Comparative study of mechanical vs. manual circumcision in the pediatric population: An alternative to the conventional technique? / Estudio comparativo entre circuncisión mecánica y manual en población pediátrica: ¿una alternativa a la técnica convencional?

OBJECTIVE: Circumcision is one of the most common surgical procedures in pediatric surgery. Even though manual suture (MANS) is regarded as the gold standard technique, easy-to-use mechanical suture (MECS) devices have been recently developed, with better postoperative results in the adult population. The objective of our study was to compare the operating time and incidence of postoperative complications between both techniques in our environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of patients undergoing circumcision in our institution from October 2021 to December 2022 was carried out. Operating time and complications observed in the first 14 postoperative days (edema, hematoma, dehiscence) were analyzed according to the technique used (MANS vs. MECS) and patient age (< 12 and ≥ 12 years old). RESULTS: 173 patients (147 MANS, 26 MECS) were included. Mean operating time was significantly lower in MECS patients, both in patients < 12 years old (16 min vs. 10 min, p= 0.002) and in patients ≥ 12 years old (23 min vs. 12 min, p< 0.001). Regarding complications, MECS patients ≥ 12 years old had a lower rate of suture dehiscence (23.5% vs. 0%, p< 0.001), with no significant differences in the younger group. CONCLUSIONS: MECS circumcision is a simple and effective technique involving shorter operating times than MANS circumcision, regardless of age. It has a lower rate of complications in older children (≥ 12 years), which means it stands as a valid alternative to the conventional technique.

OBJETIVOS: La circuncisión es una de las intervenciones quirúrgicas más realizadas en cirugía pediátrica. Aunque la técnica con sutura manual (SMAN) se considera el gold standard, recientemente se han desarrollado dispositivos de sutura mecánica (SMEC) de fácil manejo y con mejores resultados postoperatorios en la población adulta. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es comparar el tiempo quirúrgico y la incidencia de complicaciones postoperatorias entre ambas técnicas en nuestro ámbito. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes circuncidados en nuestro centro entre octubre 2021 y diciembre 2022. Se analizó el tiempo quirúrgico y las complicaciones observadas en los primeros 14 días postoperatorios (edema, hematoma, dehiscencia), en función de la técnica empleada (SMAN vs SMEC) y la edad de los pacientes (< 12 y ≥ 12 años). RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 173 pacientes (147 SMAN, 26 SMEC). El tiempo quirúrgico medio fue significativamente menor en los pacientes con SMEC, tanto en < 12 años (16 min vs. 10 min, p= 0,002) como en ≥ 12 años (23 min vs 12 min, p< 0,001). En cuanto a las complicaciones, los pacientes con SMEC del grupo ≥ 12 años presentaron menor tasa de dehiscencia de sutura (23,5% vs 0%, p< 0,001), sin observarse diferencias significativas en el grupo de menor edad. CONCLUSIONES: La circuncisión con SMEC es una técnica sencilla y eficaz, que precisa un tiempo quirúrgico más reducido que la sutura manual, independientemente de la edad. Presenta menor tasa de complicaciones en los niños de mayor edad (≥ 12 años), por lo que se plantea como una alternativa válida a la técnica clásica.

Estudio comparativo entre circuncisión mecánica y manual en población pediátrica: ¿una alternativa a la técnica convencional? / Comparative study of mechanical vs. manual circumcision in the pediatric population: An alternative to the conventional technique?

