: Sagittal plane hypermobility is probable during the second rocker in the talar articulations following tibiotalar fusion, but is unlikely in other midfoot joints. The normal coupling between frontal plane hindfoot motion and tibial rotation in early and mid stance was also clearly disrupted. These alterations reflect a complex compensatory movement pattern that undoubtedly affects the function of arthrodesis patients, likely alters the arthrokinematics of the talar joints (which may be a mechanism for arthritis development), and should be considered in future arthrodesis as well as arthroplasty research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative study.