Postoperative analgesic options after spine surgery: finding the optimal treatment strategies.

INTRODUCTION: Spine surgery is one of the most common types of surgeries performed in the United States; however, managing postoperative pain following spine surgery has proven to be challenging. Patients with spine pathologies have higher incidences of chronic pain and resultant opioid use and potential for tolerance. Implementing a multimodal plan for postoperative analgesia after spine surgery can lead to enhanced recovery and outcomes. AREAS COVERED: This review presents several options for analgesia following spine surgery with an emphasis on multimodal techniques to best aid this specific patient population. In addition to traditional therapeutics, such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and opioids, we discuss intrathecal morphine administration and emerging regional anesthesia techniques. EXPERT OPINION: Several adjuncts to improve analgesia following spine surgery are efficacious in the postoperative period. Intrathecal morphine provides sustained analgesia and can be instilled intraoperatively by the surgical team under direct visualization. Local anesthetics deposited under ultrasound guidance by an anesthesiologist trained in regional techniques also provide the opportunity for single injections or continuous analgesia via an indwelling catheter.

Implementation of a Frailty Assessment and Targeted Care Interventions and Its Association with Reduced Postoperative Complications in Elderly Surgical Patients.

BACKGROUND: Older patients with frailty syndrome have a greater risk of poor postoperative outcomes. In this study, we used a RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework to implement an assessment tool to identify frail patients and targeted interventions to improve their outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We implemented a 5-question frailty assessment tool for patients 65 years and older admitted to the general and vascular surgery services from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. Identified frail patients received evidence-based clinical orders and nursing care plan interventions tailored to optimize recovery. A RE-AIM framework was used to assess implementation effectiveness through provider and nurse surveys, floor audits, and chart review. RESULTS: Of 1,158 patients included in this study, 696 (60.1%) were assessed for frailty. Among these, 611 patients (87.8%) scored as frail or intermediately frail. After implementation, there were significant increases in the completion rates of frailty-specific care orders for frail patients, including delirium precautions (52.1% vs 30.7%; p < 0.001), aspiration precautions (50.0% vs 26.9%; p < 0.001), and avoidance of overnight vitals (32.5% vs 0%). Floor audits, however, showed high variability in completion of care plan components by nursing staff. Multivariate analysis showed significant decreases in 30-day complication rates (odds ratio 0.532; p < 0.001) after implementation. CONCLUSIONS: A frailty assessment was able to identify elderly patients for provision of targeted, evidence-based frailty care. Despite limited uptake of the assessment by providers and completion of care plan components by nursing staff, implementation of the assessment and care interventions was associated with substantial decreases in complications among elderly surgical patients.

Loss to Follow-Up After Newborn Hearing Screening: Analysis of Risk Factors at a Massachusetts Urban Safety-Net Hospital.

OBJECTIVES: This study examines the unique factors that influence loss to follow-up after newborn hearing screening for patients at a Massachusetts urban safety-net hospital. We seek to characterize our patient population, investigate correlations between patient factors and rates of follow-up, and understand gaps in care. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients born at an urban safety-net hospital from January 2015 through May 2018 who did not pass the newborn hearing screening in one or both ears. A total of 197 infants were included in our study. Outcomes of interest included rates and latency of follow-up appointments, infant demographics (sex, race, birth weight, risk factors for hearing loss), and maternal factors (age, marital status, smoking status, number of children). RESULTS: From January 2015 through May 2018, 17% (n = 34) of infants were lost to follow-up. Of those who attended an initial audiology evaluation, the median time between screening and appointment was 29 days. Newborns were 3.5 times at risk of being lost to follow-up if their mothers smoked during pregnancy compared to those whose mothers did not smoke. Further, newborns with multiple siblings in the home were less likely to utilize any audiological services. High-risk infants, such as those with an extended stay in the neonatal intensive care unit, were found to have higher rates of loss to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that patients at urban safety-net hospitals require increased support to decrease rates of loss to follow-up. In particular, strategies to aid mothers who smoke, have multiple children, or have high-risk infants can address gaps in care for newborns after hearing screening.

Prevalence and natural history of obstructive sleep apnea in pediatric patients with laryngomalacia.

OBJECTIVE: Laryngomalacia is the most common cause of infant stridor, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is sometimes found concurrently in patients with laryngomalacia. OSA has been shown to improve after surgical treatment of laryngomalacia, but the majority of laryngomalacia patients have spontaneous resolution of symptoms. It is unknown whether their comorbid OSA also resolves. This study seeks to define the incidence of OSA in laryngomalacia and assess for resolution of OSA with polysomnography data. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care academic medical center. All pediatric patients with diagnoses of laryngomalacia or stridor were reviewed, and patients with laryngomalacia confirmed by Otolaryngologist exam were included. All patients with laryngomalacia were recommended to undergo polysomnography. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients had laryngomalacia confirmed by an Otolaryngologist. Of those patients, 56 completed a polysomnogram, and 44 (79%) were diagnosed with OSA. Among the OSA patients, 34 had no surgery, 5 underwent supraglottoplasty, and 5 underwent adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy. Follow-up polysomnograms were performed for 9 non-surgical patients, 4 supraglottoplasty patients, and 4 adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy patients. Mean change in AHI was -2.81 without surgery, -8.18 after supraglottoplasty, and -2.94 after adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy. CONCLUSION: OSA is often present in patients who have laryngomalacia, and the proportion in this population was higher than previous reports. The only significant predictor for obstructive sleep apnea was race, specifically Black/African American. Among patients with follow-up polysomnograms, the largest OSA improvement was in supraglottoplasty patients, but all patients improved.

Readability of online patient education materials for parents after a failed newborn hearing screen.

OBJECTIVE: A cross-sectional study design was utilized to evaluate the readability of patient education materials on the newborn hearing screen from Google and major institutions. METHODS: The top 55 websites from the Google search "failed newborn hearing screen" and websites from major institutions (the U.S. News & World Report ranked top 10 children's hospitals, the top 5 pediatric otolaryngology fellowships as ranked by Doximity Residency Navigator, the Centers for Disease and Control, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery) were compiled. Text from each website was edited to remove extraneous text. Readability grade was calculated using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Flesch Reading Ease Score, Gunning-Fog Index (GFI), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Coleman-Liau Index, and Automated Readability Index. Intra- and inter-observer reliability were assessed. RESULTS: 26 websites from Google and 29 websites from major institutions were evaluated. From Google, provider-oriented websites (n = 2) were more difficult to read than patient-oriented websites (n = 24) with statistical significance for FKGL (p < 0.001), GFI (p < 0.013) and SMOG (p < 0.001). From the major institutions, more than half were at a reading level that exceeded the average American adult with an average FKGL 9.71 ±â€¯2.69. Intra- and inter-observer reliability were both excellent with an intra-class correlation coefficient for each readability tool ≥0.950 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Online patient education materials about the newborn hearing screen may be too difficult for the average reader. Revisions to these materials and redirection to more readable online resources may be necessary to benefit a more inclusive patient population.