Spanish Registry of Acute Aortic Syndrome (RESA). Changes in therapeutic management and lower mortality in acute aortic syndrome.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The Spanish Registry of Acute Aortic Syndrome (RESA) was launched in 2005 to identify the characteristics of acute aortic syndrome (AAS) in Spain. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in management and mortality in the 3 RESA iterations. METHODS: We analyzed data from patients with AAS prospectively included by 24 to 30 tertiary centers during the 3 iterations of the registry: RESA I (2005-2006), RESA-II (2012-2013), and RESA III (2018-2019). RESULTS: AAS was diagnosed in 1902 patients (74% men; age, 60.7±12.5 years): 1329 (69.9%) type A and 573 (30.1%) type B. Comparison of the 3 periods revealed that the use of computed tomography increased as the first diagnostic technique (77.1%, 77.9%, and 84.2%, respectively; P=.001). In type A, surgical management increased (79.6%, 78.7%, and 84.5%; P=.045) and overall mortality decreased (41.2%, 34.5%, and 31.2%; P=.002), due to a reduction in surgical mortality (33.4%, 25.1%, and 23.9%; P=.003). In type B, endovascular treatment increased (22.8%, 32.8%, and 38.7%; P=.006), while medical and surgical treatment decreased. Overall type B mortality also decreased (21.6%, 16.1%, and 12.0%; P=.005) in line with a reduction in mortality with medical (16.8%, 13.8%, and 8.8%, P=.030) and endovascular (27.0%, 18.0%, and 9.2%; P=.009) treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The iterations of RESA show a decrease in mortality from type A AAS, coinciding with an increase in surgical treatment and a reduction in surgical mortality. In type B, the use of endovascular treatment was associated with improved survival, allowing better management in patients with complications.

The cognitive and psychiatric subacute impairment in severe Covid-19.

Neurologic impairment persisting months after acute severe SARS-CoV-2 infection has been described because of several pathogenic mechanisms, including persistent systemic inflammation. The objective of this study is to analyze the selective involvement of the different cognitive domains and the existence of related biomarkers. Cross-sectional multicentric study of patients who survived severe infection with SARS-CoV-2 consecutively recruited between 90 and 120 days after hospital discharge. All patients underwent an exhaustive study of cognitive functions as well as plasma determination of pro-inflammatory, neurotrophic factors and light-chain neurofilaments. A principal component analysis extracted the main independent characteristics of the syndrome. 152 patients were recruited. The results of our study preferential involvement of episodic and working memory, executive functions, and attention and relatively less affectation of other cortical functions. In addition, anxiety and depression pictures are constant in our cohort. Several plasma chemokines concentrations were elevated compared with both, a non-SARS-Cov2 infected cohort of neurological outpatients or a control healthy general population. Severe Covid-19 patients can develop an amnesic and dysexecutive syndrome with neuropsychiatric manifestations. We do not know if the deficits detected can persist in the long term and if this can trigger or accelerate the onset of neurodegenerative diseases.

Prevalence of Neural Autoantibodies in Paired Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid in Adult Patients with Drug-Resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology.

In order to determine the prevalence of neural autoantibodies in adult patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (DRTLE) of unknown etiology, we compared the characteristics of patients with and without autoantibodies and applied antibody predictive scores to the patients. Patients aged ≥18 years with DRTLE of unknown etiology and ≥12 months of evolution were prospectively recruited. Neural autoantibodies in serum and CSF were systematically determined in all patients. We created the ARTE (antibody in drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy) score based on the variables associated with the presence of neural autoantibodies. Twenty-seven patients were included. The mean (SD) age in years at the index date was 52 (±14.2) and at epilepsy onset was 32 (±17.1). The mean epilepsy duration was 19 (±12.5) years. Neural autoantibodies were detected in 51.85% (14/27) of patients. The presence of bitemporal, independent, interictal epileptiform discharges (BIIED) had a higher frequency in patients with neural autoantibodies (57.1% vs. 15.4%; p = 0.025) as well as those patients with a previous history of status epilepticus (49.2% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.007). The ARTE score showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.854. Using a cut-off point of ≥1, the sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 46.1%, whereas when using a cut-off point of ≥3, the results were 35.7% and 100%, respectively. We found a high prevalence of neural autoantibodies in patients with DRTLE of unknown etiology, indicating an autoimmune mechanism. The presence of BIIED and a history of SE in DRTLE of unknown etiology are possible markers for autoimmune-associated epilepsy. The proposed ARTE score requires future validation in larger independent cohorts.

