Mirvetuximab after anaphylaxis to Paclitaxel: A case report.

Introduction: Patients with platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer have limited treatment options which are further limited by hypersensitivity reactions to first line medications such as paclitaxel. Paclitaxel is a taxane that inhibits microtubules and has a high incidence of hypersensitivity reactions. Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV) is a folate receptor alpha (FRα) directed antibody and microtubule inhibitor that is approved for patients with FRα positive platinum resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Both medications are microtubule-targeting agents with similar binding sites, therefore a theoretical risk of cross reactivity between paclitaxel and MIRV may exist. Additionally, phase II clinical trial, SORAYA, did not include data on patients with prior hypersensitivity to paclitaxel. Case: This is the case of a 33-year-old female with recurrent stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer with a history of severe anaphylaxis to paclitaxel. She was deemed eligible for MIRV after progression on multiple regimens, but MIRV was given with caution given her severe reaction history. With proper pre-treatment and monitoring, she was treated with MIRV without a reaction. Discussion: It is suspected that most paclitaxel reactions are due to the cremophor solvent rather than paclitaxel itself; however, cross reactivity with docetaxel which is suspended in a polysorbate solution can also occur. Therefore, there is no clear way to determine the risk of cross reactivity between paclitaxel and similar medications. MIRV is also suspended in polysorbate and has a similar mechanism to taxanes, therefore it was unknown if a patient with a prior grade 5 reaction to paclitaxel would also have a reaction to MIRV. Though this is one case, patients with a history of severe hypersensitivity to paclitaxel and meet the criteria for MIRV could be treated with MIRV with careful monitoring.

The role of obesity in treatment planning for early-stage cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Optimal management of obese patients with early-stage cervical cancer is debated despite evidence of non-inferior survival in obese patients undergoing radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (RH) compared to primary radiation with or without radiosensitizing chemotherapy (RT). Objectives included describing patient factors affecting disposition to RH versus RT; comparing RH outcomes for obese (BMI >30 mg/m2) and non-obese patients; and comparing differences in recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: This was a single institution cohort study of all cervical cancer patients who underwent RH or were candidates for RH based on clinical stage. Demographic, clinicopathologic and treatment outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: RT patients (n = 39, 15%) had a higher BMI (p = 0.004), older age (p < 0.001), more life-limiting comorbidities (LLC) (p < 0.001), larger tumor size (p = 0.001), and higher clinical stage (p = 0.013) compared to RH patients (n = 221, 85%). On multivariable survival analysis there was no difference in OS based on treatment modality; significant predictors of worse OS were larger tumor size, higher number of LLC and recurrence. Among the RH group, obese patients had a longer operative time (p = 0.01) and more LLC (p = 0.02); there were no differences in demographic or clinicopathologic characteristics, operative outcomes, RFS or OS compared to non-obese patients. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of RH-eligible cervical cancer patients, BMI was independently associated with disposition to RT. Studies demonstrate that RH is feasible and safe in obese patients with no difference in RFS or OS when compared to non-obese patients. Thus, the decision for disposition to RT should not be based on obesity alone.

Implementation of Nurse Navigation Improves Rate of Molecular Tumor Testing for Ovarian Cancer in a Gynecologic Oncology Practice.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of implementing a Nurse Navigator (NN) to improve the rate and timeliness of molecular tumor testing. METHODS: This is an evaluation of the impact of education sessions, consensus building, and NN implementation for molecular tumor testing in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. The NNs' responsibilities included attending tumor boards and ensuring Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is ordered, reviewed, and coordinated for appropriate patients. RESULTS: NNs significantly improved NGS testing rates from 35.29% to 77.27%, p = 0.002. Ordering a targeted panel test (TPT) was the most common reason for not ordering NGS in the pre-NN cohort (13/22, 59%). The total turnaround time for testing was reduced after the introduction of NNs from 145.2 days to 42.8 days, p < 0.0001. The post-NN group had a significantly higher rate of actionable mutations identified for the recurrent setting [67.6% versus 20.8% (p = 0.0005)] and a trend towards a higher rate of actionable mutations identified in the frontline setting [41.2% versus 33.3% (p = 0.41)]. CONCLUSION: NNs significantly improved somatic tumor testing rates and timeliness for patients with ovarian cancer. Discontinuing TPT in favor of NGS revealed a higher rate of actionable tumor mutations that would have been missed with TPT alone.