The Prevalence of Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity and Implications for the Utility of Frozen Section Diagnosis Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Patients with Clinically Node-Negative HER2-Positive or Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Axillary dissection is the standard of care for patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) following neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Frozen section can provide intraoperative information regarding the need for axillary dissection during the index operation. However, there are limited data on the utility of frozen section in patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a single-institution observational cohort study including patients with non-inflammatory, cN0, HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy between 2015 and 2019. We estimated the prevalence of SLN positivity and the diagnostic test characteristics of SLN frozen section. RESULTS: Overall, 662 patients were eligible for inclusion, and 44 patients had one or more positive SLNs (prevalence: 6.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.9-8.8). There were 490 (74.0%) patients who had intraoperative frozen section, and 19 (3.9%) tested positive among 33 (6.7%) with positive final pathology. Frozen section sensitivity was 57.6% (95% CI 39.2-74.5), specificity was 100% (95% CI 99.2-100), positive predictive value was 100% (95% CI 82.4-100), and negative predictive value was 97.0% (95% CI 95.1-98.4). The sensitivity of frozen section for detection of micrometastases or isolated tumor cells was 35.3% (95% CI 14.2-61.7). CONCLUSION: In patients with cN0 HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer who have been treated with neoadjuvant therapy, positive SLNs are uncommon and frozen section sensitivity is modest. Decisions to defer SLN evaluation to final pathology, which may be reasonable in many settings, can be informed, in part, by these findings.

The Spectrum of Non-neoplastic Changes Associated With Breast Implants: Histopathology, Imaging, and Clinical Significance.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma has been recognized as a distinct entity in the World Health Organization classification of hematolymphoid neoplasms. These neoplasms are causally related to textured implants that were used worldwide until recently. Consequently, there is an increased demand for processing periprosthetic capsules, adding new challenges for surgeons, clinicians, and pathologists. In the literature, the focus has been on breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma; however, benign complications related to the placement of breast implants occur in up to 20% to 30% of patients. Imaging studies are helpful in assessing patients with breast implants for evidence of implant rupture, changes in tissues surrounding the implants, or regional lymphadenopathy related to breast implants, but pathologic examination is often required. In this review, we couple our experience with a review of the literature to describe a range of benign lesions associated with breast implants that can be associated with different clinical presentations or pathogenesis and that may require different diagnostic approaches. We illustrate the spectrum of the most common of these benign disorders, highlighting their clinical, imaging, gross, and microscopic features. Finally, we propose a systematic approach for the diagnosis and handling of breast implant specimens in general.

Discordance of Oncotype DX scores in synchronous bilateral and unilateral multifocal breast cancers.

PURPOSE: Oncotype DX, a 21-gene expression profiling test, has become standard of care in the management of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. In multifocal tumors, it is unclear whether testing of the different foci is necessary. We evaluated the concordance of Oncotype DX recurrence scores (RS) between 2 tumor foci in synchronous bilateral or unilateral multifocal tumors and characterized pathological predictors of discordance. METHODS: We reviewed 713 ER+, HER2- primary invasive breast cancer patients with Oncotype RS and identified 17 bilateral synchronous patients (34 tumors) and 13 unilateral multifocal patients (26 tumors) with available Oncotype RS on all foci. Discordance in Oncotype RS between synchronous tumors was recorded and associations with clinicopathologic features including tumor size, histology, Nottingham histologic grade, progesterone receptor staining, and Ki67 index were analyzed. RESULTS: Bilateral synchronous tumors were present in older patients (median age 59 years) and had larger tumor (median size 17 mm) and more discordant histology (10/17, 59%) as compared to unilateral multifocal tumors (median age 49 years, p < 0.01; median tumor size 12 mm, p = 0.01; discordant histology 2/13, 15%, p = 0.03). Oncotype RS were discordant in 47% (8/17) of bilateral and 54% (7/13) of unilateral multifocal tumors. Concordant Oncotype RS was associated with similar histologic grade and Ki67 index in 78% (7/9) of bilateral and 100% (6/6) of multifocal tumors. In contrast, only 25% (2/8) of bilateral (p = 0.06) and 14% (1/7) of unilateral multifocal (p < 0.01) cases with discordant Oncotype RS had concordant histology grades and Ki67 levels. In synchronous tumors with discordant Oncotype RS and Ki67 index, all (4/4) foci with higher RS had higher Ki67 index. CONCLUSION: Discordance of Oncotype RS is common in both bilateral and unilateral multifocal breast cancer and is likely associated with discordant histologic grade or Ki67.

