Septal Thickness Does Not Impact Outcome After Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy Surgery (Septal Myectomy and Subvalvular Mitral Apparatus Remodeling): A 15-Years of Experience.

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of septal thickness on long-term outcomes of surgical treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and correction of mitral subvalvular anomalies. Methods: Sixty-six consecutive patients (58 ± 12 years, 56% female) undergoing extended septal myectomy and subvalvular mitral apparatus remodeling from 2007 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to septal thickness: moderate [< 18 mm, 29 patients (44%)] and severe [≥ 18 mm, 37 patients (56%)]. End points included survival, symptom improvement, reduction of left ventricle outflow tract (LVOT) gradient, resolution of mitral regurgitation (MR), and reoperation. Results: The mean interventricular septal thickness was 19 ± 3 mm, 15.8 ± 0.8 mm in patients with moderate and 21.4 ± 3.2 mm in those with severe hypertrophy. Preoperative data, intraoperative variables, postoperative complication rates, pre-discharge echocardiographic and clinical parameters did not differ between the two study groups [except for procedures involving the posterior mitral leaflet (p = 0.033) and septal thickness after myectomy (p = 0.0001)]. Subvalvular apparatus remodeling (secondary chordae of mitral valve resection and papillary muscle and muscularis trabecula procedures including resection, splitting, and elongation) was invariably added to septal myectomy (100%). Four (6%) procedures involved the posterior mitral leaflets. Mitral valve replacement was carried out in two patients (3%, p = 0.4). Reoperation for persistent MR was necessary in one patient (1%, p = 0.4). Neither iatrogenic ventricular septal defect nor in-hospital mortality occurred. During follow-up (mean 4.8 ± 3.8 years), two deaths occurred. NYHA class was reduced from 2.9 ± 0.7 to 1.6 ± 0.6 (p < 0.0001), the LVOT gradient from 89.7 ± 34.5 to 16.3 ± 8.8 mmHg (p < 0.0001), mitral valve regurgitation grade from 2.5 ± 1 to 1.2 ± 0.5 (p < 0.0001), and septal thickness from 18.9 ± 3.7 to 13.9 ± 2.7 mm (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Regardless of septal thickness, subvalvular apparatus remodeling with concomitant septal myectomy can provide satisfactory long-term outcomes in terms of symptom improvement, LVOT obstruction relief, and MR resolution (without mitral valve replacement in most cases) in patients with HOCM.

Sutureless and rapid deployment versus sutured aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched comparison from the Sutureless and Rapid Deployment International Registry.

OBJECTIVES: To compare procedural and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing sutureless (Perceval, Livanova PLC, London, UK) and rapid deployment (Intuity Elite, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) aortic valve replacement (group 1) versus sutured aortic valve replacement (group 2). METHODS: Patients receiving isolated aortic valve replacement between 2014 and 2020 were analysed using data from the Sutureless and Rapid Deployment International Registry. Patients in group 1 and group 2 were propensity-score matched in a 1:1 ratio. RESULTS: A total of 7708 patients were included in the study. After matching, 2 groups of 2643 each were created. Patients in group 1 were more likely to undergo minimally invasive approaches and were associated with shorter operative times when compared with group 2. Overall in-hospital mortality was similar between groups. While an increased risk of stroke was observed in group 1 in the first study period (2014-2016; relative risk 3.76, P < 0.001), no difference was found in more recent year period (relative risk 1.66, P = 0.08; P for heterogeneity 0.003). Group 1 was associated with reduced rates of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome, atrial fibrillation and mild aortic regurgitation. New pacemaker implant was three-fold higher in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed significant differences in procedural and clinical outcomes between the study groups. These results suggest that sutureless and rapid deployment aortic valve replacement should be considered as part of a comprehensive valve programme. The knowledge of the respective post-aortic valve replacement benefits for different valve technologies may result in patient-tailored valve selection with improved clinical outcomes.

Cardiovascular Disease in Ageing: An Overview on Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm as an Emerging Inflammatory Disease.

Medial degeneration associated with thoracic aortic aneurysm and acute aortic dissection was originally described by Erdheim as a noninflammatory lesion related to the loss of smooth muscle cells and elastic fibre fragmentation in the media. Recent evidences propose the strong role of a chronic immune/inflammatory process in aneurysm evocation and progression. The coexistence of inflammatory cells with markers of apoptotic vascular cell death in the media of ascending aorta with aneurysms and type A dissections raises the possibility that activated T cells and macrophages may contribute to the elimination of smooth muscle cells and degradation of the matrix. On the other hand, several inflammatory pathways (including TGF-ß, TLR-4 interferon-γ, chemokines, and interferon-γ) seem to be involved in the medial degeneration related to aged and dilated aorta. This is an overview on thoracic aortic aneurysm as an emerging inflammatory disease.

Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography for Surgical Repair of Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Segmental analysis of diseased mitral valves is important to predict a successful surgical valve repair. An assessment was made of the comparative accuracy of intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the evaluation of mitral valve lesions when compared with intraoperative surgical segmental analysis. METHODS: A total of 42 consecutive patients (12 females, 30 males; mean age 70.5 ± 14 years) with severe mitral valve regurgitation due to degenerative disease and who underwent mitral valve repair was enrolled in the study. Complete 2D- and 3D-TEE were performed before surgery. The findings obtained using the different echocardiographic techniques were compared with intraoperative segmental analysis performed by a single operator who was blinded to the 2D- and 3D-TEE findings until the end of the inspection. The sensitivity and specificity of echocardiographic evaluations of involved scallops were compared with surgical inspection. RESULTS: 3D-TEE allowed an accurate identification of all mitral lesions. Thirty-three patients had simple lesions at 3D-TEE and underwent a simple surgical procedure, while nine patients had complex lesions; in these latter cases complex surgical procedures were performed. 3D-TEE showed more sensitivity than 2D-TEE in the analysis of the anterior leaflet (A), in particular for A3 lesion (100% versus 25%, p <0.001) and for complex lesion (100% versus 33.3%, p <0.009). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-TEE allowed a more accurate identification of mitral valve lesions compared with 2D-TEE. The greatest accuracy was achieved for analysis of the anterior leaflet. 3D-TEE should be regarded as an important adjunct to standard 2D-TEE in decisions regarding mitral valve repair.