Diagnostic Utility of QuantiFERON-Gold Testing in Patients with Ocular Inflammation in a Low-Endemic Tuberculosis Region.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of QuantiFERON Gold (QFT-G) testing for ocular inflammation in a low prevalence tuberculosis (TB) area. DESIGN: Diagnostic utility analysis. METHODS: A review was performed for all uveitis patients who underwent QFT-G testing at the University of Colorado Eye Center from 2009 to 2022. Records were reviewed to assess QFT-G positivity rate and to identify which patients were tested for diagnostic purposes, defined as meeting the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria for tubercular uveitis (TBU): anterior uveitis with iris nodules, serpiginous-like choroiditis, choroidal nodule resembling a tuberculoma, multifocal choroiditis, or occlusive retinal vasculitis. RESULTS: A total of 388 patients with uveitis underwent QFT-G testing, of which 17 (4.38%) were positive. Only one (5.88%) patient had true TBU with anterior uveitis with iris nodules. The remaining 16 (94.1%) patients did not meet SUN criteria for TBU and were incidentally found to be QFT-G positive during laboratory work-up prior to immunosuppression. The positive predictive value was 100% when QFT-G testing was performed in patients who met SUN criteria for TBU, whereas the positive predictive value was 0% for QFT-G testing performed in patients who did not meet SUN criteria for TBU. CONCLUSION: In low prevalence areas, the majority of QFT-G positive tests in uveitis patients are coincidental and unrelated to their uveitic disease process. The diagnostic value of a TB test is likely to be minimal unless the SUN clinical criteria for tubercular uveitis are met.

Optimizing sexual reproductive health of men and women with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review.

This systematic review summarizes the impact of cystic fibrosis (CF) on sexual and reproductive health (SRH) in males and females, covering pubertal development, hormonal function, family planning, and fertility. Included articles featured historical CF diagnostic criteria, preclinical or clinical data (retrospective cohorts or open label trials), while excluded articles lacked full text availability, explicit methodology, or comparisons between CF and non-CF patients. Genotype differences in CFTR mutations influenced symptom severity. Males with CF experienced delayed puberty, hypogonadism, infertility from obstructive azoospermia, and semen parameter issues. Female CF patients showed decreased fertility, possibly linked to disrupted ionic balance and ovarian cystic disease. Assistive reproductive technologies addressed fertility issues, but success varied based on disease severity and genotype. CFTR modulators aided pulmonary function and sexual health but require further assessment for fertility benefits.

Risk factors for failing sub-Tenon's triamcinolone acetonide for uveitic macular edema.

BACKGROUND: Sub-Tenon's triamcinolone acetonide (STA) is less effective than intravitreal corticosteroids in the treatment of uveitic macular edema (ME), but does have some relative advantages, including substantially lower cost and decreased risk of post-injection ocular hypertension. It would be useful for clinicians to know which eyes may respond well to STA and not necessarily require intravitreal therapy. The objective of this study is to identify risk factors for failing STA for the treatment of uveitic ME. MAIN BODY: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Medical records were reviewed of patients who underwent STA for the treatment of uveitic ME between January 1, 2013, and July 31, 2022, at the University of Colorado Hospital. Uveitic ME was defined by a central subfield thickness (CST) greater than 320 µm or the presence of intra-retinal cystoid spaces on optical coherence tomography (OCT), or by the presence of petaloid macular leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA). Data collected included age, race/ethnicity, sex, history of diabetes mellitus, anatomic classification of uveitis, use of corticosteroids, use of immunomodulatory therapy, presence of intra-retinal fluid on OCT, CST on OCT, and presence of petaloid macular leakage on FA. STA failure was defined as the need for additional therapy within 12 weeks of STA due to persistent or worsening uveitic ME. One hundred eighty eyes from 131 patients were included. Forty-two eyes (23.3%) were considered treatment failures. In univariate and multivariable analysis, higher baseline CST was associated with a higher likelihood of failing STA (OR 1.17 for each 30 µm increase in CST, P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: STA, while not as potent as intravitreal corticosteroids for the treatment of uveitic ME, was still an effective therapy, particularly for patients with lower baseline CST. Given its lower side effect profile and cost compared to intravitreal treatments, clinicians could consider STA as an initial treatment for mild uveitic ME.

