Disparities in the access to atrial fibrillation ablation in Denmark: who gets ablated, who neglected?

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia associated with reduced quality of life that can lead to serious complications such as stroke and heart failure. Ablation is a safe and effective treatment for AF but is not offered equally to all patients. The aim of this study is to identify demographic groups more or less likely to undergo AF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with newly diagnosed AF between 2010 and 2018 were identified in the Danish nationwide registries. The association between gender, age, level of education and attachment to the job market, and the likelihood of receiving AF ablation was investigated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis. Cumulative incidence was calculated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. A total of 176 248 patients were included. Men were more likely to receive ablation than women (7% vs. 3%). Patients aged 25-44 and 45-64 were most likely to receive ablation, while only 0.7% of patients aged 80 or above received ablation. The rate of ablation significantly decreased with decreasing level of education. Full-time employed patients were most likely to receive ablation, followed by self-employed, unemployed, on sick leave, undergoing education, and early retired patients. Retired patients were the least likely to receive ablation (3%). CONCLUSION: This study found that women, older patients, patients with lower levels of education, and patients on social benefits are less likely to receive AF ablation. These findings suggest that there are significant social and economic disparities in AF ablation treatment in Denmark.

Safety and efficacy of pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation in the elderly: A EU-PORIA sub-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of catheter ablation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) demonstrates a favorable clinical profile, however, data on elderly patients are lacking. AIMS: We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of PFA in the elderly, using data from the EU-PORIA registry. METHODS: Periprocedural complications and long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of AF ablation using the pentaspline PFA catheter (Farapulse™) were compared between patients older than 80 years old and their younger counterparts, across seven European centers. RESULTS: Among the 1233 patients in the registry, 88 (7.1 %) were older than 80 years. Elderly patients were more often females (51.1 % vs 37.8 %, p = 0.01) with a lower median BMI (26.0, IQR:23.5-29.2 vs 26.9, IQR:24.4-30.4 kg/m2, p = 0.02), a higher median CHA2DS2-VASc score (4, IQR:3-5 vs 2, IQR:1-3, p < 0.001) and a higher incidence of hypertension (73.9 % vs 52.7 %, p < 0.001). In both groups, most patients had paroxysmal AF (58.0 % vs 60.3 %, p = 0.65). Ablation in the elderly was more frequently performed with minimally interrupted anticoagulation (87.5 % vs 59.7 %, p < 0.001). Despite comparable rates of overall complications (5.7 % vs 3.5 %, p = 0.29), elderly patients had a higher incidence of stroke (2.3 % vs 0.3 %, p = 0.04). At 12 months, major adverse clinical events (4.5 % vs. 2.1 %, p = 0.12) and arrhythmia-free survival (70 % vs 74 %, p = 0.69) were comparable in both groups. None of the recurrence-free elderly patients were on antiarrhythmic drugs at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this real-world cohort, the efficacy of PFA for AF was similar in elderly and younger patients. Despite comparable complication rates, a higher incidence of stroke was observed in the elderly.

General anaesthesia compared to conscious sedation for first-time atrial fibrillation catheter ablation-a Danish nationwide cohort study.

AIMS: Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF), where sedation and analgesia are pivotal for patient comfort and lesion formation. The impact of anaesthesia type on AF recurrence rates remains uncertain. This study aimed to examine AF recurrence rates depending on conscious sedation (CS) vs. general anaesthesia (GA) during CA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Utilizing nationwide data from the Danish healthcare registries, we conducted this cohort study involving adults (≥18 years) undergoing first-time CA for AF between 2010 and 2018. Patients were categorized by anaesthesia type (CS or GA), with the primary endpoint being AF recurrence, defined by a composite endpoint of either antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) prescriptions, AF-related hospital admissions, electrical cardioversions, or AF re-ablation. The impact of anaesthesia type was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. The study cohort comprised 7957 (6421 CS and 1536 GA) patients. Persistent AF, hypertension, and heart failure, as well as use of AAD, were more prevalent in the GA group. Cumulative incidences of recurrent AF were higher in the CS group at 1 (46% vs. 37%) and at 5 (68% vs. 63%) years. Multivariate analysis revealed CS as significantly associated with increased risk of AF recurrence at 5-year follow-up [hazard ratio 1.26 (95% confidence interval 1.15-1.38)], consistent across paroxysmal and persistent AF subtypes. CONCLUSION: This nationwide cohort study suggests a higher risk of AF recurrence with CS during CA compared to GA. These results advocate for considering GA as the preferred anaesthesia type for improved CA outcomes.

