Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Asunto principal
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Fertil Steril ; 119(4): 634-643, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36563836

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability of physical examination (PE), transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone and combined to diagnose deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). DESIGN: We retrospectively queried our pelvic MRI database to identify women who underwent PE, TVUS, and pelvic MRI for DIE up to 12 months before surgery between January 1, 2016 and August 31, 2020. The presence of uterosacral ligaments (USL), vaginal, rectosigmoid (RS), parametrial, or sacrorectogenital septum (lateral) DIE shown by PE, TVUS, and MRI were correlated with surgical and histological findings. SETTING: Academic hospital. PATIENT(S): We included 178 patients. INTERVENTION(S): Clinical and imaging evaluation of women who were diagnosed at surgery with deep pelvic endometriosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of each technique separately and combined were assessed for each location. When the 3 techniques were combined, 2 models were tested as follows: all 3 techniques positive and concordant; and ≥2 techniques positive and concordant. RESULT(S): The prevalence of USL, vaginal, RS, and lateral DIE were 94.4%, 20.2%, 34.3%, and 32.6%, respectively. In addition, MRI was more sensitive than PE, TVUS or any combination to detect DIE. Moreover, MRI and model B were the most accurate for detecting USL and RS locations with an accuracy of 90.4% and 82.6%, a sensitivity of 91.1% and 50%, and a specificity of 77.8% and 90.9%, respectively. Model B was the most accurate for the vaginal location with an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 82.6%, 50%, and 90.9%, respectively. Finally, MRI was more accurate than any combination for identifying a lateral location with an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 75.1%, 36%, and 93.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): A combination of PE, TVUS, and MRI was more accurate than each technique separately to diagnose DIE because of the equally high sensitivity of each, as well as the high specificity of PE and TVUS.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis , Humanos , Femenino , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Endometriosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Endometriosis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Examen Físico
2.
Radiol Case Rep ; 16(5): 1103-1106, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33717392

RESUMEN

Colorectal intussusception is a rare entity in adults presenting an acute abdomen. The authors present a case of a 73-year-old female who presented with an acute large bowel obstruction. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan reveals a colorectal intussusception with a colonic distension upstream. Laparoscopy founds out a stenotic tumor on colorectal junction corresponding with an adenocarcinoma on histopathological exam. CT scan is the most specific diagnostic test for intussusception and is superior to ultrasonography and endoscopy and thus should be performed preferentially.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...