Uveitis in the Setting of Co-Existing Systemic Sarcoidosis and Multiple Sclerosis.

We report a case of intermediate uveitis in the setting of both systemic sarcoidosis and multiple sclerosis. A 68-year-old female was diagnosed with bilateral granulomatous intermediate uveitis and cystoid macular edema. Initial systemic work-up was unrevealing. The uveitis was treated successfully with local corticosteroid injections. Eighteen months after presentation, the patient developed new systemic symptoms. Additional testing revealed systemic lymphadenopathy, with biopsy showing non-caseating granulomas, leading to a diagnosis of sarcoidosis. However, MRI of the brain and spinal cord along with cerebrospinal fluid analysis was consistent with MS. The management of the uveitis and systemic inflammation was co-managed by ophthalmology, neurology, and rheumatology, and eventually controlled with leflunomide and rituximab. Patients can rarely have co-existing systemic sarcoidosis and multiple sclerosis. Although challenging to diagnose, radiographic findings and cerebrospinal fluid analysis can be helpful to differentiate multiple sclerosis and neurosarcoidosis. Management of these patients requires coordination between multiple specialties.

Corticosteroid implants for chronic non-infectious uveitis.

BACKGROUND: Uveitis is a term used to describe a group of intraocular inflammatory diseases. Uveitis is the fifth most common cause of vision loss in high-income countries, with the highest incidence of disease in the working-age population. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for all subtypes of non-infectious uveitis. They can be administered orally, topically with drops, by periocular (around the eye) or intravitreal (inside the eye) injection, or by surgical implantation. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of steroid implants in people with chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, and panuveitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase, PubMed, LILACS, and three trials registries to November 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials comparing either fluocinolone acetonide (FA) or dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implants with standard-of-care therapy or sham procedures, with at least six months of follow-up after treatment. We included studies that enrolled participants of all ages, who had chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, or panuveitis with vision that was better than hand-motion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We applied standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS: We included data from four trials (683 participants, 907 eyes) that compared corticosteroid implants with either sham or standard-of-care therapy. Study characteristics and risk of bias Of the two trials that compared corticosteroid implants with sham procedure, one examined a 0.18 mg FA implant, and the other, a 0.7 mg DEX implant. The other two trials compared a 0.59 mg FA implant with standard-of-care therapy, which included systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive medications, if needed. Considering improvement in visual acuity, we assessed the four trials to be at either low risk, or with some concerns of risk of bias across all domains. Findings Using sham procedure as control, combined results at the six-month primary time point suggested that corticosteroid implants may decrease the risk of uveitis recurrence by 60% (relative risk [RR] 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30 to 0.54; 2 trials, 282 participants; low-certainty evidence); and lead to a greater improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; mean difference [MD] 0.15 logMAR, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.24; 1 trial, 153 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence based on a single-study report (146 participants) suggested that steroid implants may have no effects on visual functioning quality of life, measured on the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (MD 2.85, 95%CI -3.64 to 9.34; 1 trial, 146 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Using standard-of care therapy as control, combined estimates at the 24-month primary time point suggested that corticosteroid implants were likely to decrease the risk of recurrence of uveitis by 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.60; 2 trials, 619 eyes). Combined estimates at 24 months also suggested that steroid implants may have little to no effects on improving BCVA (MD 0.05 logMAR, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.12; 2 trials, 619 eyes; low-certainty evidence). Evidence based on a single-study report (232 participants) suggested that steroid implants may have minimal clinical effects on visual functioning (MD 4.64, 95% CI 0.13 to 9.15; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); physical functioning (SF-36 physical subscale MD 2.95, 95% CI 0.55 to 5.35; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); or mental health (SF-36 mental subscale MD 3.65, 95% CI 0.52 to 6.78; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); but not on EuroQoL (MD 6.17, 95% CI 1.87 to 10.47; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); or EuroQoL-5D scale (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.08; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse effects Compared with sham procedures, corticosteroid implants may slightly increase the risk of cataract formation (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.17 to 6.18; 1 trial, 90 eyes; low-certainty evidence), but not the risk of cataract progression (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.65 to 6.12; 1 trial, 117 eyes; low-certainty evidence); or the need for surgery (RR 2.98, 95% CI 0.82 to 10.81; 1 trial, 180 eyes; low-certainty evidence), during up to 12 months of follow-up. These implants may increase the risk of elevated intraocular pressure ([IOP] RR 2.81, 95% CI 1.42 to 5.56; 2 trials, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); and the need for IOP-lowering eyedrops (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.25; 2 trials, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); but not the need for IOP-lowering surgery (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.13 to 4.17; 2 trials, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Evidence comparing the 0.59 mg FA implant with standard-of-care suggested that the implant may increase the risk of cataract progression (RR 2.71, 95% CI 2.06 to 3.56; 2 trials, 210 eyes; low-certainty evidence); and the need for surgery (RR 2.98, 95% CI 2.33 to 3.79; 2 trials, 371 eyes; low-certainty evidence); along with the risk of elevated IOP (RR 3.64, 95% CI 2.71 to 4.87; 2 trials, 605 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence); and the need for medical (RR 3.04, 95% CI 2.36 to 3.91; 2 trials, 544 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence); or surgical interventions (RR 5.43, 95% CI 3.12 to 9.45; 2 trials, 599 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). In either comparison, these implants did not increase the risk for endophthalmitis, retinal tear, or retinal detachment (moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our confidence is limited that local corticosteroid implants are superior to sham therapy or standard-of-care therapy in reducing the risk of uveitis recurrence. We demonstrated different effectiveness on BCVA relative to comparators in people with non-infectious uveitis. Nevertheless, the evidence suggests that these implants may increase the risk of cataract progression and IOP elevation, which will require interventions over time. To better understand the efficacy and safety profiles of corticosteroid implants, we need future trials that examine implants of different doses, used for different durations. The trials should measure core standard outcomes that are universally defined, and measured at comparable follow-up time points.

