RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIM: We aimed to assess long-term outcome after transplantation of HOPE-treated donor livers based on real-world data (i.e., IDEAL-D stage 4). METHODS: In this international, multicentre, observational cohort study, we collected data from adult recipients of a HOPE-treated liver transplanted between January 2012 and December 2021. Analyses were stratified for brain-dead (DBD) and circulatory-dead (DCD) donor livers, sub-divided by their respective risk categories. The primary outcome was death-censored graft survival. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of primary non-function (PNF) and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). RESULTS: We report on 1202 liver transplantations (64% DBD) performed at 22 European centres. For DBD, a total number of 99 benchmark (8%), 176 standard (15%), and 493 extended-criteria (41%) cases were included. For DCD, 117 transplants were classified as low-risk (10%), 186 as high-risk (16%), and 131 as futile (11%), with significant risk profile variations among centres. Actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year death-censored graft survival for DBD and DCD was 95%, 92%, and 91%, vs. 92%, 87%, and 81%, respectively (logrank p=0.003). Within DBD and DCD-strata, death-censored graft survival was similar among risk groups (logrank p=0.26, p=0.99). Graft loss due to PNF or IC was 2.3% and 0.4% (DBD), and 5% and 4.1% (DCD). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows excellent 5-year survival after transplantation of HOPE-treated DBD and DCD livers with low rates of graft loss due to PNF or IC, irrespective of their individual risk profile. HOPE-treatment has now reached IDEAL-D stage 4, which further supports the implementation of HOPE in routine clinical practice. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates the excellent long-term performance of HOPE-treatment of DCD and DBD liver grafts irrespective of their individual risk profile in a real-world setting, outside the evaluation of randomized controlled trials. While previous studies have established safety, feasibility, and efficacy against the current standard, according to the IDEAL-D evaluation framework, HOPE-treatment has now reached the final IDEAL-D Stage 4, which further supports the implementation of HOPE in routine clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05520320.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Organ transplantation using grafts from elderly donors entails a higher risk for severe ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Advanced IRI after liver transplantation (LT) seems to be associated with the development of acute kidney injury (AKI). We studied if end-ischemic hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) of liver grafts, aimed at mitigating liver IRI, impacts on the frequency and severity of AKI after LT. METHODS: LTs performed at our center between January 2017 and December 2022 using organs from deceased brain-dead donors aged 70 or older were reviewed. From November 2020 on, HOPE was performed routinely in this donor category. The frequency and severity of AKI (KDIGO criteria) within 48 hours of graft reperfusion and the model of early allograft function (MEAF) were compared between HOPE-LTs (n = 30) and control LTs (n = 71). RESULTS: AKI developed in 23/30 (77%) HOPE-LTs and in 40/71 (56%) control LTs (p = n.s.), with no difference in severity and timing between groups. Renal replacement therapy was required in 3/30 (10%) HOPE-LTs and 6/71 (8%) control LTs. In addition, transaminase leak during the first week (marker of IRI) and MEAF were similar between groups. These findings persisted after propensity matching. Histology showed more hepatocyte vacuolization and higher Suzuki score in HOPE-LTs. Although this analysis could have been underpowered, no trends supporting the benefit of HOPE on liver and renal injury after LT were ever identified. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, HOPE in this group of older donors does not seem to improve either graft IRI, or the incidence of early AKI after LT.