Evaluation of a nurse-led intervention program in heart failure: A randomized trial / Evaluación de un programa de intervención de enfermería en insuficiencia cardiaca: un ensayo aleatorizado

Background and objective: Several trials have evaluated the effect of disease management programs in heart failure (HF) with diverse results. The aim of this study was to develop a simple nurse-led clinic intervention program for patients with HF and assess whether this intervention positively affects the prognosis of patients, their care costs and perceived quality of life (QoL). Methods: Between 2011 and 2013, 127 patients with reduced ejection fraction were prospectively randomly allocated (1:2) to standard care or intervention program. Primary composite endpoint was all-cause mortality and hospital readmissions. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, all-cause hospital readmissions, readmissions for HF, time to first readmission and QoL improvements assessed by "Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire" (MLHFQ). An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Results: After a median follow-up of 2-years, no differences were found in the primary composite endpoint. Likewise, there were no differences between groups in the predefined secondary endpoints of mortality and readmissions from any cause. However, in the intervention group, readmissions for HF were significantly reduced (35% vs. 18%; p=0.04) and QoL significantly improved (MLHFQ±SD: 2.29±14 vs. 10.9±14.75; p=0.04). Conclusions: In patients with HF, the use of a nurse-led intervention program significantly improves perceived QoL and reduce HF hospital readmissions

Introducción y objetivos: Se han publicado múltiples ensayos sobre programas de gestión de enfermedades en la insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) con resultados muy heterogéneos. El objetivo de este estudio fue desarrollar un sencillo programa de intervención clínica dirigido por enfermería en pacientes con IC y evaluar si dicha intervención afecta positivamente sobre el pronóstico de los pacientes, sus costes de atención y la calidad de vida percibida. Métodos: Entre 2011 y 2013, 127 pacientes con fracción de eyección reducida fueron aleatorizados (1:2) a manejo estándar o al programa de intervención. El objetivo primario compuesto fue mortalidad y reingresos hospitalarios por cualquier causa. Los criterios de valoración secundarios fueron mortalidad por cualquier causa, reingresos hospitalarios por cualquier causa, reingresos hospitalarios por IC, tiempo hasta el primer ingreso y mejoría de la calidad de vida evaluado por el Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). Resultados: Tras un seguimiento medio de 2 años, no se encontraron diferencias en el criterio de valoración compuesto primario. Igualmente, no hubo diferencias en la mortalidad o los reingresos por cualquier causa. Sin embargo, en el grupo de intervención, los reingresos por IC se redujeron (35 vs. 18%; p=0,04) y la calidad de vida percibida mejoró de forma significativa (MLHFQ±DE: 2,29±14 vs. 10,9±14,75; p=0,04). Conclusiones: En los pacientes con IC, el empleo de un programa de intervención dirigido por enfermería mejora significativamente la calidad de vida percibida y reduce los reingresos hospitalarios por IC