Objetivos: La circuncisión es una de las intervenciones quirúrgicas más realizadas en cirugía pediátrica. Aunque la técnica con suturamanual (SMAN) se considera el gold standard, recientemente se handesarrollado dispositivos de sutura mecánica (SMEC) de fácil manejo ycon mejores resultados postoperatorios en la población adulta. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es comparar el tiempo quirúrgico y la incidencia decomplicaciones postoperatorias entre ambas técnicas en nuestro ámbito.Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes circuncidados en nuestro centro entre octubre 2021 y diciembre 2022. Se analizóel tiempo quirúrgico y las complicaciones observadas en los primeros14 días postoperatorios (edema, hematoma, dehiscencia), en funciónde la técnica empleada (SMAN vs SMEC) y la edad de los pacientes(< 12 y ≥ 12 años). Resultados: Se incluyeron 173 pacientes (147 SMAN, 26 SMEC).El tiempo quirúrgico medio fue significativamente menor en los pacientes con SMEC, tanto en < 12 años (16 min vs. 10 min, p= 0,002) comoen ≥ 12 años (23 min vs 12 min, p< 0,001). En cuanto a las complicaciones, los pacientes con SMEC del grupo ≥ 12 años presentaron menortasa de dehiscencia de sutura (23,5% vs 0%, p< 0,001), sin observarsediferencias significativas en el grupo de menor edad. Conclusiones: La circuncisión con SMEC es una técnica sencillay eficaz, que precisa un tiempo quirúrgico más reducido que la suturamanual, independientemente de la edad. Presenta menor tasa de complicaciones en los niños de mayor edad (≥ 12 años), por lo que se planteacomo una alternativa válida a la técnica clásica.(AU)

Objective: Circumcision is one of the most common surgical procedures in pediatric surgery. Even though manual suture (MANS) isregarded as the gold standard technique, easy-to-use mechanical suture(MECS) devices have been recently developed, with better postoperative results in the adult population. The objective of our study was tocompare the operating time and incidence of postoperative complicationsbetween both techniques in our environment.Materials and methods: A retrospective study of patients undergoing circumcision in our institution from October 2021 to December 2022was carried out. Operating time and complications observed in the first14 postoperative days (edema, hematoma, dehiscence) were analyzedaccording to the technique used (MANS vs. MECS) and patient age(< 12 and ≥12 years old).Results: 173 patients (147 MANS, 26 MECS) were included.Mean operating time was significantly lower in MECS patients, bothin patients < 12 years old (16 min vs. 10 min, p= 0.002) and in patients≥12 years old (23 min vs. 12 min, p< 0.001). Regarding complications,MECS patients ≥12 years old had a lower rate of suture dehiscence(23.5% vs. 0%, p< 0.001), with no significant differences in the youngergroup. Conclusions: MECS circumcision is a simple and effective technique involving shorter operating times than MANS circumcision, regardless of age. It has a lower rate of complications in older children (≥12years), which means it stands as a valid alternative to the conventionaltechnique.(AU)

Risk of a Second Skin Cancer in a Cohort of Patients With Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer -Basal Cell Carcinoma or Squamous Cell Carcinoma-Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A National Prospective Cohort Study. / Riesgo de aparición de segundas neoplasias cutáneas en una cohorte de pacientes diagnosticados de carcinoma queratinocítico (carcinoma basocelular y carcinoma epidermoide) tratados con cirugía de Mohs. Estudio de cohortes prospectivo nacional.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC)-ie, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)-have an increased risk of developing a second skin cancer. The aim of this study was to describe the frequency, incidence per 1000 person-years, and predictors of a second skin cancer in a cohort of patients with NMSC treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study of a national cohort of patients with NMSC who underwent MMS at 22 Spanish hospitals between July 2013 and February 2020; case data were recorded in the REGESMOHS registry. The study variables included demographic characteristics, frequency and incidence per 1000 person-years of second skin cancers diagnosed during the study period, and risk factors identified using mixed-effects logistic regression. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 4768 patients who underwent MMS; 4397 (92%) had BCC and 371 (8%) had SCC. Mean follow-up was 2.4 years. Overall, 1201 patients (25%) developed a second skin cancer during follow-up; 1013 of the tumors were BCCs (21%), 154 were SCCs (3%), and 20 were melanomas (0.4%). The incidence was 107 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 101-113) for any cancer, 90 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 85-96) for BCC, 14 (95% CI, 12-16) per 1000 person-years for SCC, and 2 (95% CI, 1-3) per 1000 person-years for melanoma. More men than women developed a subsequent skin cancer (738 [61%] vs 463 [39%]). The main risk factors were a history of multiple tumors before diagnosis (relative risk [RR], 4.6; 95% CI, 2.9-7.1), immunosuppression (RR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.1), and male sex (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4-1.9). CONCLUSION: Patients have an increased risk of developing a second tumor after MMS treatment of NMSC. Risk factors are a history of multiple tumors at diagnosis, immunosuppression, and male sex.

Tratamiento con inhibidores de la bomba de protones. ¿Realmente lo necesita el paciente? / Proton-pump inhibitors treatment. Does your patient really need it?

Introducción: Los inhibidores de la bomba de protones (IBP) son fármacos utilizados frecuentemente para el manejo de diferentes enfermedades gastrointestinales. Aunque sus indicaciones y dosis están bien establecidas, se han comunicado elevadas tasas de maluso. Métodos: Estudio observacional transversal realizado en un servicio de urgencias de un hospital terciario. Pacientes adultos que acudían por distintas patologías fueron invitados a participar. Se evaluó la correcta indicación del IBP, además de su dosis, duración del tratamiento y facultativo prescriptor. Resultados: Se incluyeron 300 pacientes. La indicación se consideró correcta en 142 pacientes (47,3%), siendo la indicación más frecuente la profilaxis de enteropatía inducida por AINE/AAS (n=95; 31,7%). La «gastroprotección» en paciente polimedicados, sin fármacos gastroerosivos fue la principal indicación inadecuada (n=82; 27,3%) seguida de la profilaxis innecesaria en pacientes menores de 60 años tratados en monoterapia con un fármaco gastroerosivo. La mediana del tiempo de prescripción fue de 31 meses (RIC: 9-72) con un intervalo de 1-360 meses. El tiempo de prescripción era inferior en aquellos con indicación correcta (42,3 vs. 59,6 meses, p=0,02). El médico de atención primaria era el prescriptor más frecuente (n=165; 55%), seguido del gastroenterólogo (n=38; 12,7%), sin encontrar diferencias significativas en cuanto a la adecuación de la prescripción. Conclusiones: Estudios como el presente alertan de la persistencia de unas elevadas sobreutilización y maluso de los IBP. La desprescripción, cuando el IBP no está indicado, puede ayudar a controlar el gasto sanitario innecesario y a evitar iatrogenia (AU)

Introduction: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) are frequently prescribed for wide gastrointestinal disorders. The indications are well established, although a high rate of misuse has been reported. Methods: Observation cross-sectional study conducted a tertiary hospital. Adult patients who attended the emergency department were eligible. The appropriate indication was evaluated. Also, the prescription period, dosage and the prescribing clinician were reviewed. Results: 300 patients were included. The indication was adequate in 142 patients (47.3%). The main indication was the primary prophylaxis for NSAIDs/ASA-induced enteropathy (n=95 patients, 31.7%). Polypharmacy was the main misuse indication (n=82 patients, 27.3%). The median prescription duration was 31 months (IQR 9-72), ranging from one month to 360 months. The duration was lower in those with correct indication (42.3 vs 59.6 months, P=.02). The primary care physician was the main responsible for prescription (n=165 patients, 55%), followed by gastroenterologist (n=38 patients, 12.7%) without significant differences in appropriateness by speciality. Conclusions: Studies like this raise awareness about the PPI overuse and misuse. Deprescribing should be considered as essential to reduce iatrogenic risk and redundant health expenditure (AU)

[Proton-pump inhibitors treatment. Does your patient really need it?] / Tratamiento con inhibidores de la bomba de protones. ¿Realmente lo necesita el paciente?

