Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Aging (Albany NY) ; 15(12): 5592-5610, 2023 06 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37338518

RESUMEN

Currently, the role of liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) in cancer has been preliminarily explained. However, the significance of LLPS in breast cancer is unclear. In this study, single cell sequencing datasets GSE188600 and GSE198745 for breast cancer were downloaded from the GEO database. Transcriptome sequencing data for breast cancer were downloaded from UCSC database. We divided breast cancer cells into high-LLPS group and low-LLPS group by down dimension clustering analysis of single-cell sequencing data set, and obtained differentially expressed genes between the two groups. Subsequently, weighted co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed on transcriptome sequencing data, and the module genes most associated with LLPS were obtained. COX regression and Lasso regression were performed and the prognostic model was constructed. Subsequently, survival analysis, principal component analysis, clinical correlation analysis, and nomogram construction were used to evaluate the significance of the prognostic model. Finally, cell experiments were used to verify the function of the model's key gene, PGAM1. We constructed a LLPS-related prognosis model consisting of nine genes: POLR3GL, PLAT, NDRG1, HMGB3, HSPH1, PSMD7, PDCD2, NONO and PGAM1. By calculating LLPS-related risk scores, breast cancer patients could be divided into high-risk and low-risk groups, with the high-risk group having a significantly worse prognosis. Cell experiments showed that the activity, proliferation, invasion and healing ability of breast cancer cell lines were significantly decreased after knockdown of the key gene PGAM1 in the model. Our study provides a new idea for prognostic stratification of breast cancer and provides a novel marker: PGAM1.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Multiómica , Factores de Transcripción , Análisis por Conglomerados , Bases de Datos Factuales , Pronóstico , Proteínas Reguladoras de la Apoptosis
2.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg ; 57(1-6): 7-15, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34581645

RESUMEN

Implant-related breast reconstruction can be divided into subpectoral breast reconstruction (SPBR) and prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) according to the different anatomical planes. The previous stereotype was that PPBR had a high complication rate and was not suitable for clinical use. However, with the emergence of acellular dermal matrix (ADM), the clinical effect of PPBR has been improved. To compare the outcomes difference between SPBR and PPBR, We conducted this meta-analysis. Articles on SPBR versus PPBR were searched in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Embase, and Cochrane databases, strictly following the PRISMA guidelines. According to the set criteria, we included the literature that met the requirements. Extracted data were the incidence of adverse events and the duration of drainage. Results show that SPBR has a higher incidence rate in capsular contracture, animation deformity, infection, hematoma and delayed healing wound than PPBR. There are no significant differences in skin flap necrosis, seroma, implant loss, reoperation and duration of drainage between the two groups. Hence, PPBR is no longer a high complication surgical method and can be used in the clinical practice. However, there are few large sample studies at present, so it is necessary to carry out further studies on PPBR.


Asunto(s)
Dermis Acelular , Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Expansión de Tejido/efectos adversos , Reoperación , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos
3.
J Healthc Eng ; 2021: 9391104, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34733461

RESUMEN

Plakophilins (PKPs) act as a key regulator of different signaling programs and control a variety of cellular processes ranging from transcription, protein synthesis, growth, proliferation, and tumor development. The function and possible mechanism of PKP3 in ovarian cancer (OC) remain unknown. It is extremely important to investigate the expression and prognostic values of PKP3, as well as their possible mechanisms, and immune infiltration in OC. Therefore, in this paper we explored the potential oncogenic role of PKP3 in 33 tumors based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. The result outcomes showed that PKP3 is highly expressed in most cancers, and the expression level and prognosis of PKP3 showed little significance in cancer patients. Moreover, oncologists have found that members of the plakophilin family have different degrees of abnormality in ovarian cancer. PKP3 played a key part in carcinogenesis and aggressiveness of OC as well as malignant biological activity and can be used as a biomarker for early diagnosis and prognosis evaluation in OC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Placofilinas , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Placofilinas/genética , Placofilinas/metabolismo , Pronóstico
4.
Channels (Austin) ; 15(1): 496-506, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34334114

