Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Ther Clin Risk Manag ; 17: 669-677, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34234443

RESUMEN

AIM: To assess the efficacy and tolerance of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and the impact of a standardised management-based protocol in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients who had received anti-PD-(L)1 were collected from our pharmacy database. Clinical response and toxicity were assessed using RECIST criteria and CTCAE version 5.0, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential prognostic factors were identified using Cox's model. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients and 201 lines of treatment were included (median age: 66 (range: 38-89) years). Types of cancer included non-small cell lung cancer (73%), transitional cell carcinoma (10%), renal cell carcinoma (6%), small cell lung cancer (5%), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (4%) and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (1%). Twenty-five (12%) patients had pre-existing autoimmune conditions. Our standardised management-based protocol included 129 (64%) patients. Objective response rate was 29%, median OS was 10 months (IQR: 7-15) and median PFS was 5 months (IQR: 1-22). Patients with an abnormal baseline complete blood count had a worse OS (HR=2.48 [95% CI: 1.24-4.96]; p=0.0103). Thirty-three (16%) patients experienced severe (grade 3 or 4) immune-related adverse event (irAE). There were three (1%) irAE-related deaths. AEs resolved faster when patients were assessed by an internist before anti-PD-(L)1 initiation (p=0.0205). CONCLUSION: PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are effective and safe in a real-world setting. Implementation of a standardised management-based protocol with internal medicine specialists is an effective way to optimise irAE management.

3.
Therapie ; 66(6): 481-91, 2011.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22186073

RESUMEN

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is considered as the most redoubtable pathogenic agent at cystic fibrosis patients. Its eradication is a priority to avoid the passage to chronic infection, the real turning point of the disease. For this, a wide therapeutic panel of intravenous antibiotics exists, and for some years, the research teams concentrate more and more on the inhaled way. The synthesis of the literature data presented herein focuses on both already experienced molecules (colistin and tobramycin), and on new therapeutics. This review aims at loosening advantages and inconveniences of each of these therapeutic options, while bringing to light the necessity of follow-up studies in order to prove the therapeutic interests of molecules in development.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Fibrosis Quística/complicaciones , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/etiología , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles , Amicacina/administración & dosificación , Amicacina/efectos adversos , Amicacina/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/efectos adversos , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Colistina/efectos adversos , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Fluoroquinolonas/administración & dosificación , Fluoroquinolonas/efectos adversos , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Tobramicina/administración & dosificación , Tobramicina/efectos adversos , Tobramicina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...