INTRODUCTION: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) are frequently prescribed for wide gastrointestinal disorders. The indications are well established, although a high rate of misuse has been reported. METHODS: Observation cross-sectional study conducted a tertiary hospital. Adult patients who attended the emergency department were eligible. The appropriate indication was evaluated. Also, the prescription period, dosage and the prescribing clinician were reviewed. RESULTS: 300 patients were included. The indication was adequate in 142 patients (47.3%). The main indication was the primary prophylaxis for NSAIDs/ASA-induced enteropathy (n=95 patients, 31.7%). Polypharmacy was the main misuse indication (n=82 patients, 27.3%). The median prescription duration was 31 months (IQR 9-72), ranging from one month to 360 months. The duration was lower in those with correct indication (42.3 vs 59.6 months, P=.02). The primary care physician was the main responsible for prescription (n=165 patients, 55%), followed by gastroenterologist (n=38 patients, 12.7%) without significant differences in appropriateness by speciality. CONCLUSIONS: Studies like this raise awareness about the PPI overuse and misuse. Deprescribing should be considered as essential to reduce iatrogenic risk and redundant health expenditure.

Routine anti-reflux surgery combined with gastrostomy in children: is it really necessary? Our single-center experience. / ¿Es realmente necesario asociar una técnica antirreflujo a la gastrostomía de forma rutinaria? Experiencia en nuestro centro.

OBJECTIVE: To study gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in children undergoing gastrostomy in a single pediatric institution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of patients undergoing gastrostomy from 2000 to 2017 was carried out. Demographic data, clinical data, progression, and complications were recorded. GER was considered positive in patients with clinical signs requiring antisecretory treatment, prokinetic treatment, or anti-reflux surgery to control symptoms. RESULTS: 207 patients with a median age of 2 years [R: 0.25-18] were included. Neurological impairment was the most frequent underlying condition (74%). Swallowing difficulty and undernourishment were the main surgical indications for gastrostomy. Prior to gastrostomy, 96 out of 207 patients (46%) showed GER symptoms. Combined fundoplication and gastrostomy was performed in 41 (43%) patients with preexisting GER, 6 of whom showed GER worsening (4 required redo fundoplication). 5 complications following fundoplication were noted - gastric perforation, sustained Dumping syndrome, and gastroesophageal stenosis. 55 out of 96 (57%) patients with preexisting GER underwent gastrostomy alone. Clinical signs disappeared in 16 of them (29%) and improved or stabilized in 19 (35%). GER worsening occurred in 20 patients (36%), with subsequent fundoplication being required in 10 cases. In patients with no previous clinical signs (111 out of 207), GER symptoms occurred following gastrostomy in just 18 cases (16%), and only 2 patients required fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, routine anti-reflux surgery combined with gastrostomy is not justified. Individualized fundoplication should be considered in case of medical treatment failure. Further studies with an adequate design are required to establish which patients could really benefit from this procedure.

OBJETIVO: Estudio del reflujo gastroesofágico (RGE) en los pacientes en los que se ha realizado una gastrostomía en nuestro centro. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Revisión de los pacientes intervenidos de gastrostomía en el periodo 2000-2017. Registro de datos demográficos, clínicos, evolución y complicaciones. Definimos RGE como la presencia de clínica compatible en pacientes que requirieron tratamiento médico o quirúrgico antirreflujo. RESULTADOS: Incluimos 207 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 2 años [r:0,25-18]. La patología subyacente más frecuente fue déficit neurológico (74%). Las indicaciones quirúrgicas fueron trastornos deglutorios y/o desnutrición. Previamente a la gastrostomía, 96/207 pacientes (46%) presentaban clínica de RGE. Se realizó funduplicatura asociada a gastrostomía en 41/96 (43%) de los pacientes con RGE previo. En 6/41 pacientes (15%) el RGE empeoró, requiriendo 4 de ellos una segunda funduplicatura. Se registraron 5 complicaciones tras funduplicatura (perforaciones gástricas, síndromes de Dumping prolongados y estenosis esofagogástrica). En 55/96 pacientes con RGE previo a la gastrostomía no se asoció funduplicatura. La clínica desapareció en 16/55 (29%), y mejoró o se estabilizó en 19/55 pacientes (35%). En 20/55 (36%) la sintomatología empeoró, y 10 de ellos precisaron una funduplicatura posterior. De los pacientes sin clínica previa de RGE (111/207), presentaron síntomas de RGE tras la gastrostomía 18/111 (16%), y solo 2 pacientes requirieron funduplicatura. CONCLUSIONES: Según nuestra experiencia, la funduplicatura de rutina asociada a la gastrostomía no está justificada. En caso de fracaso del tratamiento médico del RGE, una técnica antirreflujo debe plantearse de forma individualizada. Son necesarios estudios adecuadamente diseñados para definir qué pacientes realmente se beneficiarían de este procedimiento.

¿Es realmente necesario asociar una técnica antirreflujo a la gastrostomía de forma rutinaria? Experiencia en nuestro centro / Routine anti-reflux surgery combined with gastrostomy in children: is it really necessary? Our single-center experience

Objetivos: Estudio del reflujo gastroesofágico (RGE) en los pacientes en los que se ha realizado una gastrostomía en nuestro centro. Material y métodos: Revisión de los pacientes intervenidos degastrostomía en el periodo 2000-2017. Registro de datos demográficos,clínicos, evolución y complicaciones. Definimos RGE como la presenciade clínica compatible en pacientes que requirieron tratamiento médicoo quirúrgico antirreflujo. Resultados: Incluimos 207 pacientes con una mediana de edadde 2 años [r:0,25-18]. La patología subyacente más frecuente fue déficit neurológico (74%). Las indicaciones quirúrgicas fueron trastornosdeglutorios y/o desnutrición. Previamente a la gastrostomía, 96/207pacientes (46%) presentaban clínica de RGE. Se realizó funduplicatu-ra asociada a gastrostomía en 41/96 (43%) de los pacientes con RGEprevio. En 6/41 pacientes (15%) el RGE empeoró, requiriendo 4 deellos una segunda funduplicatura. Se registraron 5 complicaciones trasfunduplicatura (perforaciones gástricas, síndromes de Dumping prolongados y estenosis esofagogástrica). En 55/96 pacientes con RGE previoa la gastrostomía no se asoció funduplicatura. La clínica desaparecióen 16/55 (29%), y mejoró o se estabilizó en 19/55 pacientes (35%). En20/55 (36%) la sintomatología empeoró, y 10 de ellos precisaron unafunduplicatura posterior. De los pacientes sin clínica previa de RGE(111/207), presentaron síntomas de RGE tras la gastrostomía 18/111(16%), y solo 2 pacientes requirieron funduplicatura. Conclusiones: Según nuestra experiencia, la funduplicatura de rutina asociada a la gastrostomía no está justificada. En caso de fracaso del tratamiento médico del RGE, una técnica antirreflujo debe plantearsede forma individualizada. Son necesarios estudios adecuadamente di-señados para definir qué pacientes realmente se beneficiarían de esteprocedimiento.(AU)

