RESUMEN
This article presents new approaches for investigating the past using digital technologies. "Pauliceia 2.0: collaborative mapping of the history of São Paulo (1870-1920)" is an open-source project intended to broadly engage with the public through collaborative methodologies. This text discusses the concept, current status, and prospects of this project, and presents it as a case study to discuss the relationship between digital technologies and historical methods. The product of this journey (at least the outcome intended by the authors and the other team members listed at the end of the article) is meant to assign new meaning to the project at the juncture between digital humanities, public history, and open science.
O artigo apresenta novas abordagens para investigar o passado usando tecnologias digitais. O projeto "Pauliceia 2.0: mapeamento colaborativo da história de São Paulo (1870-1920)" é de código aberto e visa engajar o público de maneira ampla, usando metodologias colaborativas. O texto discute a concepção do projeto, seu estágio atual e suas perspectivas. Além disso, também se oferece o Pauliceia 2.0 como um estudo de caso para discutir a relação entre tecnologias digitais e métodos históricos. O resultado desse percurso, ao menos essa é a intenção dos autores listados e dos demais integrantes da equipe do projeto, nomeados ao final do artigo, almeja ressignificar o trabalho em questão na confluência entre humanidades digitais, história pública e ciência aberta.
RESUMEN
Resumo O artigo apresenta novas abordagens para investigar o passado usando tecnologias digitais. O projeto "Pauliceia 2.0: mapeamento colaborativo da história de São Paulo (1870-1920)" é de código aberto e visa engajar o público de maneira ampla, usando metodologias colaborativas. O texto discute a concepção do projeto, seu estágio atual e suas perspectivas. Além disso, também se oferece o Pauliceia 2.0 como um estudo de caso para discutir a relação entre tecnologias digitais e métodos históricos. O resultado desse percurso, ao menos essa é a intenção dos autores listados e dos demais integrantes da equipe do projeto, nomeados ao final do artigo, almeja ressignificar o trabalho em questão na confluência entre humanidades digitais, história pública e ciência aberta.
Abstract This article presents new approaches for investigating the past using digital technologies. "Pauliceia 2.0: collaborative mapping of the history of São Paulo (1870-1920)" is an open-source project intended to broadly engage with the public through collaborative methodologies. This text discusses the concept, current status, and prospects of this project, and presents it as a case study to discuss the relationship between digital technologies and historical methods. The product of this journey (at least the outcome intended by the authors and the other team members listed at the end of the article) is meant to assign new meaning to the project at the juncture between digital humanities, public history, and open science.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Interdisciplinaria , Tecnología Digital , Brasil , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , HumanidadesRESUMEN
Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in intensive care units. Previously, we identified Protein Kinase C-delta (PKCδ) as an important regulator of the inflammatory response in sepsis. An important issue in development of anti-inflammatory therapeutics is the risk of immunosuppression and inability to effectively clear pathogens. In this study, we investigated whether PKCδ inhibition prevented organ dysfunction and improved survival without compromising pathogen clearance. Sprague Dawley rats underwent sham surgery or cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) to induce sepsis. Post-surgery, PBS or a PKCδ inhibitor (200µg/kg) was administered intra-tracheally (IT). At 24 hours post-CLP, there was evidence of lung and kidney dysfunction. PKCδ inhibition decreased leukocyte influx in these organs, decreased endothelial permeability, improved gas exchange, and reduced blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratios indicating organ protection. PKCδ inhibition significantly decreased bacterial levels in the peritoneal cavity, spleen and blood but did not exhibit direct bactericidal properties. Peritoneal chemokine levels, neutrophil numbers, or macrophage phenotypes were not altered by PKCδ inhibition. Peritoneal macrophages isolated from PKCδ inhibitor-treated septic rats demonstrated increased bacterial phagocytosis. Importantly, PKCδ inhibition increased survival. Thus, PKCδ inhibition improved survival and improved survival was associated with increased phagocytic activity, enhanced pathogen clearance, and decreased organ injury.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias/inmunología , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología , Macrófagos Peritoneales , Neutrófilos , Proteína Quinasa C-delta/antagonistas & inhibidores , Sepsis , Animales , Quimiocinas , Macrófagos Peritoneales/inmunología , Macrófagos Peritoneales/patología , Masculino , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Neutrófilos/patología , Fagocitosis/efectos de los fármacos , Proteína Quinasa C-delta/inmunología , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/inmunología , Sepsis/microbiología , Sepsis/patologíaRESUMEN
Richter transformation (RT), or Richter syndrome, is defined as the transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to an aggressive B-cell lymphoma. The vast majority, up to 99%, transform into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with a small subset (<1%) becoming classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Approximately half of RT cases progress through a pathway involving dysregulation of C-MYC. High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) is a recent diagnostic category of aggressive B-cell lymphomas set forth in the updated 2017 WHO Classification of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. HGBL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements, formerly "double-hit" and "triple-hit" lymphomas, comprise the majority of HGBL cases. Patients with HGBL have a worse prognosis than those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We present a case of RT with rearrangements of MYC and BCL6. To our knowledge, there are no reported cases of RT with a "double-hit" lymphoma genotype.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/patología , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , CitogenéticaRESUMEN
Richter transformation (RT), or Richter syndrome, is defined as the transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to an aggressive B-cell lymphoma. The vast majority, up to 99%, transform into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with a small subset (<1%) becoming classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Approximately half of RT cases progress through a pathway involving dysregulation of C-MYC. High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) is a recent diagnostic category of aggressive B-cell lymphomas set forth in the updated 2017 WHO Classification of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. HGBL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements, formerly "double-hit" and "triple-hit" lymphomas, comprise the majority of HGBL cases. Patients with HGBL have a worse prognosis than those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We present a case of RT with rearrangements of MYC and BCL6. To our knowledge, there are no reported cases of RT with a "double-hit" lymphoma genotype.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To understand the worldwide scope of RBC crossmatching and issuing practices and measure efficiency using a novel quality indicator, the crossmatch/issue (C/I) ratio. METHODS: An electronic survey was disseminated to hospital transfusion services collecting details about RBC crossmatching and issuing practices. Respondents were asked to enumerate the number of RBCs crossmatched and issued at their institutions during the 2014 calendar year to calculate the C/I ratio. RESULTS: Fifty-two survey responses were received, mostly from North American transfusion services (28/52, 54%). The electronic crossmatch was the most common technique (n = 29), and most respondents performed the crossmatch at the time that an order for RBCs was received in the transfusion service (even if an order to issue the RBCs was not received). Data to calculate the C/I ratio were supplied by 22 respondents, and the mean ± SD was 1.30 ± 0.34. There was no difference in C/I ratios between services that use the electronic or serologic crossmatch techniques (P = .49). The ratio was the same at the four sites that crossmatch RBCs at the time of issue compared with the time of order receipt (mean ± SD, 1.11 ± 0.09 vs. 1.35 ± 0.36, respectively; P = .19). CONCLUSIONS: Electronic crossmatching is common, and the C/I ratio can be an indicator of efficiency.