TRPS1 and GATA3 Expression in Invasive Breast Carcinoma With Apocrine Differentiation.

CONTEXT.­: The recently identified immunohistochemical marker TRPS1 is highly sensitive and specific for invasive breast carcinoma, especially triple-negative breast carcinoma. However, TRPS1 expression in special morphologic subtypes of breast cancer is unclear. OBJECTIVE.­: To investigate the expression of TRPS1 in invasive breast cancer with apocrine differentiation, in comparison to the expression of GATA3. DESIGN.­: A total of 52 invasive breast carcinomas with apocrine differentiation, comprising 41 triple-negative breast carcinomas and 11 estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive cases, along with 11 triple-negative breast carcinomas without apocrine differentiation, were evaluated for TRPS1 and GATA3 expression by immunohistochemistry. All tumors were diffusely positive (>90%) for androgen receptor (AR). RESULTS.­: Triple-negative breast carcinoma with apocrine differentiation had positive TRPS1 expression in 12% of cases (5 of 41), whereas GATA3 was positive in all cases. Similarly, HER2+/ER- invasive breast carcinoma with apocrine differentiation showed positive TRPS1 in 18% of cases (2 of 11), whereas GATA3 was positive in all cases. In contrast, triple-negative breast carcinoma with strong AR expression but without apocrine differentiation showed both TRPS1 and GATA3 expression in 100% (11 of 11) of cases. CONCLUSIONS.­: Most ER-/PR-/AR+ invasive breast carcinomas with apocrine differentiation are TRPS1 negative and GATA3 positive, regardless of HER2 status. Therefore, TRPS1 negativity does not exclude breast origin in tumors with apocrine differentiation. A panel of TRPS1 and GATA3 immunostains can be helpful when the tissue origin of such tumors is clinically relevant.

Invasive Carcinoma With Skin Adnexal Trichilemmal Hair Follicular Differentiation Occurring in the Breast: A Case Report With Detailed Immunohistochemical and Molecular Analysis.

Cutaneous-type adnexal tumors involving the breast are rare and create a diagnostic dilemma as they are often indistinguishable from primary mammary neoplasms. Tumors showing hair follicular differentiation are particularly challenging due to their rarity and the subtle appreciation of the intricate microanatomy of the hair follicle. We report a triple negative cutaneous-type adnexal carcinoma with follicular differentiation involving the breast to bring attention to the existence of these specialized group of tumors which should be managed differently from conventional triple negative carcinomas of the breast.

Metastatic nonhematopoietic neoplasms to the breast: a study of 238 cases.

The aim of this study was to review the clinicopathologic characteristics of metastatic nonhematopoietic malignancies to the breast, in order to identify salient features for practicing pathologists that are useful in distinguishing metastatic lesions from primary breast neoplasms. A total of 238 cases were identified during the period from January 2005 to January 2015. Clinicopathologic features of these cases were retrospectively reviewed. Primary tumors included melanoma (99, 42%), serous carcinoma (35, 15%), neuroendocrine neoplasm (32, 13%), sarcoma (23, 10%), and adenocarcinoma from various organs (47, 20%), and 2 others. Most metastases were unilateral (223, 94%) and unifocal (206, 87%) and were detected radiographically (167, 70%). Concurrent ipsilateral axillary metastasis occurred in 33 (14%) patients. Among 238 cases, 41 had metastatic disease to the breast concurrently or preceding the primary cancer diagnosis. Notably, in 39 (16%) cases, breast metastasis was the first clinical presentation of disease, and 16 (41%) of these cases were initially misdiagnosed as breast primaries. In contrast, with a known history of nonmammary primary tumors, only 4 of 197 (2%) cases were misdiagnosed (p < 0.0001). Metastatic tumors share many overlapping features with breast primary carcinomas. However, cases with a well-circumscribed tumor, lack of in situ component, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negativity, and unusual morphologic features should raise the consideration of metastatic disease. While clinical history is paramount for correct diagnosis, metastasis to the breast as the first clinical presentation is not uncommon.