Objective: To study gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in childrenundergoing gastrostomy in a single pediatric institution. Materials and methods: A retrospective study of patients undergoing gastrostomy from 2000 to 2017 was carried out. Demographic data,clinical data, progression, and complications were recorded. GER wasconsidered positive in patients with clinical signs requiring antisecretory treatment, prokinetic treatment, or anti-reflux surgery to controlsymptoms. Results: 207 patients with a median age of 2 years [R: 0.25-18]were included. Neurological impairment was the most frequent underlying condition (74%). Swallowing difficulty and undernourishment werethe main surgical indications for gastrostomy. Prior to gastrostomy, 96out of 207 patients (46%) showed GER symptoms. Combined fun-doplication and gastrostomy was performed in 41 (43%) patients withpreexisting GER, 6 of whom showed GER worsening (4 required redofundoplication). 5 complications following fundoplication were noted –gastric perforation, sustained Dumping syndrome, and gastroesophagealstenosis. 55 out of 96 (57%) patients with preexisting GER underwentgastrostomy alone. Clinical signs disappeared in 16 of them (29%) andimproved or stabilized in 19 (35%). GER worsening occurred in 20patients (36%), with subsequent fundoplication being required in 10cases. In patients with no previous clinical signs (111 out of 207), GERsymptoms occurred following gastrostomy in just 18 cases (16%), andonly 2 patients required fundoplication.Conclusions: In our experience, routine anti-reflux surgery combined with gastrostomy is not justified. Individualized fundoplicationshould be considered in case of medical treatment failure. Further studieswith an adequate design are required to establish which patients couldreally benefit from this procedure.(AU)

TMEM97 facilitates the activation of SOCE by downregulating the association of cholesterol to Orai1 in MDA-MB-231 cells.

The expression of TMEM97, a regulator of cholesterol transport, has been reported to be enhanced in some tumour cells. We have recently shown that TMEM97 is involved in the proliferation of the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231, probably through changes in store-operated calcium entry (SOCE). By using silencing and overexpression of TMEM97 in MDA-MB-231 cells (two manoeuvres that either reduce or increase the calcium influx, respectively), we show enhanced cholesterol uptake in these cells as compared to the non-tumoral breast cell line, MCF10A. The enhanced cholesterol uptake in MDA-MB-231 cells was inhibited by silencing TMEM97, while overexpression of this protein increased cholesterol uptake in MCF10A cells and, therefore, indicating that this protein plays a role in the enhanced cholesterol uptake in MDA-MB-231 cancer cell line. TMEM97 silencing and overexpression resulted in an increase and decrease in the association of cholesterol to the SOCE calcium channel Orai1, respectively. Interestingly, silencing of TMEM97 in MDA-MB-231 cells significantly reduced the co-localization of Orai1 with the SOCE regulatory protein STIM1. Finally, neither silencing nor overexpression of TMEM97 altered SOCE in MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with the cholesterol insensible mutant of Orai1(Y80E). Our results reveal a novel regulatory mechanism of SOCE that relies on TMEM97 activity that courses through the reduction of the cholesterol content in the plasma membrane, and subsequently, by impairing its interaction with Orai1.

Colgajo en isla del labio superior: claves fundamentales y serie de casos / Island Flap for Upper-Lip Reconstruction: Analysis of Key Aspects and a Case Series

La reconstrucción del labio superior tras la cirugía de Mohs supone, en ocasiones, un reto para el cirujano dermatológico. Presentamos una serie de 15 pacientes (7 hombres y 8 mujeres; edad media de 65,6 años) con cáncer cutáneo (10 carcinomas basocelulares, 2 melanomas y 3 carcinomas escamosos) localizados en el labio superior intervenidos mediante cirugía de Mohs con defectos resultantes de 3-7,6 cm. Para la reconstrucción se empleó un colgajo en isla del labio superior diseñado escondiendo las incisiones en el pliegue nasolabial, en la línea de unión del bermellón con la piel y en las líneas de tensión de la piel relajada. Se explican las claves del diseño y la cirugía, enfatizando en la importancia de sacrificar en ocasiones pequeñas zonas de tejido sano. Se alcanzaron resultados satisfactorios cosméticos y funcionales, sin complicaciones posquirúrgicas en todos los pacientes

