Randomized trial: treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause using radiofrequency.

OBJECTIVE: A randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency treatment in postmenopausal women not willing to use or presenting a contraindication for menopause hormone therapy (MHT) and suffering from genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). METHODS: A prospective randomized open study evaluated the effect of radiofrequency treatment versus a gel (control group) in postmenopausal women suffering from GSM. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 10-12 weeks of treatment for severity of vulvovaginal atrophy, dyspareunia, pH, vaginal smear maturation index, Vaginal Health Index and Female Sexual Function Index. The difference at baseline and after 10-12 weeks of treatment and the difference in improvement were tested between groups by a two-sample t-test and the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we were only able to treat 48 patients (24 patients using radiofrequency and 24 patients using a gel). Globally, at the end of the study, there were no differences in changes of the measured outcomes between the group of women treated with radiofrequency and the control group. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency treatment was found to be safe, but was not superior to a gel, although the study lacked power. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03857893).

MOF/Hip Fracture Ratio in a Belgian Cohort of Post-menopausal Women (FRISBEE): Potential Impact on the FRAX® Score.

The ratio between major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) and hip fractures in the Belgian FRAX® tool to predict fractures is currently based on Swedish data. We determined these ratios in a prospective cohort of Belgian postmenopausal women. 3560 women, aged 60-85 years (70.1 ± 6.4 years), were included in a prospective study from 2007 to 2013 and surveyed yearly (FRISBEE). We analyzed the number of validated incident fractures until October 2020 by age and sites and compared the MOFs/hip ratios in this cohort with those from the Swedish databases. We registered 1336 fractures (mean follow-up of 9.1 years). The MOFs/hip ratios extracted from the FRISBEE cohort were 10.7 [95% CI: (5.6-20.5)], 6.4 [4.7-8.7], and 5.0 [3.9-6.5] for women of 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89 years old, respectively. These ratios were 1.7-1.8 times higher for all age groups than those from the Swedish data, which decreased from 6.5 (60-64 years group) down to 1.8 (85-89 age group). The overall MOFs/hip ratio in Frisbee was 6.0 [5.9-6.1], which was higher than any Swedish ratio between 65 and 85 years. Nevertheless, the decrease of the ratios with age paralleled that observed in Sweden. In this Brussels prospective cohort, MOFs/hip ratios were 1.7-1.8 times those observed in Sweden currently used for MOFs prediction in the Belgian FRAX® version. This discrepancy can greatly modify the estimation of the risk of MOFs, which is among the main criteria used to recommend a pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis in several countries.

Discriminating value of HR-pQCT for fractures in women with similar FRAX scores: A substudy of the FRISBEE cohort.

Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) has a low sensitivity to identify women at high fracture risk. The FRAX algorithm, by combining several clinical risk factors, might improve fracture prediction compared to aBMD alone. Several micro-architectural and biomechanical parameters which can be measured by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) are associated with fracture risk. HR-pQCT in combination or not with finite element analysis (FEA) may be used to improve bone strength prediction. Our aim was to assess whether HR-pQCT measurements (densities, cortical and trabecular microarchitecture, biomechanical proprieties assessed by FEA) had an added value in predicting fractures in a subgroup of women belonging to the Belgian FRISBEE cohort. One hundred nineteen women who sustained a fracture (aged 60 to 85 years) during the initial follow-up of our cohort had a radius and tibia examination by HR-pQCT and were compared with controls matched for their FRAX score at baseline. We found that low distal radius total (OR = 1.41 [1.07-1.86] per SD, p < 0.05) and trabecular densities (OR = 1.45 [1.10-1.90], p < 0.01), trabecular number (OR = 1.32 [1.01-1.72], p < 0.05), intra individual distribution of separation (OR = 0.73 [0.54-0.99], p < 0.05) as several FEA parameters were significantly associated with fractures. At the distal tibia, impaired cortical density (OR = 1.32 [1.03-1.70] per SD, p < 0.05) and thickness (OR = 1.29 [1.01-1.63], p < 0.05) and apparent modulus (OR = 1.30 [1.01-1.66], p < 0.05) were significantly correlated with fractures. A low ultra distal radial aBMD (UDR) measured at the time of HR-pQCT was significantly associated with fractures (OR = 1.67 [1.22-2.28], p < 0.01). Women from both groups were followed further after the realization of the HR-pQCT and 46 new fractures were registered. In this second part of the study, low UDR aBMD (OR = 1.66 [1.18-2.35], p < 0.01), total (OR = 1.48 [1.08-2.03], p < 0.05), cortical (OR = 1.40 [1.04-1.87], p < 0.05) and trabecular (OR = 1.37 [1.01-1.85], p < 0.05) densities or apparent modulus (OR = 1.49 [1.07-2.05], p < 0.05) at the radius were associated with a significant increase of fracture risk. At the tibia, only the cortical density was significantly associated with the fracture risk (OR = 1.34 [1.02-2.76], p < 0.05). These results confirm the interest of HR-pQCT measurements for the evaluation of fracture risk, also in women matched for their baseline FRAX score. They also highlight that UDR aBMD contains pertinent information.

The Belgian Bone Club 2020 guidelines for the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

PURPOSE: To provide updated evidence-based guidelines for the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women in Belgium. METHODS: The Belgian Bone Club (BBC) gathered a guideline developer group. Nine "Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome" (PICO) questions covering screening, diagnosis, non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments, and monitoring were formulated. A systematic search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus was performed to find network meta-analyses, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, and recommendations from scientific societies published in the last 10 years. Manual searches were also performed. Summaries of evidence were provided, and recommendations were further validated by the BBC board members and other national scientific societies' experts. RESULTS: Of the 3840 references in the search, 333 full texts were assessed for eligibility, and 129 met the inclusion criteria. Osteoporosis screening using clinical risk factors should be considered. Patients with a recent (<2 years) major osteoporotic fracture were considered at very high and imminent risk of future fracture. The combination of bone mineral density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and 10-year fracture risk was used to categorize patients as low or high risk. Patient education, the combination of weight-bearing and resistance training, and optimal calcium intake and vitamin D status were recommended. Antiresorptive and anabolic osteoporosis treatment should be considered for patients at high and very high fracture risk, respectively. Follow-up should focus on compliance, and patient-tailored monitoring should be considered. CONCLUSION: BBC guidelines and 25 guideline recommendations bridge the gap between research and clinical practice for the screening, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis.

Is there a role for menopausal hormone therapy in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis?

We provide an evidence base and guidance for the use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) for the maintenance of skeletal health and prevention of future fractures in recently menopausal women. Despite controversy over associated side effects, which has limited its use in recent decades, the potential role for MHT soon after menopause in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis is increasingly recognized. We present a narrative review of the benefits versus risks of using MHT in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Current literature suggests robust anti-fracture efficacy of MHT in patients unselected for low BMD, regardless of concomitant use with progestogens, but with limited evidence of persisting skeletal benefits following cessation of therapy. Side effects include cardiovascular events, thromboembolic disease, stroke and breast cancer, but the benefit-risk profile differs according to the use of opposed versus unopposed oestrogens, type of oestrogen/progestogen, dose and route of delivery and, for cardiovascular events, timing of MHT use. Overall, the benefit-risk profile supports MHT treatment in women who have recently (< 10 years) become menopausal, who have menopausal symptoms and who are less than 60 years old, with a low baseline risk for adverse events. MHT should be considered as an option for the maintenance of skeletal health in women, specifically as an additional benefit in the context of treatment of menopausal symptoms, when commenced at the menopause, or shortly thereafter, in the context of a personalized benefit-risk evaluation.

Assessment of Cardiovascular Safety of Anti-Osteoporosis Drugs.