Cataract Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Non-ocular Autoimmune Disease.

INTRODUCTION: While phacoemulsification cataract extraction is generally highly effective and safe, patients with a history of uveitis are at higher risk for postoperative complications and often require a modified perioperative medication regimen. No data exists on risks of postoperative complications and persistent anterior uveitis (PAU) in patients with non-ocular autoimmune disease. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed of patients who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019 at the University of Colorado Hospital (UCH) as part of a retrospective cohort study. Exclusion criteria included patient history of ocular inflammation and cataract surgery combined with another intraocular surgery. Patients were only included as having autoimmune disease if the diagnosis was confirmed by a relevant specialist at UCH. Patients with autoimmune disease were then stratified into systemic versus organ-specific autoimmune disease, and patients with systemic autoimmune disease were further stratified into immunosuppressed and not immunosuppressed at the time of cataract surgery. Patients with PAU were identified according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Working Group. Data including sex, race/ethnicity, intraoperative cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 422 eyes from 248 patients had confirmed autoimmune disease, compared to a control group of 10,201 eyes. The autoimmune and systemic autoimmune disease groups were not more likely to have postoperative complications or PAU compared to the control group. Immunosuppression status among the systemic autoimmune disease group was also not associated with postoperative complications or PAU. CONCLUSION: Patients with non-ocular autoimmune disease do not appear to be at higher risk for postoperative complications, including worse BCVA or increased rates of IOP elevation and PAU, following phacoemulsification cataract surgery. These patients do not appear to require modification of the typical perioperative medication regimen.

Risk of failing both methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil from the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial.

BACKGROUND: The antimetabolites methotrexate (MTX) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are commonly used as initial corticosteroid-sparing treatment for uveitis. There is little data examining risk factors for failing both MTX and MMF. The objective of this study is to determine risk factors for failing both MTX and MMF in patients with non-infectious uveitis. MAIN BODY: This is a sub-analysis of the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial, which was an international, multicenter, block-randomized, observer-masked, comparative effectiveness trial comparing MTX and MMF as initial treatments for non-infectious uveitis. This study was undertaken at multiple referral centers in India, the United States, Australia, Saudi Arabia and Mexico between 2013 and 2017. A total of 137 patients who completed all 12 months of follow-up from the FAST trial, were included in this study. The primary outcome was failing both antimetabolites over the 12 months of the trial. Potential predictors included: age, sex, bilateral involvement, anatomic location of the uveitis, presence of cystoid macular edema (CME) and retinal vasculitis at baseline visit, uveitis duration, and country/study sites as risk factors for failing both MTX and MMF. The presence of retinal vasculitis posterior to the equator on fluorescein angiogram was associated with failing both MTX and MMF. CONCLUSION: Retinal vasculitis may be a risk factor for failing multiple antimetabolites. Clinicians could consider more quickly advancing these patients to other medication classes, such as biologics.

Peyronie's Disease: An Outcomes-Based Guide to Non-Surgical and Novel Treatment Modalities.

The clinical landscape of Peyronie's disease is everchanging. There has been growing interest in non-invasive therapeutic options that could assist patients with achieving a meaningful reduction in penile curvature without surgical intervention. These therapies are wide-ranging in terms of their mechanisms of action, efficacies, and short- and long-term safety profiles. Recently, an abundance of outcomes literature on longstanding and novel non-surgical treatment modalities has been published. For sexual medicine providers hoping to offer patients the most up-to-date and evidence-based treatments for the management of Peyronie's disease, it can be challenging to gain a thorough understanding of this body of literature. In this clinical management review, the workup and current theories on the pathophysiology of Peyronie's disease are reviewed, and the most recent outcomes data on the currently available non-surgical treatment modalities are presented. With an accurate understanding of the current landscape of Peyronie's disease treatment, sexual health providers will be able to better evaluate and engage in evidence-based shared decision-making with their patients.

Corticosteroid implants for chronic non-infectious uveitis.

