Universal Depression Screen of Ambulatory Heart Transplant Recipients With Referral for Mental Health Intervention: A Quality Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a heart transplant and depression have higher rates of graft failure and noncompliance. LOCAL PROBLEM: The heart transplant clinic had no standardized approach to assess for depression. METHODS: The heart transplant clinic implemented routine use of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). INTERVENTIONS: Team members were educated via an online module about depression. A process for depression screening and follow-up was developed and implemented. RESULTS: From July 2018 to February 2019, there were 834 visits; PHQ2 screens were completed during 779 (93%) of those visits with 40 (5%) positive screens. All 40 patients had PHQ9 assessment, with 33 patients (4%) exhibiting moderate or severe depressive symptoms. All 33 patients were provided with mental health resources and received follow-up. Median time to administer PHQ2 was 2 minutes (range 1-3 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of universal depression screening in a heart transplant clinic is feasible, identifies patients with depression, and does not add significant clinical burden.

Subsequent Fracture Prevention in Patients 50 Years and Older With Fragility Fractures: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Because of osteoporosis, patients older than 50 years with fragility fractures are at risk of further fractures. We developed a quality improvement initiative based on an evidence-based Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) model of care to help prevent subsequent fractures. Previous to the implemented FLS model, less than 13% of patients with fragility fractures were assessed for osteoporosis at our institution. We created a registry tool to identify patients with fractures who were older than 50 years. Our interventions focused on identifying, contacting, and educating patients; and coordinating screening tests and an outpatient follow-up visit with an endocrinologist. Identification of patients older than 50 years with fragility fractures increased from 0% to 74.5%, with implementation of the fracture registry. Of those identified, 33.9% were screened and had a follow-up visit. The fragility fracture population older than 50 years is at risk of subsequent fractures and should be identified, contacted, educated, screened, and assessed for osteoporosis to prevent subsequent fractures.

Failure to fail: the institutional perspective.

PURPOSE: To determine institutional barriers to placing failing students on probation, dismissing students. METHODS: An online survey study was distributed to Student Affairs Deans or the equivalent at allopathic (MD) and osteopathic (DO) medical schools, and physician assistant (PA) and nurse practitioner (NP) schools across the United States. Nineteen (40%) of the 48 schools responded: six MD, four DO, five PA and four NP. The survey contained demographic questions and questions regarding probation and dismissal. Themes were independently coded and combined via consensus based on grounded theory. The survey was distributed until saturation of qualitative responses were achieved. RESULTS: Respondents identified variations in the use of probation and dismissal and a wide range of barriers, with the greatest emphasis on legal concerns. Respondents felt that students were graduating who should not be allowed to graduate, and that the likelihood of a student being placed on probation or being terminated was highly variable. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that institution culture at heath professions schools across the United States may represent an obstacle in placing failing learners on probation and dismissing learners who should not graduate. Additional studies are needed to prove if these concerns are founded or merely fears.

Inpatient Falls: Defining the Problem and Identifying Possible Solutions. Part II: Application of Quality Improvement Principles to Hospital Falls.

In this 2 part series, analysis of the risk stratification tools that are available and definition of the scope of the problem and potential solutions through a review of the literature is presented. A systematic review was used to identify articles for risk stratification and interventions. Three risk stratification systems are discussed, STRATIFY, Morse Fall Scale, and the Hendrich Fall Risk Model (HFRM). Of these scoring systems, the HFRM is the easiest to use and score. Predominantly, multifactorial interventions are used to prevent patient falls. Education and rehabilitation are common themes in studies with statistically significant results. The second article presents a guide to implementing a quality improvement project around hospital falls. A 10-step approach to Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles is described. Specific examples of problems and analysis are easily applicable to any institution. Furthermore, the sustainability of interventions and targeting new areas for improvement are discussed. Although specific to falls in the hospitalized patient, the goal is to present a stepwise approach that is broadly applicable to other areas requiring quality improvement.

Inpatient falls: defining the problem and identifying possible solutions. Part I: an evidence-based review.

In this 2 part series, analysis of the risk stratification tools that are available, definition for the scope of the problem, and potential solutions through a review of the literature are presented. A systematic review was used to identify articles for risk stratification and interventions. Three risk stratification systems are discussed, St Thomas's Risk Assessment Tool in Falling Elderly Inpatients, Morse Fall Scale, and the Hendrich Fall Risk Model. Of these scoring systems, the Hendrich Fall Risk Model is the easiest to use and score. Predominantly, multifactorial interventions are used to prevent patient falls. Education and rehabilitation are common themes in studies with statistically significant results. The second article presents a guide to implementing a quality improvement project around hospital falls. A 10-step approach to Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles is described. Specific examples of problems and analysis are easily applicable to any institution. Furthermore, the sustainability of interventions and targeting new areas for improvement is discussed. Although specific to falls in the hospitalized patient, the goal is to present a stepwise approach which is broadly applicable to other areas requiring quality improvement.