Significado pronóstico de la extensión extranodal en pacientes con carcinomas escamosos de cabeza y cuello cN0 con metástasis ganglionares ocultas / Prognostic significance of extranodal extension in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cN0 patients with occult metastatic neck nodes

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: La presencia de extensión extranodal en adenopatías metastásicas de pacientes con carcinoma escamoso de cabeza y cuello es un reconocido factor de mal pronóstico. Sin embargo, pocos estudios analizan específicamente su significado en pacientes sin evidencia clínica de extensión ganglionar en el momento del diagnóstico inicial. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de 348 pacientes con carcinoma escamoso de cabeza y cuello cN0 tratados con un vaciamiento cervical electivo. Se evaluó la presencia de metástasis ganglionares ocultas con extensión extranodal y se analizó su impacto sobre la supervivencia. RESULTADOS: El porcentaje de pacientes con metástasis ganglionares ocultas fue del 33%. De estos, un 23,5% presentaron al menos una adenopatía metastásica con extensión extranodal. Existieron diferencias significativas en la supervivencia específica en función del estatus ganglionar. La supervivencia a los 5 años para los pacientes sin afectación ganglionar patológica fue del 90%, para aquellos con metástasis ganglionares ocultas sin extensión extranodal, del 71,2%, y para los pacientes con metástasis ganglionares ocultas con extensión extranodal, del 25,9% (p = 0,0001). En un estudio multivariante la presencia de metástasis ganglionares ocultas con extensión extranodal fue el factor relacionado de forma más importante con la supervivencia. La incorporación de la extensión extranodal como criterio de clasificación histopatológico en la octava edición del TNM mejoró la capacidad pronóstica en relación con las ediciones anteriores. CONCLUSIONES: La presencia de adenopatías metastásicas con extensión extranodal es un factor de mal pronóstico en pacientes con carcinoma escamoso de cabeza y cuello sin evidencia clínica de afectación regional en el momento del diagnóstico de la enfermedad

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Extranodal extension in nodal metastases is an independent adverse prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. However, few studies specifically address the subgroup of patients with no clinical evidence of nodal disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from 348 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients without any previous treatment and lacking clinical or radiological evidence of neck node metastases during the initial workup, treated with an elective neck dissection between 1992-2014. The incidence of occult metastatic neck nodes with extranodal extension and the impact of extranodal extension in survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with occult neck node metastases was 33%. Of these, 23.5% had at least one metastatic neck node with extranodal extension. There were significant differences in the disease-specific survival rate according to neck node status. Five-year disease-specific survival for patients without histopathological metastases was 90%, for patients with occult neck node metastases without extranodal extension it was 71.2%, and for patients with occult neck node metastases with extranodal extension it was 25.9% (P = .0001). The multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of occult node metastases with extranodal extension was the factor with strongest impact on survival. The inclusion of the extranodal extension as a criterion of histopathological evaluation in the 8 th TNM classification edition improves the prognostic capacity compared to previous TNM editions. CONCLUSIONS: Appearance of metastatic neck nodes with extranodal extension is an adverse prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients without clinical evidence of regional disease during the initial workup of the tumour

Prognostic significance of extranodal extension in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cN0 patients with occult metastatic neck nodes. / Significado pronóstico de la extensión extranodal en pacientes con carcinomas escamosos de cabeza y cuello cN0 con metástasis ganglionares ocultas.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Extranodal extension in nodal metastases is an independent adverse prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. However, few studies specifically address the subgroup of patients with no clinical evidence of nodal disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from 348 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients without any previous treatment and lacking clinical or radiological evidence of neck node metastases during the initial workup, treated with an elective neck dissection between 1992-2014. The incidence of occult metastatic neck nodes with extranodal extension and the impact of extranodal extension in survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with occult neck node metastases was 33%. Of these, 23.5% had at least one metastatic neck node with extranodal extension. There were significant differences in the disease-specific survival rate according to neck node status. Five-year disease-specific survival for patients without histopathological metastases was 90%, for patients with occult neck node metastases without extranodal extension it was 71.2%, and for patients with occult neck node metastases with extranodal extension it was 25.9% (P=.0001). The multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of occult node metastases with extranodal extension was the factor with strongest impact on survival. The inclusion of the extranodal extension as a criterion of histopathological evaluation in the 8th TNM classification edition improves the prognostic capacity compared to previous TNM editions. CONCLUSIONS: Appearance of metastatic neck nodes with extranodal extension is an adverse prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients without clinical evidence of regional disease during the initial workup of the tumour.

Prognostic significance of extracapsular spread in isolated neck recurrences in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Few studies have analyzed the appearance of extracapsular spread (ECS) in salvage neck dissections carried out after regional recurrence of the disease. The aim of our study was to evaluate the frequency of ECS in patients with an isolated regional recurrence treated with a salvage neck dissection, and to assess the influence of ECS on prognosis. We conducted a retrospective study of 123 patients treated with a salvage neck dissection. Eighty-two patients (66.7 %) had nodes with ECS. Five-year salvage-specific survival for patients without ECS was 77.2 %, whereas for patients with ECS it was 32.0 % (P = 0.0001). According to the results of a multivariate analysis, the presence of ECS in the salvage neck dissection was the only variable significantly related to the salvage-specific survival. Sixty-six percent of the patients with nodes with ECS had adjuvant treatment with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Five-year salvage-specific survival for patients with ECS who had not received adjuvant treatment (n = 26) was 15.2 %, whereas for patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 39) or chemotherapy (n = 17), 5-year salvage-specific survival was 36.4 and 47.1 %, respectively. Patients with ECS could benefit from adjuvant treatment with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.