Validation of 3D Knee Kinematics during Gait on Treadmill with an Instrumented Knee Brace.

To test a novel instrumented knee brace intended for use as a rehabilitation system, based on inertial measurement units (IMU) to monitor home-based exercises, the device was compared to the gold standard of motion analysis. The purpose was to validate a new calibration method through functional tasks and assessed the value of adding magnetometers for motion analysis. Thirteen healthy young adults performed a 60-second gait test at a comfortable walking speed on a treadmill. Knee kinematics were captured simultaneously, using the instrumented knee brace and an optoelectronic camera system (OCS). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed excellent reliability for the three axes of rotation with and without magnetometers, with values ranging between 0.900 and 0.972. Pearson's r coefficient showed good to excellent correlation for the three axes, with the root mean square error (RMSE) under 3° with the IMUs and slightly higher with the magnetometers. The instrumented knee brace obtained certain clinical parameters, as did the OCS. The instrumented knee brace seems to be a valid tool to assess ambulatory knee kinematics, with an RMSE of <3°, which is sufficient for clinical interpretations. Indeed, this portable system can obtain certain clinical parameters just as well as the gold standard of motion analysis. However, the addition of magnetometers showed no significant advantage in terms of enhancing accuracy.

6MWT on a new self-paced treadmill system compared with overground.

The 6-min walk test (6MWT) is a useful tool for clinicians and researchers to estimate gait performance and fatigue affecting functional mobility. A modified 6MWT administered on a treadmill (TM) can be an efficient, space-saving alternative to perform the 6MWT. The aim of this study was to investigate if a 6MWT on a self-paced (SP) TM produced similar results compared to an overground (OG) 6MWT among healthy participants with the hypothesis that users would demonstrate similar gait parameters. The second aim was to assess the reliability of SP TM sessions with the hypothesis that gait parameters would be reliable. Twelve healthy young adults performed one OG 6MWT and two SP TM 6MWTs, with the TM tests performed on two different testing days. The OG 6MWTs were conducted along a 20 m corridor with a portable optometric system. The SP TM 6MWTs were performed using a dual-belt instrumented TM with speed controlled by feedback from a LIDAR sensor. In the OG condition, participants walked 664.8 m ± 48.9 m when the standard method was used to calculate distance and 721.3 m ± 56.2 m with an average-speed-based estimation of distance, which corrects for U-turns. For the SP TM 6MWT, they covered 729.4 m ± 45.8 m in the first session and 727.4 m ± 56.0 m in the second session. Gait parameters showed good to excellent within- and between-day reliability on the adaptive TM. Gait parameters were similar between modalities. A significant difference in the 6MWT distance was found between modalities. This is attributable to the U-turns, because a comparison between TM 6MWT distance and the average-speed-based estimation of the distance for the OG modality showed no significant difference. However, this system produced similar spatiotemporal gait parameters among participants compared to OG.

Validity of a simple sit-to-stand method for assessing force-velocity profile in older adults.

BACKGROUND: Lower limb muscle strength is an important determinant of physical function in older adults. However, its measure in clinical settings is limited because of the requirement for large-scale and costly equipment. A new simple protocol based on sit-to-stand test (STS) is developed to measure force velocity (F-v) and power velocity (P-v) profile in the community-dwelling older adults. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the validity of this new methodology for measuring F-v and P-v profile compared to the gold standard isokinetic BIODEX. PARTICIPANTS: 46 older people aged 65-85 years (M = 73.7; SD = 7.7). METHODS: F-v and P-v profiles were assessed in participants on their dominant leg. The concurrent validity of STS was tested using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and Passing Bablok: maximal power output Pmax, optimal velocity and force Vopt and Fopt, maximal force at null velocity F0, maximal unloaded velocity V0 and coefficient of F-v (SFV) and P-v equation (a_poly, b_poly). RESULTS: No proportional difference for F0 and b_poly and a low significant correlation for Pmax (r = 0.314), Sfv (r = 0.229), a_poly (r = 0.335) and b_poly (r = 0.226) whereas the other parameters were non correlated significantly. CONCLUSION: STS method is moderately reliable on force and power parameters whereas further improvements are needing for velocity parameters. However, its feasibility, portability and lower cost compared to other methods makes it very affordable in clinical context and will allow easy investigation of aging population.