Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Ann Transl Med ; 11(5): 192, 2023 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37007579

RESUMEN

Background: The proposed definition of septic shock in the Sepsis-3 consensus statement has been previously validated in critically ill patients. However, the subset of critically ill patients with sepsis and positive blood cultures needs further evaluation. To compare the combined (old and new septic shock) versus old definition of septic shock in sepsis patients that have positive blood cultures and are critically ill. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients (age ≥18 years), who had evidence of positive blood cultures, requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission at a large tertiary care academic center from January 2009 through October 2015. Eligible subjects who opted out of research participation, those requiring intensive care admission after elective surgery, and those who were deemed to have a low probability of infection were excluded. Basic demographics data, clinical and laboratory parameters, and outcomes of interest were pulled from the validated institutional database/repository and contrasted between the patients who qualified the new and old definitions criteria (combined) of septic shock versus the group meeting the old septic shock criteria only. Results: We included a total of 477 patients in the final analysis who qualified for old and new septic shock definitions. For the entire cohort, median age was 65.6 (IQR, 55-75) years, with male predominance (N=258, 54%). When compared to patients in the group who only met the old definition (N=206), the patients who met the combined (new or both new and old, N=271) definition had a higher APACHE III scores, 92 (IQR, 76-112) vs. 76 (IQR, 61-95), P<0.001; a higher SOFA day-1 score of 10 (IQR, 8-13) vs. 7 (IQR, 4-10), P<0.001, but did not differ significantly in age 65.5 years (IQR, 55-74) vs. 66 years (IQR, 55-76) years, P=0.47. The patients who met the combined (new or both new and old) definition had higher chances of having conservative resuscitation preferences (DNI/DNR); 77 (28.4) vs. 22 (10.7), P<0.001. The same group also had worse outcomes in terms of hospital mortality (34.3% vs. 18%, P<0.001) and standardized mortality ratio (0.76 vs. 0.52, P<0.04). Conclusions: In patients with sepsis with positive blood cultures, the group of patients meeting the combined definition (new or both new and old) have higher severity of illness, higher mortality, and a worse standardized mortality ratio as compared to patients meeting the old definition of septic shock.

2.
JACC Case Rep ; 4(15): 982-986, 2022 Aug 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35935150

RESUMEN

Mechanical circulatory support devices are used to offer short-term support for patients with cardiogenic shock. However, these devices are not without complications, and the risk and management of each must be closely considered. We discuss an infrequent complication of the percutaneous right heart pump and review complications reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

3.
Crit Care Med ; 48(7): 985-992, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32304413

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Critically ill surgical patients may receive concomitant aspirin and therapeutic anticoagulation postoperatively, yet the safety of this practice remains unknown. We evaluated the risk of major bleeding with concomitant therapy compared with anticoagulation alone. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to assess the association between concomitant therapy and a primary outcome of major bleeding. SETTING: Postoperative ICUs at an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adults (≥ 18 yr old) receiving anticoagulation during postoperative ICU admission between 2007 and 2016. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Nine thousand five hundred eighteen anticoagulated patients were included, including 3,237 (34%) receiving aspirin. A total of 1,874 unique patients (19.7%) experienced a major bleeding event. In inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses, concomitant therapy was associated with increased odds for major bleeding (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05-1.36; p = 0.006) compared with anticoagulation alone. An interaction test suggested a differential relationship between aspirin use and major bleeding based on aspirin use in the 7 days prior to anticoagulation, such that a strong association between aspirin and major bleeding was observed for recent initiators of aspirin (1.40; 1.13-1.72;p = 0.002) but not for those continuing prior aspirin use. Aspirin use prior to anticoagulation did not modify the relationship between concomitant therapy and new myocardial infarction or stroke (i.e., rates were not increased with aspirin discontinuation prior to anticoagulation). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant aspirin and anticoagulation in critically ill surgical patients was associated with an increased rate of major bleeding. Future investigations are warranted to further define optimal management of antiplatelet therapy during anticoagulation in surgical patients.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Hemorragia/etiología , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Crit Care ; 58: 34-40, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32335493

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the risk of major bleeding in non-surgical critically ill patients who received aspirin in conjunction with therapeutic anticoagulation (concomitant therapy) compared to those who received therapeutic anticoagulation alone. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients initiated on therapeutic anticoagulation at a large academic medical center from 2007 to 2016. The exposure of interest was aspirin therapy during anticoagulation. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, hospital free days, and new myocardial infarction or stroke. RESULTS: 5507 (73.2%) patients received anticoagulation alone and 2014 (26.8%) received concomitant therapy; major bleeding occurred in 19.0% and 22.2%, respectively. There was no increased risk of major bleeding [OR 1.10 (95% CI: 0.93-1.30); p = .27] or mortality [OR 0.93 (95% CI: 0.77-1.11); p = .43] with concomitant therapy. Patients receiving concomitant therapy had fewer hospital-free days (mean decrease of 0.73 [1.36, 0.09]; p = .03) and were more likely to experience new myocardial infarction or stroke [OR 2.61 (95% CI: 1.72-3.98); p < .001]. CONCLUSIONS: In non-surgical critically ill patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation, concomitant use of aspirin was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding or in-hospital mortality.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Quimioterapia Combinada , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York/epidemiología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
5.
Clin Res Cardiol ; 109(5): 616-627, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31535171

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anemia and elevated red cell distribution width (RDW) or mean corpuscular volume (MCV) are associated with an adverse prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disease and critical illness. Limited data exist regarding these associations in unselected cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of CICU patients between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015, with a hemoglobin (Hb) level measured at admission. Multivariable regression was performed to determine predictors of hospital mortality, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine post-discharge survival. RESULTS: We included 9644 patients with a mean age of 67.5 ± 15.1 years, including 3604 (37.4%) females. The median (IQR) values of Hb, MCV and RDW were 12.2 g/dL (10.6, 13.7), 90.7 fL (87.3, 94.2) fL, and 14.1% (13.3, 15.8), respectively. Anemia (admission Hb < 12 g/dL) was present in 4434 (46%) patients. A total of 845 (8.8%) patients died in the hospital. Patients with anemia had higher hospital mortality (11.3% vs. 6.6%, unadjusted OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.58-2.10, p < 0.001). After multivariable regression, admission Hb and MCV were not significantly associated with hospital mortality (both p > 0.1), while admission RDW (adjusted OR 1.12 per 1%, 95% CI 1.07-1.18, p < 0.001) was significantly associated with hospital mortality. Hospital survivors with lower Hb, higher MCV, or higher RDW had lower post-discharge survival. CONCLUSION: Elevated RDW on admission was independently associated with higher hospital mortality in CICU patients. These data emphasize the importance of hematologic abnormalities for mortality risk stratification in CICU populations.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/sangre , Anemia/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/sangre , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Cuidados Críticos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Índices de Eritrocitos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
6.
J Crit Care ; 50: 269-274, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30660915

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The newly proposed septic shock definition has provoked a substantial controversy in the emergency and critical care communities. We aim to compare new (SEPSIS-III) versus old (SEPSIS-II) definitions for septic shock in a contemporary cohort of critically ill patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort of consecutive patients, age ≥ 18 years admitted to intensive care units at the Mayo Clinic between January 2009 and October 2015. We compared patients who met old, new, both, or neither definition of sepsis shock. SMR were calculated using APACHE IV predicted mortality. RESULTS: The initial cohort consisted of 16,720 patients who had suspicion of infection, 7463 required vasopressor support. The median (IQR) age was 65(54-75) years and 4167(55.8%) were male. Compared to patients with old definition, the patients with new definition had higher APACHE III score (median IQR); (73 (57-92) vs. 70 (56-89), p < .01); SOFA score; (6 (4-10) vs. 6 (4-9), p < .01), were older (70 (59-79) vs. 64 (54-74) years, p = .03). They also had higher hospital mortality, N (%) 71, (19.7%) vs. 40 (12.6%), p < .01) and a higher SMR (0.66 vs. 0.45, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to SEPSIS-II, SEPSIS-III definition of septic shock identifies patients further along disease trajectory with higher likelihood of poor outcome.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Enfermedad Crítica/clasificación , Choque Séptico/clasificación , APACHE , Anciano , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Séptico/mortalidad
7.
J Intensive Care Med ; 34(2): 87-93, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29552957

RESUMEN

The data on speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) in patients with sepsis are limited. This systematic review from 1975 to 2016 included studies in adults and children evaluating cardiovascular dysfunction in sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock utilizing STE for systolic global longitudinal strain (GLS). The primary outcome was short- or long-term mortality. Given the significant methodological and statistical differences between published studies, combining the data using meta-analysis methods was not appropriate. A total of 120 studies were identified, with 5 studies (561 patients) included in the final analysis. All studies were prospective observational studies using the 2001 criteria for defining sepsis. Three studies demonstrated worse systolic GLS to be associated with higher mortality, whereas 2 did not show a statistically significant association. Various cutoffs between -10% and -17% were used to define abnormal GLS across studies. This systematic review revealed that STE may predict mortality in patients with sepsis; however, the strength of evidence is low due to heterogeneity in study populations, GLS technologies, cutoffs, and timing of STE. Further dedicated studies are needed to understand the optimal application of STE in patients with sepsis.


Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía/métodos , Sepsis/diagnóstico por imagen , Sepsis/mortalidad , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Sepsis/fisiopatología , Choque Séptico/mortalidad
8.
J Intensive Care Med ; 33(11): 635-644, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27913775

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The role of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is less understood in the risk stratification of patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), especially in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: This retrospective study from 2008 to 2012 evaluated all adult patients with AECOPD having BNP levels and available echocardiographic data demonstrating LVEF ≥40%. The patients were divided into groups 1, 2, and 3 with BNP ≤ 100, 101 to 500, and ≥501 pg/mL, respectively. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients without renal dysfunction. Outcomes included need for and duration of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and mechanical ventilation (MV), NIV failure, reintubation at 48 hours, intensive care unit (ICU) and total length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality. Two-tailed P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the total 1145 patients, 550 (48.0%) met our inclusion criteria (age 65.1 ± 12.2 years; 271 [49.3%] males). Groups 1, 2, and 3 had 214, 216, and 120 patients each, respectively, with higher comorbidities and worse biventricular function in higher categories. Higher BNP values were associated with higher MV use, NIV failure, MV duration, and ICU and total LOS. On multivariate analysis, BNP was an independent predictor of higher NIV and MV use, NIV failure, NIV and MV duration, and total LOS in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1. B-type natriuretic peptide continued to demonstrate positive correlation with NIV and MV duration and ICU and total LOS independent of renal function in a subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: Elevated admission BNP in patients with AECOPD and normal LVEF is associated with worse in-hospital outcomes and can be used to risk-stratify these patients.


Asunto(s)
Péptido Natriurético Encefálico/sangre , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/sangre , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Cuidados Críticos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ventilación no Invasiva , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Tiempo
9.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 38(6): 740-742, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28294090

RESUMEN

A nonrandomized, retrospective comparison of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia between an academic hospital setting (n=53) and a community hospital setting (n=245) within a single healthcare system was performed. Despite infectious disease consultations, S. aureus bacteremia management recommendations based on Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines were not followed as closely in the community hospital setting. The community hospital setting requires management standardization for patients with S. aureus bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:740-742.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adhesión a Directriz , Hospitales Comunitarios , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/complicaciones , Cultivo de Sangre , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico por imagen , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/complicaciones
10.
COPD ; 13(6): 712-717, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27379826

RESUMEN

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is associated with worse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, its role in an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) has not been reported. This was a retrospective cohort study during 2008-2012 at an academic medical center. AECOPD patients >18 years with available echocardiographic data were included. LVH was defined as LV mass index (LVMI) >95 g/m2 (women) and >115g/m2 (men). Relative wall thickness was used to classify LVH as concentric (>0.42) or eccentric (<0.42). Outcomes included need for and duration of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and mechanical ventilation (MV), NIV failure, intensive care unit (ICU) and total length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality. Two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Of 802 patients with AECOPD, 615 patients with 264 (42.9%) having LVH were included. The LVH cohort had higher LVMI (141.1 ± 39.4 g/m2 vs. 79.7 ± 19.1 g/m2; p < 0.001) and lower LV ejection fraction (44.5±21.9% vs. 50.0±21.6%; p ≤ 0.001). The LVH cohort had statistically non-significant longer ICU LOS, and higher NIV and MV use and duration. Of the 264 LVH patients, concentric LVH (198; 75.0%) was predictive of greater NIV use [82 (41.4%) vs. 16 (24.2%), p = 0.01] and duration (1.0 ± 1.9 vs. 0.6 ± 1.4 days, p = 0.01) compared to eccentric LVH. Concentric LVH remained independently associated with NIV use and duration. In-hospital outcomes in patients with AECOPD were comparable in patients with and without LVH. Patients with concentric LVH had higher NIV need and duration in comparison to eccentric LVH.


Asunto(s)
Progresión de la Enfermedad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/complicaciones , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Intubación Intratraqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ventilación no Invasiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Volumen Sistólico , Factores de Tiempo
11.
Case Rep Med ; 2015: 467935, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26379711

RESUMEN

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SOVA) is a rare clinical entity. Clinical manifestations can vary from an incidental finding on an imaging study to a life-threatening emergency. We report a case of a 51-year-old female with a large symptomatic left SOVA. Echocardiogram and computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest revealed marked dilatation of the left sinus of Valsalva, measuring 7.5 cm. This resulted in superior displacement of the left main coronary artery. Surgical repair of the aneurysm with reimplantation of the right and left coronary arteries was performed in addition to aortic valve replacement (Bentall procedure). The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and remains asymptomatic at the three-month follow-up visit.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...