BACKGROUND: Uveitis is a term used to describe a group of intraocular inflammatory diseases. Uveitis is the fifth most common cause of vision loss in high-income countries, with the highest incidence of disease in the working-age population. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for all subtypes of non-infectious uveitis. They can be administered orally, topically with drops, by periocular (around the eye) or intravitreal (inside the eye) injection, or by surgical implantation. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of steroid implants in people with chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, and panuveitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase, PubMed, LILACS, and three trials registries to November 2021.  SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials comparing either fluocinolone acetonide (FA) or dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implants with standard-of-care therapy or sham procedures, with at least six months of follow-up after treatment. We included studies that enrolled participants of all ages, who had chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, or panuveitis with vision that was better than hand-motion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We applied standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS: We included data from four trials (683 participants, 907 eyes) that compared corticosteroid implants with either sham or standard-of-care therapy. Study characteristics and risk of bias Of the two trials that compared corticosteroid implants with sham procedure, one examined a 0.18 mg FA implant, and the other, a 0.7 mg DEX implant. The other two trials compared a 0.59 mg FA implant with standard-of-care therapy, which included systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive medications, if needed. We assessed the four trials to be at either low risk, or with some concerns of risk of bias across all domains. Findings Using sham procedure as control, combined results at the six-month primary time point suggested that corticosteroid implants may decrease the risk of uveitis recurrence by 60% (relative risk [RR] 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30 to 0.54; 2 trials, 282 participants; low-certainty evidence); and lead to a greater improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; mean difference [MD] 0.22 logMAR, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.31; 1 trial, 153 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence based on a single-study report (146 participants) suggested that steroid implants may have no effects on visual functioning quality of life, measured on the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (MD 2.85, 95%CI -3.64 to 9.34; 1 trial, 146 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Using standard-of care therapy as control, combined estimates at the 24-month primary time point suggested that corticosteroid implants were likely to decrease the risk of recurrence of uveitis by 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.60; 2 trials, 619 eyes). Combined estimates at 24 months also suggested that steroid implants may have little to no effects on BCVA (MD 0.05 logMAR, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.12; 2 trials, 619 eyes; low-certainty evidence). Evidence based on a single-study report (232 participants) suggested that steroid implants may have minimal clinical effects on visual functioning (MD 4.64, 95% CI 0.13 to 9.15; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); physical functioning (SF-36 physical subscale MD 2.95, 95% CI 0.55 to 5.35; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); or mental health (SF-36 mental subscale MD 3.65, 95% CI 0.52 to 6.78; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); but not on EuroQoL (MD 6.17, 95% CI 1.87 to 10.47; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); or EuroQoL-5D scale (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.08; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse effects Compared with sham procedures, corticosteroid implants may slightly increase the risk of cataract formation (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.17 to 6.18; 1 trial, 90 eyes; low-certainty evidence), but not the risk of cataract progression (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.65 to 6.12; 1 trial, 117 eyes; low-certainty evidence); or the need for surgery (RR 2.98, 95% CI 0.82 to 10.81; 1 trial, 180 eyes; low-certainty evidence), during up to 12 months of follow-up. These implants may increase the risk of elevated intraocular pressure ([IOP] RR 2.81, 95% CI 1.42 to 5.56; 2 trials, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); and the need for IOP-lowering eyedrops (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.25; 2 trials, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); but not the need for IOP-lowering surgery (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.13 to 4.17; 2 trials, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).  Evidence comparing the 0.59 mg FA implant with standard-of-care suggested that the implant may increase the risk of cataract progression (RR 2.71, 95% CI 2.06 to 3.56; 2 trials, 210 eyes; low-certainty evidence); and the need for surgery (RR 2.98, 95% CI 2.33 to 3.79; 2 trials, 371 eyes; low-certainty evidence); along with the risk of elevated IOP (RR 3.64, 95% CI 2.71 to 4.87; 2 trials, 605 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence); and the need for medical (RR 3.04, 95% CI 2.36 to 3.91; 2 trials, 544 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence); or surgical interventions (RR 5.43, 95% CI 3.12 to 9.45; 2 trials, 599 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). In either comparison, these implants did not increase the risk for endophthalmitis, retinal tear, or retinal detachment (moderate-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our confidence is limited that local corticosteroid implants are superior to sham therapy or standard-of-care therapy in reducing the risk of uveitis recurrence. We demonstrated different effectiveness on BCVA relative to comparators in people with non-infectious uveitis. Nevertheless, the evidence suggests that these implants may increase the risk of cataract progression and IOP elevation, which will require interventions over time.  To better understand the efficacy and safety profiles of corticosteroid implants, we need future trials that examine implants of different doses, used for different durations. The trials should measure core standard outcomes that are universally defined, and measured at comparable follow-up time points.

Reduced Dose Methotrexate and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Noninfectious Uveitis: A Sub-Analysis from the First-Line Antimetabolites as Steroid Sparing Therapy (FAST) Trial.

PURPOSE: Some patients taking methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) experience intolerable side effects at full doses. We evaluated whether dose reduction affected treatment outcomes in uveitis patients. METHODS: Subanalysis of the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial. Patients were randomized to receive MTX (25 mg weekly) or MMF (3 g daily). A pre-specified dose reduction protocol could be employed for intolerable side effects. Primary analysis was performed at 6 months. RESULTS: 43/194 patients (22%) required dose reduction. 88/151 patients (58%) on maximum doses and 32/43 patients (74%) on reduced doses were deemed treatment successes at 6 months. The odds ratio point estimate (1.60, 95% CI 0.72-3.74) favored dose-reduction but this was not significant. Following reduction, adverse events improved at the subsequent study visit (79 events reduced to 63 events). CONCLUSION: Dose reduction of antimetabolites was not associated with worse outcomes in this subanalysis of a uveitis trial.