The incidence of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease increases with age, and there are potentially shared mechanistic associations between the two conditions. It is therefore highly relevant to understand the cardiovascular implications of osteoporosis medications. These are presented in this narrative review. Calcium supplementation could theoretically cause atheroma formation via calcium deposition, and in one study was found to be associated with myocardial infarction, but this has not been replicated. Vitamin D supplementation has been extensively investigated for cardiac benefit, but no consistent effect has been found. Despite findings in the early 21st century that menopausal hormone therapy was associated with coronary artery disease and venous thromboembolism (VTE), this therapy is now thought to be potentially safe (from a cardiac perspective) if started within the first 10 years of the menopause. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are associated with increased risk of VTE and may be related to fatal strokes (a subset of total strokes). Bisphosphonates could theoretically provide protection against atheroma. However, data from randomised trials and observational studies have neither robustly supported this nor consistently demonstrated the potential association with atrial fibrillation. Denosumab does not appear to be associated with cardiovascular disease and, although parathyroid hormone analogues are associated with palpitations and dizziness, no association with a defined cardiovascular pathology has been demonstrated. Finally, romosozumab has been shown to have a possible cardiovascular signal, and therefore post-market surveillance of this therapy will be vital.

How to manage osteoporosis before the age of 50.

This narrative review discusses several aspects of the management of osteoporosis in patients under 50 years of age. Peak bone mass is genetically determined but can also be affected by lifestyle factors. Puberty constitutes a vulnerable period. Idiopathic osteoporosis is a rare, heterogeneous condition in young adults due in part to decreased osteoblast function and deficient bone acquisition. There are no evidence-based treatment recommendations. Drugs use can be proposed to elderly patients at very high risk. Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in the young can be challenging, in particular in the absence of a manifest secondary cause. Young adults with low bone mineral density (BMD) do not necessarily have osteoporosis and it is important to avoid unnecessary treatment. A determination of BMD is recommended for premenopausal women who have had a fragility fracture or who have secondary causes of osteoporosis: secondary causes of excessive bone loss need to be excluded and treatment should be targeted. Adequate calcium, vitamin D, and a healthy lifestyle should be recommended. In the absence of fractures, conservative management is generally sufficient, but in rare cases, such as chemotherapy-induced osteoporosis, antiresorptive medication can be used. Osteoporosis in young men is most often of secondary origin and hypogonadism is a major cause; testosterone replacement therapy will improve BMD in these patients. Diabetes is characterized by major alterations in bone quality, implying that medical therapy should be started sooner than for other causes of osteoporosis. Primary hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism, Cushing's syndrome and growth hormone deficiency or excess affect cortical bone more often than trabecular bone.

Osteoporosis treatment gap in a prospective cohort of volunteer women.

Despite the availability of efficient drugs to prevent osteoporotic fractures, only a minority of women receives osteoporosis therapy after a fracture. The high treatment gap in our cohort consisted of unselected volunteer patients highlights the urgent need of additional education, especially for the medical profession, regarding the risk-benefit balance of treatment. INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of efficient drugs to prevent osteoporotic fractures, only a minority of women receives osteoporosis therapy after a fracture, with a treatment gap around 80%. This can have dramatic consequences for patients and the healthcare systems. METHODS: In this study based on longitudinal data from the FRISBEE (Fracture RIsk Brussels Epidemiological Enquiry) cohort of 3560 volunteer women aged 60 to 85 years, we evaluated the 1-year treatment gap after a first major incident fragility fracture. RESULTS: There were 386 first validated fragility fractures, 285 major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and 101 "other major" fractures. The rate of untreated patients was 85.0% (82.8% for MOF versus 91.0 % for "other major" fracture sites) (p = 0.04), with a lower rate for spine (70.5%) and hip (72.5%) versus shoulder (91.6%) and wrist (94.1%) (p < 0.0001). More specifically, the treatment gap for patients with osteoporosis, defined by a T-score < - 2.5 SD was 74.6% versus 76.5% for patients with osteoporosis defined by the presence of hip, shoulder, or spine fractures, independently of DXA results. When considering age groups, the rate of untreated women was 87.9% for women 60-70 years old, 88.2% between 70 and 80 years and 77.8% above 80 years (p = 0.03), with a greater difference between women who were younger or older than 80 years at inclusion: 88.1% versus 77.8% (p = 0.009). A diagnosis of osteoporosis (p = 0.01) and age (p = 0.03) were the only clinical risk factors (CRFs) significantly associated with treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the urgent need of additional education, especially for the medical profession, regarding the risk-benefit balance of treatment.

[La ménopause et le traitement hormonal de la ménopause : une actualisation]. / Menopause and menopause hormonal treatment : an update.

Postmenopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is mainly used for the relief of menopausal symptoms. It can also be prescribed for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but nowadays, other medications are given to older patients for this indication. Current, available data, demonstrates that MHT is beneficial as well as safe for postmenopausal, symptomatic women. Modern regimens of MHT comprise lower dosages of estrogens than in the past, either safer progestins or SERMs. These regimens should be the preferred option for women with a uterus. Non-androgenic progestin may present reduced thrombotic and breast cancer risks, and transdermal oestrogen could have a reduced thrombotic risk. Oestrogen-only therapy is the preferred option for women who underwent a hysterectomy. Vaginal oestrogen therapy is indicated for women with atrophic vaginitis and recurrent urinary tract infections.

Le traitement des symptômes vasomoteurs constitue l'indication principale du traitement hormonal de la ménopause (THM). La seconde indication est le traitement de l'ostéoporose après la ménopause. Toutefois, d'autres produits sont utilisés pour traiter des femmes plus âgées à cette même fin. La balance bénéfice-risque est en faveur du THM pour les femmes postménopausées et symptomatiques, mais les doses d'oestrogène ont été réduites dans les schémas de traitement actualisés. Par ailleurs, ces schémas préconisent l'utilisation soit de progestatifs moins androgéniques et ayant une moindre innocuité que les progestatifs anciens, soit des SERMs. Ces schémas constituent les premiers choix de traitement pour les femmes non-hystérectomisées. Les progestatifs nonandrogéniques sont associés à un risque diminué de thrombose veineuse et de cancer du sein alors que les oestrogènes par voie transdermique présentent un moindre risque de thrombose veineuse. Chez les femmes qui n'ont plus d'utérus, il convient de prescrire des oestrogènes sans progestatifs. Le traitement local par voie vaginale à base d'oestrogènes est indiqué chez les femmes souffrant de vaginite atrophique, entrainant des difficultés sexuelles ou des infections urinaires récidivantes.

[Prolapse and urinary incontinence in women : place of the general practitioner]. / Prolapsus et incontinence urinaire chez la femme : la place du médecin généraliste.

The ageing of the population, having access to good quality of care, will result in an increase in the prevalence of pelvic floor diseases. Those persons, often in good general health, may experience difficulties in accepting functional pathologies, associated with loss in quality of life. One out of 2 women will have a pelvic floor problem and 1 out of 9 will have a surgical perineal procedure before the age of 80 years. The unitary character of the pelvic floor, a complex functional anatomic region, is often forgotten, essentially because the patients complain about one main pathology like urinary incontinence, genital prolapse, constipation and sexual disorders or chronic pain and will consult one specific specialist. Our role as health care professionals is to be aware of those associated pathologies and to obtain an optimal quality of care. The actual evolution towards specific clinical pathways with the integration of office provided care outside the hospital, needs to become the new standard of care. We try to give an overview of the different preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic options, available in a general practitioner's office. Taking care of the pelvic floor needs to be done in a global and pluridisciplinar setting. Referring towards specialised centres as well as the integration of the general practitioner, especially for the more complex cases, is essential.

Le vieillissement de la population ayant un accès à des soins de santé de qualité, mène à une augmentation de la prévalence des pathologies du périnée. Ces personnes, souvent en bonne santé, auront des difficultés à accepter des pathologies fonctionnelles associées à une perte de qualité de vie car ces pathologies du périnée représentent un large éventail de pathologies fonctionnelles. On estime qu'une femme sur 2 aura un jour un problème périnéal, 1 sur 9 devra subir une intervention chirurgicale périnéale avant l'âge de 80 ans. Le caractère unitaire du périnée, région anatomique fonctionnelle complexe, est malheureusement souvent oublié, au départ parce que les patientes se présentent chez leur médecin pour une plainte bien spécifique sans se rendre compte de cette unité et de l'association de différents symptômes comme l'incontinence urinaire, le prolapsus génital, la constipation et des troubles sexuels et douloureux. Notre rôle en tant que professionnel de santé est de ne pas négliger ces plaintes associées, afin d'avoir une qualité de soin optimale. L'évolution actuelle vers le développement des trajets de soin avec l'intégration standardisée des soins en extrahospitalier est évidente. Nous avons tenté dans cet article de donner une revue des moyens préventifs, diagnostiques et thérapeutiques applicables dans le cabinet du médecin généraliste. La prise en charge du périnée devrait toutefois avoir lieu de manière globale et de préférence pluridisciplinaire. La référence vers les centres pluridisciplinaires comme également l'intégration du médecin généraliste dans les trajets de soin, surtout pour les cas plus complexes, est essentielle.

Distribution of clinical risk factors for fracture in a Brussels cohort of postmenopausal women: The FRISBEE study and comparison with other major cohort studies.

OBJECTIVES: The estimation of fracture risk using clinical risk factors (CRFs) is of primary concern in osteoporosis management, but only some risk factors have been thoroughly evaluated and incorporated in predictive models. We have launched a large prospective study, the 'Fracture Risk Brussels Epidemiological Enquiry' (FRISBEE), to develop a new predictive model for osteoporotic fractures. The aims of this report are to describe the methodology of the FRISBEE study and to compare the distribution of CRFs in our cohort with those reported in other large studies. STUDY DESIGN: FRISBEE is a new study that prospectively evaluates a cohort of 3560 post-menopausal women (aged 60-85 years) followed yearly for the occurrence of fragility fractures. Multiple validated CRFs, densitometry (DXA) values and intake of medication were systematically registered at baseline. The distribution of the FRISBEE CRFs has been compared with the distributions of CRFs in the cohorts used to develop the FRAX® model as well as in more recent cohorts. For these recent cohorts, we focused on CRFs not included in FRAX®. RESULTS: The most frequently encountered CRFs used in FRAX® were a prior fragility fracture (27.1%) and a parental history of hip fracture (13.4%). The prevalence of some CRFs not integrated in FRAX® was relatively high, such as the use of proton pump inhibitors (20.8%) and a history of fall(s) (19.7%). The prevalence of many CRFs was quite variable between cohorts; for example, the prevalence of 'personal prior fragility fracture' ranged from 9% to 51%. CONCLUSION: We found considerable heterogeneity in the prevalence of CRFs between cohort studies. The impact of these differences on the predictive value of a particular CRF is unknown. We will construct a predictive model calibrated to the Belgian population. More importantly, the FRISBEE study should allow us to determine the predictive value of newly recognized CRFs in addition to the FRAX® algorithm to reliably estimate fracture risk.

Osteoporosis in Frail Patients: A Consensus Paper of the Belgian Bone Club.

In this consensus paper, the Belgian Bone Club aims to provide a state of the art on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis in frail individuals, including patients with anorexia nervosa, patients on dialysis, cancer patients, persons with sarcopenia, and the oldest old. All these conditions may indeed induce bone loss that is superimposed on physiological bone loss and often remains under-recognized and under-treated. This is of particular concern because of the major burden of osteoporotic fractures in terms of morbidity, mortality, and economic cost. Therefore, there is an urgent need to appreciate bone loss associated with these conditions, as this may improve diagnosis and management of bone loss and fracture risk in clinical practice.

Value of the 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT in the diagnosis of endometriosis. A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: The non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis remains challenging. Recent data suggested that somatostatin might be involved in its pathogenesis. High sensitive visualization of somatostatin receptors expression is possible using PET-CT imaging after the administration of a 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analog (DOTATATE) that will bind to the somatostatin receptor sub-types 2 and 5. The aim of the present study was to assess the usefulness of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT in the diagnosis of endometriosis. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective, single center pilot study. A pre operative 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT was performed in all of the patients who presented with suspected endometriosis and who were scheduled for a laparoscopy. Surgical endometriosis staging and histopathological analysis, including somatostatin receptors SST1, 2 and 5 immunohistochemistry (IHC) of removed specimens, were confronted to the results of the 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT. RESULTS: 12 patients were included in this study. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT performed pre operatively showed increased pathologic uptake in four patients with a deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) recto-vaginal lesion and in another patient with an adenomyoma. Expression of SST1, 2 and 5 receptors in surgical specimens was confirmed by IHC in these five lesions. Neither superficial peritoneal endometriosis, nor ovarian endometrioma were found to show an increased pathologic uptake on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT. IHC analysis confirmed that SST1, 2, and 5 receptors were not present in these lesions. CONCLUSION: The results observed in this small size series of patients seem to confirm expression of somatostatin receptors only in recto-vaginal DIE and focal adenomyosis lesions. The usefulness of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT in the diagnosis of this entity is uncertain. Future research should concentrate on studying the role of somatostatin in the pathogenesis of DIE.

Nonlinear wave interactions between short pulses of different spatio-temporal extents.

We study the nonlinear wave interactions between short pulses of different spatio-temporal extents. Unlike the well-understood mixing of quasi-monochromatic waves, this configuration is highly non-intuitive due to the complex coupling between the spatial and temporal degrees of freedom of the interacting pulses. We illustrate the process intuitively with transitions between different branches of the dispersion curves and interpret it in terms of spectral exchange between the interacting pulses. We verify our interpretation with an example whereby a spectrally-narrow pulse "inherits" the wide spectrum of a pump pulse centered at a different wavelength, using exact numerical simulations, as well as a simplified coupled mode analysis and an asymptotic analytical solution. The latter also provides a simple and intuitive quantitative interpretation. The complex wave mixing process studied here may enable flexible spatio-temporal shaping of short pulses and is the starting point of the study of more complicated systems.