Upper-lip reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery is challenging for dermatologic surgeons. We describe a series of 15 patients (7 men and 8 women; mean age, 65.6 years) with skin cancer on the upper lip treated with Mohs surgery: 10 were basal cell carcinomas, 2 were melanomas, and 3 were squamous cell carcinomas. The resulting defects measured between 3 and 7.6cm. We used island flaps to reconstruct the defects in all cases, hiding the incisions in the nasolabial fold, at the line where the skin meets the vermillion border of the lip, and in the relaxed skin tension lines. We explain key aspects of the surgeries and design of the reconstructions, with emphasis on the importance of occasionally sacrificing small areas of healthy skin. Cosmetic and functional outcomes were satisfactory in all patients, and there were no postsurgical complications

Island Flap for Upper-Lip Reconstruction: Analysis of Key Aspects and a Case Series. / Colgajo en isla del labio superior: claves fundamentales y serie de casos.

Upper-lip reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery is challenging for dermatologic surgeons. We describe a series of 15 patients (7 men and 8 women; mean age, 65.6 years) with skin cancer on the upper lip treated with Mohs surgery: 10 were basal cell carcinomas, 2 were melanomas, and 3 were squamous cell carcinomas. The resulting defects measured between 3 and 7.6cm. We used island flaps to reconstruct the defects in all cases, hiding the incisions in the nasolabial fold, at the line where the skin meets the vermillion border of the lip, and in the relaxed skin tension lines. We explain key aspects of the surgeries and design of the reconstructions, with emphasis on the importance of occasionally sacrificing small areas of healthy skin. Cosmetic and functional outcomes were satisfactory in all patients, and there were no postsurgical complications.

A review of terms used to define cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with a poor prognosis. / Revisión de los términos que definen un carcinoma epidermoide cutáneo asociado a mal pronóstico.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common cancer in humans and its incidence is both underestimated and on the rise. cSCC is referred to in the literature as high-risk cSCC, locally advanced cSCC, metastatic cSCC, advanced cSCC, and aggressive cSCC. These terms can give rise to confusion and are not always well defined. In this review, we aim to clarify the concepts underlying these terms with a view to standardizing the description of this tumor, something we believe is necessary in light of the new drugs that have been approved or are in development for cSCC.

Revisión de los términos que definen un carcinoma epidermoide cutáneo asociado a mal pronóstico / A review of terms used to define cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with a poor prognosis

El carcinoma epidermoide cutáneo (CEC) es el segundo tumor más frecuente en humanos y tiene una incidencia creciente e infraestimada. En la literatura nos encontramos con términos como CEC de alto riesgo, CEC localmente avanzado, CEC metastásico, CEC avanzado y CEC agresivo, que pueden dar lugar a confusión y que en algunas ocasiones no se encuentran del todo bien definidos. En esta revisión pretendemos aclarar estos conceptos con la idea de lograr homogeneidad en su descripción, algo que parece necesario a la luz de los nuevos fármacos aprobados y en desarrollo para este tumor

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common cancer in humans and its incidence is both underestimated and on the rise. cSCC is referred to in the literature as high-risk cSCC, locally advanced cSCC, metastatic cSCC, advanced cSCC, and aggressive cSCC. These terms can give rise to confusion and are not always well defined. In this review, we aim to clarify the concepts underlying these terms with a view to standardizing the description of this tumor, something we believe is necessary in light of the new drugs that have been approved or are in development for cSCC

Split-thickness skin grafts obtained from adjacent hairy skin for reconstructing auricular concave surfaces after Mohs surgery.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of large auricular defects with full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) is a commonly reported option, but less attention has focused on the advantages and indications of using split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) in the ear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to report our experience using STSG for repair of defects located on the auricular concave surfaces, highlighting the utility of choosing the adjacent hairy skin as donor site. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all Mohs micrographic defects on the auricular concave surfaces repaired with STSG obtained from the adjacent hairy skin, between January 2017 and July 2018 at our institution. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients with defects on the auricular concavities resulting from removal of non-melanoma skin cancer were reconstructed with STSG taken from the adjacent hairy skin. Only one patient experienced partial graft failure and no other complications were observed after 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Split-thickness skin grafts are suitable for reconstructing concave areas in the ear, providing good cosmetic results with a simple, cost-effective and easily reproducible technique. Choosing the adjacent hairy skin as a donor area shortens the operative and postoperative time, and allows the procedure to be performed in a single surgical field.