Single Institution Experience of Intravitreal 0.18-mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Noninfectious Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of the 0.18-mg fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAi) in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who received the 0.18-mg FAi for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment (NIU-PS) between July 1, 2019, and August 31, 2021, at the University of Colorado. Patients were excluded if they did not have ≥ 6 months of follow-up after the placement of the implant. METHODS: Data including age, race/ethnicity, sex, uveitis diagnosis, history and current use of anti-inflammatory therapy, use of short-acting corticosteroid injections within the 3 months before the 0.18-mg FAi implantation, visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), grading of anterior chamber and vitreous cell, and presence of cystoid macular edema were obtained from the medical charts. Uveitis recurrence was defined as any increased inflammation that required additional anti-inflammatory therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Probability of remaining recurrence-free after the placement of the 0.18-mg FAi. RESULTS: Sixty-four eyes from 42 patients were included. The overall probability of remaining recurrence-free was 68.8% at 6 months and 52.6% at the 12-month follow-up. Eyes that remained recurrence-free at 12 months had a younger mean age than eyes that had a recurrence within 12 months (P = 0.02). Eyes that received a short-acting corticosteroid injection before the 0.18-mg FAi were more likely to have a recurrence by 6 months of follow-up than eyes that did not receive a pre-FAi corticosteroid injection (P = 0.05). Initiation or addition of IOP-lowering eyedrops was required in 15.6% of eyes, and 4.7% of eyes required IOP-lowering surgery after 0.18-mg FAi placement. CONCLUSIONS: The 0.18-mg FAi appears to be an effective option in the management of NIU-PS, with relatively low rates of ocular hypertension requiring intervention. The use of short-acting corticosteroid injections before the placement of the 0.18-mg FAi does not seem to improve the effectiveness of the 0.18-mg FAi, although this may be partially because of selection bias. Additional studies are required to determine patients who are the optimal candidates for this therapy.

Testicular Core Extraction: Important Technique for Determining Sperm Retrieval Method in Non-obstructive Azoospermia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of preliminary testicular core extraction (TCE) as a tool for determining whether to pursue clinic testicular extraction (cTESE) versus microscopic testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) to minimize both financial burden and procedural complexity. METHODS: All men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) from 2018 to 2022 who underwent clinic TCE were analyzed. Patients who were found to have sperm on initial TCE were recommended cTESE. Patients who did not have sperm on initial TCE were recommended for mTESE. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of TCE were calculated. Cost reductions were determined based on this institution's fees. A nonparametric Wilcoxon test was performed to determine statistical significance between the results of the TCE sperm present and sperm absent groups. RESULTS: Of the 82 NOA patients undergoing TCE, 51 (62.2%) core biopsies were positive for sperm and 31 (37.8%) were negative for sperm. The SRR for 35 men who then underwent cTESE following sperm seen on TCE was 97.1%. The SRR for 8 men who underwent mTESE after no sperm was found on TCE was 75%. The positive predictive value of TCE for successful TESE result is 94.4% for men with NOA. Treatment success rate of TCE and cTESE was 79.1% with a cost reduction of 59.4%. CONCLUSION: TCE is a prognostic tool to guide decision making between cTESE and mTESE and maximize sperm retrieval rate while mitigating financial burden and operative complexity. TCE is important to identify ideal candidates for both procedures to maximize efficacy and safety amongst men with NOA.

Bilateral choroidal effusions and angle closure in the setting of systemic capillary leak syndrome from HLA-directed vaccine and pembrolizumab therapy for squamous cell carcinoma.

Purpose: Immunotherapy has become an important addition to oncology treatment plans in recent years. As these therapies become more widely employed, many unique side effects have been reported. In ophthalmology the most well-documented side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) include uveitis, macular edema and dry eye syndrome. This manuscript describes a rare case of bilateral choroidal effusions and secondary angle narrowing in the setting of systemic capillary leak syndrome (SCLS) from an HLA-directed vaccine and an ICI, pembrolizumab, for the treatment of stage IV squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung. Observations: A 67-year-old male with a history of stage IV SCC of the lung status-post pneumonectomy presented to the emergency department due to functional decline, anasarca, and dyspnea after receiving an HLA-directed vaccine in combination with pembrolizumab. Extensive workup revealed that his symptoms were secondary to SCLS. Ophthalmology was consulted due bilateral choroidal detachments seen on magnetic resonance imaging. B-scan ultrasound and ultrasound biomicroscopy revealed large, non-appositional choroidal effusions with anterior rotation of the ciliary body. Given minimal response to oral steroid therapy, sub-Tenon's triamcinolone acetonide, atropine, and intraocular pressure-lowering eyedrops were initiated with a good response. Conclusions and Importance: Choroidal effusions and secondary angle closure can be rare complications of SCLS in the setting of ICIs. Clinicians must be aware of the potentials side effects of ICI therapy, as these medications become more commonly used.

