Lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery: a comparison between robot-assisted vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic approach.

Background: TNM staging is the most important prognosticator for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Staging has significant implications for the treatment modality for these patients. Lymph node dissection in robot-assisted thoracoscopic (RATS) surgery remains an area of ongoing evaluation. In this study, we aim to compare lymph node dissection in RATS and VATS approach for lung resection in NSCLC patients. Methods: We retrospectively compiled a database of 717 patients from July 31, 2015-July 7, 2022, who underwent either a wedge resection, segmentectomy or lobectomy. We analysed the database according to lymph node dissection. The database was divided into RATS (n = 375) and VATS (n = 342) procedures. Results: The mean number of lymph nodes harvested overall with RATS was 6.1 ± 1.5 nodes; with VATS approach, it was 5.53 ± 1.8 nodes. The mean number of N1 stations harvested was 2.66 ± 0.8 with RATS, 2.36 ± 0.9 with VATS. RATS approach showed statistically higher lymph node dissection rates compared to VATS (p = 0.002). Out of the 375 RATS procedures, 26 (6.4%) patients undergoing a RATS procedure were upstaged from N0/N1 staging to N2. N0/N1-N2 upstaging was reported in 28 of 342 (8.2%) patients undergoing a VATS procedure. The majority of upstaging was seen in N0-N2 disease: 19 of 375 (5%) for RATS and 23 of 342 (6.7%) for VATS. Conclusions: We conclude that in RATS procedures, there is a higher rate of lymph node dissection compared to VATS procedures. Upstaging was mostly seen in N0-N2 disease, this was observed at a higher rate with VATS procedures.

Squamous Cell Carcinoma Arising in YAP1::MAML2 Fusion-Associated Metaplastic Thymoma: A Case Report.

Metaplastic thymoma is a rare thymic neoplasm that has generally been considered to follow a benign to indolent clinical course; however, 3 metaplastic thymomas with high-grade malignant transformation to sarcomatoid carcinoma have been reported. In recent years, both conventional metaplastic thymomas and this subset showing malignant transformation have been associated with recurrent YAP1::MAML2 fusions. We report a metaplastic thymoma showing transformation to squamous cell carcinoma, that to our knowledge is the fourth reported in the literature with transition to overtly malignant features and the first showing pure carcinomatous transformation, and in which YAP1::MAML2 fusion was demonstrated via next generation sequencing.

Learning curve of robotic surgery for lung cancer: analysis for two surgeons during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the RATS learning curve between two surgeons in one department for lung cancer surgery using the CUSUM method. METHODS: Retrospective analysis using a prospective database on robotic-assisted lung resections performed by two different surgeons in one hospital. The CUSUM method was used to describe the learning curve. RESULTS: 366 consecutives cases were analysed (195 for the first surgeon and 171 for the second surgeon). A traditional 3-phase pattern learning curve was found with a diminution of the operating time throughout the different phases. For Surgeon 1, phase 1 was from case 1 to 59, phase 2 from case 60 to 99 and phase 3 started at case 100. For Surgeon 2, phase 1 was from 1 to 44, phase 2 from case 45 to 79 and phase 3 started at case 80. CONCLUSION: This study described our first experience with the Da Vinci Robotic System in our department. The curves had a similar shape which shows the learning curve of robotic surgery using the CUSUM method is reproducible. Furthermore, our results showed that the learning curve may improve after the programme starts in the department when the different team elements are all trained.

Resectability versus Operability in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With increased detection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) owing to screening, determining optimal management increasingly hinges on assessing resectability and operability. Resectability refers to the feasibility of achieving microscopically negative margins based on tumour size, location and degree of local invasion and achieving an anatomical lobar resection. Operability reflects the patient's tolerance for resection based on comorbidities, cardiopulmonary reserve and frailty. Standardized criteria help guide these assessments, but application variability contributes to practice inconsistencies. This review synthesizes a strategic approach to evaluating resectability and operability in contemporary practice. Standardization promises reduced care variability and optimized patient selection to maximize curative outcomes in this new era of early detection. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent pivotal trials demonstrate equivalency of sublobar resection to lobectomy for small, peripheral, node-negative NSCLC, expanding options for parenchymal preservation in borderline surgical candidates. Furthermore, recent phase 3 trials have highlighted the benefit of chemoimmunotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment with an excellent pathological response and a down staging of the tumour, improving the resectability of the early-stage NSCLC. A good assessment of the operability and resectability is paramount in order to offer the best course of treatment for our patients. European and American societies have issued recommendations to help clinicians assess the cardiopulmonary function and predict the extension of pulmonary resection that could afford the patient. This operability assessment is closely linked with the evaluated tumour resectability which will determine the extension of pulmonary resection that is needed for the patient in order to achieve a good oncological outcome. Some major progresses have been done recently to improve the operability and resectability of patients. For instance, prehabilitation program allows better postoperative morbidity. Some studies have shown a potential good oncological outcome with sublobar resection expending access to surgery for patient with reduced lung function. Some others have identified the neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy as a potential solution for downstaging tumours. Work-up of early-stage NSCLC is a key moment and has to be done thoroughly and in full knowledge of the recent findings in order to propose the most appropriate treatment for the patient.

Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes in Robot-Assisted and Video-Assisted Lobectomies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

This study compares long-term outcomes in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); all consecutive patients who underwent RATS or VATS lobectomy for NSCLC between July 2015 and December 2021 in our center were enrolled in a single-center prospective study. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence rate. The secondary outcomes were complication rate, length of hospitalization (LOS), duration of chest tubes (LOD), and number of lymph node stations harvested. A total of 619 patients treated with RATS (n = 403) or VATS (n = 216) were included in the study. There was no significant difference in OS between the RATS and VATS groups (3-year OS: 75.9% vs. 82.3%; 5-year OS: 70.5% vs. 68.5%; p = 0.637). There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the RATS and VATS groups (3-year DFS: 92.4% vs. 81.2%; 5-year DFS: 90.3% vs. 77.6%; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis according to the pathological stage also demonstrated a significant difference between RATS and VATS groups in DFS in stage I (3-year DFS: 94.4% vs. 88.9%; 5-year DFS: 91.8% vs. 85.2%; p = 0.037) and stage III disease (3-year DFS: 82.4% vs. 51.1%; 5-year DFS: 82.4% vs. 37.7%; p = 0.024). Moreover, in multivariable Cox regression analysis, the surgical approach was significantly associated with DFS, with an HR of 0.46 (95% CI 0.27-0.78, p = 0.004) for RATS compared to VATS. VATS lobectomy was associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate compared to RATS (21.8% vs. 6.2%; p < 0.001). LOS and LOD, as well as complication rate and in-hospital and 30-day mortality, were similar among the groups. RATS lobectomy was associated with a higher number of lymph node stations harvested compared to VATS (7 [IQR:2] vs. 5 [IQR:2]; p < 0.001). In conclusion, in our series, RATS lobectomy for lung cancer led to a significantly higher DFS and significantly lower recurrence rate compared to the VATS approach. RATS may allow more extensive nodal dissection, and this could translate into reduced recurrence.

A cost analysis of robotic vs. video-assisted thoracic surgery: The impact of the learning curve and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) is an alternative to video-assessed thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of lung cancer but concern exists regarding the high associated costs. The COVID-19 pandemic added further financial pressure to healthcare systems. This study investigated the impact of the learning curve on the cost-effectiveness of RATS lung resection and the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a RATS program. Methods: Patients undergoing RATS lung resection between January 2017 and December 2020 were prospectively followed. A matched cohort of VATS cases were analyzed in parallel. The first 100 and most recent 100 RATS cases performed at our institution were compared to assess the learning curve. Cases performed before and after March 2020 were compared to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. A comprehensive cost analysis of multiple theatre and postoperative data points was performed using Stata statistics package (v14.2). Results: 365 RATS cases were included. Median cost per procedure was £7,167 and theatre cost accounted for 70%. Major contributing factors to overall cost were operative time and postoperative length of stay. Cost per case was £640 less after passing the learning curve (p < 0.001) largely due to reduced operative time. Comparison of a post-learning curve RATS subgroup matched to 101 VATS cases revealed no significant difference in theatre costs between the two techniques. Overall cost of RATS lung resections performed before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were not significantly different. However, theatre costs were significantly cheaper (£620/case; p < 0.001) and postoperative costs were significantly more expensive (£1,221/case; p = 0.018) during the pandemic. Discussion: Passing the learning curve is associated with a significant reduction in the theatre costs associated with RATS lung resection and is comparable with the cost of VATS. This study may underestimate the true cost benefit of passing the learning curve due to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on theatre costs. The COVID-19 pandemic made RATS lung resection more expensive due to prolonged hospital stay and increased readmission rate. The present study offers some evidence that the initial increased costs associated with RATS lung resection may be gradually offset as a program progresses.

