Effect of Soccer Boot Outsole Configuration on Translational Traction Across Both Natural and Artificial Playing Surfaces.

Background: Soccer boots are produced with different stud patterns and configurations to provide players with extra traction on specific surface types to minimize slipping and improve player performance. Excessive traction, however, can lead to foot fixation injuries, particularly anterior cruciate ligament tears. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to explore the translational traction properties of 5 different outsole configurations moving in 4 different directions across both natural grass and artificial grass (AG) playing surfaces. It was hypothesized that longer studs or studs with an asymmetric shape would yield a higher traction coefficient compared with the recommended stud configuration for the given playing surface. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A custom-built testing apparatus recorded the translational traction of 5 different soccer boots moving in an anterior, posterior, medial, or lateral direction on both natural grass and AG playing surfaces. A 3-way analysis of variance was performed to determine the effect of outsole configuration on the traction, and a post hoc Tukey analysis was performed to compare different outsole configurations with a control. Results: For the natural grass playing surface, the longer and asymmetric studs yielded a significantly higher (P < .05) traction coefficient on 75% of loading scenarios, while on AG, they yielded a significantly higher traction on 50% of loading scenarios. Conclusion: Some soccer boots yielded higher traction values compared with the recommended configuration. Clinical Relevance: The results highlight the importance of boot selection on different playing surfaces. Higher traction values could increase the injury risk for players due to excessive traction and foot fixation.

Neck stiffness and range of motion for young males and females.

Well characterised mechanical response of the normal head-neck complex during passive motion is important to inform and verify physical surrogate and computational models of the human neck, and to inform normal baseline for clinical assessments. For 10 male and 10 female participants aged 20 to 29, the range of motion (ROM) of the neck about three anatomical axes was evaluated in active-seated, passive-lying and active-lying configurations, and the neck stiffness was evaluated in passive-lying. Electromyographic signals from the agonist muscles, normalised to maximum voluntary contractions, were used to provide feedback during passive motions. The effect of sex and configuration on ROM, and the effect of sex on linear estimates of stiffness in three regions of the moment-angle curve, were assessed with linear mixed models and generalised linear models. There were no differences in male and female ROM across all motion directions and configurations. Flexion and axial rotation ROM were configuration dependent. The passive-lying moment-angle relationship was typically non-linear, with higher stiffness (slope) closer to end of ROM. When normalising the passive moment-angle curve to active lying ROM, passive stiffness was sex dependent only for lateral bending region 1 and 2. Aggregate moment-angle corridors were similar for males and females in flexion and extension, but exhibited a higher degree of variation in applied moment for males in lateral bending and axial rotation. These data provide the passive response of the neck to low rate bending and axial rotation angular displacement, which may be useful for computational and surrogate modelling of the human neck.

Evaluation of Apparatus and Protocols to Measure Human Passive Neck Stiffness and Range of Motion.

Understanding of human neck stiffness and range of motion (ROM) with minimal neck muscle activation ("passive") is important for clinical and bioengineering applications. The aim of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate the reliability of methods for assessing passive-lying stiffness and ROM, in six head-neck rotation directions. Six participants completed two assessment sessions. To perform passive-lying tests, the participant's head and torso were strapped to a bending (flexion, extension, lateral bending) or a rotation (axial rotation) apparatus, and clinical bed, respectively. The head and neck were manually rotated by the researcher to the participant's maximum ROM, to assess passive-lying stiffness. Participant-initiated ("active") head ROM was also assessed in the apparatus, and seated. Various measures of apparatus functionality were assessed. ROM was similar for all assessment configurations in each motion direction except flexion. In each direction, passive stiffness generally increased throughout neck rotation. Within-session reliability for stiffness (ICC > 0.656) and ROM (ICC > 0.872) was acceptable, but between-session reliability was low for some motion directions, probably due to intrinsic participant factors, participant-apparatus interaction, and the relatively low participant number. Moment-angle corridors from both assessment sessions were similar, suggesting that with greater sample size, these methods may be suitable for estimating population-level corridors.