Unusual staining of immunohistochemical markers PAX8 and CDX2 in breast carcinoma: a potential diagnostic pitfall.

Knowing the sensitivity and specificity of tissue-specific immunohistochemical markers is crucial for accurate determination of the primary tumor site. PAX8 has been used as a diagnostic marker for carcinomas of the gynecologic tract, kidney, and thyroid gland, and CDX2 has been used as a marker of gastrointestinal carcinoma. Neither is considered a marker for breast carcinoma (BC). However, we have encountered BCs that express PAX8 or CDX2, some of which caused diagnostic confusion. We investigated the immunohistochemical staining frequency of PAX8 and CDX2 in BC. We identified 237 BCs for which PAX8 staining results were reported (102 primary and 135 metastatic BCs); seven primary and four metastatic BCs (4.6%) were positive for PAX8, with various intensities and staining patterns. CDX2 staining results were reported for 271 BCs (78 primary and 193 metastatic); four primary BCs and one metastatic BC (1.8%) were positive for CDX2, ranging from focal and weak to diffuse and strong. We also stained primary invasive BCs with PAX8 and CDX2 using tissue microarrays. None of the 332 PAX8-stained cases was positive, while one of 143 CDX2-stained cases was positive. Four PAX8-positive and three CDX2-positive cases were stained with TRPS1, and all were positive for TRPS1. In addition, we reviewed the literature for PAX8 and CDX2 expression in BCs and found 5.5% PAX8-positive BCs (90/1625) in 17 studies and 0.8% CDX-2 positive BCs (7/909) in 20 studies. PAX8 and CDX2 are infrequently expressed in BC by immunohistochemistry, and in rare cases, the staining can be strong and diffuse. Additional diagnostic markers are necessary and helpful in distinguishing breast from other primary origins.

TRPS1, GATA3, and SOX10 expression in triple-negative breast carcinoma.

A diagnostic dilemma can be encountered when primary triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) without an in situ component or metastatic TNBCs lose the currently used organ-specific marker such as GATA3, raising concerns about metastatic carcinoma from other sites. In the current study, we compared the newly identified breast marker TRPS1 with currently used breast markers GATA3 and SOX10 in whole-tissue sections from 315 cases of various subtypes of TNBC. TRPS1 was highly expressed in 100% of triple-negative primary and metastatic invasive lobular carcinomas, 99% of triple-negative primary and metastatic invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST), and 95% of metaplastic breast carcinomas. In contrast, GATA3 and SOX10 were expressed in 94% and 0% of invasive lobular carcinomas, 63% and 74% of IBC-NST, and 50% and 49% of metaplastic breast carcinomas, respectively. For special-type TNBCs, both TRPS1 and GATA3 were negative in acinic cell carcinomas, most cribriform adenoid cystic carcinomas, and neuroendocrine carcinomas, but positive in secretory carcinomas. Triple-negative apocrine carcinoma was the only subtype of TNBC with positive GATA3 but negative TRPS1. These data indicate that TRPS1 is a highly sensitive marker for TNBCs with positivity not only in GATA3/SOX10-positive TNBCs but also in almost all GATA3/SOX10-negative TNBCs.

Expression of TRPS1 in phyllodes tumor and sarcoma of the breast.