Ocular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article summarizes the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis and common ocular manifestations that it is associated with: keratoconjunctivitis sicca, episcleritis, scleritis, and peripheral ulcerative keratitis. RECENT FINDINGS: Newer biologic agents are being used to effectively treat rheumatoid arthritis and its ocular manifestations. SUMMARY: The eye is a frequent extra-articular site of inflammation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ocular involvement can range from more benign conditions such as keratoconjunctivitis sicca and episcleritis, to potentially vision and globe-threatening diseases like scleritis and peripheral ulcerative keratitis. Clinicians should be aware of these ophthalmic manifestations and the various treatment options that are available. Coordination between ophthalmology and rheumatology is helpful in the treatment of these patients.

Is urgent surgical management necessary for priapism in pediatric patients with hematologic conditions?

INTRODUCTION: Acute priapism is usually considered a medical emergency that warrants prompt urologic evaluation and treatment. Efforts have been made to determine the optimal management strategy for pediatric priapism. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess differences in conservative, minimally-invasive, and operative management of acute priapism in the pediatric population. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of pediatric patients with acute priapism from 2015 to 2021 at a single tertiary care children's hospital was conducted. Conservative, minimally-invasive, and operative approaches for the priapism episodes during these hospital encounters were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were identified with a total of 61 cases of acute pediatric priapism were evaluated in the study period. Eight-three percent of patients were African-Americans, and 72% of patients had a history of sickle cell disease. Oxygen therapy (P = 0.001) and hydration with intravenous fluids (P = 0.00318) were more commonly utilized for hematologic-associated cases compared to other etiologies. For priapism episodes of hematologic etiology, 18 (40.0%) and 18 (40.0%) patients received phenylephrine injection and aspiration/irrigation (e.g., minimally-invasive therapy), respectively, while for the other causes of priapism, three (18.8%) and four (25.0%) received phenylephrine injection and aspiration/irrigation (e.g., minimally-invasive), respectively. Conservative and minimally-invasive treatment resulted in complete resolution of priapism in 27 (60%) and 16 (35.5%) patients with hematologic-associated priapism while 12 (75%) and 1 (6.3%) patients with other etiologies had resolution of priapism with conservative and minimally-invasive treatment, respectively. One patient received shunting in the hematologic group while two patients received shunting in the non-hematologic group (P = 0.1031). DISCUSSION: Hematologic disorders are the most common causes of priapism in children and adolescents. An overwhelming majority of priapism events in the pediatric population can be managed with conservative therapies including oxygenation and intravenous hydration as well as minimally-invasive procedures such as corporal aspiration, irrigation and/or injections. The utilization of corporal shunting, anesthesia, and hospital resources is infrequently necessary for pediatric priapism episodes. CONCLUSION: While urgent surgical management is often performed in the adult population, a minimally-invasive management strategy can be implemented in the pediatric population where an extended period of conservative management that avoids operative management and general anesthesia is effective.

Bilateral anterior and intermediate uveitis in SARS-CoV-2 associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in a pediatric patient.

PURPOSE: To report a case of bilateral anterior intermediate uveitis after recovery from SARS-CoV-2 associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). CASE REPORT: A 9-year-old male presented with bilateral anterior intermediate uveitis with fluorescein angiography (FA) leakage of the disc and peripheral vasculature 1 month after recovery from MIS-C. He was treated with difluprednate 0.05% in both eyes with resolution of FA leakage, but our patient has required an extended treatment of topical therapy and the need long term immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: This is a case of uveitis presenting after recent MIS-C related to SARS-CoV-2. Ongoing follow up and monitoring is required, and it is important for the ophthalmologist and rheumatologist to be aware of this rare complication during the current COVID-19 pandemic.