Coping with menopausal symptoms: An internet survey of Belgian postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVES: An internet survey was performed to obtain data on the current use in Belgium of hormone replacement therapy and alternative treatments for the alleviation of menopausal symptoms. A supplementary aim was to assess the use of opt-in internet opinion panels (TalkToChange, http://www.talktochange.com, and GMI, http://www.gmi-mr.com/global-panel) as a potential new way to obtain data on menopausal issues. STUDY DESIGN: Data were collected via an internet platform from 696 postmenopausal women aged 45-60 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Respondents were asked questions about their socio-demographic profile, their experience of the menopause, the burden of the menopause, its impact on their quality of life and the treatment of menopausal symptoms (if any). RESULTS: The opt-in internet opinion panels proved a quick way (19days) to obtain reliable information with a low error margin (3.7%). The online survey collected detailed socio-demographic data. Almost all of the women (98%) had heard about the menopause before. Sixty-one percent perceived the menopause as a temporary phase (17% thought it lasted for one or two years and 44% thought it lasted for three to five years) and only 39% realized the menopause would last for the rest of their life. Twenty-three percent of the women reported any kind of impact of the menopause on their quality of life. However, for the other 77% the menopause had resulted in complaints. No differences according to the women's age, level of education or professional status were found in this respect. Sixty-nine percent of the women had 'ever' used some type of treatment for menopausal symptoms and 53% were currently using a treatment. Forty percent of those with more than three symptoms were currently untreated. Of those who were not on hormone replacement therapy (HRT), 61% would not consider taking it (54% were 'strongly opposed' and 7% simply 'opposed'), while 8% would consider asking their doctor for HRT. Among those women who were opposed to HRT, 25% indicated that they were afraid of the increased risk of breast cancer, 34% cited cardiovascular risks and 26% were worried about weight gain. In this Belgian sample, HRT was used significantly more often by French-speaking women (32%) than by Dutch-speaking women (9%) (OR 4.4, p<0.0001). The alternatives to HRT had a high satisfaction rate among users. Relaxation techniques, regular physical activity, acupuncture and avoiding stress had satisfaction rates similar to that with HRT. It was not possible to compare the alternatives in the same women. Nor was it possible to assess whether more pronounced symptoms required a specific treatment. CONCLUSION: Opt-in internet opinion panels proved a quick and efficient way to gather data on menopausal issues in Belgium. Despite the high levels of awareness and knowledge, there is some confusion concerning the duration of the menopause, and its common perception as a temporary condition is likely to mean that the menopausal burden is substantially underestimated. Many symptomatic women are untreated.

The role of biochemical of bone turnover markers in osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease: a consensus paper of the Belgian Bone Club.

The exact role of biochemical markers of bone turnover in the management of metabolic bone diseases remains a topic of controversy. In this consensus paper, the Belgian Bone Club aimed to provide a state of the art on the use of these biomarkers in different clinical or physiological situations like in postmenopausal women, osteoporosis in men, in elderly patients, in patients suffering from bone metastasis, in patients with chronic renal failure, in pregnant or lactating women, in intensive care patients, and in diabetics. We also gave our considerations on the analytical issues linked to the use of these biomarkers, on potential new emerging biomarkers, and on the use of bone turnover biomarkers in the follow-up of patients treated with new drugs for osteoporosis.

[State of contraception in 2016]. / Etat de la contraception en 2016.

INTRODUCTION: The Pill and other forms of hormonal contraception, if taken correctly, are very effective and safe for millions of women, but since a few years, due to the debates and controversies about the third- and fourth-generation pills, other options have gained in popularity. OBJECTIVES: to provide a review of oestroprogestative contraception (OP), progesta-tive contraception, IUDs with a focus on their advantages and side-effects according to the specific needs of women. METHODS: literature review and lessons learned from clinical practice. RESULTS: The importance of family and individual history, the life-style and socio-economic conditions are critical factors for advising women on the 15 contraceptive choices available to them. The risk/benefit ratio of OP contraception needs a yearly follow-up. The progestative contraception is the preferred option for women who have contraindication for oestrogen, are older than forty, and/or have risk factors such as a history of venous thromboembolism, overweight and smoking. The IUD usually is well tolerated and causes few side effects. Among the other contraceptive methods, sterilization and diaphragms are briefly discussed. CONCLUSION: Among the many safe and effective contraceptive methods, it is important for general practitioners to know the advantages and the side effects of each method, as well as the specific conditions of the woman, to propose the best options available. In case of difficulties of follow up or adherence to daily uptake, in particular among adolescents, long-acting methods such as IDU or implants are preferable.

