Acute distal biceps tendon repair using cortical button fixation results in excellent short- and long-term outcomes : a single-centre experience of 102 patients.

AIMS: Acute distal biceps tendon repair reduces fatigue-related pain and minimizes loss of supination of the forearm and strength of flexion of the elbow. We report the short- and long-term outcome following repair using fixation with a cortical button techqniue. METHODS: Between October 2010 and July 2018, 102 patients with a mean age of 43 years (19 to 67), including 101 males, underwent distal biceps tendon repair less than six weeks after the injury, using cortical button fixation. The primary short-term outcome measure was the rate of complications. The primary long-term outcome measure was the abbreviated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score. Secondary outcomes included the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), EuroQol five-dimension three-level score (EQ-5D-3L), satisfaction, and return to function. RESULTS: Eight patients (7.8%) had a major complication and 34 (33.3%) had a minor complication. Major complications included re-rupture (n = 3; 2.9%), unrecovered nerve injury (n = 4; 3.9%), and surgery for heterotopic ossification (n = 1; 1.0%). Three patients (2.9%) overall required further surgery for a complication. Minor complications included neurapraxia (n = 27; 26.5%) and superficial infection (n = 7; 6.9%). A total of 33 nerve injuries occurred in 31 patients (30.4%). At a mean follow-up of five years (1 to 9.8) outcomes were available for 86 patients (84.3%). The median QuickDASH, OES, EQ-5D-3L, and satisfaction scores were 1.2 (IQR 0 to 5.1), 48 (IQR 46 to 48), 0.80 (IQR 0.72 to 1.0), and 100/100 (IQR 90 to 100), respectively. Most patients were able to return to work (81/83, 97.6%) and sport (51/62,82.3%). Unrecovered nerve injury was associated with an inferior outcome according to the QuickDASH (p = 0.005), OES (p = 0.004), EQ-5D-3L (p = 0.010), and satisfaction (p = 0.024). Multiple linear regression analysis identified an unrecovered nerve injury to be strongly associated with an inferior outcome according to the QuickDASH score (p < 0.001), along with infection (p < 0.001), although re-rupture (p = 0.440) and further surgery (p = 0.652) were not. CONCLUSION: Acute distal biceps tendon repair using cortical button fixation was found to result in excellent patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life. Although rare, unrecovered nerve injury adversely affects outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1284-1291.

Tension-Band Wire Fixation of Olecranon Fractures.

Olecranon fractures account for approximately 20% of fractures of the proximal part of the forearm1. Clinicians may consider nonoperative management for elderly low-demand patients2, whereas operative fixation is recommended for active patients with a displaced fracture. Tension-band wire (TBW) fixation is commonly employed for simple isolated stable displaced fractures of the olecranon (type IIA according to the Mayo classification)3-5. In contrast, plate fixation is thought to provide superior outcomes for unstable comminuted olecranon fractures. Biomechanical principles of the TBW construct are based on the hypotheses of absolute fracture stability, exploiting functional limb movement, and converting tensile forces into compression through the actions of the triceps and brachialis. The surgical goals are to restore articular congruity, provide stable reliable fixation, and allow early mobilization to minimize joint stiffness. In a recent prospective randomized trial comparing plate fixation with TBW in 67 active adult patients, we found no difference between groups with respect to either patient or surgeon-reported outcome measures6. The overall complication rate was higher following TBW fixation, with implant removal required for 1 in 2 patients. However, it may still be the preferable procedure given that the more serious issues of infection and revision surgery occurred exclusively following plate fixation. The key steps of the procedure are (1) preoperative planning with careful assessment of radiographs; (2) positioning the patient supine and gaining exposure with a posterior longitudinal direct midline incision, raising lateral and medial fasciocutaneous flaps, and developing subperiosteal dissection in the interval between the flexor carpi ulnaris and extensor carpi ulnaris to visualize the fracture; (3) visual reduction maintained with a pointed reduction clamp, with joint congruity confirmed with an image intensifier if needed; (4) creation of the TBW construct with 2 parallel 1.6-mm Kirschner wires passed longitudinally from the proximal fragment into the distal part of the ulna, engaging the anterior cortex with care, and a 1.2-mm flexible cerclage wire placed through a transverse tunnel 3 to 4 cm distal to the fracture, passed posterior to the 2 Kirschner wires, and secured in a figure-of-8 configuration; (5) appropriate tensioning of the construct followed by trimming and burial of the wire ends; (6) layered wound closure according to surgeon preference; and (7) a postoperative protocol consisting of application of an above-the-elbow synthetic bandage, which is worn for 10 to 14 days, and gentle active mobilization under physiotherapy supervision. We advise against heavy lifting for at least 6 to 8 weeks and do not routinely remove implants unless they are symptomatic.

Effect of distal humeral varus deformity on strain in the lateral ulnar collateral ligament and ulnohumeral joint stability.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have implicated cubitus varus deformity as a risk factor for the development of late posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow. The purpose of this study was to determine the biomechanical relationship between cubitus varus and strain in the lateral ulnar collateral ligament and subluxation of the ulnohumeral joint as it relates to posterolateral rotatory instability. METHODS: Eleven fresh-frozen cadaveric elbow joints were mounted in an apparatus that allowed active elbow motion. Supracondylar osteotomies were performed to create cubitus varus deformities of 0 degrees to 30 degrees in 5 degrees increments. Each elbow was loaded with a supination moment of 1.2 Nm and a resistive triceps extension force. Strain in the lateral ulnar collateral ligament and widening of the ulnohumeral joint were measured at each position of varus, and the resulting strain and joint-widening values were averaged. RESULTS: Strain in the lateral ulnar collateral ligament was found to increase as the cubitus varus deformity increased. Likewise, the ulnohumeral joint space was seen to progressively widen with increasing cubitus varus. Strain was significantly increased at 30 degrees of varus deformity (p = 0.03), and widening of the ulnohumeral joint space was significantly increased at 25 degrees of varus deformity (p = 0.004). When differences in the size of the cadaveric specimens were accounted for in an analysis of covariance, ligament strain was significantly increased at 25 degrees of varus (p = 0.005) and widening of the ulnohumeral joint space, at 20 degrees (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Cubitus varus deformity of the elbow increases strain in the lateral ulnar collateral ligament, with a corresponding increase in ulnohumeral joint-opening consistent with the posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow seen clinically.