RESUMEN

Metabolic reprogramming is common in various cancers. Targeting metabolism to treat tumors is a hot research topic at present. Among them, changes in glucose metabolism in cancer have been widely studied. The Warburg effect maintains a high metabolic level in the tumor, accompanied by changes in glucose transporters. The transmembrane transport of sugar was previously thought to be mediated by SGLT and GLUT. Recently, the Solute Carrier Family(SLC) 45 family may be the third sugar transporter. But the role and value of the SLC45 family in melanoma, a highly malignant skin tumor, is unclear. Our study found that the four members of the SLC45 family, SLC45A1-SLC45A4, were differentially expressed in melanoma, but only SLC45A2 and SLC45A3 had prognostic guiding values. Further analysis revealed that the co-expression patterns of SLC45A2 and SLC45A3 were enriched in multiple metabolic pathways, suggesting their potential role in melanoma. In addition, SLC45A2 and SLC45A3 are also associated with immune cell infiltration. In conclusion, SLC45A2 and SLC45A3 are good prognostic indicators for melanoma and have guiding value for the treatment of melanoma in the future.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Transporte Biológico , Humanos , Melanoma/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Azúcares
5.
Channels (Austin) ; 15(1): 483-495, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34254872

RESUMEN

Melanoma is a type of cancer with a relatively poor prognosis. The development of immunotherapy for the treatment of patients with melanoma has drawn considerable attention in recent years. It is of great clinical significance to identify novel promising prognostic biomarkers and to explore their roles in the immune microenvironment. The solute carrier (SLC) superfamily is a group of transporters predominantly expressed on the cell membrane and are involved in substance transport. SLC16A1 is a member of the SLC family, participating in the transport of lactate, pyruvate, amino acids, ketone bodies, etc. The role of SLC16A1 in tumor immunity has been recently elucidated, while its role in melanoma remains unclear. In this study, bioinformatics analysis was performed to explore the role of SLC16A1 in melanoma. The results showed that high SLC16A1 expression was correlated with decreased overall survival in patients with melanoma. The genes co-expressed with SLC16A1 were significantly enriched in metabolic regulation, protein ubiquitination, and substance localization. Moreover, SLC16A1 was correlated with the infiltration of immune cells. In conclusion, SLC16A1 is a robust prognostic biomarker for melanoma and may be used as a novel target in immunotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Línea Celular Tumoral , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Pronóstico , Melanoma Cutáneo Maligno
6.
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 28(6): 411-5, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23520774

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To sum up the various procedures for skeleton and soft tissue contour reconstruction in severe progressive hemifacial atrophy. METHODS: From Jan 2004 to May 2012, 25 patients with severe progressive hemifacial atrophy underwent the procedures of lipoinjection, microsurgical flap transplantation, dermis grafting, distraction osteogenesis, orthognathic surgery and so on for both skeleton and soft tissue reconstruction. RESULTS: Among them, zygomatic augmentation and lipoinjection were performed in 24 cases, anterolateral thigh adipofascial flap in 10 cases and latissimus dorsi flap in one case, orthognathic surgery in 17 cases, including Le Fort I osetoectomy in 3 cases, genioplasty in 4 cases, mandibular distraction osteogenesis combined with secondary Le Fort I osteotomy in 3 cases, genioplasty combined with mandibular augmentation with Medpor implant in 7 cases. The patients were followed up for 6 months to 5 years. Through skelton and soft tissue reconstruction, the oblique occlusion plane and malocclusion were corrected with great improvement in face asymmetry. CONCLUSIONS: For severe progreassive hemifacial atrophy, comprehensive procedures should be adopted for both skelton and soft tissue reconstruction to achieve good results.


Asunto(s)
Hemiatrofia Facial/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/trasplante , Tejido Adiposo/trasplante , Asimetría Facial/cirugía , Humanos , Mandíbula/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos , Osteogénesis por Distracción/métodos , Osteotomía Le Fort/métodos , Trasplante de Piel/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...