Daylight photodynamic therapy for prevention of new actinic keratosis and keratinocyte carcinomas in organ transplants. A cryotherapy-controlled randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Organ transplant recipients (OTR) have a higher risk of actinic keratosis (AK) and keratinocyte carcinomas (KC). There are no clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of daylight photodynamic therapy (DPDT) to prevent new AK and KC in OTR. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether repeated treatments of field cancerization with DPDT are effective in preventing new AK and KC in OTR. METHODS: A randomized, intra-subject controlled, evaluator-blind, split-face and/or scalp trial, from April 2016 to October 2018. Participants were OTR older than 18 years, 1-year posttransplant, with at least 5 AK on each hemi-face/hemi-scalp. One side received six field treatments with DPDT: two sessions 15 days apart at baseline, two at 3 months and two at 9 months after baseline. Control side received lesion-directed treatment with cryotherapy (double freeze-thaw) at baseline, 3 and 9 months. Total number of lesions (AK and KC) at 21 months, number of new AK and KC at 3, 9, 15 and 21 months and treatment preferences were analysed. RESULTS: Of 24 men included, 23 were analysed at 3 months; and 21, at 9, 15 and 21 months. Mean (SD) age was 69.8 years (9.2). The total number of lesions at 21 months was 4.7 (4.3) for DPDT and 5.8 (5.0) for control side; P = 0.09. DPDT showed significantly lower means [SD] of new lesions compared to control side at 3 months (4.2 [3.4] vs. 6.8 [4.8]; P < 0.001), 9 months (3.0 [3.3] vs. 4.3 [3.4]; P = 0.04) and 15 months (3.0 [4.6] vs. 4.8 [5.0]; P = 0.02), and non-significant at 21 months (3.7 [3.5] vs. 5.0 [4.5]; P = 0.06). Most participants preferred DPDT. CONCLUSION: DPDT showed potential effectiveness in preventing new AK and KC in OTR by consecutive treatments of field cancerization. The preference for DPDT could facilitate adherence to the long-term treatment necessary in these patients.

Early outcome of a 31-gene expression profile test in 86 AJCC stage IB-II melanoma patients. A prospective multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical and pathological features of primary melanoma are not sufficiently sensitive to accurately predict which patients are at a greater risk of relapse. Recently, a 31-gene expression profile (DecisionDx-Melanoma) test has shown promising results. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the early prognostic performance of a genetic signature in a multicentre prospectively evaluated cohort. METHODS: Inclusion of patients with AJCC stages IB and II conducted between April 2015 and December 2016. All patients were followed up prospectively to assess their risk of relapse. Prognostic performance of this test was evaluated individually and later combined with the AJCC staging system. Prognostic accuracy of disease-free survival was determined using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. Results of the gene expression profile test were designated as Class 1 (low risk) and Class 2 (high risk). RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 26 months (IQR 22-30). The gene expression profile test was performed with 86 patients; seven had developed metastasis (8.1%) and all of them were in the Class 2 group, representing 21.2% of this group. Gene expression profile was an independent prognostic factor for relapse as indicated by multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjusted for AJCC stages and age. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective multicentre cohort study, performed in a Spanish Caucasian cohort, shows that this 31-gene expression profile test could correctly identify patients at early AJCC stages who are at greater risk of relapse. We believe that gene expression profile in combination with the AJCC staging system could well improve the detection of patients who need intensive surveillance and optimize follow-up strategies.

Corrección de la deformidad en trampilla secundaria a colgajos de trasposición en pirámide nasal / Correction of Trapdoor Effect Following Nasal Pyramid Reconstruction With a Transposition Flap

No disponible