Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Health Promot Pract ; 21(6): 898-904, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32990046

RESUMEN

As an awardee of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program, the California Department of Public Health partnered with Neighborhood Healthcare to implement evidence-based interventions and provider incentives (incentives offered to support staff, e.g., medical assistants, phlebotomists, front office staff, lab technicians) to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and cost of the provider incentive intervention implemented by Neighborhood Healthcare to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake. We collected and analyzed process and cost data to assess fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit return rates to the health centers and the number of completed FIT kits. We estimated the costs of the preexisting interventions and the new interventions. Analyses were conducted for two time periods: preimplementation and implementation. Most Neighborhood Healthcare health centers experienced an increase in the percentage of FIT kit returns (average of 3.6 percentage points) and individuals screened (an average increase of 111 FIT kits per month) from the baseline period through the implementation period. The cost of the incentive intervention for each additional screen was $66.79. In conclusion, the results indicate that incentive programs can have an overall positive impact on both the percentage of FIT kits returned and the number of individuals screened.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Motivación , California , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Atención a la Salud , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Sangre Oculta
2.
Cancer ; 124(21): 4137-4144, 2018 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30359474

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This report details the cost effectiveness of a non-nurse patient navigation (PN) program that was implemented at the University of Chicago Medical Center to increase colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. METHODS: The authors investigated the impact of the PN intervention by collecting process measures. Individuals who received navigation were compared with a historic cohort of non-navigated patients. In addition, a previously validated data-collection instrument was tailored and used to collect all costs related to developing, implementing, and administering the program; and the incremental cost per patient successfully navigated (the cost of the intervention divided by the change in the number who complete screening) was calculated. RESULTS: The screening colonoscopy completion rate was 85.1% among those who were selected to receive PN compared with 74.3% when no navigation was implemented. With navigation, the proportion of no-shows was 8.2% compared with 15.4% of a historic cohort of non-navigated patients. Because the perceived risk of noncompletion was greater among those who received PN (previous no-show or cancellation, poor bowel preparation) than that in the historic cohort, a scenario analysis was performed. Assuming no-show rates between 0% and 50% and using a navigated rate of 85%, the total incremental program cost per patient successfully navigated ranged from $148 to $359, whereas the incremental intervention-only implementation cost ranged from $88 to $215. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings indicate that non-nurse PN can increase colonoscopy completion, and this can be achieved at a minimal incremental cost for an insured population at an urban academic medical center.


Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Navegación de Pacientes/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Chicago/epidemiología , Colonoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/normas , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Navegación de Pacientes/organización & administración , Navegación de Pacientes/normas , Participación del Paciente/economía , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 15(2): 116-22, 2006 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16536674

RESUMEN

Disparities in health status and health outcomes exist among subpopulations of women; these disparities may be related to socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, and country of birth. In this paper, we use surveillance data from 2003 and earlier to examine racial and ethnic differences among women in sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and tuberculosis. We also describe prevention programs the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed to address the disparities.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/etnología , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/etnología , Tuberculosis/etnología , Salud de la Mujer/etnología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Asiático/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Emigración e Inmigración/estadística & datos numéricos , Emigración e Inmigración/tendencias , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Indígenas Norteamericanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA