Aminophylline increases parasternal muscle action in awake canines.

The traditional theophylline bronchodilator, aminophylline, is still widely used, especially in the treatment of COPD. The effects of aminophylline on ventilation and action of the costal diaphragm have been previously defined, but other respiratory muscles - notably the chest wall, are not well determined. Therefore, we investigated the effects of aminophylline on the Parasternal intercostal, a key obligatory inspiratory muscle, examining muscle length, shortening and EMG. We studied 11 awake canines, chronically implanted with sonomicrometer crystals and fine-wire EMG electrodes in the parasternal muscle. Ventilatory parameters, muscle length (shortening), and moving average muscle EMG activity, were measured at baseline and with aminophylline, during resting and hypercapnic stimulated breathing. Experiments were carried out prior to administration of aminophylline (baseline), and 1.5 h after loading and ongoing infusion. Minute ventilation, tidal volume and respiratory frequency all increased significantly with aminophylline, both during resting breathing and at equivalent levels of hypercapnic stimulated breathing. Parasternal baseline muscle length was entirely unchanged with aminophylline. Parasternal shortening increased significantly with aminophylline while corresponding parasternal EMG activity remained constant, consistent with increased contractility. Thus, in awake, intact mammals, aminophylline, in the usual therapeutic range, elicits increased ventilation and increased contractility of all primary inspiratory respiratory muscles, including both chest wall and diaphragm.

The reliability of digitized radiographs for dental identification: a Web-based study.

In the era of Daubert and other judicial rulings pertaining to the acceptability of forensic evidence, it is increasingly important that experts are able to testify that their methods have been scientifically tested and that error rates and other factors relating to reliability have been published. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of digitized radiographic comparisons for the purposes of dental identification. Participants with various forensic backgrounds and experience levels were passively recruited to the website. Ten forensic identification cases composed of antemortem and postmortem dental radiographs were supplied to examiners using a bespoke website. Participants responded to the cases on two occasions after a one-month washout interval using the ABFO conclusion levels for forensic identifications. A total of 115 first attempts and 87 matched second attempts were received. Of the total responses, 72% were dentally trained respondents who had completed at least one forensic identification case; of these, 38% were experienced forensic dentists who had completed more than 25 identifications. Data relating to accuracy, intra- and inter-examiner agreement, and the effect of case difficulty are presented. Mean accuracy was 85.5% for all cases, with the experienced forensic dentists obtaining a 91% success rate. The inter-examiner agreement on the negative identification cases was classified as poor. The data suggest that dental identifications resulting from the comparison of postmortem and antemortem radiographs are valid, accurate, and reliable when undertaken by experienced odontologists.