Embedding Identity and How Clinical Teachers Reconcile Their Multiple Professional Identities to Meet Overlapping Demands at Work.

PHENOMENON: Clinical teachers perform overlapping tasks in education and patient care. They are therefore expected to juggle many professional identities such as educator and clinician. Yet little is known about how clinical teachers negotiate their professional identities. The present research examined the lived experiences of clinical teachers as they manage and make sense of their professional identities in the context of a faculty development program. APPROACH: This study adopted interpretative phenomenological analysis, which is an idiographic and inductive methodological approach that enables an in-depth examination of how people conceptualize their personal and social worlds. In-depth semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with six purposively sampled Brazilian clinical teachers who were attending a faculty development program. Each participant's lived experience was analyzed independently. Then, these individual analyses were compared against each other to identify convergence and divergence. FINDINGS: Participants recognized one identity, which was labeled as embedding identity, containing other identities and roles. Participants integrated their professional identities in agreement with their personal identities, values, and beliefs, striving thus for identity consonance. Participants understood their craft as a relational process by which they wove themselves into their context and entangled their experience with that of others. They, however, diverged when recognizing who their peers were; whereas some named a single professional group (i.e., family physicians), others had a more comprehensive view and considered as peers healthcare professionals, students, and even patients. Finally, participants identified time constraints and lower prestige of family medicine as a medical discipline vis-à-vis other specialties as challenges posed by their contexts. INSIGHTS: Clinical teachers have multifaceted identities, to which they give a sense, manage, and integrate into their daily practice. Participants recognized an embedding identity and looked for common points between the identities it contained, which allowed them to meaningfully reconcile the different demands from their overlapping professional identities. Thus, this research introduces the notion of embedding identity as a strategy to make sense of many professional identities. Variability in the embedding identities depicted in this investigation suggests the fluid and contextualized character of professional identity development. How participants saw themselves also influenced how they behaved and interacted with others accordingly. Understanding clinical teacher identity development enriches current perspectives of what it is like to be one of these medical professionals. Faculty development programs ought to consider these perspectives to better support clinical teachers in meeting the overlapping demands in education and patient care.

La colaboración entre médicos de familia y especialistas: vacío de conocimientos y necesidades de investigación / Collaboration between family physicians and specialists: knowledge gaps and research needs

Identificar las lagunas de conocimiento y las necesidades de investigación de los procesos de colaboración entre médicos de familia y especialistas. Métodos: Revisión tradicional de la literatura empírica sobre la colaboración profesional entre médicos publicada entre 1990 y 2012. Resultados: Veintiséis artículos fueron finalmente incluidos. En los trabajos revisados, el concepto de colaboración aparece poco claro y rara vez definido. La evidencia empírica disponible parece indicar que los médicos de familia se muestran más predispuestos a la colaboración que los especialistas, y alegan dos razones principales para ello: adquirir más conocimientos y fomentar el respeto mutuo. Por su parte, los especialistas tienden a no considerar a los generalistas como sus iguales, y si colaboran con ellos, lo hacen para formarlos y conseguir una mejor gestión del flujo de pacientes. Diversos factores de orden individual, organizativo e institucional parecen ejercer una influencia sobre la dinámica de colaboración entre generalistas y especialistas. Sin embargo, los resultados observados son poco concluyentes. Conclusiones: A pesar de su reconocida relevancia, la colaboración entre médicos de familia y especialistas es un proceso extremadamente complejo y no muy conocido. Para su mayor comprensión, se necesitan trabajos empíricos más exhaustivos que contemplen diferentes niveles de análisis y examinen en profundidad diversas dinámicas de acción de los actores implicados...

[Governance and health: meaning and implications in Latin America]. / Gobernanza y salud: significado y aplicaciones en América Latina.

The term governance is used more and more often in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of public policies. The purpose of this paper is twofold: to shed light on its meaning, and to study its applicability for the study of recent public health policies in Latin America. After discussing the differences between governance and the close concepts of management, governability and government, we propose the adoption of the notion of Giddens' duality of social structure for better understanding of the governance processes. Then we use this theoretical framework for reviewing the conceptual and empirical implications of the set of papers about governance and health in Latin America included in the present special issue of the Journal of Public Health. Recognizing that the debate on governance is not closed, we end the paper highlighting the main contributions of the revised works, namely: the importance of equity in decision-making processes, the appreciation of the political nature of governance, and the advantages and limitations of the clan mechanism of governance for regulating interactions among actors involved in the health policy decision-making processes.

Gobernanza y salud: significado y aplicaciones en América Latina / Governance and health: meaning and implications in Latin America

El término gobernanza es cada vez mas utilizado en la formulación, implementación y evaluación de políticas públicas. El propósito de este artículo es de clarificar su significado y de estudiar su utilidad en el estudio de las recientes políticas de salud de la América Latina. Después de discutir de las diferencias existentes entre gobernanza y los conceptos conexos de gestión, gobernabilidad y gobierno, proponemos la noción de la dualidad de la estructura social de Giddens para una mejor comprensión de los procesos de gobernanza. Utilizamos después este marco teórico para discutir de las implicaciones conceptuales y empíricas del grupo de trabajos sobre la gobernanza en salud en América Latina incluidos en el presente número de la Revista de Salud Pública. Reconociendo que el debate sobre gobernanza aun no está cerrado, terminamos nuestro texto subrayando las contribuciones más importantes de los trabajos revisados, a saber la importancia de la equidad en el proceso de toma de decisiones, el reconocimiento de la naturaleza política de la gobernanza, y las ventajas y limitaciones del modelo de clan en la regulación de las interacciones entre los actores implicados en la toma de decisiones políticas en salud.

The term governance is used more and more often in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of public policies. The purpose of this paper is twofold: to shed light on its meaning, and to study its applicability for the study of recent public health policies in Latin America. After discussing the differences between governance and the close concepts of management, governability and government, we propose the adoption of the notion of Giddens' duality of social structure for better understanding of the governance processes. Then we use this theoretical framework for reviewing the conceptual and empirical implications of the set of papers about governance and health in Latin America included in the present special issue of the Journal of Public Health. Recognizing that the debate on governance is not closed, we end the paper highlighting the main contributions of the revised works, namely: the importance of equity in decision-making processes, the appreciation of the political nature of governance, and the advantages and limitations of the clan mechanism of governance for regulating interactions among actors involved in the health policy decision-making processes.