Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transplant Proc ; 48(9): 3021-3023, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27932136

RESUMEN

Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation (HTx) has a very high mortality rate, especially if the left ventricle (PGD-LV) is involved. Early diagnosis is important to select the appropriate therapy to improve prognosis. The value of high-sensitivity troponin T (HS-TNT) measurement obtained at patient arrival at the intensive care unit was analyzed in 71 HTx patients. Mild or moderate PGD-LV was defined by hemodynamic compromise with one of the following criteria: left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, hemodynamic compromise with right atrial pressure >15 mm Hg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >20 mm Hg, cardiac index <2.0 L/min/m2, hypotension (mean arterial pressure <70 mm Hg), and need for high-dose inotropes (inotrope score >10) or newly placed intra-aortic balloon pump. The mean recipient age was 54 ± 12 years (73% men), and donor age was 47 ± 11 years. Ischemic time was 200 ± 51 minutes, and coronary bypass time was 122 ± 31 minutes. Nine (13%) HTx patients were diagnosed with PGD-LV post-HTx, 8 with biventricular dysfunction. Four patients died, 2 with PGD-LV (22%) and 2 without PGD (4%). Mean HS-TNT before HTx was 158 ± 565 ng/L, and post-HT was 1621 ± 1269 ng/L. The area under the curve (receiver-operator characteristic) of HS-TNT to detect patients at risk of PGD-LV was 0.860 (P < .003). A cutoff value of HS-TNT >2000 ng/L had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 87% to identify patients at risk of PGD-LV. Multivariate analysis identified HS-TNT >2000 ng/L (P < .02) and coronary bypass-time (P < .01) as independent predictors of PGD-LV. HS-TNT >2000 ng/L at intensive care admission after HT and prolonged coronary bypass time were the most powerful predictors of PGD-LV. HS-TNT may be helpful for early detection of HTx patients at risk of PGD-LV.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/diagnóstico , Troponina T/metabolismo , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Ventrículos Cardíacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/etiología
2.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim ; 56(6): 361-71, 2009.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19725344

RESUMEN

Interventional neuroradiology procedures have become increasingly complex, requiring planning and coordination. Key roles are played by the anesthesiologist and the radiologist, as well as by technicians and nurses. This review aims to analyze the anesthesiologist's part in managing these procedures, from the start of the intervention through the immediate postoperative period. First concerns are to assure patient safety during transfer, maintain the airway, keep the patient immobile and hemodynamically stable, and manage anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatments. Rapid awakening must also be assured so that the patient's neurologic status can be assessed in situ. The anesthesiologist should treat any neurologic complications that develop and that might lead to emergency situations during the procedures.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Anestesiología , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Encefalopatías/cirugía , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/cirugía , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & control , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Rol del Médico , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Medicación Preanestésica , Cuidados Preoperatorios
3.
Rev. esp. anestesiol. reanim ; 56(6): 361-371, jun.-jul. 2009. tab, ilus
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-77864

RESUMEN

Los procedimientos que se realizan en neurorradiologíaintervencionista son cada vez más complejos por loque deben estar bien planificados y coordinados. Elanestesiólogo junto con el radiólogo, técnicos y enfermerasjuega un papel fundamental. Con esta revisión sepretende analizar el papel del anestesiólogo en estos procedimientosdesde el inicio hasta su manejo en el postoperatorioinmediato. En primer lugar debe garantizar laseguridad en el transporte, mantener la vía aérea, conseguirla inmovilidad del paciente, controlar la estabilidadhemodinámica, manejar la anticoagulación y la antiagregacióny asegurar un despertar rápido para valorarneurológicamente al paciente in situ. Así mismo, deberátratar las posibles complicaciones cerebrales durante losprocedimientos que pueden llegar a ser emergencias (AU)


Interventional neuroradiology procedures havebecome increasingly complex, requiring planning andcoordination. Key roles are played by the anesthesiologistand the radiologist, as well as by technicians and nurses.This review aims to analyze the anesthesiologist’s part inmanaging these procedures, from the start of theintervention through the immediate postoperativeperiod. First concerns are to assure patient safety duringtransfer, maintain the airway, keep the patient immobileand hemodynamically stable, and manage anticoagulantand antiplatelet treatments. Rapid awakening must alsobe assured so that the patient’s neurologic status can beassessed in situ. The anesthesiologist should treat anyneurologic complications that develop and that mightlead to emergency situations during the procedures (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/cirugía , Anestesia General/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional , Neurocirugia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...