Evaluation of a nurse-led intervention program in heart failure: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Several trials have evaluated the effect of disease management programs in heart failure (HF) with diverse results. The aim of this study was to develop a simple nurse-led clinic intervention program for patients with HF and assess whether this intervention positively affects the prognosis of patients, their care costs and perceived quality of life (QoL). METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013, 127 patients with reduced ejection fraction were prospectively randomly allocated (1:2) to standard care or intervention program. Primary composite endpoint was all-cause mortality and hospital readmissions. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, all-cause hospital readmissions, readmissions for HF, time to first readmission and QoL improvements assessed by "Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire" (MLHFQ). An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 2-years, no differences were found in the primary composite endpoint. Likewise, there were no differences between groups in the predefined secondary endpoints of mortality and readmissions from any cause. However, in the intervention group, readmissions for HF were significantly reduced (35% vs. 18%; p=0.04) and QoL significantly improved (MLHFQ±SD: 2.29±14 vs. 10.9±14.75; p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HF, the use of a nurse-led intervention program significantly improves perceived QoL and reduce HF hospital readmissions.

Anomalía coronaria congénita familiar / Congenital hereditary anomalous coronary artery origin

No disponible

Predictors of pulmonary hypertension in patients with end-stage heart failure.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with a greater mortality rate in patients with heart failure (HF) and it is a risk factor for right ventricular failure after heart transplantation. This study was designed to explore risk factors for PH development in patients with advanced heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. In a retrospective observational study of 419 patients evaluated for heart transplantation due to end stage HF, different variables were analyzed to find predictors of PH (defined as a mean pulmonary pressure >25 mmHg), reactive PH (defined as a transpulmonary gradient >12 mmHg) and severe PH (defined as a mean pulmonary pressure >40 mmHg and/or pulmonary vascular ressistance >3 WU) using a multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis. Prevalence of PH, out of proportion and severe PH was 62.2%, 23.8%, and 18.8% respectively. The presence of moderate-severe mitral regurgitation [2.1 (1.2-3.7); P=0.006], moderate-severe tricuspid regurgitation [OR 2.9 (1.3-6.4); P=0.005] and a duration of disease >3 years [OR 1.7 (1.1-2.7); P=0.03] were independent risk factors associated with PH. Moreover, the presence of a moderate-severe mitral regurgitation and a duration of disease greater than 3 years, were independent predictors of out of proportion and severe PH.

Guías de práctica clínica de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología en tromboembolismo e hipertensión pulmonar / Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiology for Pulmonary Thromboembolism and Hypertension

La hipertensión pulmonar primaria es una enfermedad de carácter progresivo, más frecuente en mujeres jóvenes y de mediana edad. Su etiología se desconoce, aunque existe una predisposición familiar hasta en un 6 por ciento de los casos. Las teorías patogénicas actuales se centran en la existencia de disfunción endotelial y fallos en los canales iónicos de las fibras musculares lisas del vaso. Las pruebas diagnósticas se dirigen a descartar las causas secundarias y a evaluar la gravedad de la enfermedad. El test vasodilatador agudo es imprescindible para la elección del tratamiento más adecuado. La anticoagulación oral está indicada en todos los pacientes. El trasplante de pulmón queda reservado a aquellos casos en los que fracasa el tratamiento médico. La septostomía auricular es un procedimiento paliativo útil en casos seleccionados. La hipertensión pulmonar tromboembólica crónica es una forma especial de hipertensión pulmonar secundaria; aunque indistinguible clínicamente de la hipertensión pulmonar primaria, su diagnóstico resulta crucial, ya que es posible su curación mediante la realización de tromboendarterectomía pulmonar. El tromboembolismo pulmonar es frecuente en pacientes hospitalizados, presentando elevadas tasas de mortalidad (el 30 por ciento en pacientes no tratados). El diagnóstico es difícil, ya que puede acompañar o simular otras enfermedades cardiopulmonares. Las pruebas diagnósticas no invasivas tienen una baja sensibilidad y especificidad. Nuevas alternativas como la determinación de dímero D o la TAC helicoidal incrementan la precisión diagnóstica. El tratamiento estándar consiste en la administración de heparina durante 5-10 días y posteriormente anticoagulantes orales durante 3-6 meses. La prevención con heparinas o dextranos en los pacientes de alto riesgo ha demostrado claros beneficios (AU)