BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship of reporting accuracy in 24-h dietary recalls to child-respondent characteristics-cognitive ability, social desirability, body mass index (BMI) percentile and socioeconomic status (SES). SUBJECTS/METHODS: Fourth-grade children (mean age 10.1 years) were observed eating two school meals and interviewed about dietary intake for 24 h that included those meals. (Eight multiple-pass interview protocols operationalized the conditions of an experiment that crossed two retention intervals-short and long-with four prompts (ways of eliciting reports in the first pass)). Academic achievement-test scores indexed cognitive ability; social desirability was assessed by questionnaire; height and weight were measured to calculate BMI; nutrition-assistance program eligibility information was obtained to index SES. Reported intake was compared to observed intake to calculate measures of reporting accuracy for school meals at the food-item (omission rate; intrusion rate) and energy (correspondence rate; inflation ratio) levels. Complete data were available for 425 of 480 validation-study participants. RESULTS: Controlling for manipulated variables and other measured respondent characteristics, for one or more of the outcome variables, reporting accuracy increased with cognitive ability (omission rate, intrusion rate, correspondence rate, P<0.001), decreased with social desirability (correspondence rate, P<0.0004), decreased with BMI percentile (correspondence rate, P=0.001) and was better by higher- than by lower-SES children (intrusion rate, P=0.001). Some of these effects were moderated by interactions with retention interval and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Children's dietary-reporting accuracy is systematically related to such respondent characteristics as cognitive ability, social desirability, BMI percentile and SES.
Body Mass Index , Cognition , Diet Surveys/methods , Diet , Self Report/standards , Social Class , Social Desirability , Child , Diet Records , Eating , Feeding Behavior , Female , Humans , Male , Meals , Mental Recall , Reproducibility of Results , Schools , Students
BACKGROUND: Effective care of young people with rare conditions requires ongoing coordinated medical treatment as well as educational and social support services. However, information on treatment is often lacking due to limited data. South Carolina has a repository of comprehensive health and human service data with which individuals may be tracked across the data systems of multiple state agencies and organizations. OBJECTIVE: To develop a method for studying health care of young persons with rare conditions using this repository. METHODS: We identified individuals aged 15 to 24 years diagnosed during 2000-2010 with Fragile X syndrome (FXS), spina bifida (SB), or muscular dystrophy (MD) using a series of algorithms. ICD-9-CM codes were used to initially identify the cohort from medical billing data. Demographics, medical care, employment, education, and socioeconomic status data were then extracted from linked administrative sources. RESULTS: We identified 1,040 individuals with these rare conditions: 125 with FXS, 695 with SB, and 220 with MD. The vast majority of the cases (95%) were identified in the Medicaid database. Half of the cohort was male, with a higher percentage in the FXS and MD groups. Sixty-two percent of the cohort was enrolled in the last year of high school. Over half of the cohort received support services from the state's disability and special-needs agency; 16% received food assistance. Thirty-eight percent were employed at some point during the study period. Forty-nine individuals with SB and 56 with MD died during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: We used a linked statewide data system to study rare conditions. Strengths include the diversity of information, rigorous identification strategies, and access to longitudinal data. Despite limitations inherent to administrative data, we found that linked state data systems are valuable resources for investigating important public health questions on rare conditions.
Fragile X Syndrome/epidemiology , Muscular Dystrophies/epidemiology , Rare Diseases/epidemiology , Registries , Spinal Dysraphism/epidemiology , State Government , Adolescent , Female , Fragile X Syndrome/diagnosis , Fragile X Syndrome/therapy , Government Agencies , Humans , Male , Muscular Dystrophies/diagnosis , Muscular Dystrophies/therapy , Rare Diseases/diagnosis , Rare Diseases/therapy , South Carolina/epidemiology , Spinal Dysraphism/diagnosis , Spinal Dysraphism/therapy , Young Adult
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Validation-study data were analyzed to investigate the effect of retention interval (time between the to-be-reported meal and interview) on accuracy of children's school-breakfast reports and school-lunch reports in 24-h recalls, and to compare accuracy of children's school-breakfast reports for two breakfast locations (classroom; cafeteria). SUBJECTS/METHODS: Each of 374 fourth-grade children was interviewed to obtain a 24-h recall using one of six conditions from crossing two target periods (prior 24 h; previous day) with three interview times (morning; afternoon; evening). Each condition had 62 or 64 children (half boys). A recall's target period included one school breakfast and one school lunch, for which the child had been observed. Food-item variables (observed number; reported number; omission rate; intrusion rate) and energy variables (observed; reported; report rate; correspondence rate; inflation ratio) were calculated for each child for school breakfast and school lunch separately. RESULTS: Accuracy for school-breakfast reports and school-lunch reports was inversely related to retention interval. Specifically, as indicated by smaller omission rates, smaller intrusion rates, larger correspondence rates and smaller inflation ratios, accuracy for school-breakfast reports was best for prior-24-h recalls in the morning, and accuracy for school-lunch reports was best for prior-24-h recalls in the afternoon. For neither school meal was a significant sex effect found for any variable. For school-breakfast reports, there was no significant school-breakfast location effect for any variable. CONCLUSIONS: By shortening the retention interval, accuracy can be improved for school-breakfast reports and school-lunch reports in children's 24-h recalls.
Eating/psychology , Interviews as Topic/methods , Interviews as Topic/standards , Mental Recall , Self Disclosure , Students/psychology , Child , Cross-Over Studies , Diet Surveys , Female , Humans , Male , Psychology, Child , Reproducibility of Results , Schools , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
This paper describes an ecosystem approach to the management of dysfunctional stress in a medical education setting. An assessment of the student-perceived environment was conducted in three phases: (a) brainstorming to identify potential sources of stress; (b) design and use of the Medical School Environmental Stress Inventory (MSESI) to measure student-reported stress; and (c) follow-up interviews to validate these findings and to identify specific factors contributing to the stressful situations, consequences resulting from the stress, coping strategies used, potential solutions to the stressful situations, and aspects of the environment perceived as supportive. Students described the major stressors as information-input overload, short-age of time, inadequate feedback regarding performance, and poor quality of interpersonal relationships. The authors, committed to an action-research model, used the results to design appropriate interventions.
Stress, Psychological/etiology , Students, Medical/psychology , Adult , Environment , Female , Humans , Male , Psychological Tests , Schools, Medical , Sex Factors , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control , Stress, Psychological/psychology