Robotic versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer: Short-Term Outcomes of a Propensity Matched Analysis.

Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has gained popularity for the treatment of lung cancer, but its quality outcome measures are still being evaluated. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of lung cancer resection using RATS versus video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). To achieve this aim, we conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent lung cancer surgery between July 2015 and December 2020. A propensity-matched analysis was performed based on patients' performance status, forced expiratory volume in 1 s% of predicted, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide% of predicted, and surgical procedure (lobectomy or segmentectomy). Following propensity matching, a total of 613 patients were included in the analysis, of which 328 underwent RATS, and 285 underwent VATS, with satisfactory performance indicators. The results of the analysis indicated that RATS had a significantly longer operating time than VATS (132.4 ± 37.3 versus 122.4 ± 27.7 min; mean difference of 10 min 95% CI [confidence interval], 4.2 to 15.9 min; p = 0.001). On the other hand, VATS had a significantly higher estimated blood loss compared to RATS (169.7 ± 237.2 versus 82.2 ± 195.4 mL; mean difference of 87.5 mL; 95% CI, 48.1 to 126.8 mL; p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the duration of chest tubes, length of hospital stay, low- and high-grade complications, as well as readmissions and mortality within 30 days after surgery. Moreover, the number of dissected lymph-node stations was significantly higher with VATS than RATS (5.9 ± 1.5 versus 4.8 ± 2.2; mean difference of 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.5; p = 0.001). Nonetheless, the percentage of patients who were upstaged after histopathological analysis of the resected lymph nodes was similar between the two groups. In conclusion, RATS and VATS yielded comparable results for most of the short-term outcomes assessed. Further research is needed to validate the implementation of RATS and identify its potential benefits over VATS.

Preclinical evaluation of Versius, an innovative device for use in robot-assisted thoracic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The adoption of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has helped to overcome some of the challenges associated with surgeons performing conventional video-assisted thoracic surgery. The Versius Surgical System (CMR Surgical, Cambridge, UK) has been developed iteratively in line with surgical team feedback to improve the surgeon's experience and patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to assess the use of the device in RATS in a preclinical setting and to fulfil Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-Term Follow Up-Devices stage 1 (Idea). METHODS: Four cadaveric sessions were conducted between November 2018 and December 2020, during which device performance in a range of thoracic operations was assessed. Procedures were categorized as either completed or not completed, and surgeons evaluated the device's ability to successfully complete necessary surgical steps. Port and bedside unit positions were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 22/24 (91.7%) thoracic procedures were successfully completed, including 17/18 lobectomies, 2/3 thymectomies and 3/3 diaphragm plications, in 9 cadaver specimens. One thymectomy could not be completed due to cadaver anatomy and 1 lobectomy was not completed due a console system fault. Port and bedside unit configurations were successfully validated for all procedures, and lead surgeons deemed the device to be well-suited for thoracic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This preclinical study demonstrated the successful use of the device in RATS in cadaveric models and supports progression to small-scale clinical studies, as part of Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-Term Follow Up-Devices stage 2a (Development).

Maintaining safe lung cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in a global city.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 has challenged health service provision worldwide. This work evaluates safe surgical pathways and standard operating procedures implemented in the high volume, global city of London during the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We also assess the safety of minimally invasive surgery(MIS) for anatomical lung resection. METHODS: This multicentre cohort study was conducted across all London thoracic surgical units, covering a catchment area of approximately 14.8 Million. A Pan-London Collaborative was created for data sharing and dissemination of protocols. All patients undergoing anatomical lung resection 1st March-1st June 2020 were included. Primary outcomes were SARS-CoV-2 infection, access to minimally invasive surgery, post-operative complication, length of intensive care and hospital stay (LOS), and death during follow up. FINDINGS: 352 patients underwent anatomical lung resection with a median age of 69 (IQR: 35-86) years. Self-isolation and pre-operative screening were implemented following the UK national lockdown. Pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 swabs were performed in 63.1% and CT imaging in 54.8%. 61.7% of cases were performed minimally invasively (MIS), compared to 59.9% pre pandemic. Median LOS was 6 days with a 30-day survival of 98.3% (comparable to a median LOS of 6 days and 30-day survival of 98.4% pre-pandemic). Significant complications developed in 7.3% of patients (Clavien-Dindo Grade 3-4) and 12 there were re-admissions(3.4%). Seven patients(2.0%) were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection, two of whom died (28.5%). INTERPRETATION: SARS-CoV-2 infection significantly increases morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective anatomical pulmonary resection. However, surgery can be safely undertaken via open and MIS approaches at the peak of a viral pandemic if precautionary measures are implemented. High volume surgery should continue during further viral peaks to minimise health service burden and potential harm to cancer patients. FUNDING: This work did not receive funding.

Risks and rewards of the surgical treatment of lung cancer in octogenarians.

OBJECTIVES: Surgeons will face an increasing number of octogenarians with lung cancer potentially curable by surgery. The goal of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes after lung resection. METHODS: We performed a single-centre study of consecutive patients ≥80 years old, surgically treated for suspected lung cancer between 2009 and 2016. Age, sex, performance status, lung function, surgical approach, type of lung resection, complications, in-hospital and 30- and 90-day deaths and long-term survival were analysed. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-seven patients were enrolled. The median age was 82 years (range 80-97). One hundred and thirty-four patients were treated by thoracotomy and 123 by video-assisted thoracic surgery [10 (8.1%) converted]. Two hundred and thirty-two underwent lobar resection and 25 underwent sublobar resection. There were no intraoperative deaths and 9 admissions to the intensive therapy unit; 112 (43.6%) patients suffered complications: More complications occurred after lobar versus after sublobar resections [45.7% vs 24% (P = 0.037)] and in those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [57.4% vs 40% (P = 0.02)]. The 30-day mortality was 3.9% (n = 10) and the 90-day mortality was 6.22% (n = 16). One hundred and sixty-seven patients died during the study period; patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 233) had a median survival of 46.5 months with 67.2% alive at 2 years and 40.8% at 5 years. Pathological stage and R status were independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for malignancies in octogenarians is feasible and safe with good long-term outcomes. The risk of postoperative complications, especially in those with COPD, is high but can be minimized with sublobar resection. Postoperative mortality is acceptable, and long-term survival is primarily governed by lung cancer stage. Age is no reason to deny patients surgery for early-stage disease.

Surgeon Knowledge of the Pulmonary Arterial System and Surgical Plan Confidence Is Improved by Interactive Virtual 3D-CT Models of Lung Cancer Patient Anatomies.

Objective: Interactive three-dimensional virtual models of pulmonary structures (3D-CT) may improve the safety and accuracy of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of 3D-CT models as an imaging adjunct on surgical confidence and anatomical assessment for lobectomy planning. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the response of 10 specialist thoracic surgeons who each reviewed 10 pre-operative images of patients undergoing robotic-assisted lobectomy lung cancer cases from June to November 2018 in our institute, resulting in 100 data points. The number of arteries, veins, and bronchi entering the resected lobes were determined from the operation video recording by the operating surgeon. 3D-CT models were generated for each case and made available for online visualization and manipulation. Thoracic surgeons were invited to participate in the survey which consisted of evaluation of CT (control) and 3D-CT (intervention) models. A questionnaire regarding anatomical structures, surgical approach, and confidence was administered. Results: Ten participants were recruited. 3D-CT models led to a significant (p < 0.003) increase in the surgeons' ability to correctly identifying pulmonary arteries entering the resection lobes in 35% (CT) and 57% (3D-CT) of cases. A significant (p < 1e-13) improvement in anatomy assessment and surgical plan confidence was observed for the 3D-CT arm, with median Likert scale scores of "2-Slightly easy" (CT) and "4-Very easy" (3D-CT). Conclusion: The use of 3D-CT models for thoracic surgery planning increases the surgeon confidence in recognizing anatomical structures, largely by enhanced appreciation of anatomical variations in the segmental pulmonary arterial system. Further studies are needed to investigate if 3D-CT models can be used in providing precise information about segmental artery distribution and therefore surgical planning of sub-lobar resections.

Preoperative Physical Activity Predicts Surgical Outcomes Following Lung Cancer Resection.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether preoperative levels of physical activity predict the incidence of post-operative complications following anatomical lung resection. METHODS: Levels of physical activity (daily steps) were measured for 15 consecutive days using pedometers in 90 consecutive patients (prior to admission). Outcomes measured were cardiac and respiratory complications, length of stay, and 30-day re-admission rate. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients' datasets were analysed (12 patients were excluded due to non-compliance). Based on steps performed they were divided into quartiles; 1 (low physical activity) to 4 (high physical activity). There were no significant differences in age, smoking history, COPD, BMI, percentage predicted FEV1 and KCO and cardiovascular risk factors between the groups. There were significantly fewer total complications in quartiles 3 and 4 (high physical activity) compared to quartiles 1 and 2 (low physical activity) (8 vs 22; P = .01). There was a trend (P > .05) towards shorter hospital length of stay in quartiles 3 and 4 (median values of 4 and 5 days, respectively) compared to quartiles 1 and 2 (6 days for both groups). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative physical activity can help to predict postoperative outcome and can be used to stratify risk of postoperative complications and to monitor impact of preoperative interventions, ultimately improving short term outcomes.

Continuity of Cancer Care: The Surgical Experience of Two Large Cancer Hubs in London and Milan.

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic is having a large effect on the management of cancer patients. This study reports on the approach and outcomes of cancer patients receiving radical surgery with curative intent between March and September 2020 (in comparison to 2019) in the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS (IEO) in Milan and the South East London Cancer Alliance (SELCA). Both institutions implemented a COVID-19 minimal pathway where patients were required to self-isolate prior to admission and were swabbed for COVID-19 within 72 h of surgery. Positive patients had surgery deferred until a negative swab. At IEO, radical surgeries declined by 6% as compared to the same period in 2019 (n = 1477 vs. 1560, respectively). Readmissions were required for 3% (n = 41), and <1% (n = 9) developed COVID-19, of which only one had severe disease and died. At SELCA, radical surgeries declined by 34% (n = 1553 vs. 2336). Readmissions were required for 11% (n = 36), <1% (n = 7) developed COVID-19, and none died from it. Whilst a decline in number of surgeries was observed in both centres, the implemented COVID-19 minimal pathways have shown to be safe for cancer patients requiring radical treatment, with limited complications and almost no COVID-19 infections.

Impact of the TNM staging system for thymoma.

BACKGROUND: Masaoka-Koga staging system remains the most frequently applied clinical staging system for thymic malignancy. However, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC)/International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) proposed a tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system in 2014. This study aims to evaluate its impact on stage distribution, clinical implementation, and prognosis for thymomas. METHODS: We performed a single institution, retrospective analysis of 245 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for thymoma. 9 patients with thymic carcinoma were excluded. No patients were lost to follow up. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate overall survival. RESULTS: Median age was 62 years; 129 patients (53%) were female. The median overall survival was 158 months (range, 108-208 months), and disease-free survival 194 months (range, 170-218 months). At the end of follow up 63 patients were dead. Early Masaoka-Koga stages I (n=74) and II (n=129) shifted to the IASLC/ITMIG stage I (n=203). 8 patients were down staged from Masaoka-Koga stage III to IASLC/ITMIG stage II because of pericardial involvement. Advanced stages III (Masaoka-Koga: n=30; IASLC/ITMIG: n=22) and IV (Masaoka-Koga: n=12; IASLC/ITMIG: n=12) remained similar and were associated with more aggressive WHO thymoma histotypes (B2/B3). Masaoka-Koga (P=0.004), IASLC/ITMIG staging (P<0.0001) and complete surgical resection (P<0.0001) were statistically associated with survival. At multivariate analysis only R status was an independent prognostic factor for survival. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with stage I disease increased significantly when IASLC/ITMIG system used, whilst the proportion with stages III and IV were similar in both systems. Completeness of resection, Masaoka-Koga and the IASLC/ITMIG staging system are strong predictors of survival. The TNM staging system is useful in disease management and a strong predictor of overall survival.

New N1/N2 classification and lobe specific lymphatic drainage: Impact on survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with surgery.

OBJECTIVE: to validate the proposed N descriptor revision on a large cohort of patients and assess the impact of tumour location on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases for patients with NSCLC. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients who had anatomical lung resections. Systematic lymph node dissection was done for all patients. RESULTS: Between January 2009 and December 2019 2566 patients had surgical resection for NSCLC. 448 patients (17.5%) had histologically confirmed lymph node metastases: 257 (57.4 %) had pN1 and 191 pN2. Median age of the study population was 69.1 years. Overall survival (OS) for study population was 37.3 months with 5-year survival rate of 35.7 %. The survival analysis of the N subgroups showed the pN2 patients had a median OS of 27.9 months vs. 41.7 months for pN1 patients (p = 0.013). Analysis as per the new proposal of the N subgroups N1a vs N1b vs N2a1 vs N2a2 vs N2b showed that median survival OS was 41.7 vs. 39.2 mo vs. 33.3 mo vs. 28.9 mo vs. 24.6 mo (p = 0.099). There was statistically significant difference in survival between N2 patients with skip metastasis and N2 patients without skip metastases: OS 32.2 (95 % CI: 16.8-47.6) months vs. 24.2 months (p = 0.024). On multivariate analysis only pathological N (p = 0.011) and the new proposed N classification (p = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: N1 and N2 disease are heterogeneous groups and require further stratification. The number of N2 lymph node stations involved and the presence or not of N1 disease translated to significant differences in survival and therefore have to be included in N staging.

Retrospective Observational Study into the Early Causes of Death Following Surgery for NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory failure has historically been the major cause of mortality after elective lung resections. With improved intubation using fiber-optic scopes, better preoperative respiratory risk assessment, more advanced anesthetic single lung ventilation, and minimally invasive surgical technique, this may have changed. Our objective was to assess the main causes of mortality over the past 10 years in patients undergoing elective lung surgery in a major UK center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective unit data search was made for all deaths during the 10-year period between January 2007 and December 2016 inclusive. All inpatient deaths within 30 days of an elective anatomical lung resection for lung malignancies were included. RESULTS: Three-thousand three-hundred sixteen lung resections for malignancy were performed in the 10-year period. There were 44 (1.3%) deaths during this period, 27 (61.4%) after open lobectomies, 8 (18.2%) after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomies, 5 (11.4%) after sleeve lobectomies, and 4 (9%) after pneumonectomies. Causes of death included 24 (54.5%) respiratory failure, 10 (22.7%) ischemic bowel, 4 (9%) coronary events, 2 (4.5%) strokes, 2 (4.5%) on table hemorrhage, 1 (2.3%) massive pulmonary embolus, and 1 (2.3%) postoperative hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Although respiratory failure is still a major cause of mortality in the postoperative patient, bowel ischemia has been found to be the second greatest cause of death. This study highlights the need to identify those at risk of this fatal complication during preoperative assessment and their postoperative management.

Differential Survival Characteristics of Sarcomatoid Subtype in Biphasic Pleural Mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Biphasic pleural mesothelioma (BPM) accounts for approximately 10% of all pleural mesothelioma. Our aim was to assess the clinical, radiologic, and pathologic factors impacting survival in BPM and to better identify patients most likely to benefit from active treatment. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective review was made of 214 biopsy-proven BPM cases with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients with insufficient tissue for analysis were excluded (n = 96). Clinical and pathologic factors were evaluated along with radiologic assessment of pleural thickness. Survival was measured from time of diagnosis. Univariable and multivariable predictors of survival were evaluated. RESULTS: In all, 118 patients were included; 28 underwent pleurectomy/decortication, with 27 receiving additional modalities. Ninety patients underwent chemotherapy (n = 18) or radiotherapy alone (n = 9), 63 received combination therapy, and 27 received best supportive care. Median overall survival was 11.2 months (range, 0.3 to 36.2). At univariable analysis, pleurectomy/decortication (p = 0.0061), radiotherapy (p < 0.0001), and chemotherapy (p < 0.0001) were associated with superior survival when compared with best supportive care alone. Pleurectomy/decortication demonstrated 40% survival improvement compared with no surgery (p = 0.122). In a multivariable model, necrosis was negatively prognostic (hazard ratio 2.1, SE 0.76). Furthermore, increased sarcomatoid component was associated with worse survival without radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: BPM prognosis remains poor despite multimodality treatment. Anticancer treatment is associated with superior outcome in this nonrandomized retrospective series. Our findings suggest superior survival for patients with a lower proportion of sarcomatoid disease, with selective benefit of radiotherapy in higher proportions of sarcomatoid disease. When planning active treatment, the potential survival benefits require balancing against associated morbidity and recovery period.