When a sarcomatous neoplasm is identified in the breast, distinguishing metaplastic carcinoma, malignant phyllodes tumor (MPT), and primary sarcoma is a diagnostic challenge, especially on small biopsies, as all these tumors may have overlapping morphological features, thoroughly grossing with histological examination and immunohistochemical staining being the standard approach to aid in classifying these lesions. Recently, we identified a highly sensitive and specific breast carcinoma marker TRPS1 with high expression in metaplastic breast carcinoma. In the current study, we tested TRPS1 in MPTs and primary sarcoma of the breast. We found TRPS1 was highly expressed (95%) within spindle cell, chondro-osseous, and/or liposarcomatous components of MPTs, in all breast primary chondrosarcomas and extraskeletal osteosarcomas, but not in other sarcomas of the breast. In extramammary sarcomas, TRPS1 was expressed in 28% of conventional chondrosarcomas and 56% of osteosarcomas of bone, but rarely in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPSs), liposarcomas, and angiosarcomas. In summary, MPTs may share similar genetic background with metaplastic carcinoma exhibiting TRPS1 expression, and TRPS1 may play a role in chondro-osseous differentiation because of its expression in chondro-osseous sarcomas from both breast and extramammary sites. Our findings suggest TRPS1 may be clinically useful in distinguishing MPT and metaplastic carcinoma from primary breast sarcoma except for tumors with chondro-osseous differentiation.

Interobserver variability in the assessment of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple-negative invasive breast carcinoma influences the association with pathological complete response: the IVITA study.

High stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are associated with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Histopathological assessment of sTILs in TNBC biopsies is characterized by substantial interobserver variability, but it is unknown whether this affects its association with pCR. Here, we aimed to investigate the degree of interobserver variability in an international study, and its impact on the relationship between sTILs and pCR. Forty pathologists assessed sTILs as a percentage in digitalized biopsy slides, originating from 41 TNBC patients who were treated with NAC followed by surgery. Pathological response was quantified by the MD Anderson Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) score. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated per pathologist duo and Bland-Altman plots were constructed. The relation between sTILs and pCR or RCB class was investigated. The ICCs ranged from -0.376 to 0.947 (mean: 0.659), indicating substantial interobserver variability. Nevertheless, high sTILs scores were significantly associated with pCR for 36 participants (90%), and with RCB class for eight participants (20%). Post hoc sTILs cutoffs at 20% and 40% resulted in variable associations with pCR. The sTILs in TNBC with RCB-II and RCB-III were intermediate to those of RCB-0 and RCB-I, with lowest sTILs observed in RCB-I. However, the limited number of RCB-I cases precludes any definite conclusions due to lack of power, and this observation therefore requires further investigation. In conclusion, sTILs are a robust marker for pCR at the group level. However, if sTILs are to be used to guide the NAC scheme for individual patients, the observed interobserver variability might substantially affect the chance of obtaining a pCR. Future studies should determine the 'ideal' sTILs threshold, and attempt to fine-tune the patient selection for sTILs-based de-escalation of NAC regimens. At present, there is insufficient evidence for robust and reproducible sTILs-guided therapeutic decisions.

Comparison of three FDA-approved diagnostic immunohistochemistry assays of PD-L1 in triple-negative breast carcinoma.

The Dako 28-8, Dako 22C3, and Ventana SP142 assays are among the approved programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemical companion/complementary diagnostics associated with cancer treatment. To address the concordance of these assays in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), we examined PD-L1 expression in 98 TNBC tumors and compared the positive rates using the three assays and three scoring methods: immune cell (IC), tumor cell (TC), and combined tumor cell and immune cell (TCIC) (an equivalent to combined positive score, or CPS). The positive rate for PD-L1 expression with a 1% cutoff was highest with 28-8, followed by the 22C3. These two assays demonstrated almost perfect or substantial agreement in all three scores. There was less agreement between SP142 and the other assays. Using the IC score or the TCIC score at a 1% cutoff (CPS 1), 4% of tumors were positive for PD-L1 with SP142 but negative with the other assays. Using SP142 with a 1% cutoff as a reference, the optimal cutoff for best agreement was at 1% for IC, 30% for TC, and 2% for TCIC (CPS 2) with the other two assays. A 2% cutoff for the 22C3 TCIC (CPS 2) yielded the best agreement with SP142 1% IC cutoff (kappa 0.65). Our study showed the lowest positive rate with SP142 among the three assays. However, the other two assays were not able to identify all tumors that would test positive with SP142 using IC or TCIC/CPS. It is unlikely to achieve high agreement between SP142 and the other two assays by changing the analytical cutoffs.

