Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 44(9): 1503-8, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14565651

RESUMEN

Pegfilgrastim is composed of the protein filgrastim to which a 20-kDa polyethylene glycol (PEG) is covalently bound at the N-terminal residue resulting in decreased renal clearance and increased plasma half-life compared with filgrastim. This open-label, randomized, phase 2 study compared two doses of single administration pegfilgrastim (60 and 100 microg/kg) with daily doses of filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day) or no cytokine treatment after standard CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 50 elderly patients. The primary endpoint was the duration of grade 4 (severe) neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/l) in cycle 1. Duration of grade 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 was 2.2 (SD 1.2), 1.5 (SD 1.1), 0.8 (1.2) and 5.0 (2.0) days for patients who received pegfilgrastim 60 microg/kg, pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg, filgrastim 5 microg/kg and no cytokine, respectively. The baseline characteristics of the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups were imbalanced with increased bone-marrow involvement and prior therapy in the former. When the treatment groups were balanced for these risk factors, duration of grade 4 neutropenia was comparable with 2.0 and 3.0 vs. 0.6 and 0.5 days for pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg and filgrastim patients with and without these risk factors, respectively. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (defined as ANC < 0.5 x 10(9)/l and temperature > 38.2degrees C) was low (10% of patients). Pegfilgrastim was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to daily filgrastim. Once per chemotherapy cycle administration of pegfilgrastim was comparable to filgrastim in this clinical setting.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/análogos & derivados , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Australia , Terapia Combinada , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Filgrastim , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Linfoma no Hodgkin/radioterapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Dolor/inducido químicamente , Polietilenglicoles , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes , Seguridad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Vincristina/efectos adversos
2.
Oncol Rep ; 10(3): 715-24, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12684649

RESUMEN

This combined, retrospective analysis compared once-per-chemotherapy-cycle pegfilgrastim with daily Filgrastim in breast cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy enrolled in two similarly designed, randomized, double-blind, pivotal trials. On day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle, a single subcutaneous (SC) injection of pegfilgrastim [either 6 mg (n=77) or 100 microg/kg (n=149)] was administered, or daily Filgrastim SC injections (5 microg/kg/day; n=222) were initiated and continued until either absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or =10 x 10(9)/l after the expected nadir or for up to 14 days, whichever occurred first. Individually, each of these trials demonstrated that a single pegfilgrastim injection per cycle is as effective at reducing the duration of severe neutropenia as daily injections of Filgrastim. Clinical efficacy data from the two trials were combined for analysis (n=448). The risk of febrile neutropenia (FN; absolute neutrophil count <0.5 x 10(9)/l with fever > or =38.2 degrees C) was significantly lower [11% vs 19%, respectively; relative risk = 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.35, 0.89)] in patients receiving pegfilgrastim than for those receiving Filgrastim. Trends towards lower risks of hospitalization and intravenous anti-infective use were also observed. These observations were consistent irrespective of risk factors, including age, disease stage, performance status and prior treatment. Pegfilgrastim may offer patients more effective protection against neutropenic complications of chemotherapy with fewer injections and less disruption to their lives.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/análogos & derivados , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Peso Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Filgrastim , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Polietilenglicoles , Proteínas Recombinantes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA