RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The presence of concomitant mitral (MR) or tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common issue in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The objective was (i) to analyse the outcomes of patients with concomitant moderate or more severe MR, (ii) to compare the outcomes with those of TAVI patients without concomitant MR and (iii) to evaluate the impact of TAVI on grade of concomitant MR. METHODS: For creating a homogeneous study group, the study was restricted to transapical (TA)-TAVI patients. Since 2008, 615 patients have undergone TAVI at our institution, 386 of these using the TA approach with the Edwards SAPIEN™ bioprosthesis. Out of these, 116 (30.1%) presented with concomitant moderate or more severe MR. Mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk (EuroSCORE) was 18.1 ± 11.5%, EuroSCORE II 5.4 ± 0.7%. Intra- and post-hospital course, change in grade of MR, TR, right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) were particularly analysed. Outcomes were compared with those of the remaining TA-TAVI patients (n = 270). Mean follow-up time was 471 ± 391 days, giving a total of 135 patient-years. RESULTS: Three patients (2.6%) died during primary hospital stay. Estimated 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-year survival rates were 76.7, 75.6, 68.3 and 50.6% for study and 78.1, 77.8, 61.1 and 55.0% for control groups, respectively. Postoperative morbidity and mortality did not differ significantly from those of the control group. Postoperatively, a significant reduction in MR (2.1 ± 0.2 to 1.5 ± 0.7; P < 0.01) and TR (1.9 ± 0.5 to 1.5 ± 0.7; P < 0.01) was observed. Likewise, RVSP decreased significantly from 46 ± 16 to 39 ± 15 mmHg (P < 0.01) and TAPSE non-significantly (21.9 ± 7.3 to 19.5 ± 5.5 mm; P = 0.07). After 3-6 months, 68.9% of the patients were at New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I or II, 25% at Class III and 6.0% downgraded to Class IV. A reason for remaining in NYHA Class III or downgrading to NYHA Class IV could not be detected, and particularly, there was no impact of grade of MR/TR, left ventricular ejection fraction, TAPSE or right ventricular endsystolic pressure (RVESP) on outcomes or NYHA class. CONCLUSION: TA-TAVI in patients with concomitant moderate or more severe MR provides results comparable with those of TA-TAVI in general. Concomitant MR had no significant impact on the short- and mid-term outcomes. A significant reduction in MR, TR and pulmonary hypertension was observed after TA-TAVI during short-term follow-up. Nonetheless, a relevant number of patients did not experience an improvement in NYHA class.