Analysis of Clinical-Pathological Data with Impact on Overall Survival in Male Breast Carcinoma: An International Multi-Institutional Study of 217 Cases.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical-pathological parameters with impact on overall survival (OS) in male breast carcinoma (MBC). Methodology: We assessed OS at 5 years and at 10 years respectively, as well as OS according to age, tumor size, microscopic type, histological grade, axillary lymph node status, and molecular profile. Results:Two hundred seventeen cases, with a mean age of 62 (range: 18- 85), right breast involvement (52.53%), invasive carcinoma of no special type (86.63%), G2 histological grade (55.4%), T2 (54.41%), N+ (65.89%) and Luminal A molecular subtype (85.29%) were identified. ER, PR and AR were positive in 89.71%, 83.82% and 93.29% of cases, respectively. HER2 was overexpressed in 8.33% of cases and a high Ki67 proliferation index was present in 75% of cases. The 5-year OS was 67.2%, whereas 10-year OS was 48.5%; OS was 92.7% at 5 years and 73.8% at 10 years in axillary lymph node (LN) negative cases, while OS was 59.7% at 5 years and 41.3% at 10 years in axillary LN positive cases (p=0.003). Conclusions: Age at diagnosis ( 60 years), larger tumor size, presence of LN metastases and absence of oncological treatment are negative factors influencing prognosis, with only axillary LN status (p=0.005) and triple negative molecular profile (p=0.05) being statistically significant unfavorable independent prognostic parameters in a multivariate analysis.

Comparison of three scoring methods using the FDA-approved 22C3 immunohistochemistry assay to evaluate PD-L1 expression in breast cancer and their association with clinicopathologic factors.

BACKGROUND: In the evaluation of PD-L1 expression to select patients for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment, uniform guidelines that account for different immunohistochemistry assays, different cell types and different cutoff values across tumor types are lacking. Data on how different scoring methods compare in breast cancer are scant. METHODS: Using FDA-approved 22C3 diagnostic immunohistochemistry assay, we retrospectively evaluated PD-L1 expression in 496 primary invasive breast tumors that were not exposed to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment and compared three scoring methods (TC: invasive tumor cells; IC: tumor-infiltrating immune cells; TCIC: a combination of tumor cells and immune cells) in expression frequency and association with clinicopathologic factors. RESULTS: In the entire cohort, positive PD-L1 expression was observed in 20% of patients by TCIC, 16% by IC, and 10% by TC, with a concordance of 87% between the three methods. In the triple-negative breast cancer patients, positive PD-L1 expression was observed in 35% by TCIC, 31% by IC, and 16% by TC, with a concordance of 76%. Associations between PD-L1 and clinicopathologic factors were investigated according to receptor groups and whether the patients had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The three scoring methods showed differences in their associations with clinicopathologic factors in all subgroups studied. Positive PD-L1 expression by IC was significantly associated with worse overall survival in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and showed a trend for worse overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival in triple-negative patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Positive PD-L1 expression by TCIC and TC also showed trends for worse survival in different subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the three scoring methods with a 1% cutoff are different in their sensitivity for PD-L1 expression and their associations with clinicopathologic factors. Scoring by TCIC is the most sensitive way to identify PD-L1-positive breast cancer by immunohistochemistry. As a prognostic marker, our study suggests that PD-L1 is associated with worse clinical outcome, most often shown by the IC score; however, the other scores may also have clinical implications in some subgroups. Large clinical trials are needed to test the similarities and differences of these scoring methods for their predictive values in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

Interobserver variability in upfront dichotomous histopathological assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the DCISion study.

