RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to validate the Sunderland Tracheoesophageal Perceptual Scale (SToPS) in the Italian language by checking the inter- and intra-rater reliability. STUDY DESIGN: Scale validation METHODS: The validation of the tool involved the following steps: (1) translation and adaptation of the SToPS into Italian language; (2) recruitment of participants (60 laryngectomized patients with a voice prosthesis and 12 health professionals-six speech and language therapists (SLTs) and six ear, nose, and throat surgeons-classified into experienced (Exp) or not at assessing voice; (3) recording of patients' speech samples; (4) perceptual evaluation of recorded speech samples (test and retest) performed by the 12 health professionals; and (5) statistical analysis (quadratic weighted Cohen kappa and weighted kappa of Light coefficients). RESULTS: When all raters were considered as one group, an agreement ≥0.50 was reached for all parameters. The "ExpSLTs" group rated more reliably than the other groups, achieving a "good" intrarater agreement for 9/10 parameters. Despite the interrater coefficients were lower than the intrarater ones for all rater groups, "ExpSLTs" obtained the best levels of interrater agreement, achieving a level of agreement ≥0.50 for all parameters. Finally, considering intrarater+interrater agreement ("good + good" or "good + moderate"), the "ExpSLTs" group showed the greatest agreement, attaining all parameters that met the criteria for "good" or "moderate" agreement levels. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian version of SToPS can be considered a reliable tool. As in the original version, expert SLTs are the better judges for tracheoesophageal voice assessment.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We performed a single-center, prospective, observational study of newborns born from mothers with microbiologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy or at time of delivery to evaluate acute and mid-term multidisciplinary outcomes. METHODS: Infants were offered a multidisciplinary follow-up consisting of nasopharyngeal Polymerase Chain Reaction test at birth and at 48-72 h of life, auxological and ophthalmological assessments, and serologic testing. RESULTS: 791 women and their 791 children (52.3% males) were included. Most placentas (94.9%) had abnormal inflammatory findings. 171 (27.3%) and 36 (13.7%) children respectively had pathological TEOAEs in at least one ear and bilaterally, while only four of the 85 children that underwent ABR had pathological findings (4.7%). 64 children underwent fluorescein angiography, which resulted pathological only in 1 case (1.6%). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgGs were found in up to 60% of children tested at six months of age. Our findings showed no association between the maternal vaccination status or the presence of maternal symptoms during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the large majority of newborns exposed to SARS-CoV-2 infection in utero or during the first hours of life have optimal outcomes. Our previous report of abnormal ophthalmologic findings was not confirmed on a larger cohort, while further studies are needed to better characterize audiological outcomes. Further prospective, case-controlled studies are still needed.