Complementary use of cardiac magnetic resonance and 18 F-FDG positron emission tomography imaging in suspected immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) myocarditis is an uncommon but potentially fatal complication of immunotherapy. Cardiac imaging is essential to make timely diagnoses as there are critical downstream implications for patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the agreement of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) in patients with suspected ICI myocarditis. METHODS: Patients with suspected ICI myocarditis, who underwent CMR and 18 F-FDG-PET imaging at a single cardio-oncology service from 2017 to 2023, were enrolled. CMR was performed according to recommended guidelines for assessment of myocarditis. 18 F-FDG-PET imaging was performed following 18 h carbohydrate-free fast. Imaging was analysed by independent reviewers to determine the presence or absence of ICI myocarditis. RESULTS: Twelve patients (mean age 60 ± 15 years old, 7 [58%] male) underwent both CMR and 18 F-FDG-PET imaging. Three (25%) met the 2018 Lake Louise Criteria for CMR diagnosis of myocarditis; 4 (33%) had evidence of myocardial inflammation as determined by 18 F-FDG-PET. Amongst those with positive 18 F-FDG-PET, mean standard uptake value (SUV) was 3.5 ± 1.7. There was agreement between CMR and PET in 7 cases (CMR and PET positive (n = 1), CMR and PET negative (n = 6)) and discordance in 5 cases (CMR positive and PET negative (n = 2), CMR negative and PET positive (n = 3)). CONCLUSION: Both CMR and PET provide complementary clinical information in diagnostic of ICI myocarditis. CMR informs on myocardial oedema, whilst 18 F-FDG-PET provides information on glucose metabolism reflecting monocyte and lymphocytic activity. Future studies should investigate the role of hybrid PET-CMR for the timely diagnosis of ICI myocarditis.

Cardiovascular events in CML patients treated with Nilotinib: validation of the HFA-ICOS baseline risk score.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic landscape of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has been transformed by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Nilotinib, showed higher rates of major molecular response than imatinib, however associated with higher cardiovascular (CV) toxicity. We sought to describe the CV events associated with nilotinib in a real-world population and assess the predictive value of the HFA-ICOS risk score. METHODS: The HFA-ICOS baseline risk was calculated for patients with CML treated with nilotinib beween 2006 and 2021. The primary end point was the incidence of all CV events. The secondary end point was the incidence of ischaemic events. Survival analysis evaluated the risk (hazard ratio [HR]) of events stratified by baseline risk category, whilst on nilotinib therapy. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine eligible patients were included. The incidence of CV events was 20.9% (95% CI: 15.7-26.2%) following a median duration of treatment of 34.4 months. The secondary end point occurred in 12.7% (95% CI: 8.4-16.9%) of the population. Patients with higher HFA-ICOS baseline score had higher rates of CV events (low: 11.2%, medium: 28.2% [HR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.17-5.66], high/very high: 32.4% [HR: 3.57, 95% CI: 1.77-7.20]) and ischaemic events (low: 5.20%, medium: 17.9% [HR: 2.19, 95% CI: 0.97-4.96], high/very high: 21.6% [HR: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.91-7.89]). In patients who did not have a CV event, the median total dose at last follow up or cessation of nilotinib therapy was lower when compared to the total daily median dose of nilotinib in patients who had a CV event (450 mg vs. 600 mg, p = 0.0074). CONCLUSIONS: The HFA-ICOS risk stratification tool is an efficient discriminator at low, medium and high/very high risk of developing cardiovascular events, with an overall positive trend towards increasing cardiotoxicity rates with rising risk catergories. This study provides evidence to support the use of this predictive tool in nilotinib treated patients.

Cancer therapy related cardiac dysfunction as a result of Panitumumab.