Prognostic importance of ischemic heart disease for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) has been linked to an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data are sparse regarding the role of IHD in AF recurrence after catheter ablation. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate whether preexisting or new-onset IHD is associated with a greater risk of AF recurrence after ablation. METHODS: With use of Danish nationwide registries, all patients undergoing first-time AF ablation in Denmark from 2010 to 2020 were identified. The primary outcome was AF recurrence defined by AF-related hospital admission or antiarrhythmic drug use within 1 year after ablation excluding a 3-month blanking period. IHD was defined as an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis of IHD or prior coronary revascularization. RESULTS: Of 12,162 patients undergoing first-time ablation for AF (mean age, 62 years; 30% female), 20% had preexisting IHD. Preexisting IHD was associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence in univariable log-binomial logistic regression (relative risk, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14; P < .001). However, after multivariable adjustment including procedural year, preexisting IHD was no longer associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence (relative risk, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.97-1.06; P = .42). In a nested case-control study of those without preexisting IHD before ablation (n = 9778), newly diagnosed IHD after ablation was associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.84-4.99; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The presence of IHD does not appear to reduce the effectiveness of AF ablation procedures. However, the emergence of IHD after AF ablation may serve as a trigger for AF that is insufficiently suppressed by prior ablation.

Safety and Effectiveness of Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) coexist, increasing morbidity and mortality. Studies have demonstrated improved outcomes following AF ablation in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF). OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the outcomes of pulsed field ablation (PFA) in HF. METHODS: MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-Approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) is a multicenter, patient-level registry of consecutive patients undergoing PFA for paroxysmal AF or persistent AF (PerAF). In this substudy, patients were stratified as no history of HF (no-HF), HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) (left ventricular EF of ≥50%) or HF with reduced/mildly reduced EF (HFmr/rEF) (left ventricular EF of <50%). The primary effectiveness and safety endpoints were freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30 seconds and major adverse events, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 1,381 patients, 85% (n = 1,174) were no-HF, 6.2% (n = 87) were HFpEF, and 8.6% (n = 120) were HFmr/rEF. No-HF patients had less PerAF than patients with HF (P < 0.001), with no difference between HF subtypes (P = >0.99). The 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia was significantly higher in no-HF patients than in those with HFpEF or HFmr/rEF (79.9%, 71.3%, and 67.5%, respectively; P < 0.001) but similar between patients with HFmr/rEF and HFpEF (P = 0.26). However, there was no significant difference in freedom from atrial arrhythmia among patients with no-HF vs HFpEF vs HFmr/rEF for those with paroxysmal AF (82.8%, 82.4%, and 71.7%, respectively; P = 0.09) and PerAF (73.3%, 64.2%, and 64.9%, respectively; P = 0.14). Major adverse event rates were similar between the no-HF, HFpEF, and HFmr/rEF groups (1.9%, 0%, and 2.5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PFA appears to be potentially safe and effective in AF patients with HF. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia post-PFA was higher in patients without a history of HF, with no significant difference between HF subtypes.

Safety and Effectiveness of Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure: A MANIFEST-PF Sub-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) coexist, increasing morbidity and mortality. Studies have demonstrated improved outcomes following AF ablation in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF). OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of pulsed-field ablation (PFA) in HF. METHODS: MANIFEST-PF is a multicenter patient-level registry of consecutive patients undergoing PFA for paroxysmal (PAF) or persistent AF (PerAF). In this sub-study, patients were stratified as: no history of HF (no-HF), HF with preserved EF (HFPEF; LVEF≥50%) or HF with reduced/mildly-reduced EF (HFMR/REF; LVEF<50%). The primary effectiveness and safety endpoints were freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30s and major adverse events (MAEs), respectively. RESULTS: Of the 1,381 patients, 85% (n=1,174) were no-HF, 6.2% (n=87) were HFPEF, and 8.6% (n=120) were HFMR/REF. No-HF patients had less PerAF than patients with HF (p<0.001), with no difference between HF subtypes (p=1.00). The 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia was significantly higher in no-HF than with HFPEF or HFMR/REF (79.9%, 71.3%, 67.5%, p<0.001), but similar between HFMR/REF and HFPEF (p=0.26). However, there was no significant difference in freedom from atrial arrhythmia among patients with no-HF vs HFPEF vs HFMR/REF for those with PAF (82.8%/82.4%/71.7%, p=0.09) and PerAF (73.3%, 64.2%, and 64.9%, p=0.14.MAE rates were similar between the no-HF, HFPEF and HFMR/REF groups (1.9%, 0%, and 2.5%, respectively). CONCLUSION: PFA appears to be potentially safe and effective in AF patients with HF. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia post-PFA was higher in patients without a history of HF, with no significant difference between HF subtypes.

Effect of early cryoballoon ablation on atrial fibrillation recurrence-A Danish nationwide register study.

INTRODUCTION: Cryoballoon ablation is a safe and efficient rhythm control strategy in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. The impact of time from diagnosis to ablation is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of timing of first-time cryoballoon ablation on AF recurrence in a nationwide cohort of AF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: From nationwide registers, all AF patients ≥18 years of age who underwent first-time AF cryoballoon ablation in Denmark from 2012 to 2018 were included. The AF patients were stratified by ablation timing: Early group (≤1 year after AF diagnosis), intermediate group (1-3 years after AF diagnosis), and late group (≥3 years after AF diagnosis). By adjusted Cox regression models, the effect of timing on AF recurrence was examined. This study included 1064 AF patients with a median age of 63 years. Most patients were male (66%) and had paroxysmal AF (67%). The 1-year risk of AF recurrence increased from 31% in the early group to 41% and 44% in the intermediate and late group. The hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 1.28 (0.95, 1.74) in the intermediate group and 1.42 (1.09, 1.86) in the late group when compared to the early group. Continuous diagnosis-to-ablation time seemed to have the greatest impact on AF recurrence within the first 2 years. CONCLUSION: In AF patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation, late timing of ablation was associated with a significantly higher AF recurrence rate when compared to early timing of ablation. These findings support early cryoballoon ablation to improve the outcomes after ablation.

Impact of Left Atrial Posterior Wall Ablation During Pulsed-Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is insufficient to treat many patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). Adjunctive left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) ablation with thermal technologies has revealed lack of efficacy, perhaps limited by the difficulty in achieving lesion durability amid concerns of esophageal injury. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of PVI + LAPW ablation vs PVI in patients with PersAF using pulsed-field ablation (PFA). METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of the MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) registry, we studied consecutive PersAF patients undergoing post-approval treatment with a pentaspline PFA catheter. The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia of ≥30 seconds. Safety outcomes included the composite of acute and chronic major adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 547 patients with PersAF who underwent PFA, 131 (24%) received adjunctive LAPW ablation. Compared to PVI-alone, patients receiving adjunctive LAPW ablation were younger (65 vs 67 years of age, P = 0.08), had a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score (2.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.6 ± 1.6, P = 0.08), and were more likely to receive electroanatomical mapping (48.1% vs 39.0%, P = 0.07) and intracardiac echocardiography imaging (46.1% vs 17.1%, P < 0.001). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias was not statistically different between groups in the full (PVI + LAPW: 66.4%; 95% CI: 57.6%-74.4% vs PVI: 73.1%; 95% CI: 68.5%-77.2%; P = 0.68) and propensity-matched cohorts (PVI + LAPW: 71.7% vs PVI: 68.5%; P = 0.34). There was also no significant difference in major adverse events between the groups (2.2% vs 1.4%, respectively, P = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PersAF undergoing PFA, as compared to PVI-alone, adjunctive LAPW ablation did not improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months.

Lower Recurrence Rates of Atrial Fibrillation and MACE Events After Early Compared to Late Ablation: A Danish Nationwide Register Study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend prioritizing treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs before referral of patients with atrial fibrillation to ablation, delaying a potential subsequent ablation. However, delaying ablation may affect ablation outcomes. We sought to investigate the impact of duration from diagnosis to ablation on the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence and adverse events. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Danish nationwide registries, all patients with first-time ablation for atrial fibrillation were identified and included from 2010 to 2018. Patients were divided into 4 groups by diagnosis-to-ablation time: <1.0 year (early ablation), 1.0 to 1.9 years, 2.0 to 2.9 years, and >2.9 years (late ablation). The primary end point was atrial fibrillation recurrence after the 90-day blanking period, defined by admission for atrial fibrillation, cardioversions, use of antiarrhythmic drugs, or repeat atrial fibrillation ablations. The secondary end point was a composite end point of heart failure, ischemic stroke, or death, and each event individually. The study cohort consisted of 7705 patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation recurrence in the 4 groups was 42.9%, 54.8%, 55.9%, and 58.4%, respectively. Hazard ratios were 1.20 (95% CI, 1.07-1.35), 1.29 (95% CI, 1.13-1.47), and 1.40 (95% CI, 1.28-1.53), respectively, with the early ablation group as reference. The hazard ratio for the combined secondary end point was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.04-1.44) in the late ablation group compared with the early ablation group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation, early ablation was associated with a significantly lower risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence. Furthermore, the associated risk of heart failure, ischemic stroke, or death was significantly lower in early-compared with late-ablation patients.

Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Pulsed-Field Ablation: Results From the Multicenter EU-PORIA Registry.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal ablation technology with high procedural safety and efficiency for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Premarket data showed high PVI durability during mandatory remapping studies. Data on lesion durability in real-world patients with clinically indicated redo procedures are scarce. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to report PVI durability rates in patients undergoing a clinically indicated redo procedure after an index PVI using PFA. METHODS: Patients from 7 European centers undergoing an index PVI using PFA were included the EU-PORIA (European Real-world Outcomes With Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation) registry. In patients with subsequent left atrial redo procedures due to arrhythmia recurrence, 3-dimensional electroanatomical maps were acquired. PVI durability was assessed on a per-vein and per-patient level, and sites of reconnections and predictors of lesion durability were identified. RESULTS: Of 1,184 patients (62% paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) undergoing an index PVI using PFA, 272 (23%) had an arrhythmia recurrence. Of these, 144 (53%) underwent a left atrial redo procedure a median of 7 (Q1-Q3: 5-10) months after the first ablation. Three-dimensional electroanatomical maps identified 404 of 567 pulmonary veins (71%) with durable isolation. In 54 patients (38%), all pulmonary veins were durably isolated. Prior operator experience with cryoballoon ablation was associated with a higher PVI durability compared to operators with only point-by-point radiofrequency experience (76% vs 60%; P < 0.001). Neither the operators' cumulative experience in atrial fibrillation ablation (≤5 vs >5 years) nor the size of the PFA device used (31 mm vs 35 mm) had an impact on subsequent lesion durability (both P > 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: In 144 patients with arrhythmia recurrence after PFA PVI, durable isolation was observed in 71% of the pulmonary veins during the redo procedure, and 38% of all patients showed durable isolation of all veins.

Focal pulsed field ablation and ultrahigh-density mapping - versatile tools for all atrial arrhythmias? Initial procedural experiences.

BACKGROUND: Focal pulsed field ablation (FPFA) is a novel and promising method of cardiac ablation. The aim of this study was to report the feasibility, short-term safety, and procedural findings for a broad spectrum of ablated atrial arrhythmias. METHODS: Patients (n = 51) scheduled for ablation of atrial arrhythmias were prospectively included and underwent FPFA using the Galvanize CENTAURI generator with energy delivery through commercially available ablation catheters with ultrahigh-density (UHDx) 3D electroanatomic voltage/local activation time map evaluations. Workflow, procedural data, and peri-procedural technical errors and complications are described. RESULTS: Planned ablation strategy was achieved with FPFA-only in 48/51 (94%) of the cases. Ablation strategy was first-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in 17/51 (36%), repeat ablation in 18/51 (38%), PVI + in 13/51 (28%), and cavotricuspid isthmus block (CTI)-only in 3/51 (6%). The mean procedure time was 104 ± 31 min (first-time PVI), 114 ± 26 min (repeat procedure), 152 ± 36 min (PVI +), and 62 ± 17 min (CTI). Mean UHDx mapping time to assess lesion formation and block after ablation was 7 ± 4 min with 5485 ± 4809 points. First pass acute (linear) isolation with bidirectional block for anatomical lesion sets was 120/124 (97%) for all PVs, 17/17 (100%) for (any) isthmus, and 14/17 (82%) for left atrium posterior wall (LAPW). We observed several time-consuming integration errors with the used ablation system (mean 3.4 ± 3.7 errors/procedure), one transient inferior ST elevation when ablating CTI resolved by intravenous nitroglycerine and one transient AV block requiring temporary pacing for > 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: FPFA was a highly versatile method to treat atrial arrhythmias with high first-pass efficiency. UHDx revealed acute homogenous low-voltage lesions in ablated areas. More data is needed to establish lesion durability and limitations of FPFA.

Characterization of durability and reconnection patterns at time of repeat ablation after single-shot pulsed field pulmonary vein isolation.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel method of cardiac ablation where there is insufficient knowledge on the durability and reconnection patterns after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The aim of this study was to characterize the electrophysiological findings at time of repeat procedure in real-world atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent a repeat procedure (n=26) for symptomatic recurrent arrhythmias after index first-time treatment with single-shot PFA PVI (n=266) from July 2021 to June 2023 were investigated with 3D high-density mapping and ad-hoc re-ablation by radiofrequency or focal PFA. RESULTS: Index indication for PVI was persistent AF in 17 (65%) patients. The mean time to repeat procedure was 292 ± 119 days. Of the 26 patients (104 veins), complete durable PVI was observed in 11/26 (42%) with a durable vein isolation rate of 72/104 (69%). Two patients (8%) had all four veins reconnected. The posterior wall was durably isolated in 4/5 (80%) of the cases. The predominant arrhythmia mechanism was AF in 17/26 (65%) patients and regular atrial tachycardia (AT) in 9/26 (35%). Reconnection was observed 9/26 (35%) in right superior, 11/26 (42%) in right inferior, 7/26 (27%) in left superior, 5/26 (19%) in left inferior, p=0.31 between veins. The gaps were significantly clustered in the right-sided anterior carina compared to other regions (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Durable PVI was observed in less than half of the patients at time of repeat procedure. No significant difference in PV reconnection pattern was observed, but the gap location was preferentially located at the anterior aspects of the right-sided PVs. Predominant recurrence was AF. More data is needed to establish lesion formation and durability and AT circuits after PFA.

Two decades of SVT ablation in Denmark: a trend towards higher age, more comorbidity, and less prior use of antiarrhythmic and rate-limiting pharmacotherapy-a nationwide registry-based Danish study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Trends in patient selection and use of pharmacotherapy prior to catheter ablation (CA) for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) are not well described. This study examined temporal trends in patients undergoing first-time CA for regular SVT, including atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT), accessory pathways (APs), and ectopic atrial tachycardia (EAT) on a nationwide scale in Denmark in the period 2001-2018. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Danish Nationwide registers, 9959 patients treated with first-time CA for SVT between 2001 and 2018 were identified, of which 6023 (61%) received CA for AVNRT, 2829 (28%) for AP, and 1107 (11%) for EAT. Median age was 55, 42, and 55 in the AVNRT, APs, and EAT group, respectively. The number of patients receiving CA increased from 1195 between 2001 and 2003 to 1914 between 2016 and 2018. The percentage of patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 increased in all patient groups. The number of patients who underwent CA with no prior use of antiarrhythmic- or rate limiting medicine increased significantly, though prior use of beta-blockers increased for AVNRT patients. Use of verapamil decreased in all three SVT groups (P < 0.05). Use of amiodarone and class 1C antiarrhythmics remained low, with the highest usage among EAT patients. CONCLUSION: Between 2001 and 2018, CA was increasingly performed in patients with SVT, primarily AVNRT- and EAT patients. The burden of comorbidities increased. Patients undergoing CA without prior antiarrhythmic- or rate-limiting drug therapy increased significantly. Use of beta-blockers increased and remained the most widely used drug.

Clinical Outcomes by Sex After Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Importance: Previous studies evaluating the association of patient sex with clinical outcomes using conventional thermal ablative modalities for atrial fibrillation (AF) such as radiofrequency or cryoablation are controversial due to mixed results. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel AF ablation energy modality that has demonstrated preferential myocardial tissue ablation with a unique safety profile. Objective: To compare sex differences in patients undergoing PFA for AF in the Multinational Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Postapproval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation (MANIFEST-PF) registry. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study of MANIFEST-PF registry data, which included consecutive patients undergoing postregulatory approval treatment with PFA to treat AF between March 2021 and May 2022 with a median follow-up of 1 year. MANIFEST-PF is a multinational, retrospectively analyzed, prospectively enrolled patient-level registry including 24 European centers. The study included all consecutive registry patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent first-ever PFA for paroxysmal or persistent AF. Exposure: PFA was performed on patients with AF. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation and additional ablation, which was performed at the discretion of the operator. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from clinically documented atrial arrhythmia for 30 seconds or longer after a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety outcome was the composite of acute (<7 days postprocedure) and chronic (>7 days) major adverse events (MAEs). Results: Of 1568 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.5] years; 1015 male [64.7%]) with AF who underwent PFA, female patients, as compared with male patients, were older (mean [SD] age, 68 [10] years vs 62 [12] years; P < .001), had more paroxysmal AF (70.2% [388 of 553] vs 62.4% [633 of 1015]; P = .002) but had fewer comorbidities such as coronary disease (9% [38 of 553] vs 15.9% [129 of 1015]; P < .001), heart failure (10.5% [58 of 553] vs 16.6% [168 of 1015]; P = .001), and sleep apnea (4.7% [18 of 553] vs 11.7% [84 of 1015]; P < .001). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 99.8% of female (552 of 553) and 98.9% of male (1004 of 1015; P = .90) patients. Additional ablation was performed in 22.4% of female (124 of 553) and 23.1% of male (235 of 1015; P = .79) patients. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia was similar in male and female patients (79.0%; 95% CI, 76.3%-81.5% vs 76.3%; 95% CI, 72.5%-79.8%; P = .28). There was also no significant difference in acute major AEs between groups (male, 1.5% [16 of 1015] vs female, 2.5% [14 of 553]; P = .19). Conclusion and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that after PFA for AF, there were no significant sex differences in clinical effectiveness or safety events.

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia indicates pulmonary vein reconduction independent of blanking period duration in the RACE-AF trial.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period (early ATA) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is associated with an increased risk of later recurrence, but its relationship with pulmonary vein reconduction (PVR) is poorly understood. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between early ATA and PVR. Second, to provide data on the optimal blanking period by (a) evaluating how the predictive values of ATA for PVR are affected by blanking period duration, and (b) assessing the temporal development in atrial fibrillation (AF) burden. METHODS: In this RACE-AF substudy, 91 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI randomized to radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation were included. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor and underwent a protocol-mandated repeat procedure after 4-6 months for assessment of PVR. ATA ≥ 30 s. ≤ 90 days after PVI constituted early ATA. RESULTS: PVR was found in 37/54 (69%) patients with early ATA and in 11/37 (30%) patients without (p < .001). The positive predictive value of ATA for PVR was independent of blanking period duration (range 0-90 days). In both patients with and without PVR, AF burden was higher in the first month after PVI, but AF burden from the second month was similar to AF burden after the conventional blanking period. CONCLUSION: Early ATA indicates PVR, and the positive predictive value is independent of the blanking period duration. Altogether, the results of this study support substantially shortening the blanking period after PVI for paroxysmal AF.

Association Between Pulmonary Vascular Volume and Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Pulmonary vascular abnormalities, quantified from computed tomography scans, have frequently been observed in patients with pulmonary diseases. However, little is known about pulmonary vascular changes in patients with cardiac disease. Thus, we aimed to examine the cardiopulmonary relation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by comparing pulmonary vascular volume (PVV) to echocardiographic measures and AF severity. A total of 742 patients (median age 63 years, 70% men) who underwent ablation for AF were included. Preprocedural cardiac computed tomography was used to measure the total and small-vessel PVV, along with the pulmonary artery to aorta ratio and the degree of emphysema. The association between PVV and echocardiographic parameters was evaluated using a multivariable linear regression analysis. Lower total and small-vessel PVV were associated with more impaired measures of cardiac structure and function, including but not limited to left ventricular ejection fraction and peak atrial longitudinal strain. Patients with reduced total and small-vessel PVV had higher odds of having persistent AF than paroxysmal AF in the unadjusted logistic regression analyses. However, after clinical and echocardiographic adjustments, only reduced small-vessel PVV remained independently associated with persistent AF (odds ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.26 to 2.87, p = 0.002). In conclusion, pulmonary vascular remodeling is associated with persistent AF and with more impaired measures of cardiac structure and function, providing further insights into heart-lung interactions in this patient group.

EUropean real-world outcomes with Pulsed field ablatiOn in patients with symptomatic atRIAl fibrillation: lessons from the multi-centre EU-PORIA registry.

AIMS: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new, non-thermal ablation modality for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The multi-centre EUropean Real World Outcomes with Pulsed Field AblatiOn in Patients with Symptomatic AtRIAl Fibrillation (EU-PORIA) registry sought to determine the safety, efficacy, and learning curve characteristics for the pentaspline, multi-electrode PFA catheter. METHODS AND RESULTS: All-comer AF patients from seven high-volume centres were consecutively enrolled. Procedural and follow-up data were collected. Learning curve effects were analysed by operator ablation experience and primary ablation modality. In total, 1233 patients (61% male, mean age 66 ± 11years, 60% paroxysmal AF) were treated by 42 operators. In 169 patients (14%), additional lesions outside the PVs were performed, most commonly at the posterior wall (n = 127). Median procedure and fluoroscopy times were 58 (interquartile range: 40-87) and 14 (9-21) min, respectively, with no differences due to operator experience. Major complications occurred in 21/1233 procedures (1.7%) including pericardial tamponade (14; 1.1%) and transient ischaemic attack or stroke (n = 7; 0.6%), of which one was fatal. Prior cryoballoon users had less complication. At a median follow-up of 365 (323-386) days, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of arrhythmia-free survival was 74% (80% for paroxysmal and 66% for persistent AF). Freedom from arrhythmia was not influenced by operator experience. In 149 (12%) patients, a repeat procedure was performed due to AF recurrence and 418/584 (72%) PVs were durably isolated. CONCLUSION: The EU-PORIA registry demonstrates a high single-procedure success rate with an excellent safety profile and short procedure times in a real-world, all-comer AF patient population.

Safety and Effectiveness of Pulsed Field Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation: One-Year Outcomes From the MANIFEST-PF Registry.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation is a novel nonthermal cardiac ablation modality using ultra-rapid electrical pulses to cause cell death by a mechanism of irreversible electroporation. Unlike the traditional ablation energy sources, pulsed field ablation has demonstrated significant preferentiality to myocardial tissue ablation, and thus avoids certain thermally mediated complications. However, its safety and effectiveness remain unknown in usual clinical care. METHODS: MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-Approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) is a retrospective, multinational, patient-level registry wherein patients at each center were prospectively included in their respective center registries. The registry included all patients undergoing postapproval treatment with a multielectrode 5-spline pulsed field ablation catheter to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) between March 1, 2021, and May 30, 2022. The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from clinical documented atrial arrhythmia (AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia) of ≥30 seconds on the basis of electrocardiographic data after a 3-month blanking period (on or off antiarrhythmic drugs). Safety outcomes included the composite of acute (<7 days postprocedure) and latent (>7 days) major adverse events. RESULTS: At 24 European centers (77 operators) pulsed field ablation was performed in 1568 patients with AF: age 64.5±11.5 years, female 35%, paroxysmal/persistent AF 65%/32%, CHA2DS2-VASc 2.2±1.6, median left ventricular ejection fraction 60%, and left atrial diameter 42 mm. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 99.2% of patients. After a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 367 (289-421) days, the 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 78.1% (95% CI, 76.0%-80.0%); clinical effectiveness was more common in patients with paroxysmal AF versus persistent AF (81.6% versus 71.5%; P=0.001). Acute major adverse events occurred in 1.9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this large observational registry of the postapproval clinical use of pulsed field technology to treat AF, catheter ablation using pulsed field energy was clinically effective in 78% of patients with AF.