Histopathological assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ, a nonobligate precursor of invasive breast cancer, is characterized by considerable interobserver variability. Previously, post hoc dichotomization of multicategorical variables was used to determine the "ideal" cutoffs for dichotomous assessment. The present international multicenter study evaluated interobserver variability among 39 pathologists who performed upfront dichotomous evaluation of 149 consecutive ductal carcinomas in situ. All pathologists independently assessed nuclear atypia, necrosis, solid ductal carcinoma in situ architecture, calcifications, stromal architecture, and lobular cancerization in one digital slide per lesion. Stromal inflammation was assessed semiquantitatively. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were quantified as percentages and dichotomously assessed with a cutoff at 50%. Krippendorff's alpha (KA), Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated for the appropriate variables. Lobular cancerization (KA = 0.396), nuclear atypia (KA = 0.422), and stromal architecture (KA = 0.450) showed the highest interobserver variability. Stromal inflammation (KA = 0.564), dichotomously assessed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (KA = 0.520), and comedonecrosis (KA = 0.539) showed slightly lower interobserver disagreement. Solid ductal carcinoma in situ architecture (KA = 0.602) and calcifications (KA = 0.676) presented with the lowest interobserver variability. Semiquantitative assessment of stromal inflammation resulted in a slightly higher interobserver concordance than upfront dichotomous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes assessment (KA = 0.564 versus KA = 0.520). High stromal inflammation corresponded best with dichotomously assessed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes when the cutoff was set at 10% (kappa = 0.881). Nevertheless, a post hoc tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes cutoff set at 20% resulted in the highest interobserver agreement (KA = 0.669). Despite upfront dichotomous evaluation, the interobserver variability remains considerable and is at most acceptable, although it varies among the different histopathological features. Future studies should investigate its impact on ductal carcinoma in situ prognostication. Forthcoming machine learning algorithms may be useful to tackle this substantial diagnostic challenge.

MicroRNA-17 acts as a tumor chemosensitizer by targeting JAB1/CSN5 in triple-negative breast cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the breast cancer subtype with the poorest prognosis. Evidence indicates that aberrant JAB1/CSN5 expression is associated with advanced tumor stage and poor prognosis in breast cancer. In this study, we evaluated expression of JAB1 in TNBC and potential mechanisms regulating this expression. We found that miR-17 expression was lower in TNBC than in normal breast tissue, and miR-17 expression in patients with TNBC was associated with a good prognosis. Furthermore, JAB1 expression was regulated by miR-17 in TNBC cells, and mice with miR-17-overexpressing tumors had less tumor growth and lower tumor JAB1 expression than control mice. We also demonstrated that miR-17 suppressed JAB1's oncogenic function, leading to tumor growth inhibition and sensitizing TNBC cells to chemotherapy treatment. JAB1 knockdown in TNBC cells mimicked the effect of miR-17 overexpression and led to significant decreases in cell proliferation, colony formation, and migration, increased p27 expression, and enhanced cisplatin sensitivity. Our findings suggest that miR-17 acts as a tumor suppressor by directly targeting JAB1 in TNBC; this may lead to novel therapeutic targets and strategies for treating TNBC patients.

Clinical Management of Mucocele-Like Lesions of the Breast with Limited or no Epithelial Atypia on Core Biopsy: Experience from Two Institutions.

PURPOSE: Mucocele-like lesions of the breast identified on core biopsy are rare high-risk lesions associated with variable upgrade rates to carcinoma on excision. We aimed to identify the clinicoradiopathological features that can help optimize management of this lesion. METHODS: We evaluated 50 mucocele-like lesions identified on core biopsies from two institutions, including 36 with no atypia and 14 with limited atypia. Outcome data from excision or clinicoradiological follow-up were reviewed with core biopsy results. RESULTS: Radiological targets were calcifications in 74% of cases, calcifications with associated mass or density in 16%, and mass in 10%. One of the 16 excised lesions without atypia on core biopsy, which was a mass lesion, was upgraded to mucinous carcinoma on excision. Of the 12 excised lesions with limited atypia, none were upgraded on excision. Among the lesions not excised, 20 without atypia had a median follow-up of 61 months, and 2 with limited atypia had follow-up of 97 and 109 months. None of these 22 patients had new development of their lesions on follow-up. The upgrade rate was 2% in our entire cohort, 3% for lesions without atypia, and 0% for lesions with limited atypia. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicoradiological surveillance can be appropriate when a mucocele-like lesion without atypia is identified on core biopsy for a non-mass lesion with pathological-radiological concordance. For mucocele-like lesions with limited atypia, a nonsurgical approach could be considered if the atypia by itself does not warrant excision. The latter recommendation requires careful clinicopathological correlation and support from additional studies.

Histopathological grading of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: validation of a web-based survey through intra-observer reproducibility analysis.

BACKGROUND: Histopathological grading diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast may be very difficult even for experts, and it is important for therapeutic decisions. The challenge may be due to the inaccurate and/or subjective application of the diagnosis criteria. The aim of this study was to investigate the intra-observer agreement between a traditional method and a developed web-based questionnaire for scoring breast DCIS. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out to evaluate the diagnostic agreement of an electronic questionnaire and its point scoring system with the subjective reading of digital images for 3 different DCIS grading systems: Holland, Van Nuys and modified Black nuclear grade system. Three pathologists analyzed the same set of digitized images from 43 DCIS cases using two different web-based programs. In the first phase, they accessed a website with a newly created questionnaire and scoring system developed to allow the determination of the histological grade of the cases. After at least 6 months, the pathologists read again the same images, but without the help of the questionnaire, indicating subjectively the diagnoses. The intra-observer agreement analysis was employed to validate this innovative web-based survey. RESULTS: Overall, diagnostic reproducibility was similar for all histologic grading classification systems, with kappa values of 0.57 ± 0.10, 0.67 ± 0.09 and 0.67 ± 0.09 for Holland, Van Nuys classification and modified Black nuclear grade system respectively. Only two 2-step diagnostic disagreements were found, one for Holland and another for Van Nuys. Both cases were superestimated by the web-based survey. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic agreement between the web-based questionnaire and a traditional method, both using digital images, is moderate to good for Holland, Van Nuys and modified Black nuclear grade system. The use of a scoring point system does not appear to pose a major risk of presenting large (2-step) diagnostic disagreements. These findings indicate that the use of this point scoring system in this web-based survey to grade objectively DCIS lesions is a useful diagnostic tool.

GATA-binding protein 3 enhances the utility of gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 and mammaglobin A in triple-negative breast cancer by immunohistochemistry.

AIMS: We have demonstrated previously that gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) and mammaglobin A (MAM) are of limited utility in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA-3) is an emerging breast-associated immunohistochemical (IHC) marker with limited data in TNBC. Here, we examined GATA-3 expression in TNBC in comparison with GCDFP-15 and MAM. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied GATA-3, GCDFP-15 and MAM IHC expression in 62 primary and 68 metastatic TNBCs. In primary TNBCs, GATA-3 staining was observed in 25 cases (40%), including 16 cases that were negative for GCDFP-15 and MAM. In metastatic TNBCs, GATA-3 staining was observed in 30 cases (44%), including 16 cases that were negative for GCDFP-15 and MAM. The expression frequency of any of the markers was 56% in primary and 62% in metastatic TNBCs. However, when focal staining was excluded, the expression frequency of any marker dropped to 31% and 44%, respectively. CONCLUSION: GATA-3 is expressed at a higher frequency by IHC in TNBC compared to GCDFP-15 and MAM, although the tissue specificity of the latter markers may be superior. When evaluating a triple-negative tumour, including GATA-3 in a panel of markers may increase the diagnostic accuracy for tissue origin in the appropriate clinical setting.