Panitumumab is a human immunoglobulin monoclonal antibody designed to target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) which is used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer alone or in combination with chemotherapy. In this report, we present a case of new onset heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in a patient following panitumumab therapy. A 73-year-old gentleman with metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma presented to his local hospital with increased shortness of breath, two months after his first and only dose of panitumumab. A transthoracic echocardiogram demonstrated dilated left ventricle with global hypokinesis and an estimated left ventricular ejection fraction of 25%. Our patient underwent a comprehensive diagnostic assessment at his presentation, including ECG, transthoracic echocardiogram, cardiac magnetic resonance, computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), invasive coronary angiogram and 18F-FDG PET-CT. These investigations revealed no evidence of ischemic events or inflammatory processes that could account for the severe left ventricular dysfunction. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction linked to panitumumab with subsequent deep phenotyping. The current guidelines do not recommend specific cardiovascular monitoring protocols for patients receiving anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Until more data are available, it would be prudent to implement the same cardiovascular surveillance measures outlined for individuals receiving osimertinib, which is an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Late cardiotoxicity related to HER2-targeted cancer therapy.

Long-term anti-HER2 therapy in metastatic HER2 + cancers is increasing, but data about the incidence and risk factors for developing late Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) are missing. We conducted a single-centre, retrospective analysis of a cohort of late anti-HER2 related cardiac dysfunction referred to our Cardio-Oncology service. We include seventeen patients with metastatic disease who developed CTRCD after at least five years of continuous anti-HER2 therapy. Events occurred after a median time of 6.5 years (IQR 5.3-9.0) on anti-HER2 therapy. The lowest (median) LVEF and GLS were 49% (IQR 45-55) and - 15.4% (IQR - 14.9 - -16.3) respectively. All our patients continued or restarted, after a brief interruption, their anti-HER2 therapy. Most (16/17) were started on heart failure medical therapy and normalized their left ventricular ejection fraction at a follow-up. Our study has demonstrated that CTRCD can occur after many years of stability on anti-HER2 therapy and reinforces the importance of continuing cardiovascular surveillance in this population.

Echocardiography versus Cardiac MRI for Measurement of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Individuals with Cancer and Suspected Cardiotoxicity.

Purpose To compare left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured with echocardiography and cardiac MRI in individuals with cancer and suspected cardiotoxicity and assess the potential effect on downstream clinical decision-making. Materials and Methods In this prospective, single-center observational cohort study, participants underwent same-day two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography and cardiac MRI between 2011 and 2021. Participants with suboptimal image quality were excluded. A subset of 74 participants also underwent three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography. The agreement of LVEF derived from each modality was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and at relevant thresholds for cardiotoxicity. Results A total of 745 participants (mean age, 60 years ± 5 [SD]; 460 [61.7%] female participants) underwent same-day echocardiography and cardiac MRI. According to Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias was -3.7% ± 7.6 (95% limits of agreement [LOA]: -18.5% to 11.1%) for 2D echocardiography versus cardiac MRI. In 74 participants who underwent cardiac MRI, 3D echocardiography, and 2D echocardiography, the mean LVEFs were 60.0% ± 10.4, 58.4% ± 9.4, and 57.2% ± 8.9, respectively (P < .001). At the 50% LVEF threshold for detection of cardiotoxicity, there was disagreement for 9.3% of participants with 2D echocardiography and cardiac MRI. Agreement was better with 3D echocardiography and cardiac MRI (mean bias, -1.6% ± 6.3 [95% LOA: -13.9% to 10.7%]) compared with 2D echocardiography and cardiac MRI (mean bias, -2.8% ± 6.3 [95% LOA: -15.2% to 9.6%]; P = .016). Conclusion Two-dimensional echocardiography had variations of ±15% for LVEF measurement compared with cardiac MRI in participants with cancer and led to misclassification of approximately 10% of participants for cardiotoxicity detection. Three-dimensional echocardiography had better agreement with cardiac MRI and should be used as first-line imaging. Keywords: Echocardiography, MR Functional Imaging, Cardiac Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.