RESUMEN
Purpose: Current retinal tamponade strategies are limited by anatomic considerations (retinal break location), durability (short-term vs need for removal), and patient adherence (positioning, travel/altitude restrictions). Here we describe the preclinical safety and toxicology of a novel biodegradable hydrogel tamponade agent (PYK-1105) with the potential to improve both patient experience and outcomes after retina surgery. Methods: We studied in vitro performance to assess hydrogel gelation time, modulus, viscosity, degradation time, refractive index, and transmittance. In addition to studying in vitro and in vivo (mice and rabbits) biocompatibility, testing was performed to assess cytotoxicity, intraocular irritation, acute systemic toxicity, genotoxicity, and pyrogenicity. Furthermore, clinical safety was assessed using in vivo (rabbits and minipigs) response to vitrectomy with PYK-1105 insertion with the following measures: clinical examination, multimodal imaging, full-field electroretinography, and histopathology. Results: PYK-1105 met the predefined performance testing criteria for optimal tamponade and demonstrated excellent biocompatibility. Animal studies showed the PYK-1105 formulation to be well tolerated and nontoxic in mice, rabbits, and pigs. Conclusions: PYK-1105 holds promise as a new biodegradable tamponade agent that has the potential to improve both the patient experience and outcomes after retina surgery. Human pilot studies are warranted to further assess for safety and efficacy.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Patients often combine prescription medications with herbal and dietary substances (herein referred to as herbal medicines). A variety of potential adverse herb-drug interactions exist based on the pharmacological properties of herbal and prescription medications. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of potential and observed adverse herb-drug interactions in patients using herbal medicines with prescription medications. DESIGN: Consecutive patients were questioned about their use of herbal medicines in 6 outpatient clinics. Patients reporting use of these products provided a list of their prescription medications, which were reviewed for any potential adverse herb-drug interactions using a comprehensive natural medicine database. Any potential adverse herb-drug interactions prompted a review of the patient's chart for evidence of an observed adverse herb-drug interaction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The rate of potential and observed adverse herb-drug interactions. RESULTS: Eight hundred four patients were surveyed, and 122 (15%) used herbal medicines. Eighty-five potential adverse herb-drug interactions were found in 49 patients (40% of herbal medicine users). Twelve possible adverse herb-drug interactions in 8 patients (7% of herbal medicine users) were observed. In all 12 cases, the severity scores were rated as mild, including 8 cases of hypoglycemia in diabetics taking nopal (prickly pear cactus). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of potential adverse herb-drug interactions were detected and a small number of adverse herb-drug interactions observed, particularly in diabetics taking nopal. Screening for herbal medicine usage in 804 patients did not uncover any serious adverse interactions with prescription medications.
