Time-Efficient, High-Resistance Inspiratory Muscle Strength Training Increases Exercise Tolerance in Midlife and Older Adults.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine if time-efficient, high-resistance inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST), comprising 30 inhalation-resisted breaths per day, improves cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise tolerance, physical function, and/or regional body composition in healthy midlife and older adults. METHODS: We performed a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial (NCT03266510) testing 6 wk of IMST (30 breaths per day, 6 d·wk -1 , 55%-75% maximal inspiratory pressure) versus low-resistance sham training (15% maximal inspiratory pressure) in healthy men and women 50-79 yr old. Subjects performed a graded treadmill exercise test to exhaustion, physical performance battery (e.g., handgrip strength, leg press), and body composition testing (dual x-ray absorptiometry) at baseline and after 6 wk of training. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants (17 women, 18 men) completed high-resistance IMST ( n = 17) or sham training ( n = 18). Cardiorespiratory fitness (V̇O 2peak ) was unchanged, but exercise tolerance, measured as treadmill exercise time during a graded exercise treadmill test, increased with IMST (baseline, 539 ± 42 s; end intervention, 606 ± 42 s; P = 0.01) but not sham training (baseline, 562 ± 39 s; end intervention, 553 ± 38 s; P = 0.69). IMST increased peak RER (baseline, 1.09 ± 0.02; end intervention, 1.13 ± 0.02; P = 0.012), peak ventilatory efficiency (baseline, 25.2 ± 0.8; end intervention, 24.6 ± 0.8; P = 0.036), and improved submaximal exercise economy (baseline, 23.5 ± 1.1 mL·kg -1 ⋅min -1 ; end intervention, 22.1 ± 1.1 mL·kg -1 ⋅min -1 ; P < 0.001); none of these factors were altered by sham training (all P > 0.05). Changes in plasma acylcarnitines (targeted metabolomics analysis) were consistently positively correlated with changes in exercise tolerance after IMST but not sham training. IMST was associated with regional increases in thorax lean mass (+4.4%, P = 0.06) and reductions in trunk fat mass (-4.8%, P = 0.04); however, peripheral muscle strength, muscle power, dexterity, and mobility were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that high-resistance IMST is an effective, time-efficient lifestyle intervention for improving exercise tolerance in healthy midlife and older adults.

Neurovascular and hemodynamic responses to mental stress and exercise in severe COVID-19 survivors.

Previous studies show that COVID-19 survivors have elevated muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), endothelial dysfunction, and aortic stiffening. However, the neurovascular responses to mental stress and exercise are still unexplored. We hypothesized that COVID-19 survivors, compared with age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched control subjects, exhibit abnormal neurovascular responses to mental stress and physical exercise. Fifteen severe COVID-19 survivors (aged: 49 ± 2 yr, BMI: 30 ± 1 kg/m2) and 15 well-matched control subjects (aged: 46 ± 3 yr, BMI: 29 ± 1 kg/m2) were studied. MSNA (microneurography), forearm blood flow (FBF), and forearm vascular conductance (FVC, venous occlusion plethysmography), mean arterial pressure (MAP, Finometer), and heart rate (HR, ECG) were measured during a 3-min mental stress (Stroop Color-Word Test) and during a 3-min isometric handgrip exercise (30% of maximal voluntary contraction). During mental stress, MSNA (frequency and incidence) responses were higher in COVID-19 survivors than in controls (P < 0.001), and FBF and FVC responses were attenuated (P < 0.05). MAP was similar between the groups (P > 0.05). In contrast, the MSNA (frequency and incidence) and FBF and FVC responses to handgrip exercise were similar between the groups (P > 0.05). MAP was lower in COVID-19 survivors (P < 0.05). COVID-19 survivors exhibit an exaggerated MSNA and blunted vasodilatory response to mental challenge compared with healthy adults. However, the neurovascular response to handgrip exercise is preserved in COVID-19 survivors. Overall, the abnormal neurovascular control in response to mental stress suggests that COVID-19 survivors may have an increased risk to cardiovascular events during mental challenge.

Exercise-induced Bronchodilation Equalizes Exercise Ventilatory Mechanics despite Variable Baseline Airway Function in Asthma.

PURPOSE: We quantified the magnitude of exercise-induced bronchodilation in adult asthmatics under conditions of narrowed and dilated airways. We then assessed the effect of the bronchodilation on ventilatory capacity and the extent of ventilatory limitation during exercise. METHODS: Eleven asthmatics completed three exercise bouts on a cycle ergometer. Exercise was preceded by no treatment (trialCON), inhaled ß2 agonist (trialBD), or a eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea challenge (trialBC). Maximal expiratory flow-volume maneuvers (MEFV) were performed before and within 40 s of exercise cessation. Exercise tidal flow-volume loops were placed within the preexercise and postexercise MEFV curve and used to determine expiratory flow limitation and maximum ventilatory capacity (V˙ECap). RESULTS: Preexercise airway function was different among the trials (forced expiratory volume 1 s during trialCON, trialBD, and trialBC = 3.3 ± 0.8 L, 3.8 ± 0.8 L, and 2.9 ± 0.8 L, respectively; P < 0.05). Maximal expired airflow increased with exercise during all three trials, but the increase was greatest during trialBC (delta forced expiratory volume 1 s during trialCON, trialBD, and trialBC = +12.2% ± 13.1%, +5.2% ± 5.7%, +28.1% ± 15.7%). Thus, the extent of expiratory flow limitation decreased, and V˙ECap increased, when the postexercise MEFV curve was used. During trialCON and trialBC, actual exercise ventilation exceeded V˙ECap calculated with the preexercise MEFV curve in seven and nine subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the critical importance of exercise bronchodilation in the asthmatic with narrowed airways. Of clinical relevance, the results also highlight the importance of assessing airway function during or immediately after exercise in asthmatic persons; otherwise, mechanical limitations to exercise ventilation will be overestimated.