INTRODUCTION: Longtemps préférées des femmes, les pilules sont en recul en Belgique depuis les polémiques sur les pilules de 3e et 4e génération. Si le recours à la contraception orale a diminué, d'autres prat iques contraceptives se sont renforcées. OBJECTIFS: fournir une description détaillée des contraceptifs oestroprogestatifs (OP), des contraceptifs à base de progestatifs seuls et des dispositifs intra-utérins, en soulignant leur intérêt mais aussi les risques de leur utilisation. METHODE: revue de la littérature et expérience clinique. RESULTATS: l'importance des antécédents personnels, familiaux, et du style de vie est déterminante pour évaluer les indications des différentes méthodes. En ce qui concerne les contraceptifs OP, le rapport risque/bénéfice nécessite un suivi annuel. La contraception progestative est une option choisie par de nombreuses femmes, particulièrement celles qui ont plus de 40 ans, et/ou des facteurs de risque comme le tabac, le surpoids ou des antécédents de TEV. Le dispositif intra-utérin est généralement bien toléré comme méthode contraceptive car il présente peu d'effets secondaires ou de complications. Parmi les autres méthodes contraceptives, la stérilisation féminine et le diaphragme sont brièvement discutés. CONCLUSION: Parmi les nombreuses possibilités de choix contraceptifs, il est important de faire connaître les indications et contre-indications en tenant compte de la situation de la personne. En cas de difficulté de suivi et d'observance, en particulier chez les adolescentes, la prescription des méthodes à longue durée d'action est préférable.

Core Outcome Measure Index for low back patients: do we miss anxiety and depression?

PURPOSE: The Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) is a multidimensional questionnaire that investigates five dimensions in low back pain (LBP) patients, but does not address the psychological dimension. As the biopsychosocial perspective is recognized as important to capture the entire clinical picture of these patients, this multicenter prospective cohort study was designed to investigate the psychometric properties of a modified version of the COMI (COMIAD) which included 2 additional items, exploring anxiety and depression, respectively. METHODS: 168 subacute or chronic LBP patients recruited in spine clinics completed a set of questionnaires before and after treatment (follow-up at 6 months). Construct validity was explored by comparing each item of the COMIAD to validated full-length questionnaires. Thus two additional questionnaires were included to assess the construct validity of the anxiety and depression measures. The psychometric properties of the COMI and COMIAD were then compared. RESULTS: The two new items showed good internal consistency, high correlations with the corresponding full-length questionnaires, no floor or ceiling effect and good reproducibility (test-retest agreement kappa 0.68 for anxiety, 0.62 for depression). The addition of the 2 items did not alter internal validity (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88 and 0.87, respectively). The smallest detectable difference, the Minimal Clinically Important Improvement and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State were only minimally affected by the changes. CONCLUSION: The questions exploring anxiety and depression have good intrinsic and psychometric capacities (i.e., no floor or ceiling effects and high correlations with full-length scales) and did not significantly modify the psychometrics of the original COMI questionnaire. The COMIAD offers the possibility to include the psychological dimension in the multidimensional evaluation without significantly affecting questionnaire length.

How much does the Dallas Pain Questionnaire score have to improve to indicate that patients with chronic low back pain feel better or well?

PURPOSE: The Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ) assesses the impact of low back pain (LBP) on four components (0-100) of daily life. We estimated the minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) values of DPQ in LBP patients. METHODS: 142 patients with LBP lasting for at least 4 weeks completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline and 6 months later. Questions for MCII addressed patient-reported response to treatment at 6 months on a five-point Likert scale, while a yes/no question concerning satisfaction with present state was used to determine PASS. MCII was computed as the difference in mean DPQ scores between patients reporting treatment as effective vs. patients reporting treatment as not effective, and PASS was computed as the third quartile of the DPQ score among patients who reported being satisfied with their present state. RESULTS: MCII values were 22, 23, 2 and 10 for daily activities, work and leisure, social interest, and anxiety/depression, respectively. PASS values were 29, 23, 20 and 21 for the four components, respectively. The PASS total score threshold of 24 correctly classified 84.1 % of the patients who reported being unsatisfied with their present state, and 74.7 % of patients reported being satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: These values give information of paramount importance for clinicians in interpreting change in DPQ values over time. Authors should be encouraged to report the percentage of patients who reach MCII and PASS values in randomized clinical trials and cohort studies to help clinicians to interpret clinical results.