RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Angiography by selective catheterization is the standard method for coronary artery imaging but carries a risk of rare, but serious complications. We investigated whether 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) could substitute for selective angiography for evaluation of coronary artery disease in surgically revascularized patients. DESIGN: In a setting closely resembling routine clinical practice, 45 patients who had been operated with coronary artery bypass grafting 508-1135 (mean 811) days before were examined with MDCT and conventional selective angiography on the same day. The interpreters were blinded to the results of the parallel imaging modality. RESULTS: Significant pathology (stenosis >/=50% or occlusion) in the larger coronary artery segments was detected by MDCT with a sensitivity of 70-98% (mean 87%) and a specificity of 0-37% (mean 21%). MDCT failed to identify three of ten left main stem stenoses. CONCLUSION: Sixteen-slice MDCT cannot routinely replace selective angiography for evaluation of coronary artery disease.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada Espiral , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Estenosis Coronaria/fisiopatología , Estenosis Coronaria/cirugía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Arteria Radial/trasplante , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Angiography by selective catheterization is the reference standard for coronary bypass graft patency assessment but carries a risk of serious complications. We have investigated whether 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) can substitute for selective angiography. DESIGN: Two to three years after coronary artery bypass grafting, 45 patients with a total of 156 bypasses (100 single and 28 sequential grafts) were examined with both MDCT and conventional selective angiography on the same day. The bypasses were classified as patent, stenotic or occluded. RESULTS: The likelihood ratio for MDCT-detected occlusion was 40, reflecting a fairly high combined sensitivity and specificity. However, 24% of the distal anastomoses could not be evaluated by MDCT, mainly because of respiratory movements, artifacts due to metal clips, and small vessel dimensions. Moreover, seven out of 117 bypasses (6%) deemed evaluable by MDCT were wrongly classified by this method. CONCLUSIONS: At present, 16-slice MDCT cannot replace selective angiography for assessment of coronary bypass graft patency since 24% of bypasses could not be evaluated by this method, and an error rate of 6% is unacceptable.
