Ten-year experience of whole lung lavage in pediatric Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis (PAP) is extremely rare and can be caused by hereditary dysfunction of the granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor (GM-CSF) receptor, autoantibodies against GM-CSF, or other diseases leading to alveolar macrophage (AM) dysfunction. This leads to protein accumulation in the lung and severe dyspnea and hypoxemia. Whole lung lavage (WLL) is the first line treatment strategy. METHODS: Here, we present data from more than ten years of WLL practice in pediatric PAP. WLL performed by the use of a single lumen or double lumen tube (SLT vs. DLT) were compared for technical features, procedure time, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of n=57 procedures in six PAP patients between 3.5 and 14.3 years of age were performed. SLT based WLL in smaller children was associated with comparable rates of adverse events but with longer intervention times and postprocedural intensive care treatment when compared to DLT based procedures. DISCUSSION: Our data shows that WLL is feasible even in small children. DLT based WLL seems to be more effective, and our data supports the notion that it should be considered as early as possible in pediatric PAP. CONCLUSION: WLL lavage is possible in small PAP patients but should performed in close interdisciplinary cooperation and with age appropriate protocols.

Incidence and characteristics of errors detected by a short team briefing in pediatric anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: In our institution, a modified WHO surgical safety checklist was implemented more than ten years ago. In retrospect, we noticed that pediatric anesthesia was underrepresented in our surgical safety checklist modification. Therefore, we added a standardized team briefing (pedSOAP-M) immediately before induction of anesthesia and hypothesized that the use of this checklist was effective to detect relevant errors with potentially harmful consequences. AIMS: The primary aim was to assess the incidence and characteristics of the detected errors, and the secondary aim was to identify factors influencing error detection. METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed between November 2020 and October 2021 in five operation rooms at the Children's Hospital of Hannover Medical School, Germany. The subcategories of the pedSOAP-M checklist were suction, oxygen, airway, pharmaceuticals, and monitoring. Demographic and procedure-related data and the briefing results were documented anonymously and undated, using a standardized case report form. RESULTS: We enrolled 1030 and analyzed 1025 patients (aged 0-18 years). Relevant errors were detected in 111 (10.8%) cases (suction 2.5%, oxygen 3.0%, airway 0.2%, pharmaceuticals 2.4%, monitoring 3.0%). In the pharmaceuticals subcategory, the most common error was entering a wrong patient weight into the perfusor syringe pumps. Experienced anesthetists detected significantly more errors than less experienced ones. CONCLUSION: The briefing tool pedSOAP-M was effective in detecting relevant errors with potentially harmful consequences. The presence of an experienced anesthetist was associated with a higher efficacy of the briefing. Particular attention should be given to entering patient weight into the anesthesia workstation and the perfusor syringe pumps.

The impact of modified fluid gelatin 4% in a balanced electrolyte solution on plasma osmolality in children-A noninterventional observational study.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous fluids for perioperative infusion therapy should be isotonic to maintain the body fluid homeostasis in children. Modified fluid gelatin 4% in a balanced electrolyte solution has a theoretical osmolarity of 284 mosmol L-1 , and a real osmolality of 264 mosmol kg H2 O-1 . Because both values are lower than those of 0.9% saline or plasma, gelatin would be expected to be hypotonic in-vitro and in-vivo. AIM: We thus hypothesized that the infusion of gelatin would be expected to decrease plasma osmolality. We performed an in-vitro experiment and an in-vivo study to evaluate the impact of gelatin on the osmolality in children. METHODS: In the in-vitro experiment, full blood samples were diluted with gelatin 4% or albumin (50 g L-1 ) from 0% (pure blood) to 100% (pure colloid), and the osmolality was measured by freezing-point depression. In the in-vivo study, blood gas analyses from children undergoing major pediatric surgery were collected before and after gelatin infusion, and the osmolality was calculated by a modified version of Zander's formula. RESULTS: In the in-vitro experiment, 65 gradually diluted blood samples from five volunteers (age 25-55 years) were analyzed. The dilution with gelatin caused no significant changes in osmolality between 0% and 100%. Compared with gelatin, the osmolality in the albumin group was significantly lower between 50% and 100% dilution (p < .05). In the in-vivo study, 221 children (age 21.4 ± 30 months) were included. After gelatin infusion, the osmolality increased significantly (mean change 4.3 ± 4.8 [95% CI 3.7-4.9] mosmol kg H2 O-1 ; p < .01) within a normal range. CONCLUSIONS: Gelatin in a balanced electrolyte solution has isotonic characteristics in-vitro and in-vivo, despite the low theoretical osmolarity, probably caused by the (unmeasured) negative charges in the gelatin molecules contributing to the plasma osmolality. For a better evaluation of the (real) tonicity of gelatin-containing solutions, we suggest to calculate the osmolality (mosmol kg H2 O-1 ) using Zander's formula. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02495285).

Correlation of exhaled propofol with Narcotrend index and calculated propofol plasma levels in children undergoing surgery under total intravenous anesthesia - an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Exhaled propofol concentrations correlate with propofol concentrations in adult human blood and the brain tissue of rats, as well as with electroencephalography (EEG) based indices of anesthetic depth. The pharmacokinetics of propofol are however different in children compared to adults. The value of exhaled propofol measurements in pediatric anesthesia has not yet been investigated. Breathing system filters and breathing circuits can also interfere with the measurements. In this study, we investigated correlations between exhaled propofol (exP) concentrations and the Narkotrend Index (NI) as well as calculated propofol plasma concentrations. METHODS: A multi-capillary-column (MCC) combined with ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) was used to determine exP. Optimal positioning of breathing system filters (near-patient or patient-distant) and sample line (proximal or distal to filter) were investigated. Measurements were taken during induction (I), maintenance (M) and emergence (E) of children under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Correlations between ExP concentrations and NI and predicted plasma propofol concentrations (using pediatric pharmacokinetic models Kataria and Paedfusor) were assessed using Pearson correlation and regression analysis. RESULTS: Near-patient positioning of breathing system filters led to continuously rising exP values when exP was measured proximal to the filters, and lower concentrations when exP was measured distal to the filters. The breathing system filters were therefore subsequently attached between the breathing system tubes and the inspiratory and expiratory limbs of the anesthetic machine. ExP concentrations significantly correlated with NI and propofol concentrations predicted by pharmacokinetic models during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. During emergence, exP significantly correlated with predicted propofol concentrations, but not with NI. CONCLUSION: In this study, we demonstrated that exP correlates with calculated propofol concentrations and NI during induction and maintenance in pediatric patients. However, the correlations are highly variable and there are substantial obstacles: Without patient proximal placement of filters, the breathing circuit tubing must be changed after each patient, and furthermore, during ventilation, a considerable additional loss of heat and moisture can occur. Adhesion of propofol to plastic parts (endotracheal tube, breathing circle) may especially be problematic during emergence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the German registry of clinical studies (DRKS-ID:  DRKS00015795 ).