Prognostic factors including lymphovascular invasion on survival for resected non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report on the influence of tumor lymphovascular invasion on overall survival and in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer and identify prognostic factors for survival. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of a consecutive series of patients who had surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer in a single institution. The study covers a 3-year period. Overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship of lymphovascular invasion and other clinicopathologic variables. A multivariate regression was used to assess the relationship between tumor lymphovascular invasion and other clinical and pathologic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 524 patients were identified and included in the study. Two hundred twenty-five patients (43%) had tumors with lymphovascular invasion. Patients with tumor lymphovascular invasion had a lower overall survival (P < .0001). Tumor lymphovascular invasion was independently associated with visceral pleural involvement (P < .0001). In a multivariable model, lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio [HR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63-4.09; P < .0001), parietal pleural invasion (HR, 45.4; 95% CI, 2.08-990; P = .015), advanced age (HR, 1.028; 95% CI, 1.009-1.048; P = .004), and N2 lymph node involvement (HR, 1.837; 95% CI, 1.257-2.690; P = .002) were independent prognostic factors for lower overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphovascular invasion is associated with a worse overall survival in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer regardless of tumor stage. Parietal pleural involvement, N2 nodal disease, and advanced age independently predict poor overall survival.

Treatment and prognostic factors of patients with thymic epithelial tumors at first recurrence or progression.

AIM: The treatment of patients with recurrent or progressive thymic epithelial tumors remains uncertain due to limited data in this rare disease. MATERIALS & METHODS: A retrospective 10-year monoinstitutional analysis was conducted on 25 patients with first recurrence or disease progression following primary treatment. RESULTS: Twenty patients had thymoma, five thymic carcinomas. Ten patients (40%) received surgery, four (40%) following chemotherapy; 17 (68%) had chemotherapy, with a combination regimen in 16 of them (94%). Surgery had a significant effect both on overall survival and progression-free survival-2 by univariate analysis (p = 0.04), combination chemotherapy only on progression-free survival-2 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy and surgery at first recurrence/progression of thymic epithelial tumors were associated with improved survival. DISCUSSION: Although several limitations may have affected this retrospective study on a relatively small number of patients with this rare entity of recurrent thymic malignancies, we suggest the use of combination chemotherapy and surgery at their first recurrence may have contributed to the high overall and progression-free survival observed with adequate follow-up and deserve further investigations in broader retrospective and comparative studies.

Clinical and quality of life outcomes following anatomical lung resection for lung cancer in high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the gold standard for patients with resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer. Current guidance identifies patients with poor pulmonary reserve to fall within a high-risk cohort. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and quality of life outcomes of anatomical lung resection in patients deemed high risk based on pulmonary function measurements. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing anatomical lung resection for nonsmall cell lung cancer between January 2013 and January 2015 was performed. All patients with limited pulmonary reserve defined as predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s or transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide of <40% were included in the study. Postoperative complications, admission to the Intensive Care Unit, length of stay, and 30-day in-hospital mortality were recorded. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire lung cancer 13 questionnaire was used to assess quality of life outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no in-hospital mortality, and 30-day mortality was 1.8%. No complications were seen in 64% (n = 34), minor complications occurred in 26% (n = 14), while 9% had a major complication (n = 5). Quality of life outcomes were above the reference results for patients with early stage lung cancer. CONCLUSION: Anatomical lung resection can be performed safely in selected high-risk patients based on pulmonary function without significant increase in morbidity or mortality and with acceptable quality of life outcomes. Given that complications following lung resection are multifactorial, fitness for surgery should be thoroughly assessed in all patients with resectable disease within a multidisciplinary setting. High operative risk by pulmonary function tests alone should not preclude surgical resection.