Diagnosis of pediatric central nervous system tumors using methylation profiling of cfDNA from cerebrospinal fluid.

Pediatric central nervous system tumors remain challenging to diagnose. Imaging approaches do not provide sufficient detail to discriminate between different tumor types, while the histopathological examination of tumor tissue shows high inter-observer variability. Recent studies have demonstrated the accurate classification of central nervous system tumors based on the DNA methylation profile of a tumor biopsy. However, a brain biopsy holds significant risk of bleeding and damaging the surrounding tissues. Liquid biopsy approaches analyzing circulating tumor DNA show high potential as an alternative and less invasive tool to study the DNA methylation pattern of tumors. Here, we explore the potential of classifying pediatric brain tumors based on methylation profiling of the circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). For this proof-of-concept study, we collected cerebrospinal fluid samples from 19 pediatric brain cancer patients via a ventricular drain placed for reasons of increased intracranial pressure. Analyses on the cfDNA showed high variability of cfDNA quantities across patients ranging from levels below the limit of quantification to 40 ng cfDNA per milliliter of CSF. Classification based on methylation profiling of cfDNA from CSF was correct for 7 out of 20 samples in our cohort. Accurate results were mostly observed in samples of high quality, more specifically those with limited high molecular weight DNA contamination. Interestingly, we show that centrifugation of the CSF prior to processing increases the fraction of fragmented cfDNA to high molecular weight DNA. In addition, classification was mostly correct for samples with high tumoral cfDNA fraction as estimated by computational deconvolution (> 40%). In summary, analysis of cfDNA in the CSF shows potential as a tool for diagnosing pediatric nervous system tumors especially in patients with high levels of tumoral cfDNA in the CSF. Further optimization of the collection procedure, experimental workflow and bioinformatic approach is required to also allow classification for patients with low tumoral fractions in the CSF.

A Fast, Affordable, and Minimally Invasive Diagnostic Test for Cancer of Unknown Primary Using DNA Methylation Profiling.

Currently, we cannot provide a conclusive diagnosis for 3% to 5% of people who are confronted with cancer. These patients have cancer of unknown primary (CUP), ie, a metastasized cancer for which the tissue of origin cannot be determined. Studies have shown that the DNA methylation profile is a unique "fingerprint" that can be used to classify tumors. Here we used cell-free reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (cfRRBS), a technique that allows us to identify the methylation profile starting from minimal amounts of highly fragmented DNA, for CUP diagnosis on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue and liquid biopsies. We collected 80 primary tumor FFPE samples covering 16 tumor entities together with 15 healthy plasma samples to use as a custom cfRRBS reference data set. Entity-specific methylation regions are defined for each entity to build a classifier based on nonnegative least squares deconvolution. This classification framework was tested on 30 FFPE, 19 plasma, and 40 pleural and peritoneal effusion samples of both known metastatic tumors and clinical CUPs for which pathological investigation finally resulted in a cancer diagnosis. Using this framework, 27 of 30 FFPE (all CUPs) and 16 of 19 plasma samples (10/13 CUPs) obtained an accurate diagnosis, with a minimal DNA input of 400 pg. Diagnosis of the 40 pleural and peritoneal effusion samples is possible in 9 of 27 samples with negative/inconclusive cytology (6/13 CUPs), showing that cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation profiling could complement routine cytologic analysis. However, a low "cfDNA - high-molecular weight DNA ratio" has a considerable impact on the prediction accuracy. Moreover, the accuracy improves significantly if the predicted tumor percentage is >7%. This proof-of-concept study shows the feasibility of using DNA methylation profiling on FFPE and liquid biopsy samples such as blood, ascites, and pleural effusions in a fast and affordable way. Our novel RRBS-based technique requires minimal DNA input, can be performed in

Digital PCR-based evaluation of nucleic acid extraction kit performance for the co-purification of cell-free DNA and RNA.

BACKGROUND: Blood plasma, one of the most studied liquid biopsies, contains various molecules that have biomarker potential for cancer detection, including cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and cell-free RNA (cfRNA). As the vast majority of cell-free nucleic acids in circulation are non-cancerous, a laboratory workflow with a high detection sensitivity of tumor-derived nucleic acids is a prerequisite for precision oncology. One way to meet this requirement is by the combined analysis of cfDNA and cfRNA from the same liquid biopsy sample. So far, no study has systematically compared the performance of cfDNA and cfRNA co-purification to increase sensitivity. RESULTS: First, we set up a framework using digital PCR (dPCR) technology to quantify cfDNA and cfRNA from human blood plasma in order to compare cfDNA/cfRNA co-purification kit performance. To that end, we optimized two dPCR duplex assays, designed to quantify both cfDNA and cfRNA with the same assays, by ensuring that primers and probes are located within a highly abundant exon. Next, we applied our optimized workflow to evaluate the co-purification performance of two manual and two semi-automated methods over a range of plasma input volumes (0.06-4 mL). Some kits result in higher nucleic acid concentrations in the eluate, while consuming only half of the plasma volume. The combined nucleic acid quantification systematically results in higher nucleic acid concentrations as compared to a parallel quantification of cfDNA and cfRNA in the eluate. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a framework to evaluate the performance of cfDNA/cfRNA co-purification kits and have tested two manual and two semi-automated co-purification kits in function of the available plasma input amount and the intended use of the nucleic acid eluate. We demonstrate that the combined quantification of cfDNA and cfRNA has a benefit compared to separate quantification. We foresee that the results of this study are instrumental for clinical applications to help increase mutation detection sensitivity, allowing improved disease detection and monitoring.